Recommendations of the AFU Infectious Diseases Committee on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infections of endo-ureteral equipment.

INTRODUCTION: No recent national guidelines exist regarding the management of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in the presence of ureteral stent. This situation could lead to discrepancies in clinical management and less opportunity for a favorable patient's outcome. METHODS: All available data published on Medline® between 1998 and 2018 were systematically searched and reviewed. All papers assessing adult patients carrying ureteral stent were included for analysis. After studies critical analysis, national guidelines for clinical management were elaborated in order to answer clinical questions. RESULTS: A total of 451 articles were identified, of which 58 have been included. The prevalence of urinary tract infections in the presence of ureteral stent remains unknown. After 3 months, all endo-ureteral devices were colonized on microbiological study. These patients also presented a positive urine culture in 25 to 70% of the cases, often polymicrobial. Staphylococci, E. coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus and Candida were the commonest micro-organisms responsible for urinary colonization or infection. The risk of UTI on endo-ureteral devices seemed higher the longer it stayed implanted. There is no justification in the literature to recommend a systematic change of endo-ureteral devices following a urinary tract infection. DISCUSSION: The existing literature is rich but of poor methodological quality, and therefore does not allow to draw robust conclusions. The greatest difficulty faced in this work was to accurately differentiate urinary colonizations from true infections, including clinical symptoms and not only microbiological results. CONCLUSION: These guidelines propose a standardized management of such common clinical situations. Well-designed studies are needed to upgrade the level of evidence of these guidelines.

[Short recommendations from the CIAFU: Interest of the urine bacterial culture performed before endo-rectal prostate biopsy]. / Recommandations courtes du CIAFU : intérêt de l'ECBU avant biopsie de la prostate réalisée par voie endo-rectale.

Prostate biopsy is sometimes complicated by infection which can lead to death. The risk factors remain controversial, notably the urine bacterial culture carried out before a prostate biopsy. The increase in resistance induces an increase in the number of complications and the need to define new antibiotic prophylaxis strategies. The urine bacterial culture remains widely discussed in cases with post-prostate biopsy infections and urologists or experts await clear recommendations on this subject. The Infectiology Committee of the French Association of Urology has therefore set up a literature analysis work in order to reach a consensus within the committee. METHOD: A literature search was performed on Pubmed and Medline. We selected randomized studies or meta-analyzes using the keywords "prostate biopsy" and "infection" or "infectious complications". All abstracts and articles have been analyzed. The summary of the analysis was reviewed by all the members of the committee proposing the most consensual recommendation possible. RESULTS: The literature on the subject remains poor, but no evidence of a link between prebiopsy bacteriuria and post-biopsy infection has been demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from a clinical situation which could evoke a male urinary tract infection, and moreover having to prefer the postponement of biopsies, it is not recommended to perform a routine urine culture before endo-rectal prostate biopsies (expert opinion).

Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up: Results of the French section of European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

INTRODUCTION: European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) mortality results were reported for 7 European countries (excluding France) and showed a significant reduction in Prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. As those results have not been part of the global ERSPC results, it is of interest to report PCa mortality at a median follow-up of 9 years for French section of ERSPC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two administrative departments were involved in the study. Only men after randomization in the screening group were invited by mail to be screened by PSA testing with two rounds at 4-6 year intervals. Biopsy was recommended if PSA>=3.0 ng/mL. No information other that the French Association of Urology recommandations on the use of PSA was offered to the control group (own decision of physicians and patients). Follow up was based on cancer registry database. Contamination defined as the receipt of PSA testing in control arm was measured. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the Rate Ratio (RR) of PCa mortality and incidence in the screening vs. control arm. RESULTS: Starting from 2003, 80,696 men aged 55-69 years were included. The percentage of men in the screening arm with at least one PSA test (compliance) was 31%. Compared to the control arm, PCa incidence increased by 10% in the screening arm (RR=1.10; 95% CI=[1.04-1.16], P=0.001), but PCa mortality did not differ (0.222 and 0.215 deaths/1000 person-years; RR=1.03[0.75-1.42], P=0.9). DISCUSSION: Limitations include low participation rate. PSA testing in the control arm was observed in 32% of men (contamination). CONCLUSIONS: Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Mucosal impact of alcoholic povidone-iodine indicated in preoperative disinfection.

BACKGROUND: Alcoholic povidone-iodine (API) used as skin disinfection reduces the risk of postoperative infection but there is no evidence for its use on mucous membranes. We therefore conducted a tolerance study on the glans of men operated in urology. AIM: To confirm the safety of using API on mucous membranes. METHODS: The impact of applying API on the glans mucosa was measured using a chromameter. Caucasian men, without any dermatological lesion of the glans, operated by endoscopic transurethral route, were included. Measurements (L*a*b*) were made preoperatively and postoperatively by an independent person. Parameters were compared using the recognized formula ΔE = √(ΔL2 + Δa2 + Δb2). FINDINGS: Ninety-six patients, average age 68.9 ± 10.4 years, were included. For L*, the mean pre- and postoperative difference was +2.36 (P = 0.168). For a* and b*, the mean pre- and postoperative differences were +0.13 (P = 0.9085) and -0.12 (P = 0.17089), respectively. ΔE was equal to 13.92 ± 17.49 (non-significant difference). CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to analyse the impact of API on genital mucous membranes. In our study conditions, API had no impact on the mucous membranes, suggesting that it can be used safely.

Perioperative infectious risk in urology: Management of preoperative polymicrobial urine culture. A systematic review. By the infectious disease Committee of the French Association of urology.

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to assess the risk of postoperative infections in patients with preoperative polymicrobial urine culture and to provide the urologist with practices to minimise the risk of infection in these clinical situations. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried. All national and international recommendations have been reviewed. Data collection has been performed from the Cochrane, LILACS and the Medline database. 31 publications were selected for inclusion. RESULTS: Risk of infection in patients without ureteral stents or urinary catheters with previous polymicrobial urine culture is low. In the absence of leukocyturia, the urine sample can be considered as sterile. With ureteral stents or urinary catheters, the colonisation by biofilm ranges from 4 to 100% depending on the duration and ureteral stents or urinary catheters type. Urine culture is positive 24 to 45% of the time when ureteral stents or urinary catheters are known to be colonised. The post-operative risk of infection in endo-urological surgery in a patient with ureteral stents or urinary catheters is estimated around 8 to 11% depending on the type of surgery. A retrospective study reports a postoperative infections rate of 18.5% in photo selective vaporization of the prostate with preoperative polymicrobial urine culture. CONCLUSIONS: Scientific data are limited but for patients without ureteral stents or urinary catheters, in the absence of leukocyturia, the polymicrobial urine culture can be considered as negative. Considering a preoperative polymicrobial urine culture as sterile in patients with colonised ureteral stents or urinary catheters is at risk of neglecting a high risk of postoperative infections or sepsis even in case of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. It should not always be considered sterile and therefore, a perioperative antibiotic therapy could be an acceptable option.

[Infection control practices while performing prostate biopsies in France: A CIAFU survey]. / Maîtrise du risque infectieux entourant la réalisation des biopsies de prostate en France : une enquête du Comité d'infectiologie de l'AFU.

In 2008, the French Public Health Committee admitted that associating ultrasound probe protection, and related precautions, and low-level disinfection would be equivalent to the intermediate level disinfection. In 2010, the French Urology Association (AFU) updated guidelines regarding trans-rectal prostate biopsies, namely preventive measures related to cross-transmission of infections. We report an evaluation of compliance to them, driven in 2016 by AFU's infection committee. Although not recommended, almost one third of the urologists still perform biopsies under general anesthesia, and two thirds of them ask for a urine culture before biopsies. Several improvements are still needed: sterilization of needle guide should always be done when not of single use, the ultrasonography gel should be sterile, probes protection should be EC labeled, and compliance to probe processing between two patients should increase. Most of urologists happened to experience blood or feces contamination of probes. Less than half of probes are entirely floodable, and when intermediate level disinfection is done, glutaraldehyde is still referred as disinfectant by one third of the urologists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Transmission of metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a nephrology-transplant intensive care unit with potential link to the environment.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been recovered in hospitals from many different sources including sinks and taps. Because P. aeruginosa is one of the main agents of nosocomial infections and increasingly resistant to antibiotics, environmental reservoirs in hospital settings are of great concern. We report here on a cluster of five cases of infection by P. aeruginosa expressing VIM carbapenemases (VIM-PA) in a nephrology intensive care unit. Our investigation pointed to transmission of VIM-PA via hands related to a contaminated tap. VIM-PA may be cross-transmitted to other patients if an environmental reservoir exists. Sinks and taps should be well designed and thoroughly cleaned and disinfected, and use of alcohol hand rub should be promoted.

Surgical site infection after valvular or coronary artery bypass surgery: 2008-2011 French SSI national ISO-RAISIN surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Multisite information regarding surgical site infection (SSI) rates for cardiac surgery programmes is not widely available. Ward characteristics that may affect outcomes have not been analysed previously. AIM: To determine individual- and ward-level factors associated with SSI occurrence after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valvular surgery. METHODS: A dataset from the French national SSI database ISO-RAISIN 2008-2011 was used. Only adult patients were included. A standardized questionnaire was completed for each patient who underwent surgery, and patients with and without SSI were characterized. Patients and ward risk factors for SSI were analysed using a multilevel logistic regression model with SSI as binary outcome (two levels: patient and ward). RESULTS: Out of 8569 patients from 39 wards, the SSI rate was 2.2%. Micro-organisms were isolated in 144 patients (74%): 35% coagulase-negative staphylococci (N = 51), 23% Staphylococcus aureus (N = 33), 6% Escherichia coli (N = 8). Higher probability of SSI was associated with the duration of preoperative hospitalization, the duration of follow-up, the duration of surgery >75th percentile and the SSI rate in the surgery ward. The residual heterogeneity between wards (median odds ratio: 1.53) was as relevant as duration of preoperative hospitalization (odds ratio: 1.57). CONCLUSION: Although patient risk factors were more strongly associated with SSI occurrence, this study provided evidence for the existence of a ward-level effect. This should be taken into account when considering possible corrective interventions.

[Infection control in urology: standard and isolation precautions]. / Maîtrise du risque infectieux en urologie : transmission croisée, précautions standard et complémentaires.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a structured review of good hygiene practices in infection control. MATERIAL: A review of existing recommendations on standard precautions, isolation precautions and specific recommendations in infection control. RESULTS: Isolation precautions complement standard precautions when a patient is identified as a carrier of bacteria showing resistance to antibiotics, virulence characteristics and/or epidemic potential. Full compliance with hand hygiene recommendations and standard precautions is mandatory as it optimizes safety when patient's viral and/or bacterial status is unknown. Acknowledging the routes of transmission, the value of individual protection equipment and good hygiene practices is therefore crucial in modern infection control. For specific micro-organisms, isolation precautions are needed against airborne, droplets and/or contact cross-contamination routes. Within isolation precautions, contact precautions are the most widely indicated as they control the risks of contamination from germs involved in cutaneous or enteric infections and of transmission of multi-resistant bacteria (MRB). In addition, specific recommendations have been defined for emerging resistant MRB. CONCLUSION: MRB are becoming worldwide a major issue in public health. Reducing cross-contamination is, with lesser and better use of antibiotics, one of the main avenue in their control.

[Non-antibiotic anti-infectious treatments in urology]. / Les médicaments anti-infectieux non antibiotiques en urologie.

OBJECTIVE: To define the terms of use of pesticides, antifungal, antiviral and antiseptic treatments in urology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE for all these treatments used in urology. The molecules were classified by family. Modes of action, indications in urology and adverse effects have been detailed. Authorisation files were consulted and then complemented by a literature analysis. RESULTS: Although parasitic or viral diseases are uncommon in urology, their specific treatment deserves a thorough knowledge of pesticide and antiviral molecules. Antifungal treatments are regularly used in urology with special features to know to improve the efficacy/safety ratio. Antiseptics are used daily in urology and a better understanding of these molecules allows better use. CONCLUSION: Beyond antibiotics, antiviral, antiparasitic and antifungal deserve a thorough knowledge. Antiseptic although used daily have features little known.

[Guidelines from the Infectious Disease Committee of the French Association of Urology and The Neuro-Urology Committee of the AFU: antibiotic prophylaxis for sacral neuromodulation]. / Recommandations de bonnes pratiques cliniques : antibioprophylaxie et neuromodulation des racines sacrées par le Comité d'infectiologie de l'Association française d'urologie (CIAFU) et le Comité de neuro-urologie de l'AFU.

INTRODUCTION: In urology, antibiotic prophylaxis is advised by the French Association of anesthesiology (SFAR) and the Infectious Disease Committee of the French Association of urology guidelines published in 2010. No guideline exists concerning the implantation of neuromodulation implants. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A literature analysis was performed on sacral modulation and antibiotic prophylaxis. Then guidelines were discussed by reviewers. Items that showed no consensus were then discussed again to arrive at recommendations. RESULTS: Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended during the test phase as well as in the case of installation of sacral neuromodulation (Grade C). Antibiotic recommended (Grade B) are: cefotetan or cefoxitin, 2g dose by slow intravenous injection or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid at a dose of 2 g, intravenously or, in the case of allergy vancomycin at a dose of 15 mg/kg or the clindamycin has 600 mg intravenously. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of high level of evidence, antibiotic prophylaxis seems necessary when setting up of electrode case of sacral neuromodulation.

[Flexible cystoscopes: disinfection and microbiological surveillance practices among French urologists]. / Cystoscopes souples : pratiques de désinfection et de surveillance microbiologique parmi les urologues français. Une enquête du comité d'infectiologie de l'AFU.

INTRODUCTION: According to the French regulatory authorities, the highest level of disinfection must be achieved for flexible cystoscopes, as they enter a sterile cavity, the current method being peracetic acid disinfection and sterile water terminal rinsing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The concordance between regulations and the routine was researched using a self-administered questionnaire sent to all French urologists. RESULTS: Responses from 78 urology units, totalling 317 urologists (26% response rate) were analysed. As a whole, 51.2% of centers followed all recommendations on disinfection. There was no microbiological surveillance in 16.6% of centers, although microbiological tests were performed in two out of three centers before using a new endoscope or when returning from maintenance. CONCLUSION: Improvements are needed, both in the disinfection process and the microbiological surveillance. Low temperature sterilization and the use of sterile disposable sheaths may represent an alternative.

Surgical-site infections and surgery of the salivary glands.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the surgical-site infection (SSI) incidence rate targeted on salivary gland surgery over a 2-year period (from January 2007 to December 2008). Then identify any risk factors associated with SSI in all the patients operated with no antibiotic prophylaxis in accordance with French Anesthesiology Society guidelines. POPULATION AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients were operated during the standard SSI surveillance period. A case-control (one case for five controls) study was then conducted aiming to identify risk factors. RESULTS: The SSI incidence rate was 9.7%. The case-control study failed to identify any relevant risk factor with univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: As no risk factors could be identified, we suggest that surgical antibioprophylaxis could be relevant in salivary glands surgery and should be evaluated in this setting.

Reducing surgical site infection incidence through a network: results from the French ISO-RAISIN surveillance system.

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are a key target for nosocomial infection control programmes. We evaluated the impact of an eight-year national SSI surveillance system named ISO-RAISIN (infection du site opératoire - Réseau Alerte Investigation Surveillance des Infections). Consecutive patients undergoing surgery were enrolled during a three-month period each year and surveyed for 30 days following surgery. A standardised form was completed for each patient including SSI diagnosis according to standard criteria, and several risk factors such as wound class, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, operation duration, elective/emergency surgery, and type of surgery. From 1999 to 2006, 14,845 SSIs were identified in 964,128 patients (overall crude incidence: 1.54%) operated on in 838 participating hospitals. The crude overall SSI incidence decreased from 2.04% to 1.26% (P<0.001; relative reduction: -38%) and the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system (NNIS)-0 adjusted SSI incidence from 1.10% to 0.74% (P<0.001; relative reduction: -33%). The most significant SSI incidence reduction was observed for hernia repair and caesarean section, and to a lesser extent, cholecystectomy, hip prosthesis arthroplasty, and mastectomy. Active surveillance striving for a benchmark throughout a network is an effective strategy to reduce SSI incidence.

[Prophylactic antibiotic use in gastro-intestinal surgery: an audit of current practice]. / L'antibioprophylaxie en chirurgie digestive: audit de pratiques.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate compliance with clinical guidelines on prophylactic antibiotic usage in gastro-intestinal surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical charts of one hundred consecutive patients undergoing surgery in the last 6 months of 2006 were analysed as to determine whether the use of prophylactic antibiotics was indicated. Compliance with the prophylactic antibiotic guidelines of the Toulouse teaching hospitals and the Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR) was examined; cases were analyzed by the criteria of the Haute Autorité en Santé for indication, type of antibiotic, time of administration, and duration of treatment. RESULTS: Antibiotic prophylaxis was prescribed in 58% of patients; there was an 85% compliance rate with the indication. Of those receiving antibiotic prophylaxis, the choice of antibiotic was appropriate in 82.8%, but the timing of administration was in compliance in only 39.7%. Duration of antibiotic administration was excessive in 5 cases. The overall rate of compliance with guidelines was 42%. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic antibiotic guidelines were inadequately applied, especially regarding the timing of administration. Further systemic progress is needed to achieve compliance with guidelines and documentation of administration; such evaluations must be repeated on regular basis.

[Evaluation of clinical practice: audit of prophylactic antibiotics in urology]. / Evaluation des pratiques professionnelles: audit portant sur l'antibioprophylaxie en urologie.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate compliance with clinical practice guidelines concerning prophylactic antibiotics in urological surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty per cent of the medical charts for the first 288 patients operated in 2005 and requiring prophylactic antibiotics were selected at random. On this sample of 84 patients, compliance with the CHU de Toulouse (Toulouse teaching hospital) and société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (SFAR) (French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care), prophylactic antibiotic guidelines were investigated according to the method recommended by the Centre de coordination de da lutte dontre des infections nosocomiales (CCLIN) Ouest (Nosocomial Infection Control Coordination Centre) which analyses the indication, type of antibiotic, time of administration and duration of treatment. RESULTS: The compliance rate with the indication was 88.1%. When prophylactic antibiotics were effectively administered, compliance with guidelines were 91.9% for type of antibiotic and 72.9% for time of administration. The duration was excessive in one case. The overall compliance rate was 58.3%. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic antibiotic guidelines were inadequately applied, especially concerning the time of administration. Further progress must be made in terms of compliance with guidelines and recording of administration, which must be repeatedly evaluated.

Epidemiological investigation of a Serratia liquefaciens outbreak in a neurosurgery department.

Between February 2001 and March 2003, 17 patients from the neurosurgery department of the University Hospital of Rangueil (Toulouse, Southern France) developed Serratia liquefaciens infections. Due to the atypical antibiotype displayed by the clinical isolates (i.e. gentamicin resistance), an outbreak was suspected. Molecular analysis carried out by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis demonstrated a genetic link for all patients. Furthermore, the patient who introduced the epidemic Serratia strain was also identified and shown to be related to the two epidemic peaks observed during the outbreak period. Investigation failed to reveal a reservoir among the antiseptics and soaps, or among the mechanical ventilators used. However, when the colonization of patients was investigated, positive carriage was observed and could be considered as a potential risk for the spread of the epidemic strain. Due to the delay between antibiotherapy and S. liquefaciens colonization, a selection effect had to be considered. Finally, implementation of hygiene measures was accompanied by control of the outbreak.

[Surgical site infection surveillance in breast implants surgery]. / Surveillance des infections de site opératoire sur prothèses mammaires en chirurgie esthétique.

The results of long-term follow-up of surgical site infection (SSI) after aesthetical breast surgery are reported. 205 consecutive patients operated from 1/2000 to 3/2002 were followed for at least one year. Postoperative incidents were observed in 26 (12.7%) patients, including SSI in six (2.9%) patients. After surgery, the mean time to SSI was 113 days, with only two cases in the first postoperative month. In all SSI cases, no antibiotic prophylaxis had been given. The causative role of infectious agents in breast implant capsule occurrence is under investigation.