Safety of MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccination in the elderly: results of a comparative study of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine versus nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine in northern Italy.

MF59-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Siena, Italy) has been shown to be more effective than nonadjuvanted vaccine in the elderly population. Here we present results from a large-scale, observational, noninterventional, prospective postlicensure study that evaluated the safety of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine in elderly subjects aged 65 years or more. The study was performed in 5 northern Italian health districts during the 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009 influenza seasons. The choice of vaccine-either adjuvanted vaccine or a nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine-was determined by individual providers on the basis of local influenza vaccination policy. Hospitalizations for potential adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified from hospital databases and then reviewed against recognized case definitions to identify confirmed cases of AESI. Cumulative incidences were calculated for AESIs in predefined biologically plausible time windows, as well as in a 6-month window following vaccination. During the 3-year study period, 170,988 vaccine doses were administered to a total of 107,661 persons. Despite the large study size, cases of AESI resulting in hospitalization were rare, and risks of AESI were similar in both the MF59-adjuvanted and nonadjuvanted vaccination groups. In conclusion, similar safety profiles were observed for both nonadjuvanted and MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines in elderly recipients.

Effectiveness of adjuvanted influenza vaccination in elderly subjects in northern Italy.

Although vaccination against influenza is recommended for elderly and high-risk patients in many countries, efficacy in the elderly has been suboptimal. The MF59 adjuvanted trivalent inactivated vaccine (ATIV) was developed to increase the immune response of elderly subjects to influenza vaccination, but its effectiveness has not yet been well documented. This prospective, observational study evaluated the relative effectiveness of ATIV versus nonadjuvanted trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) in individuals at least 65 years of age in Lombardy, northern Italy. Hospitalizations for influenza or pneumonia (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes 480-487) during the 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009 influenza seasons were identified from administrative databases. Stratified and regression analyses, including the propensity score to adjust for confounding, as well as generalized estimating equations to account for repeated vaccination, were used. Overall, 107,661 records were evaluated, contributing 170,988 person-seasons of observation. Since ATIV is preferentially recommended for more frail individuals, subjects vaccinated with ATIV were older and had more functional impairment and comorbidities. In the primary analysis, risk of hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia was 25% lower for ATIV relative to TIV (relative risk = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.57, 0.98). To the extent that there is residual bias, ATIV is likely to be even more protective than this result suggests.

Hepatitis B immune memory in children primed with hexavalent vaccines and given monovalent booster vaccines: an open-label, randomised, controlled, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: In 2000, hexavac and infanrix hexa were licensed in Europe for primary immunisation of children against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B, and invasive infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae b. In 2005, hexavac was suspended because of concerns about the long-term immunogenicity of its hepatitis B component. We aimed to assess the duration of immunity and need for booster injections in children primed with these vaccines. METHODS: In an open-label, randomised, controlled, multicentre study in six local health units and at the Bambino Gesù Paediatric Research Hospital in Italy, antibody concentrations were measured 5 years after immunisation of infants with hexavac or infanrix hexa. Children with concentrations of antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) lower than 10 mIU/mL were randomly assigned by simple randomisation to receive a booster of HBVaxPro or engerix B monovalent hepatitis B vaccine and tested 2 weeks later. Primary endpoints were the proportion of children with anti-HBs concentrations of at least 10 mIU/mL, geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of antibody 5 years after vaccination, and the proportion of children with anti-HBs concentrations lower than 10 mIU/mL who had anamnestic response to booster. The study is registered with Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, code FARM67NFPN. FINDINGS: 1543 children were enrolled, 833 had received hexavac and 710 infanrix hexa. 831 children who received hexavac and 709 who received infanrix hexa were included in the analysis. 319 children who received hexavac (38.4%, 95% CI 35.1-41.7) had anti-HBs concentrations of at least 10 mIU/mL compared with 590 who received infanrix hexa (83.2%, 80.5-86.0; p<0.0001). GMCs before booster were 4.5 mIU/mL in the hexavac group compared with 61.3 mIU/mL in the infanrix hexa group (p<0.0001). After booster 409 (92.1%, 89.6-94.6) of 444 children primed with hexavac and 99 (94.3%, 89.8-98.7) of 105 primed with infanrix hexa had anti-HBs concentrations of at least 10 mIU/mL (p=0.4); GMCs were 448.7 mIU/mL and 484.9 mIU/mL (p=0·6). The two booster vaccine groups did not differ in number of side-effects; no serious adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: 5 years after immunisation with hexavalent vaccines, immunological memory seems to persist in children with anti-HBs concentrations lower than 10 mIU/mL, suggesting that booster doses are not needed. Additional follow-up is needed. FUNDING: Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco.