Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
1.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 24(9): 653-9, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27479832

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of MRI is increasing when evaluating patients with knee pain because it is highly sensitive for detecting intra-articular pathology. However, such changes can be associated with degenerative joint disease, which may be demonstrated with weight-bearing radiographs. The purpose of this study was to determine how often MRI was obtained before orthopaedic referral in patients aged ≥40 years with knee pain, how often weight-bearing radiographs were obtained before MRI, and whether such imaging influenced treatment recommendations. METHODS: In a study of 599 new patients, participating physicians documented the presence of a prereferral MRI and/or plain radiographic studies, the results of weight-bearing radiographs, treatment recommendations, and the impact of any prereferral imaging. RESULTS: Prereferral use of MRI occurred in 130 patients (22%). Of these patients, plain radiographic studies were obtained for 58% before MRI and 13% had weight-bearing radiographs. Ultimately, 17% had weight-bearing radiographs that demonstrated >50% loss of joint space. Forty-eight percent of prereferral MRIs did not contribute to treatment recommendations. In patients with >50% loss of joint space, MRI was considered unnecessary in 95% of the cases. DISCUSSION: Many prereferral MRIs do not contribute to clinical decision making. Weight-bearing radiographs can help identify those patients in whom MRI is unlikely to be helpful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Artralgia/diagnóstico por imagen , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Artralgia/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía/métodos , Soporte de Peso
2.
Sports Health ; 8(2): 177-81, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26674619

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in older patients is a controversial topic among orthopaedic surgeons. OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes, failure, and morbidity associated with ACL reconstruction in patients older than 40 years and to compare it with nonoperative treatment as well as results of ACL reconstruction in a younger patient population. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the literature from 1970 to 2015 was conducted utilizing MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register databases using PRISMA guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were studies with longer than 2-year follow-up of primary ACL reconstruction and minimum age of patients older than 40 years, inclusive of any graft type or source and of any concomitant meniscal pathology. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers collected demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 452 patients were included. The mean patient age was 47.8 years (range, 40-66 years) with a mean follow-up of 53.3 months (minimum, 24 months). Lysholm scores improved from 53.9 to 90.5 in the 11 operative studies. The only nonoperative study reported a mean Lysholm score of 82 after rehabilitation. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores of A or B were found in 81%. Tegner activity scores averaged 4.7 preinjury, fell to 2.9 preoperatively, and returned to 4.7 postoperatively. The reported failure rate was 2.3%. There were few complications, and failure rate was similar in younger patients. CONCLUSION: The data confirm that ACL reconstruction can be recommended to patients older than 40 years who wish to maintain an active lifestyle or have symptomatic instability with daily activities. Patient-based outcomes scores were better in the operative studies compared with the single nonoperative study in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/complicaciones , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/terapia , Artritis/etiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/cirugía , Traumatismos en Atletas/terapia , Humanos , Escala de Puntuación de Rodilla de Lysholm , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Am J Sports Med ; 44(5): 1329-35, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25930672

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the health care system in the United States (US) transitions toward value-based care, there is an increased emphasis on understanding the cost drivers and high-value procedures within orthopaedics. To date, there has been no systematic review of the economic literature on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). PURPOSE: To evaluate the overall evidence base for economic studies published on ACLR in the orthopaedic literature. Data available on the economics of ACLR are summarized and cost drivers associated with the procedure are identified. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: All economic studies (including US-based and non-US-based) published between inception of the MEDLINE database and October 3, 2014, were identified. Given the heterogeneity of the existing evidence base, a qualitative, descriptive approach was used to assess the collective results from the economic studies on ACLR. When applicable, comparisons were made for the following cost-related variables associated with the procedure for economic implications: outpatient versus inpatient surgery (or outpatient vs overnight hospital stay vs >1-night stay); bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft versus hamstring (HS) graft source; autograft versus allograft source; staged unilateral ACLR versus bilateral ACLR in a single setting; single- versus double-bundle technique; ACLR versus nonoperative treatment; and other unique comparisons reported in single studies, including computer-assisted navigation surgery (CANS) versus traditional surgery, early versus delayed ACLR, single- versus double-incision technique, and finally the costs of ACLR without comparison of variables. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies were identified and included; of these, 17 included studies were cost identification studies. The remaining 7 studies were cost utility analyses that used economic models to investigate the effect of variables such as the cost of allograft tissue, fixation devices, and physical therapy, the percentage and timing of revision surgery, and the cost of revision surgery. Of the 24 studies, there were 3 studies with level 1 evidence, 8 with level 2 evidence, 6 with level 3 evidence, and 7 with level 4 evidence. The following economic comparisons were demonstrated: (1) ACLR is more cost-effective than nonoperative treatment with rehabilitation only (per 3 cost utility analyses); (2) autograft use had lower total costs than allograft use, with operating room supply costs and allograft costs most significant (per 5 cost identification studies and 1 cost utility analysis); (3) results on hamstring versus BPTB graft source are conflicting (per 2 cost identification studies); (4) there is significant cost reduction with an outpatient versus inpatient setting (per 5 studies using cost identification analyses); (5) bilateral ACLR is more cost efficient than 2 unilateral ACLRs in separate settings (per 2 cost identification studies); (6) there are lower costs with similarly successful outcomes between single- and double-bundle technique (per 3 cost identification studies and 2 cost utility analyses). CONCLUSION: Results from this review suggest that early single-bundle, single (endoscopic)-incision outpatient ACLR using either BPTB or HS autograft provides the most value. In the setting of bilateral ACL rupture, single-setting bilateral ACLR is more cost-effective than staged unilateral ACLR. Procedures using CANS technology do not yet yield results that are superior to the results of a standard surgical procedure, and CANS has substantially greater costs.


Asunto(s)
Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Trasplante Autólogo/economía , Trasplante Homólogo/economía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Humanos
4.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 23(10): 633-40, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26377673

RESUMEN

Articular cartilage injuries are quite common. Most studies and review articles on cartilage repair and restoration focus on the different techniques available to treat cartilage defects; however, few thoroughly discuss the initial evaluation of patients with these defects. Outcomes are intimately associated with appropriate patient selection and indications for treatment; therefore, understanding the initial evaluation and conservative treatment of cartilage defects is essential to achieving excellent outcomes after surgical intervention, regardless of the chosen procedure. In patients with cartilage injury, a careful history, physical examination, and imaging are required before treating the lesion to ensure the patient's symptoms are actually related to the defect. To address any special considerations, other factors must be considered to improve patient outcomes, including the status of the meniscus, assessing and treating malalignment or off-loading the patellofemoral compartment, and reconstructing any ligamentous deficiencies. It is important for medical providers to understand what cartilage lesions may be symptomatic and when to refer these patients to surgeons who manage cartilage injury.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia/normas , Cartílago Articular/lesiones , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico , Selección de Paciente , Periodo Preoperatorio , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Examen Físico , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Am J Sports Med ; 42(10): 2363-70, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25086064

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is among the most commonly studied injuries in orthopaedics. The previously reported incidence of ACL injury in the United States has varied considerably and is often based on expert opinion or single insurance databases. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in the United States; to identify changes in this incidence between 1994 and 2006; to identify changes in the demographics of ACLR over the same time period with respect to location (inpatient vs outpatient), sex, and age; and to determine the most frequent concomitant procedures performed at the time of ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological study. METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes 844.2 and 717.83 were used to search the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) and the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery (NSAS) for the diagnosis of ACL tear, and the procedure code 81.45 was used to search for ACLR. The incidence of ACLR in 1994 and 2006 was determined by use of US Census Data, and the results were then stratified based on patient age, sex, facility, concomitant diagnoses, and concomitant procedures. RESULTS: The incidence of ACLR in the United States rose from 86,687 (95% CI, 51,844-121,530; 32.9 per 100,000 person-years) in 1994 to 129,836 (95% CI, 94,993-164,679; 43.5 per 100,000 person-years) in 2006 (P = .015). The number of ACLRs increased in patients younger than 20 years and those who were 40 years or older over this 12-year period. The incidence of ACLR in females significantly increased from 10.36 to 18.06 per 100,000 person-years between 1994 and 2006 (P = .0003), while that in males rose at a slower rate, with an incidence of 22.58 per 100,000 person-years in 1994 and 25.42 per 100,000 person-years in 2006. In 2006, 95% of ACLRs were performed in an outpatient setting, while in 1994 only 43% of ACLRs were performed in an outpatient setting. The most common concomitant procedures were partial meniscectomy and chondroplasty. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ACLR increased between 1994 and 2006, particularly in females as well as those younger than 20 years and those 40 years or older. Research efforts as well as cost-saving measures may be best served by targeting prevention and outcomes measures in these groups. Surgeons should be aware that concomitant injury is common.


Asunto(s)
Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/tendencias , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Artroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Incidencia , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución por Sexo , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 43(6): 267-71, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24945476

RESUMEN

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common in athletes. Techniques and methods of treatment for these injuries continue to vary among surgeons. Thirty National Basketball Association (NBA) team physicians were surveyed during the NBA Pre-Draft Combine. Survey questions involved current and previous practice methods of primary and revision ACL reconstruction, including technique, graft choice, rehabilitation, and treatment of combined ACL and medial collateral ligament injuries. Descriptive parametric statistics, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression were used, and significance was set at α = 0.05. All 30 team physicians completed the survey. Eighty-seven percent indicated they use autograft (81% bone-patellar tendon-bone) for primary ACL reconstruction in NBA athletes, and 43% indicated they use autograft for revision cases. Fourteen surgeons (47%) indicated they use an anteromedial portal (AMP) for femoral tunnel drilling, whereas 5 years earlier only 4 (13%) used this technique. There was a significant (P = .009) positive correlation between fewer years in practice and AMP use. NBA team physicians' use of an AMP for femoral tunnel drilling has increased over the past 5 years.


Asunto(s)
Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/tendencias , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Baloncesto/lesiones , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Reoperación/tendencias , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Autoinjertos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos
8.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 96(12): 1015-1020, 2014 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24951737

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening and osteolysis commonly limit the survivorship of total hip prostheses. Retention of a well-fixed acetabular component, rather than full acetabular revision, has multiple advantages, but questions have lingered regarding the clinical success and prosthetic survivorship following this procedure. We examined the impact of acetabular component position, polyethylene type, liner insertion technique, femoral head size, and simultaneous revision of the entire femoral component (as opposed to head and liner exchange) or bone-grafting on mid-term to long-term prosthetic survival following such limited revisions. METHODS: One hundred hips in 100 patients with osteolysis, polyethylene wear, or femoral component loosening underwent revision total hip arthroplasty with retention of the acetabular component. Acetabular component inclination and anteversion were measured on prerevision radiographs and were categorized according to predetermined positional safe zones (inclination of 35° to 55° and anteversion of 5° to 25°). Operative reports were reviewed for femoral head size, polyethylene liner type (conventional or highly cross-linked), liner insertion technique (use of the existing locking mechanism or cementation), whether the patient had revision of the entire femoral component, and use of bone graft. Outcomes of interest included the Harris hip score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, episodes of instability, and need for repeat revision. RESULTS: At an average of 6.6 years (range, two to fourteen years) postoperatively, the Harris hip and UCLA activity scores were both significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Overall, the failure rate was 13%. In addition, 6% of the patients had postoperative instability. Hips in which the acetabular component was outside of the safe zone for inclination had a higher rate of failure (p = 0.048). Use of conventional, rather than highly cross-linked, polyethylene at the time of revision was also associated with an increased rate of repeat revision (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Revision total hip arthroplasty with retention of the acetabular component is associated with good outcomes in hips with an appropriately positioned, well-fixed acetabular component. Acetabular components outside the safe zone for inclination were at a higher risk for failure, as was use of conventional polyethylene. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Prótesis de Cadera , Osteólisis/cirugía , Falla de Prótesis , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietileno , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Reoperación , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 96(9): 778-88, 2014 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24806015

RESUMEN

Several studies have noted that increasing age is a significant factor for diminished rotator cuff healing, while biomechanical studies have suggested the reason for this may be an inferior healing environment in older patients. Larger tears and fatty infiltration or atrophy negatively affect rotator cuff healing. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, double-row repairs, performing a concomitant acromioplasty, and the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) do not demonstrate an improvement in structural healing over mini-open rotator cuff repairs, single-row repairs, not performing an acromioplasty, or not using PRP. There is conflicting evidence to support postoperative rehabilitation protocols using early motion over immobilization following rotator cuff repair.


Asunto(s)
Manguito de los Rotadores/fisiología , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Factores de Edad , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Artroscopía/métodos , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/complicaciones , Humanos , Osteoporosis/etiología , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas/fisiología , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Rotura/fisiopatología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura , Suturas , Tendones/fisiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Sports Med ; 44(8): 1025-36, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24760591

RESUMEN

The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is expanding to numerous medical fields, including orthopedic surgery and sports medicine. The popularity of this new treatment option has prompted a rapid increase in research endeavors; however, the differences in application technique and the composition of PRP have made it difficult to compare results or make any firm conclusions regarding efficacy. The purpose of this article is twofold. First, to recommend details that should be provided in basic science and clinical PRP studies to allow meaningful comparisons between studies which may lead to a better understanding of efficacy. Second, to provide an understanding of the different PRP preparations and their clinical relevance. There are biochemical rationales for the use of PRP because it addresses several aspects of the healing process, including cell proliferation and tissue matrix regeneration, inflammation, nociception, infection, and hemostasis, all of which will be addressed. Given the current understanding of the importance the composition of PRP plays in tissue regeneration, it is likely that our future understanding of PRP will dictate 'customizing' the PRP preparation to the specific pathology of interest. The potential complications following PRP use are minor, and thus it appears to be a safe treatment option with a variety of potentially beneficial effects to injured musculoskeletal tissues.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/terapia , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesiones , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Proliferación Celular , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Humanos , Recuperación de la Función , Cicatrización de Heridas
11.
Am J Sports Med ; 42(5): 1182-9, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24576744

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During arthroscopic Bankart repair, inferior anchor placement is critical to a successful outcome. Low anterior anchors may be placed with a standard straight guide via midglenoid portal, with a straight guide with trans-subscapularis placement, or with curved guide systems. Purpose/ HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate glenoid suture anchor trajectory, position, and biomechanical performance as a function of portal location and insertion technique. It is hypothesized that a trans-subscapularis portal or curved guide will improve anchor position, decrease risk of opposite cortex breach, and confer improved biomechanical properties. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Thirty cadaveric shoulders were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: straight guide, midglenoid portal (MG); straight guide, trans-subscapularis portal (TS); and curved guide, midglenoid portal (CG). Three BioRaptor PK 2.3-mm anchors were inserted arthroscopically, with an anchor placed at 3, 5, and 7 o'clock. Specimens were dissected with any anchor perforation of the opposite cortex noted. An "en face" image was used to evaluate actual anchor position on a clockface scale. Each suture anchor underwent cyclic loading (10-60 N, 250 cycles), followed by a load-to-failure test (12.5 mm/s). Fisher exact test and mixed effects regression modeling were used to compare outcomes among groups. RESULTS: Anchor placement deviated from the desired position by 9.9° ± 11.4° in MG specimens, 11.1° ± 13.8° in TS, and 13.1° ± 14.5° in CG. After dissection, opposite cortex perforation at 5 o'clock occurred in 50% of MG anchors, 0% of TS, and 40% of CG. Of the 90 anchors tested, 17 (19%) failed during cyclic loading, with a similar failure rate across groups (P = .816). The maximum load was significantly higher for the 3-o'clock anchors when compared with the 5-o'clock anchors, regardless of portal or guide (P = .021). For the 5-o'clock position, there were significantly fewer "out" anchors in the TS group versus the CG or MG group (P = .038). There was no statistically significant difference in maximum load among groups at 5 o'clock. CONCLUSION: Accuracy in suture anchor placement during arthroscopic Bankart repair can vary depending on both portal used and desired position of anchor. The results of the current study indicate that there was no difference in ultimate load to failure among anchors inserted via a midglenoid straight guide, midglenoid curved guide, or percutaneous trans-subscapularis approach. However, midglenoid portal anchors drilled with a straight or curved guide and placed at the 5-o'clock position had significant increased risk of opposite cortex perforation compared with trans-subscapularis percutaneous insertion, with no apparent biomechanical detriment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings from this study will facilitate improved understanding of risks and benefits of several techniques for arthroscopic shoulder instability treatment with regard to suture anchor fixation.


Asunto(s)
Artroscopía/métodos , Cartílago Articular/cirugía , Cavidad Glenoidea/cirugía , Ensayo de Materiales , Estrés Mecánico , Anclas para Sutura , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cadáver , Cartílago Articular/lesiones , Femenino , Cavidad Glenoidea/lesiones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución Aleatoria
12.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 96(4): 292-300, 2014 Feb 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24553885

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can lead to tibiofemoral instability, decreased functional outcomes, and degenerative joint disease. It is unknown whether ACL reconstruction alters this progression at long-term follow-up. METHODS: A systematic literature review of the long-term results (minimum follow-up, more than ten years) after operative intra-articular reconstruction of ACL injuries and after nonoperative management was performed to compare (1) knee stability on physical examination, (2) functional and patient-based outcomes, (3) the need for further surgical intervention, and (4) radiographic outcomes. After application of selection criteria, forty patient cohorts with a mean of 13.9 ± 3.1 years of postoperative follow-up were identified. Twenty-seven cohorts containing 1585 patients had undergone reconstruction, and thirteen containing 685 patients had been treated nonoperatively. RESULTS: Comparison of operative and nonoperative cohorts revealed no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, or rate of initial meniscal injury (p > 0.05 for all). Operative cohorts had significantly less need for further surgery (12.4% compared with 24.9% for nonoperative, p = 0.0176), less need for subsequent meniscal surgery (13.9% compared with 29.4%, p = 0.0017), and less decline in the Tegner score (-1.9 compared with -3.1, p = 0.0215). A difference in pivot-shift test results was observed (25.5% pivot-positive compared with 46.6% for nonoperative) but did not reach significance (p = 0.09). No significant differences were seen in outcome scores (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], or final Tegner scores) or the rate of radiographically evident degenerative joint disease (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: At a mean of 13.9 ± 3.1 years after injury, the patients who underwent ACL reconstruction had fewer subsequent meniscal injuries, less need for further surgery, and significantly greater improvement in activity level as measured with the Tegner score. There were no significant differences in the Lysholm score, IKDC score, or development of radiographically evident osteoarthritis.


Asunto(s)
Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico por imagen , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/fisiopatología , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Radiografía , Reoperación , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 23(2): 197-204, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24076000

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Significant controversy surrounds optimal treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has recently been proposed as an alternative to hemiarthroplasty (HA) and open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF). Several authors have questioned the additional implant cost for RTSA. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes and cost of RTSA, HA, and ORIF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated patients who underwent RTSA for displaced 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures and then retrospectively developed age- and sex-matched control groups with 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures who underwent HA and ORIF. Range of motion including active forward elevation and external rotation and time to achieve active forward elevation >90° were recorded. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Short-Form 12-item (SF-12), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores were recorded. In addition, treatment cost was assessed by Medicare data and implant list prices. RESULTS: This study enrolled 27 patients; 9 underwent RTSA, 9 HA, and 9 ORIF. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. No significant differences were seen in SST, ASES, or SF-12 scores. Significantly more patients achieved >90° of active forward elevation after RTSA (P = .012). RTSA provided significant cost savings to Medicare compared with HA and ORIF (P = .002.) CONCLUSION: In this case-control study, RTSA appears to provide superior range of motion earlier and more predictably than HA and ORIF, with significant cost savings to Medicare.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo/métodos , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/economía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Hemiartroplastia/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas del Hombro/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 38(22): 1934-8, 2013 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24266043

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. OBJECTIVE: To determine the overall incidence, location, and type of disc herniations in professional football players to target treatment issues and prevention. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disc herniations represent a common and debilitating injury to the professional athlete. The NFL's (National Football League's) Sports Injury Monitoring System is a surveillance database created to monitor the league for all injuries, including injuries to the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all disc herniations to the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine during a 12-season period (2000­2012) using the NFL's surveillance database. The primary data points included the location of the injury, player position, activity at time of injury, and playing time lost due to injury. RESULTS: During the 12 seasons, 275 disc herniations occurred in the spine. In regard to location, 76% occurred in the lumbar spine and most frequently affected the L5­S1 disc. The offensive linemen were most frequently injured. As expected, blocking was the activity that caused most injuries. Lumbar disc herniations rose in prevalence and had a mean loss of playing time of more than half the season (11 games). Thoracic disc herniations led to the largest mean number of days lost overall, whereas players with cervical disc herniations missed the most practices. CONCLUSION: Disc herniations represent a significant cause of morbidity in the NFL. Although much attention is placed on spinal cord injuries, preventive measures targeting the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine may help to reduce the overall incidence of these debilitating injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Fútbol Americano/lesiones , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/epidemiología , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Traumatismos en Atletas/clasificación , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 42(7): 331-4, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24078947

RESUMEN

We describe using an osteochondral autograft from the lateral femoral condyle of the knee to treat a symptomatic die-punch lesion of the lunate facet of the distal radius. An 18-year-old woman who sustained a distal radius fracture remained symptomatic after nonoperative treatment and diagnostic wrist arthroscopy with microfracture. We used a commercial harvesting system to transfer an osteochondral plug into a cartilage defect involving the lunate facet of the distal radius. At final follow-up, 34 months after surgery, the patient was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores and with a comprehensive physical examination. Magnetic resonance arthrogram was used to assess articular cartilage status. VAS pain score improved from 7 before surgery to 0.5 after surgery. Postoperative DASH score was 0. The patient was asymptomatic and had satisfactory wrist motion without mechanical symptoms. Magnetic resonance arthrogram showed the transferred osteochondral autograft incorporated in excellent position.


Asunto(s)
Cartílago/trasplante , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Hueso Semilunar/cirugía , Radio (Anatomía)/lesiones , Adolescente , Autoinjertos , Femenino , Humanos , Radio (Anatomía)/cirugía , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 38(38): 1934-8, 2013 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24026147

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. OBJECTIVE: To determine the overall incidence, location, and type of disc herniations in professional football players to target treatment issues and prevention. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disc herniations represent a common and debilitating injury to the professional athlete. The NFL's (National Football League's) Sports Injury Monitoring System is a surveillance database created to monitor the league for all injuries, including injuries to the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all disc herniations to the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine during a 12-season period (2000-2012) using the NFL's surveillance database. The primary data points included the location of the injury, player position, activity at time of injury, and playing time lost due to injury. RESULTS: During the 12 seasons, 275 disc herniations occurred in the spine. In regard to location, 76% occurred in the lumbar spine and most frequently affected the L5-S1 disc. The offensive linemen were most frequently injured. As expected, blocking was the activity that caused most injuries. Lumbar disc herniations rose in prevalence and had a mean loss of playing time of more than half the season (11 games). Thoracic disc herniations led to the largest mean number of days lost overall, whereas players with cervical disc herniations missed the most practices. CONCLUSION: Disc herniations represent a significant cause of morbidity in the NFL. Although much attention is placed on spinal cord injuries, preventive measures targeting the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine may help to reduce the overall incidence of these debilitating injuries.Level of Evidence: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Fútbol Americano/lesiones , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Adulto , Traumatismos en Atletas , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 22(11): e1-8, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23664748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Entrapment of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) at the spinoglenoid notch (SGN) specifically affects the infraspinatus, and isolated external rotation (ER) weakness can result. We describe the technique of open SSN decompression at the SGN for infraspinatus involvement and report the results of a consecutive series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine shoulders underwent SSN decompression at the SGN. The mean age was 44 years (range, 15-69 years), and the mean follow-up was 4.3 years (range, 1-7 years). On manual muscle testing, ER strength was abnormal in all patients: 2/5 in 3, 3/5 in 21, and 4/5 in 5. The mean preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 48 (range, 23-83). Atrophy of the infraspinatus was visible or palpable in 72% of shoulders. Magnetic resonance imaging showed ganglion cysts at the SGN in only 20.7% of shoulders. RESULTS: Of the patients, 19 (66%) regained full ER strength, 9 (31%) improved to 4/5, and 1 (3%) had ER strength of 3/5. The mean ASES score improved to 75 (range, 60-100) (P < .05). Of 29 shoulders, 23 (79%) showed improved ER strength within 1 week of surgery. All ganglion cyst cases regained full ER strength within a mean of 6 weeks. In all cases, ER strength improved by at least 1 full strength grade. DISCUSSION: A ganglion cyst is not necessary to produce SSN compression at the SGN. SSN compression at the SGN can present as an isolated entity or can occur in conjunction with rotator cuff pathology or a ganglion cyst. An index of suspicion, physical examination, magnetic resonance imaging, and electromyography confirm the diagnosis. The described operative approach detaches no muscle and allows rapid recovery, and in all cases, ER strength improved to normal or by 1 full grade.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hombro , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
20.
Am J Sports Med ; 41(11): 2684-92, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23649008

RESUMEN

Osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a common condition causing anterior or superior shoulder pain, especially with overhead and cross-body activities. This most commonly occurs in middle-aged individuals because of degeneration to the fibrocartilaginous disk that cushions the articulations. Diagnosis relies on history, physical examination, imaging, and diagnostic local anesthetic injection. Diagnosis can be challenging given the lack of specificity with positive physical examination findings and the variable nature of AC joint pain. Of note, symptomatic AC osteoarthritis must be differentiated from instability and subtle instability, which may have similar symptoms. Although plain radiographs can reveal degeneration, diagnosis cannot be based on this alone because similar radiographic findings can be seen in asymptomatic individuals. Nonoperative therapy can provide symptomatic relief, whereas patients with persistent symptoms can be considered for resection arthroplasty by open or arthroscopic technique. Both techniques have proven to provide predictable pain relief; however, each has its own unique set of potential complications that may be minimized with an improved understanding of the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the joint along with meticulous surgical technique.


Asunto(s)
Articulación Acromioclavicular , Osteoartritis/complicaciones , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Articulación Acromioclavicular/anatomía & histología , Artroscopía , Clavícula/cirugía , Humanos , Osteoartritis/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...