Using the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) to assess cognitive impairment in older patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVES: A growing body of evidence suggests that impairment in cognitive functioning is an important clinical feature of both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, and that these cognitive alterations worsen with age. Although cognitive assessments are increasingly becoming a part of research and clinical practice in schizophrenia, a standardized and easily administered test battery for elderly patients with bipolar disorder is still lacking. The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) captures those domains of cognition that are the most severely affected in patients with schizophrenia and the most strongly correlated with functional outcome. The primary aim of our study was to investigate the clinical usefulness of the BACS in assessing cognitive functioning in elderly euthymic patients with bipolar disorder, and to compare their cognitive profile to that of elderly patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Elderly euthymic patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia were assessed using the BACS and a standard cognitive test battery. RESULTS: Fifty-seven elderly patients (aged 60 years and older) with bipolar disorder (n = 42) or schizophrenia (n = 15) were invited to participate. All of the patients were assessed by the BACS as being cognitively impaired. The patients with bipolar disorder scored significantly higher on the global scale and the verbal memory and attention sub-scores of the BACS than the patients with schizophrenia. DISCUSSION: The BACS appears to be a feasible and informative cognitive assessment tool for elderly patients with bipolar disorder. We believe that these preliminary results merit further investigation.

Triple nucleoside combination zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir versus zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir as first-line therapy in HIV-1-infected adults: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a triple nucleoside combination to a protease inhibitor-containing triple regimen as first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-1-infected patients. DESIGN: Open-label study in HIV-1-infected ART-naive adults, randomized to receive either Combivir (lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg twice daily) + abacavir (300 mg twice daily), or Combivir + nelfinavir (750 mg every 8 h) for 48 weeks. Plasma HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cell count and adverse events were assessed at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48. RESULTS: 195 subjects (131 men, 64 women), median age 34 years, were randomized: 98 received combivir/abacavir and 97 combivir/nelfinavir. Baseline median plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.2 log10 copies/ml [Interquartile range (IQR): 3.7-4.5.2] and 4.1 log10 copies/ml (IQR: 3.8-4.6), respectively. Baseline median CD4 cell count was 387 cells/mm3 (IQR: 194-501) and 449 cells/mm3 (IQR: 334-605), respectively. Nine patients (3 vs 6, respectively) did not start treatment or did not have any available efficacy data. At week 48, using the intent to treat analysis (switch/missing equals failure), plasma HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/ml in 54/95 (57%) and 53/91 (58%) of subjects, respectively. Median CD4 increase was +110 and +120 cells/mm3, respectively. Possible hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir were reported in four subjects (4%). CONCLUSION: The triple nucleoside combination combivir/abacavir is well tolerated as a first-line ART regimen in HIV-1-infected adults, with comparable antiviral activity to a nelfinavir-containing regimen at week 48.

Efficacy and safety of a quadruple combination Combivir + abacavir + efavirenz regimen in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults: La Francilienne.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a protease inhibitor sparing, quadruple therapy (Combivir + abacavir + efavirenz) in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults. DESIGN: Multicenter open-label pilot study. Clinical and biological assessments were performed at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects enrolled with a median baseline viral load (VL) of 4.69 log10 copies/mL and CD4 cell count of 322 cells/mm3. At week 48, 90% (intention-to-treat [ITT] switch included) and 77% (ITT switch = failure) patients had a VL <50 copies/mL. These results were similar in the population (n = 13) with a VL >100,000 copies/mL at baseline. Combivir + abacavir + efavirenz demonstrated an early antiretroviral response: 58% of patients had plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 8. Using a modified assay, the percentage of patients with VL <5 copies/mL at week 48 was 55% (17/31) and 42% (13/31) using ITT (switch included) and ITT (switch = failure), respectively. Median VL decreased by -4.0 log10 copies/mL at week 48 (ITT). Median CD4+ cell count change from baseline at week 48 was +129 cells/mm3 (ITT). Most patients experienced at least one drug-related adverse event that was not considered treatment-limiting by the investigator. There were no cases of abacavir hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Safety and efficacy results from this study demonstrated that the quadruple regimen Combivir/abacavir/efavirenz is generally safe and displays potent and durable antiretroviral activity in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients, offering a promising therapeutic option in a PI-sparing strategy.