Short and long-term effect of polycarbophil vaginal gel on vaginal atrophy of peri- and post-menopausal women. The TRIPLE study.

OBJECTIVES: This TRIPLE study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of polycarbophil vaginal gel (PCV) in treating symptoms of vaginal atrophy (VA) of peri- and post-menopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sexually active women in peri- (n = 29) and post-menopause (n = 54) suffering from VA, were progressively enrolled and treated for 30 days with PCV. Those wishing to continue (n = 73) were treated for additional 180 days. PCV was administered as one application twice a week. The vaginal health index (VHI; range 5 to 25) and the visual analogue score (VAS range for 0 to 100 mm for each item) for vaginal dryness, irritation, and pain at intercourse, along with the global symptoms score (GSS; range 1 to 15) and treatment safety, were evaluated at baseline and after 30 days. In those continuing the treatment an evaluation was performed after additional 180 days. RESULTS: Women in peri and post-menopause were of 48.7 ± 3.3 years and 57.5 ± 5.7 years old., respectively. At baseline all outcomes were significantly worse (p<0.002) in postmenopausal group, except the VHI (p < 0.056). After 30 days VHI increased (p < 0.001) of 4.1 ± 0.5 (mean ± SE), and 5.1 ± 0.4 in peri- and post-menopausal women respectively. VAS of vaginal dryness decreased (p < 0.001) of -24.4 ± 3.6, and -52.7 ± 2.6 (p < 0.001), VAS of irritation decreased (p<0.001) of -18.6 ± 4.4 and -47.8 ± 3.2, VAS of pain decreased (p < 0.001) of -26.2 ± 4.3 and -55.6 ± 3.1 and the GSS decreased (p < 0.001) of -3.9 ± 0.3, and -4.9 ± 0.2, in peri and post-menopausal women, respectively. All the modifications were significantly greater (p < 0.001)(p < 0.032 for GSS) in postmenopausal women, and after 30 days all outcomes were similar in the two groups of women. In comparison to baseline, after 210 days of treatment VHI increased of 7.7 ± 0.3 (p < 0.001), VAS of vaginal dryness decreased of -53.6 ± 1.9 (p < 0.001) VAS of irritation of -42.6 ± 1.4 (p < 0.001) VAS of pain of -46.7 ± 2.3 (p < 0.001) and the GSS of -6.5 ± 0.2 ± 0.2 (p < 0.001). All outcomes improved (p < 0.001) over the values observed after 30 days of treatment (p < 0.001). No side effect was reported. CONCLUSIONS: In peri- and post-menopausal women PCV administration rapidly improves VA symptoms, and its prolongation up to 6 months further increases its efficacy.

POLARIS: efficacy and safety of a vaginal medical device in recurrent bacterial vaginosis-a multicenter, open-label, non-controlled, study with 10 months of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Recurrent bacterial vaginosis (RBV) after antibiotic treatment has relapse rates of 35% within 3 months and 60% within 12 months. A medical device containing polycarbophil, lauryl glucoside, and glycerides (PLGG) inhibits bacterial growth and has mucoadhesive properties. This study examined the efficacy of the device in women with RBV. METHODS: This post-market clinical follow-up study comprised two phases. The first phase was an interventional, open-label, non-controlled, multicenter study enrolling 56 women. The second phase was an observational 10-month follow-up without treatment. RESULTS: After three cycles of PLGG treatment, recurrence was identified in 8 of 54 evaluable patients (14.81%). A positive effect on lactobacilli in the vaginal secretions was observed in 26 of 39 patients (66.67%). Among 35 patients observed after stopping PLGG treatment, one case of RBV (2.86%) was observed after 4 months, and an additional six cases (17.14%) were observed after 10 ± 2 months. Therefore, no recurrence was evidenced in 12 subjects (34.28%) at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: The use of PLGG vaginal ovules in the treatment of BV reduces the rate of recurrence and apparently produces a positive effect on the vaginal microbiota.

Performance and Safety of a New Medical Device (Polybactum) for Reducing the Recurrence Rate of Bacterial Vaginosis: Protocol for a Multicenter, Open-Label, Noncontrolled International Clinical Trial (POLARIS Study).

BACKGROUND: The medical literature has reported that recurrent bacterial vaginosis (RBV) has a relapse rate of 35% within 3 months and 60% within 12 months after antibiotic administration. Products that are able to provide a barrier effect against the biofilm produced by Gardnerella vaginalis could play a role in improving the results of bacterial vaginosis (BV) treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the performance and safety of a medical device (Polybactum) containing polycarbophil, lauryl glucoside, and glycerides (PLGG) for reducing the rate of recurrence of BV. METHODS: The study includes women who are aged above 18 years, are willing to provide signed informed consent, have a diagnosis of BV according to the Amsel criteria, and have been affected by at least 2 episodes of RBV in the last 12 months. The trial includes 2 phases. In the first phase (according to an open-label noncontrolled design), the treatment involving PLGG is administered for 3 cycles and is followed by a 1-month period of follow-up without treatment. In the second phase, a 9-month follow-up period is envisaged. Thus, for each patient, a 10-month follow-up period without treatment is planned. The study involves 5 centers (2 in Italy and 3 in Romania). We calculated a sample size of 44 pairs to achieve a power of 80% and a 1-sided significance of 5% for detecting a difference of 0.25 between marginal proportions, in comparison with the mean recurrence rate of BV reported in the medical literature. We estimated a potential dropout rate of 20%, and thus, we decided to enroll 55 patients (1-group chi-square test). RESULTS: The study received ethics approval in 2016 in Romania and 1 year later in Italy. Recruitment started in September 2016. An interim analysis was performed in 2019, and full study analysis results are expected in July 2023. CONCLUSIONS: The tested medical device involving PLGG could modify the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of BV and could improve microbiological parameters owing to the acidifying effect on vaginal pH. We believe that the findings of our study could be useful for other investigators who want to test different products against RBV using a standardized protocol and standardized procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02863536; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02863536. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/42787.

Polycarbophil vaginal moisturizing gel versus hyaluronic acid gel in women affected by vaginal dryness in late menopausal transition: A prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: During menopausal transition, women are frequently affected by vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), due to the decline of estrogen levels. Resulting symptoms are itching, burning, dyspareunia, and vaginal dryness (reported in up to 85%). The aim of this trial was to verify if medical device polycarbophil vaginal (PCV) moisturizer gel is not less effective than hyaluronic acid (HA) gel in treating vaginal dryness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, open label, randomized, parallel group, comparative study with non-inferiority design. Female included were ≥45 to ≤55 years in the menopausal transition, with subjective dryness, any objective sign of VVA, pH > 5, and body mass index of ≥18.5 to ≤36 kg/m2. Subjects were randomized to 1 g of PCV gel twice a week for 30 days or 3 g of HA vaginal gel every 3 days for 30 days. RESULTS: 53 subjects (mean age 49.45 ± 2.96 years) were analyzed. Vaginal health index showed an improvement (p < 0.001) in both groups (from 12.54 ± 1.37 to 16.36 ± 2.66 for PCV, from 12.00 ± 1.91 to 16.60 ± 2.50 for HA), but the difference between final means (95%CI: -1.66 to 1.18) evidenced that PCV is non-inferior to HA treatment. Similarly, an improvement was evidenced in vaginal maturation index (p = 0.005 for PCV, ns. for HA), female sexual function index (p < 0.001 for PCV, p < 0.001 for HA), and SF-12 (p < 0.001 for PCV, p < 0.001 for HA), with no difference between groups. Safety was optimal and no adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HA gel does not give additional benefits to those that are already provided by the moisturizing PCV.

Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in subjects with moderate cardiovascular risk: Italian results from the PANDORA study Data from PANDORA (Prevalence of peripheral Arterial disease in subjects with moderate CVD risk, with No overt vascular Diseases nor Diabetes mellitus).

BACKGROUND: The PANDORA study has recently examined the prevalence of low ankle brachial index (ABI) in subjects with moderate risk of cardiovascular disease. This sub-analysis of the PANDORA study examines the prevalence of asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD), as determined by ABI, in Italian subjects presenting with moderate cardiovascular risk, in the absence of diabetes or overt vascular disease. METHODS: PANDORA is a non-interventional, cross-sectional study that was performed in 6 European countries, involving subjects with at least one cardiovascular (CV) risk factor. The primary objective was to evaluate the prevalence of asymptomatic PAD using ABI. For this post-hoc sub-analysis, data were extracted for subjects enrolled in Italy, comprising 51.5% (n = 5298) of subjects from the original PANDORA study. Secondary objectives were to establish the prevalence and treatment of CV risk factors. RESULTS: The mean age was 63.9 years and 22.9% (95% CI 21.7-24.0) of subjects presented with asymptomatic PAD. A range of risk factors comprising smoking, hypertension, low HDL-cholesterol, family history of coronary heart disease and habit of moderate-high alcohol intake were significantly associated with asymptomatic PAD (p < 0.0001). Statin treatment had the lowest incidence in Italian subjects. Furthermore, patients treated with statins were significantly less likely to have asymptomatic PAD than those who were not (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic PAD was highly prevalent in Italian subjects, the majority of whom were not candidates for ABI assessment according to current guidelines. Findings from this study suggest that these patients should be carefully examined in clinical practice and ABI measured so that therapeutic interventions known to decrease their CV risk may be offered.

The PANDORA study: peripheral arterial disease in patients with non-high cardiovascular risk.

Few studies are available with sufficient sample size to accurately describe the prevalence of low ankle-brachial index (ABI) in patients at 'non-high' cardiovascular (CV) risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD), as determined by using ABI, in this patient population. A non-interventional, cross-sectional, pan-European study was conducted in patients with ≥1 CV risk factor in addition to age, evaluating the prevalence of asymptomatic PAD (ABI ≤ 0.90). Secondary objectives included assessing the prevalence and treatment of CV risk factors. Patients were consecutively recruited during scheduled visits to the physician's office, or were randomly selected by the physician from a list of eligible patients. Patients with diabetes were excluded as this condition was deemed to be a secondary prevention risk. 10,287 patients were enrolled (9,816 evaluable: mean age 64.3 years; 53.5% male). Prevalence of asymptomatic PAD was 17.8% (99% CI 16.84-18.83). Factors significantly associated with asymptomatic PAD included hypertension, age, alcohol intake, family history of coronary heart disease, low levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, and smoking (p < 0.0001). Patients treated with statins were significantly less likely to have asymptomatic PAD than those who were not (odds ratio 0.62; 95% CI 0.50-0.76; p < 0.0001). Asymptomatic PAD was highly prevalent in patients with non-high CV risk, the majority of whom would not typically be candidates for ABI assessment. These patients should be carefully screened, and ABI measured, so that therapeutic interventions known to diminish their increased CV risk may be offered.

Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in patients at non-high cardiovascular risk. Rationale and design of the PANDORA study.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a marker of widespread atherosclerosis. Individuals with PAD, most of whom do not show typical PAD symptoms ('asymptomatic' patients), are at increased risk of cardiovascular ischaemic events. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend that individuals with asymptomatic lower extremity PAD should be identified by measurement of ankle-brachial index (ABI). However, despite its associated risk, PAD remains under-recognised by clinicians and the general population and office-based ABI detection is still poorly-known and under-used in clinical practice. The Prevalence of peripheral Arterial disease in patients with a non-high cardiovascular disease risk, with No overt vascular Diseases nOR diAbetes mellitus (PANDORA) study has a primary aim of assessing the prevalence of lower extremity PAD through ABI measurement, in patients at non-high cardiovascular risk, with no overt cardiovascular diseases (including symptomatic PAD), or diabetes mellitus. Secondary objectives include documenting the prevalence and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and the characteristics of both patients and physicians as possible determinants for PAD under-diagnosis. METHODS/DESIGN: PANDORA is a non-interventional, cross-sectional, pan-European study. It includes approximately 1,000 primary care participating sites, across six European countries (Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, The Netherlands, Switzerland). Investigator and patient questionnaires will be used to collect both right and left ABI values at rest, presence of cardiovascular disease risk factors, current pharmacological treatment, and determinants for PAD under-diagnosis. DISCUSSION: The PANDORA study will provide important data to estimate the prevalence of asymptomatic PAD in a population otherwise classified at low or intermediate risk on the basis of current risk scores in a primary care setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT00689377.