Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Surg ; 90(10): 2609-2613, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684322

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for management of anorectal abscesses make no recommendations for operative vs bedside incision and drainage (I&D). The purpose of this study was to determine if management in the operating room is necessary to adequately drain anorectal abscesses and prevent short-term complications for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Patients with perirectal abscesses were identified and divided into two groups based on intervention type: "bedside" or "operative." Demographic, laboratory, and encounter data were obtained from the medical record. Study outcomes included 30-day complications (return to the ED, reintervention, and readmission). Data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses using SPSS (version 28). RESULTS: A total of 113 patients with anorectal abscesses were identified. Sixty-six (58%) underwent bedside I&D and 47 (42%) operative I&D. The overall complication rate was 10%. A total of 9 patients (6 bedside and 3 operative) returned to the ED. Six of these patients required reintervention (5 bedside and 1 operative), and 1 was readmitted. Two patients from the bedside group required a second I&D during their index admission. Pre-procedure SIRS (P = .02) was found to be associated with 30-day complications. Provider specialty and training level were not associated with 30-day complications. DISCUSSION: In this study, for patients presenting to the ED, bedside drainage was found to be an adequate management strategy to achieve complete drainage without a significant increase in the rate of complications when compared to operative drainage.


Asunto(s)
Absceso , Drenaje , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Quirófanos , Enfermedades del Recto , Humanos , Drenaje/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Absceso/cirugía , Adulto , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades del Ano/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 31(8): 2217-2221, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33136858

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Facial asymmetry from unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) may be definitively treated in the presence of active disease (with high condylectomy and concurrent orthognathic surgery) or after waiting for disease inactivity (orthognathic surgery alone). There is currently no consensus on the standard of care. In this study, we sought to compare functional and esthetic outcomes, as well as treatment duration, between these 2 management options. METHODS: Patients who underwent treatment for UCH were identified through retrospective review. Pre- and postoperative 3-dimensional (3D) images were obtained. Short- and long-term operative outcomes of those treated during the active (group 1) were compared to those treated in the inactive phase (group 2). Total treatment time, operative time, and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Facial asymmetry was also assessed by laypersons using a Likert scale. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (mean 25.6 years, range 14-56) were included: 6 in group 1 and 9 in group 2. All surgical outcomes were statistically independent of procedure type. Treatment time was significantly longer in the group 2 (P = 0.03). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in facial asymmetry scores postoperatively with no significant difference in pre- or postoperative asymmetry between groups (P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active UCH, high condylectomy and orthognathic surgery is a procedure that restores facial symmetry and improves jaw function while halting mandibular growth. Good esthetic and functional outcomes, as well as reduced treatment time and disease burden, support the use of this treatment option for this population.


Asunto(s)
Cóndilo Mandibular/cirugía , Enfermedades Mandibulares/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Estética Dental , Asimetría Facial/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperplasia , Masculino , Cóndilo Mandibular/diagnóstico por imagen , Cóndilo Mandibular/patología , Enfermedades Mandibulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Mandibulares/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 145(4): 944-946, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32221210

RESUMEN

Treatment of nasal deformity and obstruction requires analysis, planning, and precise execution of rhinoplasty techniques. When performed well, rhinoplasty is a powerful tool for achieving appealing nasal morphology and optimizing function. This article aims to highlight an open approach to septorhinoplasty using a number of techniques that are preferred by the senior author (D.M.S.) to successfully correct a congenital nasal deformity and deviated septum.


Asunto(s)
Tabique Nasal/cirugía , Nariz/anomalías , Rinoplastia/métodos , Insatisfacción Corporal/psicología , Técnicas Cosméticas , Estética , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Modelos Anatómicos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA