Exposure to statin therapy decreases the incidence of venous thromboembolism after trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients, despite chemoprophylaxis. Statins have been shown capable of acting upon the endothelium. We hypothesized that statin therapy in the pre- or in-hospital settings leads to a decreased incidence of VTE. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of injured patients who received statin therapy pre- or in-hospital. Adult, highest-level trauma activation patients admitted January 2018 - June 2022 were included. Patients on prehospital anticoagulants, history of inherited bleeding disorder, and who died within the first 24 hours were excluded. Statin users were matched to non-users by statin use indications including age, current heart and cardiovascular conditions and history, hyperlipidemia, injury severity, and body mass index. Time to in-hospital statin initiation and occurrence of VTE and other complications within 60 days were collected. Differences between groups were determined by univariate, multivariable logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS: Of 3,062 eligible patients, 79 were statin users that were matched to 79 non-users. There were no differences in admissions demographics, vital signs, injury pattern, transfusion volumes, lengths of stay, or mortality between groups. The overall VTE incidence was 10.8% (17/158). Incidence of VTE in statin users was significantly lower (3%) than non-users (19%; P = 0.003). Differences between statin users and non-users were observed for rates of DVT (0% vs 9%), PE (3% vs 15%), and sepsis (0% vs 5%). Exposure to statins was associated with an 82% decreased risk of developing VTE (hazard ratio = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.86; P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Statin exposure was associated with decline in VTE and lower individual rates of DVT, PE, and sepsis. Our findings indicate that statins should be evaluated further as a possible adjunctive therapy for VTE chemoprophylaxis after traumatic injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE AND STUDY TYPE: Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study.

TIME-DEPENDENT CHANGES IN PROINFLAMMATORY MEDIATORS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH TRAUMA-RELATED VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM.

ABSTRACT: Background: Tissue trauma and hemorrhage result in pronounced activation of the innate immune system. Given known crosstalk between inflammation and coagulation, soluble inflammatory mediators could be associated with venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) after major trauma. Objectives : This study aimed to identify plasma inflammatory mediators that are independent predictors of VTE risk in trauma patients. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelets and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) study. Plasma levels of 27 cytokines/chemokines were measured by Bio-Plex at admission and 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h later. Patients who died from exsanguination or within 24 h were excluded. Mann-Whitney tests were performed to assess no-VTE and VTE groups at each time point. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted effects of inflammatory mediators on VTE risk. Results: Eighty-six of the 575 patients (15%) included developed VTE. Interleukin (IL)-1ra, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, eotaxin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, interferon-γ-inducible protein, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), and chemokine ligand 5 (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) were all significantly increased among VTE patients. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that IL-6, IL-8, interferon-γ-inducible protein, and MCP-1 were independently associated with VTE. Cox proportional hazards modeling identified IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 as independent predictors of accelerated VTE development. We identified significant correlations between inflammation and markers of coagulation and endothelial activation. Conclusion: Sustained systemic inflammation is a key driver of VTE risk after major trauma. Therapeutics targeting innate immune activation should be considered for development of future multimodal strategies to augment current VTE prophylaxis.

Design and Development of a Clot Burst Pressure Device to Investigate Resuscitation Strategies.

INTRODUCTION: A reduction in clot strength is a hallmark feature of trauma-induced coagulopathy. A better understanding of clot integrity can optimize resuscitation strategies. We designed a device to gauge clot strength by pressurizing fluids over a formed clot and measuring the pressure needed to dislodge the clot. We hypothesized that this device could distinguish between clots formed in hypocoagulable and hypercoagulable states by observing differences in the clot burst pressure. METHODS: Whole blood from healthy volunteers was collected into sodium citrate tubes and was treated with heparin or fibrinogen to generate clots in a hypocoagulable or hypercoagulable state, respectively. Small bore holes were drilled into polystyrene plates, and recalcified blood was pipetted into the holes. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 30 min to form clots. A pressure cap with an inlet for fluid from a syringe pump and an outlet leading to a measurement column was secured in the wells with a watertight seal. RESULTS: Clot burst pressure was normalized to individual baseline values to account for inherent differences in clot strength. The 1.0 g/L and 2.0 g/L fibrinogen groups were 1.65 ± 0.07 (P = 0.0078) and 2.26 ± 0.16 (P = 0.0078) times as strong as baseline, respectively. The 0.10, 0.15, or 0.20 USP units/mL groups were 0.388 ± 0.07 (P = 0.125), 0.31 ± 0.07 (P = 0.125), 0.21 ± 0.07 (P = 0.125) times as strong as baseline, respectively. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank testing. CONCLUSIONS: This device tests clot strength using burst pressure, an easily interpreted clinical parameter not measured in existing devices. Future work can test blood from trauma patients to better understand trauma pathophysiology.