Thirty-nine percent of patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have an incidentally detected AAA prior to rupture.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening has been offered to 65-year-old men living in Oslo, Norway, since May 2011. A significant number of AAA-related deaths occurred in individuals who are not eligible for screening. The primary aim of this study was to describe the group of patients admitted to Oslo University Hospital with a ruptured AAA after the implementation of the local AAA screening project. The following parameters were investigated: AAA detection prior to rupture, surveillance status, eligibility for screening and comorbidities. We also sought to compare outcomes (repair rates and 30-day mortality) between patients with and without an AAA detected prior to rupture. METHODS: This cohort study included patients admitted acutely to Oslo University Hospital due to a symptomatic or ruptured AAA in the period January 2011 to December 2022. Data on demographics, prior AAA detection, surveillance status, treatment and mortality were collected retrospectively through electronic medical records. RESULTS: We identified 200 patients with a symptomatic or ruptured AAA, among which 79 (40%) had an AAA detected prior to rupture - one (1%) through screening and 78 (39%) incidentally. Up to 30% of the incidentally detected AAAs were not under any surveillance. Six patients were found eligible for screening: one had attended, three were non-attenders and two had not been invited. Patients with an incidentally detected AAA prior to rupture had a more advanced age and a significantly higher degree of comorbidities than patients without a previously detected AAA, and the repair rates in these groups were 56% and 84% respectively (p < 0.001). Adjusted for comorbidities and risk factors, the odds ratio for repair among patients with incidentally detected AAA was 0.56 (p = 0.292). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.097). CONCLUSION: Most patients with a ruptured AAA were not eligible for screening, but 39% of the patients had an incidentally detected AAA prior to rupture. Standardized reporting and follow-up of incidentally detected AAAs is thus identified as an additional measure to organized screening in the effort to reduce AAA-related mortality.

Eleven-Year Outcomes of a Screening Project for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) in 65-Year-Old Men.

Objective: Since 2011, the Department of Vascular Surgery at Oslo University Hospital has offered screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to 65-year-old men living in Oslo, Norway. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the screening project on AAA-related mortality and rupture and repair rates in the screened population. Methods: This cohort study included men that participated in AAA screening at the Department of Vascular Surgery at Oslo University Hospital in the period May 2011 to September 2019. All men with screen-detected AAA (aortic diameter ≥30 mm) and subaneurysmal aortic dilatation (aortic diameter 25-29 mm) were included. A stratified (1:1 with the subaneurysm group), randomized selection of men with normal aortic diameter (<25 mm) upon screening was also included. The follow-up data on events (ruptures, repairs, and deaths) after screening were collected retrospectively from patient electronic medical records at Oslo University Hospital, the National Population Register and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry (CoDR). Results: In total, 2048 men were included, with a median follow-up time of 7.1 years (IQR 3.8). Among men with screen-detected AAA, 0.6% died of AAA-related causes (0.9 AAA-related deaths per 1000 person-years). The rupture rate was 0.3% among men with screen-detected AAA or subaneurysmal aortic dilatation, giving an incidence of 0.5 ruptures per 1000 person-years. The overall repair rate in the AAA group was 20.6% (36.1 repairs per 1000 person-years) and 0.6% (0.9 repairs per 1000 person-years) in the subaneurysm group. Conclusion: In a population screened for AAA, the incidence of rupture and the AAA-related mortality was very low. Almost one-fifth of the participants with screen-detected AAA underwent elective repair, representing a group that might have presented with rupture if untreated. These results indicate that screening is valuable in preventing AAA rupture and AAA-related mortality.

Internal herniation through foramen of Winslow. / Intern herniering gjennom Winslows foramen.

BACKGROUND: Internal herniation through the foramen of Winslow is a rare cause of bowel obstruction. The presented case illustrates this condition and considerations made regarding treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: An elderly woman was admitted to the hospital with sudden onset of epigastric pain and vomiting. Blood tests were normal except for a lactate value of 2.5 mmol/L (normal value < 1.8). Computer tomography showed internal herniation of the caecum through the foramen of Winslow. Initial treatment with intravenous fluids, a nasogastric tube and fasting did not resolve the bowel obstruction. The herniated caecum was laparoscopically reduced, and there were no signs of intestinal ischaemia. INTERPRETATION: Internal herniation through the foramen of Winslow is rare. There are no evidence-based guidelines on treatment, or on prophylactic measures to prevent recurrence. Both laparoscopic and open surgical approaches have been reported, with or without closure of the foramen. There is little documentation on recurrence rates.

Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Risk Factors in 65-Year-Old Men in Oslo, Norway.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in 65-year-old men in Oslo, Norway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2011, until September 2019, the annual population of 65-year-old men living in Oslo were invited to an ultrasonographic screening of the abdominal aorta. Candidates received a one-time invitation by mail, including a questionnaire on possible risk factors and comorbidities. Abdominal aortic outer-to-outer diameter and ankle-brachial index were measured by the screening team. Participants were allocated into three groups: non-, sub- and aneurysmal aorta. Written information on recommended follow-up regime was given to participants with an aortic diameter ≥25 mm. Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential risk factors were performed, in addition to descriptive analyses and significance testing. RESULTS: In total, 19,328 were invited, 13,215 men were screened, of which 12,822 accepted inclusion in the study. Aortic diameter was registered for 12,810 participants and 330 men had aortic diameter ≥30 mm, giving a prevalence of AAA of 2.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.31-2.86). We identified 4 independent risk factors for AAA: smoking (OR = 3.64, 95% CI 2.90-4.58), hypertension (OR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.49-2.35), BMI >30 (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.03), and diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.79), the latter showing an inverse association with AAA growth. A subgroup of 862 men with aortic diameters 25-29 mm had a significantly higher prevalence of BMI >25, smoking and family history of AAA, compared to participants with aortic diameter <25 mm. CONCLUSION: Among the participants in this study, the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms was 2.6%. Participants with AAA more frequently reported cardiovascular risk factors, and less frequently diabetes mellitus.

Construct validity of eoSim - a low-cost and portable laparoscopic simulator.

Purpose: To examine the construct validity of the low-cost, portable laparoscopic simulator eoSim using motion analysis.Material and methods: Novice and experienced surgeons (≤ 100 and >100 laparoscopic procedures performed, respectively) completed four tasks on the eoSim using the SurgTrac software: intracorporeal suture and tie, tube ligation, peg capping and precision cutting. The following metrics were recorded: Time to complete task, distance traveled, handedness (left- versus right hand use), time off-screen, distance between instrument tips, speed, acceleration and motion smoothness.Results: Compared to novices (n = 22), experienced surgeons (n = 14) completed tasks in less time (p ≤ .025), except when performing peg capping (p = .052). On all tasks, they also scored lower on the distance metric (p ≤ .001). Differences in handedness (left hand compared between groups, right hand compared between groups) were found to be significant for three tasks (p ≤ .025). In general, the experienced group made greater use of their left hand than the novice group.Conclusion: The eoSim can differentiate between experienced and novice surgeons on the tasks intracorporeal suture and tie, tube ligation and precision cutting, thus providing a convenient method for surgical departments to implement testing of their surgeons' basic laparoscopic skills.

Course in basic surgical skills.

BACKGROUND: The Basic Surgical Skills (BSS) course provides an introduction to basic surgical techniques. The course was held in Norway for the first time in 2009. This study was carried out to evaluate the learning outcomes of the course. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The participants from four consecutive courses were invited to take part in the study and were tested in three practical exercises immediately before and after the course. Their performance was measured using an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) for two of the exercises and by time needed to complete the third exercise. The participants also undertook two self-evaluations of competence on each exercise, one prior to and one after completing the course. RESULTS: A total of 57 out of the 65 course participants were included in the study. The participants' scores were significantly higher for all three practical exercises after course completion, compared with the pre-course score (p < 0.001). The self-evaluations indicated that the participants felt more competent after the course. INTERPRETATION: The study indicates that the BSS course provides better basic surgical skills. In view of the lack of equivalent courses at core surgical training, consideration should be given to introducing this as a compulsory part of the surgical training in Norway.