Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 137: 112535, 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38908078

RESUMEN

Tacrolimus (TAC) has high pharmacokinetic (PK) variability during the early transplantation period. The relationships between whole-blood and intracellular TAC concentrations and clinical outcomes remain controversial. This study identifies the factors affecting the PK variability of TAC and characterizes the relationships between whole-blood and intracellular TAC concentrations. Data regarding whole-blood TAC concentrations of 1,787 samples from 215 renal transplant recipients (<90 days postoperative) across two centers and intracellular TAC concentrations (648 samples) digitized from previous studies were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The effects of potential covariates were screened, and the distribution of whole-blood to intracellular TAC concentration ratios (RWB:IC) was estimated. The final model was evaluated using bootstrap, goodness of fit, and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks. The optimal dosing regimens and target ranges for each type of immune cell subsets were determined using Monte Carlo simulations. A two-compartment model adequately described the data, and the estimated mean TAC CL/F was 23.6 L·h-1 (relative standard error: 11.5 %). The hematocrit level, CYP3A5*3 carrier status, co-administration with Wuzhi capsules, and tapering prednisolone dose may contribute to the high variability of TAC PK variability during the early post-transplant period. The estimated RWB:IC of all TAC concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was 4940, and inter-center variability of PBMCs was observed. The simulated TAC target range in PBMCs was 20.2-85.9 pg·million cells-1. Inter-center variability in intracellular concentrations should be taken into account in further analyses. TAC dosage adjustments can be guided based on PK/PD variability and simulated intracellular concentrations.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores , Trasplante de Riñón , Tacrolimus , Humanos , Tacrolimus/farmacocinética , Tacrolimus/administración & dosificación , Tacrolimus/sangre , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Inmunosupresores/farmacocinética , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/metabolismo , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/genética , Modelos Biológicos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Anciano , Prednisolona/farmacocinética , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Método de Montecarlo
2.
J Phys Chem B ; 127(51): 10974-10986, 2023 12 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38097367

RESUMEN

In plants and algae, the primary antenna protein bound to photosystem II is light-harvesting complex II (LHCII), a pigment-protein complex that binds eight chlorophyll (Chl) a molecules and six Chl b molecules. Chl a and Chl b differ only in that Chl a has a methyl group (-CH3) on one of its pyrrole rings, while Chl b has a formyl group (-CHO) at that position. This blue-shifts the Chl b absorbance relative to Chl a. It is not known how the protein selectively binds the right Chl type at each site. Knowing the selection criteria would allow the design of light-harvesting complexes that bind different Chl types, modifying an organism to utilize the light of different wavelengths. The difference in the binding affinity of Chl a and Chl b in pea and spinach LHCII was calculated using multiconformation continuum electrostatics and free energy perturbation. Both methods have identified some Chl sites where the bound Chl type (a or b) has a significantly higher affinity, especially when the protein provides a hydrogen bond for the Chl b formyl group. However, the Chl a sites often have little calculated preference for one Chl type, so they are predicted to bind a mixture of Chl a and b. The electron density of the spinach LHCII was reanalyzed, which, however, confirmed that there is negligible Chl b in the Chl a-binding sites. It is suggested that the protein chooses the correct Chl type during folding, segregating the preferred Chl to the correct binding site.


Asunto(s)
Clorofila , Complejos de Proteína Captadores de Luz , Complejos de Proteína Captadores de Luz/química , Clorofila/química , Clorofila A , Complejo de Proteína del Fotosistema II , Plantas/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA