External Ventricular Drainage: A Practical Guide for Neuro-Anesthesiologists.

External ventricular drainage is often considered a life-saving treatment in acute hydrocephalus. Given the large number of discussion points, the ideal management of EVD has not been completely clarified. The objective of this study was to review the most relevant scientific evidence about the management of EVD in its main clinical scenarios. We reviewed the most recent and relevant articles about indications, timing, management, and complications of EVD in neurocritical care, with particular interest in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) using the following keywords alone or matching with one another: intracranial pressure, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, intraventricular hemorrhage, external ventricular drainage, cerebrospinal shunt, intracranial pressure monitoring, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt. In the management of EVD in SAH, the intermittent drainage strategy is burdened with an elevated risk of complications (e.g., clogged catheter, hemorrhage, and need for replacement). There seems to be more ventriculoperitoneal shunt dependency in rapid weaning approach-managed patients than in those treated with the gradual weaning approach. Although there is no evidence in favor of either strategy, it is conventionally accepted to adopt a continuous drainage approach in TBI patients. Less scientific evidence is available in the literature regarding the management of EVD in patients with severe TBI and intraparenchymal/intraventricular hemorrhage. EVD placement is a necessary treatment in several clinical scenarios. However, further randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify precisely how EVD should be managed in different clinical scenarios.

Decompressive Craniectomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: The Intensivist's Point of View.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a severe pathology with important social and economic concerns, decompressive craniectomy (DC) represents a life-saving surgical option to treat elevated intracranial hypertension (ICP). The rationale underlying DC is to remove part of the cranial bones and open the dura mater to create space, avoiding secondary parenchymal damage and brain herniations. The scope of this narrative review is to summarize the most relevant literature and to discuss main issues about indication, timing, surgical procedure, outcome, and complications in adult patients involved in severe traumatic brain injury, underwent to the DC. The literature research is made with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms on PubMed/MEDLINE from 2003 to 2022 and we reviewed the most recent and relevant articles using the following keywords alone or matched with each other: decompressive craniectomy; traumatic brain injury; intracranial hypertension; acute subdural hematoma; cranioplasty; cerebral herniation, neuro-critical care, neuro-anesthesiology. The pathogenesis of TBI involves both primary injuries that correlate directly to the external impact of the brain and skull, and secondary injuries due to molecular, chemical, and inflammatory cascade inducing further cerebral damage. The DC can be classified into primary, defined as bone flap removing without its replacement for the treatment of intracerebral mass, and secondary, which indicates for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), refractory to intensive medical management. Briefly, the increased brain compliance following bone removal reflects on CBF and autoregulation inducing an alteration in CSF dynamics and so, eventual complications. The risk of complications is estimated around 40%. The main cause of mortality in DC patients is due to brain swelling. In traumatic brain injury, primary or secondary decompressive craniectomy is a life-saving surgery, and the right indication should be mandatory in multidisciplinary medical-surgical consultation.

Hyponatremia Related to Neurocritical Care: Focus on Diagnosis and Therapy: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Hyponatremia is the most frequently occurring electrolyte disorder in neurocritical care and traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), neurosurgery, and ischemic stroke are the clinical conditions more often associated with this condition. SIADH and CSWS are the main causes of hyponatremia in neurologically ill patients. Since hyponatremia is a negative prognostic factor for neurocritical patients, early diagnosis and consequent targeted therapy are of fundamental importance. The present review was carried out to provide a brief recap on the main causes and management of hyponatremia in the neurocritical patient. METHODS: A methodical search of the medical literature using the online database MEDLINE was carried out and studies comprising case reports, prospective and retrospective observational studies, or randomized controlled clinical trials in which there is a diagnosis of hyponatremia in neurocritical patients were included. RESULTS: 18 articles were analyzed, consisting of 8 case reports, 4 case series, 3 prospective trials, 1 retrospective study, and 1 multicenter trial. A total of 1371 patients from 18 studies were included. Patients' average age was 29.28 ± 20.9, respectively. TBI was the main cause of hyponatremia in the literature reviewed; 12 studies were about the relationship between TBI and hyponatremia, 2 studies about stroke, 2 studies about SAH and 1 about hyponatremia postneurosurgical procedure. DISCUSSION: Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder in hospitalized patients and the main scenarios of hyponatremic neurocritical patients are subarachnoid hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury and iatrogenic hyponatremia due to neurosurgical cases. CONCLUSION: Hyponatremia is a frequent finding in neurocritical care and is also a recognized negative prognostic factor leading to increased mortality and ICU length hospitalization. Its diagnosis and therapy are essential for correct neurocritical management. The most common cause of serum sodium abnormality is SIADH, and an early diagnosis for target treatment is paramount to prevent delayed symptoms and complications.

Subaxial Vertebral Artery Rotational Occlusion Syndrome: An Overview of Clinical Aspects, Diagnostic Work-Up, and Surgical Management.

Extrinsic compression of the subaxial vertebral artery (VA) may cause rotational occlusion syndrome (ROS) and contribute to vertebrobasilar insufficiency potentially leading to symptoms and in severe cases, to posterior circulation strokes. The present literature review aimed to report the main clinical findings, diagnostic work-up, and surgical management of the subaxial VA-ROS, the diagnosis of which can be difficult and is often underestimated. An illustrative case is also presented. A thorough literature search was conducted to retrieve manuscripts that have discussed the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of ROS. Total 41 articles were selected based on the best match and relevance and mainly involved case reports and small cases series. The male/female ratio and average age were 2.6 and 55.6±11 years, respectively. Dizziness, visual disturbances, and syncope were the most frequent symptoms in order of frequency, while C5 and C6 were the most affected levels. Osteophytes were the cause in >46.2% of cases. Dynamic VA catheter-based angiography was the gold standard for diagnosis along with computed tomography angiography. Except in older patients and those with prohibitive comorbidities, anterior decompressive surgery was always performed, mostly with complete recovery, and zero morbidity and mortality. A careful neurological evaluation and dynamic angiographic studies are crucial for the diagnosis of subaxial VA-ROS. Anterior decompression of the VA is the cure of this syndrome in almost all cases.

Anterolateral approach for subaxial vertebral artery decompression in the treatment of rotational occlusion syndrome: results of a personal series and technical note.

OBJECTIVES: To report the results of a retrospective series and a technical note about the anterolateral approach for the treatment of the rotational occlusion syndrome (ROS) involving the subaxial V2 segment of the vertebral artery (VA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of a cohort of patients that underwent an anterolateral approach to decompress the VA as they suffered from ROS secondary to a subaxial compression. A dynamic study with ultrasonography, CT, MRI, and catheter-based angiography were obtained in all cases. Severe symptomatology and cerebellar-brainstem strokes were indications for surgery. The anterolateral approach involved a pre-sternocleidomastoid precarotid exposure. The retro-longus colli and pre-scalenic corridors were used to access the C5-C6 and C3-C4 segment, respectively, and to perform the decompression. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated. Recurrent drop attacks were present in all cases. Osteophytes at C5 and C6 were the most common causes of subaxial VA compression. Anterior decompression stand-alone was performed in all but 1 patient. A recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and a numbness of the C5 nerve root were the only complications observed, both transient. A satisfactory untethering of the VA with a complete recovery was achieved in all patients, apart from those with severe infratentorial strokes. DISCUSSION READ: Anterolateral approach allows for an effective and safe treatment of the ROS involving the subaxial portion of the VA. Retro-longus colli and pre-scalenic corridors, developed through a precarotid exposure, have an anatomical rationale in decreasing the risks of complications. Decompression stand-alone is adequate in almost the totality of cases.

Targeting of renin-angiotensin system in COVID-19 patients affected by stroke: Emerging concerns about detrimental vs. benefit effect.

OBJECTIVE: The present short report summarizes some clinical characteristics of six patients affected by stroke while being on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)2 inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) before and during COVID-19. METHODS: Medical charts and images of six patients affected by stroke while being on ACE-Is and ARBs therapy before and during COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy region, Italy, were reviewed. RESULTS: Three patients had a dural sinus thrombosis, whereas the remaining suffered by an arterial ischemia, which was a middle cerebral artery occlusion in one case, and a posterior-inferior cerebellar artery occlusion in the remaining two. All patients showed clinical features typical of SARS-CoV-2 infection and positive chest CT scan, and were treated with ACE-Is as needed. Hypercoagulability panel was negative in any case. A recovery was achieved in all cases, although in a variable manner. CONCLUSIONS: Whether or not and in which manner the pharmacomodulation of the renin-angiotensin system may had affect the clinical course of the reported six COVID-19 patients affected by stroke has to be still clarified. An urgent need of randomized clinical trials aimed to assess the safety profile and neuroprotective properties of ACE-Is and ARBs in COVID-19 patients diagnosed with stroke does exists.

Rates of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Mild Head Trauma Patients Presenting to Emergency Department and Their Management: A Comparison of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Drugs with Vitamin K Antagonists.

Background and objectives: Anticoagulants are thought to increase the risks of traumatic intracranial injury and poor clinical outcomes after blunt head trauma. The safety of using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is unclear. This study aims to compare the incidence of post-traumatic ICH following mild head injury (MHI) and to assess the need for surgery, mortality rates, emergency department (ED) revisit rates, and the volume of ICH. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center observational study on all patients admitted to our emergency department for mild head trauma from 1 January 2016, to 31 December 2018. We enrolled 234 anticoagulated patients, of which 156 were on VKAs and 78 on DOACs. Patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans on arrival (T0) and after 24 h (T24). The control group consisted of patients not taking anticoagulants, had no clotting disorders, and who reported an MHI in the same period. About 54% in the control group had CTs performed. Results: The anticoagulated groups were comparable in baseline parameters. Patients on VKA developed ICH more frequently than patients on DOACs and the control group at 17%, 5.13%, and 7.5%, respectively. No significant difference between the two groups was noted in terms of surgery, intrahospital mortality rates, ED revisit rates, and the volume of ICH. Conclusions: Patients with mild head trauma on DOAC therapy had a similar prevalence of ICH to that of the control group. Meanwhile, patients on VKA therapy had about twice the ICH prevalence than that on the control group or patients on DOAC, which remained after correcting for age. No significant difference in the need for surgery was determined; however, this result must take into account the very small number of patients needing surgery.