Comparative clinical and molecular landscape of primary and secondary myelofibrosis: Superior performance of MIPSS70+ v2.0 over MYSEC-PM.

Comparative clinical characteristics, molecular landscape and prognosis scoring for primary (PMF) and secondary myelofibrosis (SMF).

Distinct clinico-molecular arterial and venous thrombosis scores for myeloproliferative neoplasms risk stratification.

Current recommended risk scores to predict thrombotic events associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) do not discriminate between arterial and venous thrombosis despite their different physiopathology. To define novel stratification systems, we delineated a comprehensive landscape of MPN associated thrombosis across a large long-term follow-up MPN cohort. Prior arterial thrombosis, age >60 years, cardiovascular risk factors and presence of TET2 or DNMT3A mutations were independently associated with arterial thrombosis in multivariable analysis. ARTS, an ARterial Thrombosis Score, based on these four factors, defined low- (0.37% patients-year) and high-risk (1.19% patients-year) patients. ARTS performance was superior to the two-tiered conventional risk stratification in our training cohort, across all MPN subtypes, as well as in two external validation cohorts. Prior venous thrombosis and presence of a JAK2V617F mutation with a variant allelic frequency ≥50% were independently associated with venous thrombosis. The discrimination potential of VETS, a VEnous Thrombosis Score based on these two factors, was poor, similar to the two-tiered conventional risk stratification. Our study pinpoints arterial and venous thrombosis clinico-molecular differences and proposes an arterial risk score for more accurate patients' stratification. Further improvement of venous risk scores, accounting for additional factors and considering venous thrombosis as a heterogeneous entity is warranted.

Prognostic of Core Binding Factor (CBF) Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Complex Karyotype.

BACKGROUND: Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF AML) with recurrent genetic abnormalities inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/ CBFB-MYH11 are usually prognostically favorable but heterogeneous group and additional abnormalities change their prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate the impact of a complex karyotype on CBF AML prognosis, we included 24 patients with a median age of 56.4 years (23.2-83.3) and a median number of abnormalities of 5 (4-13). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 110.4 months. Among patients with a primary clone, complete remission (CR) was reached in 66.7% of patients. 31.3% of patients experienced AML relapse with a median of 8.5 months. Median OS for transplanted patients was 80.7 versus 40.5 months for non-transplanted patients, excluding the 4 patients with early death. Among patients harboring AML with clonal evolution, CR was reached in 62.5% of patients. 50% of patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In these, median RFS was 19.3 versus 0 months in non-transplanted patients. Median OS seemed also longer in transplanted patients with 23.5 versus 2.95 months in non-transplanted. CONCLUSION: Use of new treatment and tailored strategy based on measurable residual disease monitoring may now improve these results. However, these data allow us to reconsider the good prognosis historically associated with CBF patients despite of karyotype and the place of ASCT in the strategy.

Alternative Effective and Safe Induction Regimens for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Patients With Cardiac Contraindication to Anthracyclines.

INTRODUCTION: The standard first-line treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a combination of cytarabine and anthracyclines. To date, there is no commonly agreed-on regimen for patients who are ineligible for this therapy because of cardiac comorbidities or prior exposure to anthracyclines. We compared 3 anthracycline-free regimens currently used in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory AML were treated intensively in 3 French centers. All patients had at least one contraindication to the receipt of anthracyclines. Three regimen types were used: fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (FLAG); clofarabine and cytarabine (CLARA); and topotecan plus cytarabine (TA). RESULTS: Thirty patients (58%) had de novo AML. The European LeukemiaNet 2013 risk categories were favorable, intermediate, and adverse in 4 (8%), 27 (52%), and 20 (39%) patients, respectively. Twenty-four patients received TA and 28 FLAG/CLARA regimens. Fifty percent of patients had cardiac dysfunction, and 50% had prior anthracycline exposure above the maximum tolerated dose. The rate of cardiac events was similar after TA (17%) and FLAG/CLARA (25%) (P = .78). The 5-year nonrelapse mortality was 17.9% and 12.5% in the TA and FLAG/CLARA groups, respectively (P = .59). In patients with previously untreated AML, complete response occurred in 18 (72%) of 25, but median overall survival was only 9.7 months. CONCLUSION: TA, FLAG, and CLARA regimens are efficient and are associated with acceptable toxicity in AML patients ineligible for the 3 + 7 regimen as a result of cardiac comorbidities. However, long-term outcome remains disappointing, thereby highlighting the need for the development of less toxic regimens.