Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 38
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 62(6): e0014424, 2024 Jun 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775470

The 4th Clinical Microbiology Open (CMO) took place in Carlsbad, California, on 10 and 11 February 2023. This event facilitated discussion between clinical and public health laboratory directors, government agencies, and industry representatives from the companies that make up ASM's Corporate Council. While many topics were discussed, much of the discussion focused on pandemic preparedness. There were four major questions addressed: (i) When is the perfect the enemy of good in pandemic testing? (ii) What other types of pathogens might cause another pandemic and how would this affect laboratory response? (iii) What research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of the pandemic response? (iv) What have we learned about the utility of self and at-home testing in future pandemics? This review serves as a summary of these discussions.


Pandemics , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemic Preparedness
5.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 12: 894613, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35619652

Background: Genomic surveillance efforts for SARS-CoV-2 are needed to understand the epidemiology of the COVID-19 pandemic. Viral variants may impact routine diagnostic testing, increase viral transmissibility, cause differences in disease severity, have decreased susceptibility to therapeutics, and/or confer the ability to evade host immunity. While viral whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has played a leading role in surveillance programs, many laboratories lack the expertise and resources for performing WGS. This study describes the performance of multiplexed real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays for identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 specimens were tested for spike-gene variants using a combination of allele-specific primer and allele-specific detection technology (PlexPrime® and PlexZyme®). Targeted detection of spike gene mutations by RT-PCR was compared to variant detection in positive specimens by WGS, including the recently emerged SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Results: A total of 398 SAR-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive and 39 negative specimens previously tested by WGS were re-tested by RT-PCR genotyping. PCR detection of spike gene mutations N501Y, E484K, and S982A correlated 100% with WGS for the 29 lineages represented, including Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), and Gamma (P.1). Incorporating the P681R spike gene mutation also allowed screening for the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant (B.1.617.2 and AY sublineages). Further sampling of 664 specimens that were screened by WGS between June and August 2021 and then re-tested by RT-PCR showed strong agreement for Delta variant positivity: 34.5% for WGS vs 32.9% for RT-PCR in June; 100% vs 97.8% in August. In a blinded panel of 16 Omicron and 16 Delta specimens, results of RT-PCR were 100% concordant with WGS results. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that multiplexed real-time RT-PCR genotyping has strong agreement with WGS and may provide additional SARS-CoV-2 variant screening capabilities when WGS is unavailable or cost-prohibitive. RT-PCR genotyping assays may also supplement existing sequencing efforts while providing rapid results at or near the time of diagnosis to help guide patient management.


COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Pandemics , RNA, Viral/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Sex Transm Dis ; 49(8): 588-593, 2022 08 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35608091

ABSTRACT: The American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association has, for several years, been conducting a cross-sector workshop to bring together a variety of stakeholders to develop ideas for collaboratively improving the sexually transmitted infection control efforts in the United States. In this summary, we share the content of discussions and ideas of the fourth annual workshop for future research and potential changes to practice with a focus on diagnostic capacity.


Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Humans , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology
7.
Sex Transm Dis ; 49(5): 353-359, 2022 05 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35067597

BACKGROUND: Our laboratory system tests sera for herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) IgG using the DiaSorin Liaison chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA), with the option to confirm positive samples by a laboratory-developed HerpeSelect inhibition assay. As part of the confirmation process, the HerpeSelect HSV-2 IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is performed. This study investigated the relationship between DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG CIA-positive indices and HerpeSelect HSV-2 IgG EIA results. METHODS: HerpeSelect HSV-2 IgG EIA results were compiled for a cohort of consecutive DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG CIA-positive (index ≥1.10) samples. To further characterize DiaSorin CIA-positive samples that were positive (concordant) or negative (discordant) by the HerpeSelect EIA, a separate composite reference study panel was constructed and also tested using the Biokit HSV-2 IgG assay and an HSV-2 IgG inhibition assay developed for the DiaSorin instrument. Samples were classified as DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG true positive or false positive based on a composite reference using HerpeSelect EIA, Biokit, and DiaSorin inhibition results. RESULTS: Of 2305 consecutive DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG CIA-positive samples, 411 (17.8%) were HerpeSelect HSV-2 IgG EIA negative; 343 of 411 (83%) had DiaSorin indices of 1.10 to 3.00. For the composite reference study panel (N = 120), 59 of 60 discordant samples were classified as DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG false positive based on the composite reference, whereas 58 of 60 concordant samples were classified as true positive. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all DiaSorin HSV-2 IgG CIA-positive but HerpeSelect HSV-2 IgG EIA-negative sera are falsely positive in the DiaSorin CIA. Furthermore, most DiaSorin false-positive samples exhibit low-positive indices, suggesting that guidelines for confirmatory testing should include low-positive samples by CIA and EIA.


Herpes Genitalis , Herpes Simplex , Antibodies, Viral , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Female , Herpes Genitalis/diagnosis , Herpes Simplex/diagnosis , Herpesvirus 2, Human , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity
8.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 102(4): 115630, 2022 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35074622

Some sera tested for 1-3-beta-D-glucan to identify invasive fungal infections exhibit interference. To assess interference transience, we evaluated results for 426 patients with an interference sample followed by a later sample. Interference was transient for 73% of patients (later sample negative or positive); median time between samples was 8 days.


Invasive Fungal Infections , beta-Glucans , Glucans , Humans , Immunoassay , Proteoglycans
9.
J Clin Microbiol ; 59(10): e0026421, 2021 09 20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34319805

Trichomonas vaginalis is a prevalent sexually transmitted infection (STI). Diagnosis has historically relied on either microscopic analysis or culture, the latter being the previous gold standard. However, these tests are not readily available for male diagnosis, generally only perform well for symptomatic women, and are not as sensitive as nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Men are largely asymptomatic but carry the organism and transmit to their sexual partners. This multicenter, prospective study evaluated the performance of the cobas T. vaginalis/Mycoplasma genitalium (TV/MG) assay for detection of T. vaginalis DNA compared with patient infection status (PIS) defined by a combination of commercially available NAATs and culture using urogenital specimens. A total of 2,064 subjects (984 men and 1,080 women, 940 [45.5%] symptomatic, 1,124 [54.5%] asymptomatic) were evaluable. In women, sensitivity ranged from 99.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96.8 to 99.9%) using vaginal samples to 94.7% (95% CI 90.2 to 97.2%) in PreservCyt samples. Specificity ranged from 98.9 to 96.8% (95% CI 95.4 to 97.8%). In men, the cobas TV/MG assay was 100% sensitive for the detection of T. vaginalis in both male urine samples and meatal swabs, with specificity of 98.4% in urine samples and 92.5% in meatal swabs. The cobas TV/MG is a suitable diagnostic test for the detection of T. vaginalis, which could support public health efforts toward infection control and complement existing STI programs.


Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Trichomonas Vaginitis , Trichomonas vaginalis , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Trichomonas Vaginitis/diagnosis , Trichomonas vaginalis/genetics , Vagina
10.
Am J Prev Med ; 61(3): 386-393, 2021 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34020848

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on testing for common sexually transmitted infections. Specifically, changes are measured in chlamydia and gonorrhea testing and case detection among patients aged 14-49 years during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: U.S. chlamydia and gonorrhea testing and positivity were analyzed on the basis of >18.6 million tests (13.6 million tests for female patients and 4.7 million tests for male patients) performed by a national reference clinical laboratory from January 2019 through June 2020. RESULTS: Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing reached a nadir in early April 2020, with decreases (relative to the baseline level) of 59% for female patients and 63% for male patients. Declines in testing were strongly associated with increases in weekly positivity rates for chlamydia (R2=0.96) and gonorrhea (R2=0.85). From March 2020 through June 2020, an expected 27,659 (26.4%) chlamydia and 5,577 (16.5%) gonorrhea cases were potentially missed. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted routine sexually transmitted infection services, suggesting an increase in syndromic sexually transmitted infection testing and missed asymptomatic cases. Follow-up analyses will be needed to assess the long-term implications of missed screening opportunities. These findings should serve as a warning for the potential sexual and reproductive health implications that can be expected from the overall decline in testing and potential missed cases.


COVID-19 , Chlamydia Infections , Chlamydia , Gonorrhea , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Female , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology
11.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(4): ofab039, 2021 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33954224

BACKGROUND: The use of a remote specimen collection strategy employing a kit designed for unobserved self-collection for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) can decrease the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and exposure risk. To assess the impact of unobserved specimen self-collection on test performance, we examined results from a SARS-CoV-2 qualitative RT-PCR test for self-collected specimens from participants in a return-to-work screening program and assessed the impact of a pooled testing strategy in this cohort. METHODS: Self-collected anterior nasal swabs from employee return-to-work programs were tested using the Quest Diagnostics Emergency Use Authorization SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. The cycle threshold (Ct) values for the N1 and N3 N-gene targets and a human RNase P (RP) gene control target were tabulated. For comparison, we utilized Ct values from a cohort of health care provider-collected specimens from patients with and without coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms. RESULTS: Among 47 923 participants, 1.8% were positive. RP failed to amplify for 13/115 435 (0.011%) specimens. The median (interquartile range) Cts were 32.7 (25.0-35.7) for N1 and 31.3 (23.8-34.2) for N3. Median Ct values in the self-collected cohort were significantly higher than those of symptomatic but not asymptomatic patients. Based on Ct values, pooled testing with 4 specimens would have yielded inconclusive results in 67/1268 (5.2%) specimens but only a single false-negative result. CONCLUSIONS: Unobserved self-collection of nasal swabs provides adequate sampling for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing. These findings alleviate concerns of increased false negatives in this context. Specimen pooling could be used for this population, as the likelihood of false-negative results is very low when using a sensitive, dual-target methodology.

12.
Popul Health Manag ; 24(S1): S26-S34, 2021 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33544647

Laboratory testing is an important component in the diagnosis of respiratory tract infections such as with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, specimen collection not only risks exposure of health care workers and other patients to infection, but also necessitates use of personal protective equipment that may be in short supply during periods of heightened disease activity. Self-collection of nasal or oropharyngeal swabs offers an alternative to address these drawbacks. Although studies in the past decade have demonstrated the utility of this approach for respiratory infections, it has not been widely adopted in routine clinical practice. The rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, has focused attention on the need for safe, convenient, timely, and scalable methods for collecting upper respiratory specimens for testing. The goals of this article are to highlight the literature regarding self-collected nasal or oropharyngeal specimens for respiratory pathogen testing; discuss the role of self-collection in helping prevent the spread of the COVID-19 disease from infected patients and facilitating a shift toward "virtual" medicine or telemedicine; and describe the current and future state of self-collection for infectious agents, and the impacts these approaches can have on population health management and disease diagnosis and prevention.


COVID-19 , Population Health Management , Specimen Handling/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Middle Aged , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Self Care , Telemedicine , Young Adult
13.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 100(1): 115311, 2021 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524728

Centers for Disease Control guidelines recommend hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA testing of all HCV IgG-reactive samples, although earlier studies found that IgG-reactive samples with low indices were negative in qualitative RNA assays. To determine if previous study results could be confirmed using current real-time RT-PCR technology, we investigated the relationship between HCV IgG index (Ortho VITROS) and quantitative HCV RNA results (cobas HCV) for 2368 consecutive IgG-reactive sera. Results were segregated into Low (1.00-16.0), Medium (16.1-30.0), and High (>30.0) IgG index groups. Although median viral load (VL) of RNA-positive samples was similar in all 3 groups, the percentage with low VL (1.18-4.16 log IU/mL) was increased for the Low group. Further analysis of the Low group revealed that 23 of 370 (6%) samples with IgG indices ≤8.00 were RNA-positive, and 13/23 (57%) had low VL. Our analysis supports the Centers for Disease Control recommendation to test all HCV IgG-reactive sera for HCV RNA.


Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C , RNA, Viral , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Viral Load/methods , Female , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepacivirus/immunology , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/immunology , Hepatitis C/virology , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral/blood , RNA, Viral/genetics
14.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 100(1): 115303, 2021 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33503569

Published studies show that >99% of sera reactive in the reverse syphilis testing algorithm (RSTA) screening assay with an index above an assay-specific threshold confirm as reactive, with either a rapid plasma reagin-reactive (RPRR) or RPR-nonreactive/Treponema pallidum particle agglutination-reactive (TPPAR) result. However, the relationship between screen indices and confirmatory patterns has not been characterized. We thus assessed confirmatory testing results for 577 sera submitted for RSTA testing and a screen-reactive result in the DiaSorin Liaison assay. The median screen index was significantly higher for RPRR samples than TPPAR samples (55.6 versus 10.4), and the proportion with indices >28.3 (median for all 577 samples) was significantly higher for RPRR versus TPPAR samples (82% versus 26%). However, RPRR titers did not significantly correlate with screen indices (R2 = 0.02). These findings demonstrate a significant relationship between RSTA screen indices and confirmatory assay results. The clinical utility of this relationship requires further study.


Algorithms , Syphilis Serodiagnosis , Syphilis/diagnosis , Treponema pallidum/immunology , Adult , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Female , Humans , Immunoassay , Linear Models , Male , Syphilis/immunology , Syphilis/microbiology , Syphilis Serodiagnosis/methods , Syphilis Serodiagnosis/standards
15.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(11): ofaa466, 2020 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33204756

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification testing is a critical tool for addressing the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Specimen pooling can increase throughput and conserve testing resources but requires validation to ensure that reduced sensitivity does not increase the false-negative rate. We evaluated the performance of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for emergency use for pooled testing of upper respiratory specimens. METHODS: Positive specimens were selected from 3 prevalence groups, 1%-3%, >3%-6%, and >6%-10%. Positive percent agreement (PPA) was assessed by pooling single-positive specimens with 3 negative specimens; performance was assessed using Passing-Bablok regression. Additionally, we assessed the distributions of RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values for 3091 positive specimens. RESULTS: PPA was 100% for the 101 pooled specimens. There was a linear relationship between Ct values for pooled and single-tested specimens (r = 0.96-0.99; slope ≈ 1). The mean pooled Ct shifts at 40 cycles were 2.38 and 1.90, respectively, for the N1 and N3 targets. The median Cts for 3091 positive specimens were 25.9 (N1) and 24.7 (N3). The percentage of positive specimens with Cts between 40 and the shifted Ct was 1.42% (N1) and 0.0% (N3). CONCLUSIONS: Pooled and individual testing of specimens positive for SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated 100% agreement, which demonstrates the viability of pooled specimens for SARS-COV-2 testing using a dual-target RT-PCR system. Pooled specimen testing can help increase testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2 with a low risk of false-negative results.

16.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(11)2020 10 21.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32817144

A total of 1,200 serum samples that were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody using the Abbott Architect immunoassay targeting the nucleocapsid protein were run in 3 SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays targeting spike proteins (DiaSorin Liaison, Ortho Vitros, and Euroimmun). Consensus-positive and consensus-negative interpretations were defined as qualitative agreement in at least 3 of the 4 assays. Agreement of the 4 individual assays with a consensus-negative interpretation (n = 610) ranged from 96.7% to 100%, and agreement with a consensus-positive interpretation (n = 584) ranged from 94.3% to 100%. Laboratory-developed inhibition assays were utilized to evaluate 49 consensus-negative samples that were positive in only one assay; true-positive reactivity was confirmed in only 2 of these 49 (4%) samples. These findings demonstrate very high levels of agreement among 4 SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays authorized for emergency use, regardless of antigen target or assay format. Although false-positive reactivity was identified, its occurrence was rare (no more than 1.7% of samples for a given assay).


Coronavirus Infections , Nucleocapsid , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , Antibodies, Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Immunoassay , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
17.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(8)2020 Jul 23.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32341141

The global coronavirus (CoV) disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in a worldwide shortage of viral transport media and raised questions about specimen stability. The objective of this study was to determine the stability of severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in specimen transport media under various storage conditions. Transport media tested included UTM, UTM-RT, ESwab, M4, and saline (0.9% NaCl). Specimen types tested included nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs in the above-named transport media, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, and sputum. A high-titer SARS-CoV-2 remnant patient specimen was spiked into pooled SARS-CoV-2 RNA-negative specimen remnants for the various medium types. Aliquots of samples were stored at 18°C to 26°C, 2°C to 8°C, and -10°C to -30°C and then tested at time points up to 14 days. Specimens consistently yielded amplifiable RNA with mean cycle threshold differences of <3 over the various conditions assayed, thus supporting the use and transport of alternative collection media and specimen types under a variety of temperature storage conditions.


Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Laboratory Chemicals/chemistry , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Specimen Handling/methods , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Pandemics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Temperature
18.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(6)2020 05 26.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32213558

Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infections are a growing concern within the field of sexually transmitted infections. However, diagnostic assays for M. genitalium have been limited in the United States. As most infections are asymptomatic, individuals can unknowingly pass the infection on, and the prevalence is likely to be underestimated. Diagnosis of M. genitalium infection is recommended using a nucleic acid test. This multicenter study assessed the performance of the cobas Trichomonas vaginalis (TV)/MG assay (cobas) for the detection of M. genitalium, using 22,150 urogenital specimens from both symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women collected at geographically diverse sites across the United States. The performance was compared to a reference standard of three laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). The specificity of the cobas assay for M. genitalium ranged from 96.0% to 99.8% across symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women. The sensitivities in female vaginal swabs and urine samples were 96.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.5 to 99.1%) and 86.4% (95% CI, 75.5 to 93.0%), respectively. The sensitivities in male urine and meatal swab samples were 100% (95% CI, 94.0 to 100%) and 85.0% (95% CI, 73.9 to 91.9%), respectively. This study demonstrated that the cobas assay was highly sensitive and specific in all relevant clinical samples for the detection of M. genitalium.


Mycoplasma Infections , Mycoplasma genitalium , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Female , Humans , Male , Mycoplasma Infections/diagnosis , Mycoplasma Infections/epidemiology , Mycoplasma genitalium/genetics , Prevalence , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Specimen Handling , Urogenital System
19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 797, 2019 Sep 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31510949

BACKGROUND: The global burden of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is high and there have been reports of increasing chlamydial and gonorrheal infections. High-volume screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are an important component of STI control. This study evaluated the high-volume workflow and performance of the cobas® CT/NG assay for use on the automated Roche cobas® 6800 system, with the cobas p 480 instrument for pre-analytics, compared with the Aptima Combo 2 assay on the Hologic Panther system. METHODS: High-volume workflow and performance were evaluated using paired female urine specimens. Workflow analysis (n = 376) included hands-on time (HoT), number of manual interventions, and time to first and last results. For performance assessment, paired results from the cobas CT/NG and Aptima Combo 2 assays, for both CT and NG, were compared and two-sided 95% confidence intervals calculated to provide estimates of positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and overall percent agreement (OPA) between the tests. McNemar's test was used for significance testing. RESULTS: Pre-analytical preparations and system start-up on the cobas 6800 system required 00:27:38 (hr:min:sec) HoT whilst the Panther system required 00:30:43. The cobas 6800 system required eight interactions and 00:43:59 HoT to process 376 samples. The Panther system required six interactions and 00:39:10 HoT. Time to first results was 02:53:00 on the cobas c6800 system for 96 samples and 03:28:29 on the Panther system for five samples. The cobas 6800 system delivered all 376 results 3 h faster than the Panther system (07:45:26 and 10:47:30, respectively). The performance correlation between both assays was high (PPA, NPA and OPA > 99% for both CT and NG). McNemar's test revealed no statistically significant difference between the assays. CONCLUSION: For high-volume automated CT/NG testing, both the cobas 6800 system and Panther system provided accurate results. Although less manual intervention steps were needed for the Panther system, improved turnaround time was obtained with the cobas 6800 system with less risk for contamination. The additional testing capacity on the cobas 6800 system would allow a growing service to deliver more results in a single shift.


Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis/genetics , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genetics , Automation , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , DNA, Bacterial/metabolism , Female , Humans , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolation & purification , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sensitivity and Specificity , Workflow
...