Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 30(6): 195-201, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29543185

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The contemporary use and outcomes of excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well described. METHODS: We examined the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of 130 target lesions in 121 consecutive PCIs (n = 116 patients) in which ELCA was performed at three United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers between 2008 and 2016. RESULTS: Mean age was 68.5 ± 9 years and 97% of the patients were men. Patients had high prevalence of diabetes mellitus (63%), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (41%), and prior myocardial infarction (60%). The most common target vessel was the left anterior descending (32%), followed by the right coronary artery (30%), circumflex artery (20%), and saphenous vein graft (12%). The target lesions were highly complex, with moderate/severe calcification in 62% and in-stent restenosis in 37%. The most common indication for ELCA was balloon-uncrossable lesions (43.8%), followed by balloon-undilatable lesions (40.8%) and thrombotic lesions (12.3%). Use of ELCA was associated with high technical success rate (90.0%) and procedural success rate (88.8%), and low major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate (3.45%). Mean procedure time was 120 min (interquartile range [IQR], 81-191 min), air kerma radiation dose was 2.76 Gy (IQR, 1.32-5.01 Gy), and contrast volume was 273 mL (IQR, 201-362 mL). CONCLUSION: In a contemporary multicenter United States registry, ELCA was commonly used in highly complex lesions and was associated with high technical and procedural success rates and low incidence of MACE.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Láseres de Excímeros/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Femenino , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Láseres de Excímeros/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 91(4): 647-654, 2018 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28707381

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and the prevalence of lens changes in interventional cardiologists (ICs) and catheterization laboratory ("cath-lab") staff. BACKGROUND: Exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with the development of lens opacities. ICs and cath-lab staff can receive high doses of ionizing radiation without protection, and may thus be at risk for lens opacity formation. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study at an interventional cardiology conference. Study participants completed a questionnaire pertaining to occupational exposure to radiation and potential confounders for the development of cataracts, followed by slit-lamp examination and grading of lens findings. RESULTS: A total of 117 attendees participated in the study, including 99 (85%; 49 ± 11 years-old; 82% male) with occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and 18 (15%; 39 ± 12 years-old; 61% male) unexposed controls. The prevalence of overall cortical and posterior subcapsular lens changes (including subclinical findings) was higher in exposed participants compared with controls (47 vs. 17%, P = 0.015). Occupational exposure and age over 60 were independent predictors of lens changes (odds ratio [95% CI]: 6.07 [1.38-43.45] and 7.72 [1.60-43.34], respectively). The prevalence of frank opacities was low and similar between the two groups (14 vs. 6%, P = 0.461). Most lens findings consisted of subclinical changes in the periphery of the lens without impact on visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with unexposed controls, ICs and cath-lab staff had a higher prevalence of lens changes that may be attributable to ionizing radiation exposure. While most of these changes were subclinical, they are important due to the potential to progress to clinical symptoms, highlighting the importance of minimizing staff radiation exposure.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cardiólogos , Catarata/epidemiología , Cristalino/efectos de la radiación , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiólogos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Catarata/diagnóstico , Catarata/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Cristalino/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral , Quirófanos , Prevalencia , Dosis de Radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/fisiopatología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Microscopía con Lámpara de Hendidura , Factores de Tiempo , Agudeza Visual/efectos de la radiación
3.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 29(9): 320-326, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420803

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have developed guidelines to assist clinicians in making evidence-based decisions. This study compares the ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease (VHD). METHODS: The current ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines for VHD, last updated in 2014 and 2012, respectively, were compared by class of recommendation (COR), level of evidence (LOE), and content. RESULTS: The ACC/AHA and ESC VHD guidelines contain 229 and 85 recommendations, respectively. The COR distributions of the ACC/AHA and ESC VHD guidelines were 47.6% vs 44.7% class I [P=.65]; 46.3% vs 55.3% class II [P=.16]; and 6.1% vs 0.0% class III [P=.01], respectively. The LOE distributions were 3.1% vs 0.0% LOE A [P=.20]; 47.2% vs 10.6% LOE B [P<.001]; and 49.8% vs 89.4% LOE C [P<.001], respectively. The recommendation type distributions were 31.0% vs 2.4% diagnostic [P<.001]; 23.1% vs 16.5% medical therapy [P=.20]; and 45.9% vs 81.2% interventional/surgical recommendations [P<.001], respectively. The content of the guidelines was similar, with only minor differences in a few recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The ACC/AHA VHD guidelines contain significantly more recommendations. The distribution of COR was similar, but the ACC/AHA guidelines included more LOE B recommendations and fewer LOE C recommendations, suggesting that the ACC/AHA guidelines place greater emphasis on published data than expert opinion. Overall, the ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines provide similar recommendations, suggesting consistency in practice; however, the relative paucity of LOE A recommendations highlights the need for additional research.


Asunto(s)
American Heart Association , Cardiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
4.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 89(6): E172-E180, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27535486

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) imaging findings of aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). BACKGROUND: SVGs are prone to develop atherosclerosis similar to native coronary arteries. They have received little study using NIRS. METHODS: We examined the clinical characteristics and imaging findings from 43 patients who underwent NIRS imaging of 45 SVGs at our institution between 2009 and 2016. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 67 ± 7 years and 98% were men, with high prevalence of diabetes mellitus (56%), hypertension (95%), and dyslipidemia (95%). Mean SVG age was 7 ± 7 years, mean SVG lipid core burden index (LCBI) was 53 ± 60 and mean maxLCBI4 mm was 194 ± 234. Twelve SVGs (27%) had lipid core plaques (2 yellow blocks on the block chemogram), with a higher prevalence in SVGs older than 5 years (46% vs. 5%, P = 0.002). Older SVG age was associated with higher LCBI (r = 0.480, P < 0.001) and higher maxLCBI4 mm (r = 0.567, P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, greater annual total cholesterol exposure was associated with higher SVG LCBI (r = 0.30, P = 0.042) and annual LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride exposure were associated with higher SVG maxLCBI4 mm (LDL-C: r = 0.41, P = 0.020; triglycerides: r = 0.36, P = 0.043). On multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of SVG LCBI and maxLCBI4mm was SVG age. SVG percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 63% of the patients. An embolic protection device was used in 96% of SVG PCIs. Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Older SVG age and greater lipid exposure are associated with higher SVG lipid burden. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lípidos/análisis , Placa Aterosclerótica , Vena Safena/cirugía , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/patología , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/patología , Femenino , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Vena Safena/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Safena/patología , Texas , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 88(7): 1067-1074, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27259089

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Flash Ostial system (Ostial Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA) was designed to optimize implantation of aorto-ostial coronary stents by flaring the proximal stent struts against the aortic wall. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical record, angiograms, and intravascular ultrasound images of 22 aorto-ostial percutaneous coronary interventions performed at our institution between March and September 2015. The Flash Ostial system was used in 13 cases (59%). RESULTS: Mean age was 67 ± 8 years and all patients were men. The target vessel was the right coronary artery (59%), left main (27%), or a saphenous vein graft (14%); 59% of the lesions had moderate/severe calcification. The mean number of predilation balloons was 1.8 ± 1.6, mean Flash ostial balloon diameter was 3.3 ± 0.5 mm and mean inflation pressure was 13.1 ± 4.0 atmospheres. Intravascular ultrasonography (available for 19 patients) revealed mean ostial minimum lumen cross-sectional area (MLA) of 9.2 ± 3.0 mm2 and reference MLA of 8.5 ± 2.7 mm2 . The percent difference between ostial and reference MLA was higher in cases in which the Flash Ostial system was used versus those where it was not (9.6 ± 5.5% vs. 4.0 ± 2.8%, P = 0.03). All stent struts were well apposed. Technical success was 100%. One patient developed a left groin pseudoaneurysm treated with thrombin injection and one patient had a periprocedural myocardial infarction. Median contrast, fluoroscopy time, and procedure time were 235 mL, 33 min, and 118 min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Flash Ostial system can be successfully used in aorto-ostial stenting, resulting in large ostial vessel MLA. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Catéteres Cardíacos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/terapia , Anciano , Aneurisma Falso/tratamiento farmacológico , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Diseño de Equipo , Fluoroscopía , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vena Safena/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Safena/trasplante , Stents , Texas , Trombina/administración & dosificación , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
7.
Am J Cardiol ; 117(8): 1267-71, 2016 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26899493

RESUMEN

We sought to examine the impact of previous failure on the outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of 1,213 consecutive patients who underwent 1,232 CTO PCIs from 2012 to 2015 at 12 US centers. Mean age was 65 ± 10 years, and 84.8% of patients were men. A previously failed attempt had been performed in 215 patients (17.5%). As compared with patients without previous CTO PCI failure, patients with previous failure had higher Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan CTO score (2.40 ± 1.13 vs 3.28 ± 1.29, p <0.0001) and were more likely to have in-stent restenosis (10.5% vs 28.4%, p <0.0001) and to undergo recanalization attempts using the retrograde approach (41% vs 50%, p = 0.011). Technical (90% vs 88%, p = 0.390) and procedural (89% vs 86%, p = 0.184) success were similar in the 2 study groups; however, median procedure time (125 vs 142 minutes, p = 0.026) and fluoroscopy time (45 vs 55 minutes, p = 0.015) were longer in the previous failure group. In conclusion, a previously failed CTO PCI attempt is associated with higher angiographic complexity, longer procedural duration, and fluoroscopy time, but not with the success and complication rates of subsequent CTO PCI attempts.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión Coronaria/cirugía , Reestenosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Angiografía Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Reestenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 28(4): 168-73, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26773239

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether side-branch loss during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could adversely impact clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND: Side-branch occlusion during PCI has been associated with periprocedural myocardial infarction and higher incidence of major adverse cardiac event (MACE), but has received limited study in CTO-PCI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and coronary angiograms for 109 consecutive CTOPCI cases performed at our institution during 2012 and 2013. Post-PCI patency of ≥1 mm diameter side branches and associated clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Mean age was 65 ± 8 years and 99.1% of the patients were men. The CTO target vessel was the right coronary artery (54%), circumflex (26%), and left anterior descending artery (20%). Side-branch loss occurred in 28 cases (25.7%) due to antegrade dissection/reentry (n = 9), retrograde dissection/reentry (n = 5), stenting over the branch (n = 12), and dissection during antegrade crossing attempts (n = 2). Recanalization of the occluded side branch was pursued in 8 cases (28.6%) and was successful in 4 patients. Patients with side-branch loss had higher post-PCI increase in CK-MB levels (8.4 ng/mL [interquartile range, 2.7-33.5 ng/mL] vs 1.8 ng/mL [interquartile range, 0.025-6.775 ng/mL]; P<.001) and higher 12-month incidence of all-cause death (17.3% vs 2.8%; P=.02) and cardiovascular death (7.4% vs 0.0%; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Side-branch loss occurs in approximately 1 in 4 CTO-PCIs and is associated with higher risk for periprocedural myocardial infarction and higher mortality.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico , Oclusión Coronaria/mortalidad , Oclusión Coronaria/fisiopatología , Oclusión Coronaria/cirugía , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/lesiones , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología
10.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 27(10): 443-6, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26429845

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Google Glass (Google, Inc) is a voice-activated, hands-free, optical head-mounted display device capable of taking pictures, recording videos, and transmitting data via wi-fi. In the present study, we examined the accuracy of coronary angiogram interpretation, recorded using Google Glass. METHODS: Google Glass was used to record 15 angiograms with 17 major findings and the participants were asked to interpret those recordings on: (1) an iPad (Apple, Inc); or (2) a desktop computer. Interpretation was compared with the original angiograms viewed on a desktop. Ten physicians (2 interventional cardiologists and 8 cardiology fellows) participated. One point was assigned for each correct finding, for a maximum of 17 points. RESULTS: The mean angiogram interpretation score for Google Glass angiogram recordings viewed on an iPad or a desktop vs the original angiograms viewed on a desktop was 14.9 ± 1.1, 15.2 ± 1.8, and 15.9 ± 1.1, respectively (P=.06 between the iPad and the original angiograms, P=.51 between the iPad and recordings viewed on a desktop, and P=.43 between the recordings viewed on a desktop and the original angiograms). In a post-study survey, one of the 10 physicians (10%) was "neutral" with the quality of the recordings using Google Glass, 6 physicians (60%) were "somewhat satisfied," and 3 physicians (30%) were "very satisfied." CONCLUSION: This small pilot study suggests that the quality of coronary angiogram video recordings obtained using Google Glass may be adequate for recognition of major findings, supporting its expanding use in telemedicine.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología/métodos , Computadoras de Mano , Angiografía Coronaria , Consulta Remota/instrumentación , Motor de Búsqueda/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA