Psychosocial experiences of involuntary definitive childless women: a comparative study based on reproductive status.

STUDY QUESTION: Do involuntary definitive childless women have lower psychosocial adjustment levels than women with infertility diagnoses actively trying to conceive and presumably fertile women? SUMMARY ANSWER: Involuntary definitive childless women have lower levels of sexual functioning than infertile women actively trying to conceive and presumably fertile women, and higher levels of depression than presumably fertile women. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Involuntary definitive childless defines those who wanted to become parents but were unable to do so. Studies have provided evidence about infertility and its psychosocial consequences, but there is a lack of knowledge about the impact of involuntary definitive childlessness, namely on sexual function, social support, marital satisfaction, and psychological adjustment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This associative study was conducted between July 2021 and January 2022 for involuntary definitive childless women and between July 2016 and February 2018 for women with an infertility diagnosis actively trying to conceive as well as presumably fertile women. An online questionnaire announced in social media and gynaecology and fertility clinics was used. The inclusion criteria for all participants were being childless, in a heterosexual relationship and cohabiting for at least 2 years. Specific inclusion criteria for involuntary definitive childless women were: trying to conceive for at least 2 years; not achieving pregnancy because of biological and medical constraints; and not undergoing fertility treatment or being a candidate for adopting a child at time of the study. For women with an infertility diagnosis the inclusion criteria were: actively trying to conceive (naturally or through fertility treatments); having a primary fertility diagnosis; and aged between 22 and 42 years old. For presumably fertile women, the inclusion criteria were: having a parenthood wish in the future; and not knowing of any condition that could prevent them from conceiving. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Out of 360 women completing the survey, only 203 were eligible for this study (60 involuntary definitive childless women, 78 women with an infertility diagnosis actively trying to conceive, and 65 presumably fertile women). All participants completed a questionnaire including sociodemographic and clinical data, the Female Sexual Function Index, the 2-Way Social Support Scale, the Relationship Assessment Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Binary logistic regression was performed to assess the relation between sexual function, social support, marital satisfaction, anxiety, depression, and reproductive status, adjusting for age, and cohabitation length. Presumably fertile women were used as a reference group. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Women were 34.31 years old (SD = 5.89) and cohabited with their partners for 6.55 years (SD = 4.57). The odds ratio (OR) showed that involuntary definitive childless women had significantly lower sexual function than infertile women actively trying to conceive (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.99) and presumably fertile women (OR = 34.89, 95% CI = 1.98-614.03), and higher depression levels than presumably fertile women (OR = 99.89, 95% CI = 3.29-3037.87). Women with an infertility diagnosis actively trying to conceive did not differ from presumably fertile women in sexual function, social support, marital satisfaction, anxiety, and depression. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The majority of childless women underwent fertility treatments, and childlessness for circumstantial reasons owing to lack of a partner was not included, therefore these results may not reflect the experiences of all women with an involuntary childless lifestyle. There was a time gap in the recruitment process, and only the definitive childlessness group filled out the questionnaire after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We did not ask participants if they self-identified themselves with the groups' terminology they were assigned to. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results emphasize the importance of future research to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the adjustment experiences of childless women and an awareness of the poor adjustment they might experience, highlighting the need to keep following women after unsuccessful treatments. Clinical practitioners must attend to these dimensions when consulting involuntary definitive childless women who might not have gone through treatments but also experience these adverse outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Effect of depression and anxiety on sexual functioning in couples trying to conceive with and without an infertility diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of anxiety and depression on sexual functioning in couples trying to conceive, and tested the moderating role of infertility diagnosis on this association. DESIGN: An online questionnaire was completed by 1453 individuals in a heterosexual relationship for more than one year. The final sample had 107 couples who were actively attempting a pregnancy (63 had an infertility diagnosis; 44 were presumably fertile). Data was analyzed with the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and male and female sexual functioning were assessed through the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), respectively. RESULTS: Actor effects were found between depression and sexual functioning in both men (ß= -.28, p= .003) and women (ß= -.43, p < .001), with no significant partner effects. The moderation analysis showed that the relationship between depression and sexual functioning is stronger in infertile men than in presumably fertile men (ß= -.29; p= .002). CONCLUSION: Psychological interventions with couples trying to conceive should address the role of depression in sexual functioning, particularly in infertile men.

A web-based psychoeducational simulation game for adults in stepfamilies (GSteps)-study protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility trial.

Background: Stepfamilies are a prevalent family form. However, less stable than nuclear, first marriage families due to the presence of risk factors such as the absence of social norms and the presence of stepchildren. Stepfamilies have unique educational needs regarding stepparenting and co-parenting issues. The development and documentation of psychoeducational intervention strategies can facilitate dissemination of ongoing studies and promote transparency. This article describes the background, design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the eficacy and feasibility of a web-based Psychoeducational Simulation Game (GSteps). Behavior-modeling video training (BMT) is used to demonstrate and promote relational skills, stepparenting and co-parenting effective strategies for adults in stepfamilies. A mental health professional will be available within the GSteps platform for clarification or emotional support. Methods/design: A RCT design is presented to evaluate the outcomes of a self-administered, interactive and web-based psychoeducational Game targeting dyadic marital adjustment and interpersonal skills as the primary outcomes and remarriage beliefs, family function and stepparenting and co-parenting attitudes as the secondary outcomes. Other outcome measures include satisfaction with GSteps, participants' knowledge learned after the intervention and a purposive sampling method will be used to access feasibility. The minimum required sample size is 112 participants (56 per condition) randomly allocated either to an experimental group (EG), receiving GSteps intervention, or to a wait-list control group (CG). A survey is conducted electronically. Assessments take place at baseline (T0 ), after the intervention (T1 ) and 1-month follow-up (T2 ). Discussion: This protocol presents a RCT aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a web-based psychoeducational intervention (GSteps) designed for improving marital, stepparenting and co-parenting skills in adults who live in stepfamilies. The use of the protocol and results of intervention studies may guide the use and refinement of web-based psychoeducational intervention for stepfamilies. Additionally, GSteps may become a tool for health professionals to enhance stepfamily functioning, stepparenting skills, and marital adjustment of remarried adults.

Efeitos da satisfação conjugal e da utilidade de rituais na vivência do luto no abortamento / Effects of marital satisfaction and ritual utility on bereavement experience in abortion / Efectos de la satisfacción marital y la utilidad ritual en la experiencia de aflicción en el aborto

RESUMO Objetivo: O presente estudo analisou os efeitos da utilização e da percepção de utilidade dos rituais de luto e da satisfação conjugal no luto perinatal. Método: Responderam a um inquérito de autorrelato, 74 mulheres portuguesas que recorreram a um hospital público no Porto - Portugal, após vivenciarem um ou mais abortamentos em 2019. Foram analisados os efeitos da utilidade dos rituais e da satisfação conjugal na vivência do luto, bem como os efeitos de interação. Resultados: Tendo o ajustamento ao luto após a perda gestacional como variável dependente, observou-se um efeito negativo da satisfação conjugal (b=.33) e um efeito positivo da utilidade dos rituais (b =.46). Não foi observado um efeito significativo de moderação. Conclusão: Este estudo vem realçar a importância da abordagem dos rituais de luto e da conjugalidade no apoio emocional à perda, sendo primordial a figura do enfermeiro nos contextos do aborto e da perda neonatal.

ABSTRACT Objective: The present study analyzed the effects of the use and perceived usefulness of bereavement rituals and marital satisfaction on perinatal bereavement. Method: 74 Portuguese women who attended a public hospital in Porto - Portugal, after experiencing one or more abortions in 2019, responded to a self-report survey. The effects of ritual utility and marital satisfaction on bereavement experience, as well as interaction effects, were analyzed. Results: With adjustment to bereavement after pregnancy loss as the dependent variable, a negative effect of marital satisfaction (b=.33) and a positive effect of ritual utility (b =.46) were observed. No significant moderation effect was observed. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of addressing bereavement rituals and conjugality in providing emotional support for the loss, with the figure of the nurse being paramount in the contexts of abortion and neonatal loss.

RESUMEN Objetivo: El presente estudio examinó los efectos del uso y la utilidad percibida de los rituales de duelo y la satisfacción marital en el duelo perinatal. Método: 74 mujeres portuguesas que acudieron a un hospital público en Oporto - Portugal, después de experimentar uno o más abortos en 2019, respondieron a una encuesta de autoinforme. Se analizaron los efectos de la utilidad ritual y la satisfacción marital en la experiencia del duelo, así como los efectos de interacción. Resultados: Con la adaptación al duelo tras la pérdida del embarazo como variable dependiente, se observó un efecto negativo de la satisfacción marital (b=.33) y un efecto positivo de la utilidad ritual (b=.46). No se observó ningún efecto de moderación significativo. Conclusión: Este estudio pone de manifiesto la importancia de abordar los rituales del duelo y la conyugalidad en el apoyo emocional a la pérdida, siendo la figura de la enfermera primordial en los contextos del aborto y la pérdida neonatal.

Infertility-related stress and the risk of antidepressants prescription in women: a 10-year register study.

STUDY QUESTION: Is the first-time redeemed prescription of antidepressants predicted by the level of infertility-related stress in women seeking ART treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER: Infertility-related stress in the personal and marital domains and general physical stress reactions were significant predictors of a first redeemed prescription of antidepressants after ART treatment in this 10-year follow-up cohort study. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The literature has found inconsistent findings regarding the association between infertility-related stress and later psychological adjustment in fertility patients. The association between infertility-related stress and later prescription of antidepressants had never been explored in long-term cohort studies. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: All women (n = 1169) who participated in the Copenhagen Cohort Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) cohort study in the year 2000 (questionnaire data) were linked with the register-based Danish National ART-Couple (DANAC) I cohort, which includes women and their partners having received ART treatment from 1 January 1994 to 30 September 2009. The study population were among other national health and sociodemographic registers further linked with the Danish National Prescription Registry. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women initiating ART treatment were followed until they had redeemed the first prescription of antidepressants or until 31 December 2009. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to test the association between general physical stress reactions and infertility-related stress in the personal, marital and social domains, respectively, and a future redeemed prescription of antidepressants. Age, education level, marital status, number of fertility treatments prior to study inclusion and female infertility diagnosis were included as covariates in the adjusted analyses. Further, the analysis was stratified according to childbirth or no childbirth during follow-up. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The final sample consisted of 1009 women with a mean age of 31.8 years. At study inclusion, women had tried to conceive for an average of 3.45 years. At 10-year follow-up, a total of 13.7% of women had a first redeemed prescription of antidepressant medication. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) showed that high general physical stress predicted the later prescription of antidepressants (adjusted (adj) OR = 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.96-4.16). Regarding infertility-related stress domains, high personal stress (adj OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.46-3.13) and high marital stress (adj OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.64) were significantly associated with the later prescription of antidepressants. Social stress was not significantly associated with the future redeemed prescription of antidepressants (adj OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.76-1.61). Among women not having achieved childbirth during follow-up, the risk of a first-time prescription of antidepressants associated with infertility-specific stress was higher compared to the risk among women having childbirth during follow-up. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study did not account for potential mediating factors, such as negative life events, which could be associated with the prescription of antidepressants. Second, we are not able to know if these women had sought psychological support during follow-up. Additionally, antidepressants might be prescribed for other health conditions than depressive disorders. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results suggest that women presenting high infertility-related stress in the personal and marital domains were at higher risk of redeemed first-time prescription of antidepressants after ART, independently of having delivered a child or not after initiation of ART treatment. Women would benefit from an initial screening specifically for high infertility-related stress. The COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales can be used by clinical staff in order to identify women in need of psychological support before starting ART treatments. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under an individual doctoral grant attributed to the first author (SFRH/BD/103234/2014). The establishment of the DANAC I cohort was funded by Rosa Ebba Hansen's Fund. The COMPI Infertility Cohort project was supported by The Danish Health Insurance Fund (J.nr. 11/097-97), the Else and Mogens Wedell-Wedellsborgs Fund, the manager E. Danielsens and Wife's Fund, the merchant L.F. Foghts Fund, the Jacob Madsen and Wife Olga Madsens Fund. The authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NA.

The impact of ART on union dissolution: a register-based study in Denmark 1994-2010.

STUDY QUESTION: Are couples initiating ART treatment at higher risk for future union dissolution compared to other couples? SUMMARY ANSWER: There is no effect of ART treatments in future marital dissolution over a period of 16 years when adjusting for all confounders. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Findings regarding marital stability and infertility treatments have been sparse and controversial. While there is data showing higher divorce rates among women who go through infertility treatments, there is also some evidence of this experience bringing couples closer by forcing them to communicate more and to deal with the surrounding stigma. Using a population-based study and couple-level data, we investigated the extent to which ART treatment increases the risk for divorce/marital dissolution during up to 16 years of follow-up. STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION: Register-based national cohort study including all women registered with ART treatment in Denmark between 1 January 1994 and 30 September 2009 (n = 42 845). Marital/cohabiting status was confirmed by matching these women to partners who they were married to or shared an address with. To account for having a significant relationship at baseline (2 years), marital/cohabiting status was confirmed by accessing this variable before the establishment of the cohort back to 1 January 1992. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A comparison group from the background population including five controls per case and matched to female age at baseline was prospectively sampled. Participants could change status during follow-up if they entered ART. The final sample had 148 972 couples, followed until marital dissolution, death of self/spouse, migration or until 31 December 2010. We used Cox regression models adjusting for female and male age, education, marriage, common child at baseline and live-born child during follow-up. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: At baseline, the majority of couples were married (69%). More non-ART couples opted for marriage (70% versus 64%; P < 0.0001) and already had common children at study entry (43% versus 9%; P < 0.0001). During the 16 years of follow-up the majority of couples had children with their baseline partners (56% non-ART versus 65% ART), and 22% ended up separated or divorced (20% ART versus 22% non-ART). Findings revealed a lower risk of break-up among ART couples (crude HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.86), even after adjusting for both partners' age, education, partnership status and having a common child at baseline (adj HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.86). However, when subsequent common children (time-dependent) was added to the model, no difference in the risk of dissolution was found (adj HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01). A significant interaction between ART status and common children showed that the risk of break-up was attributed to childlessness regardless of having gone through ART treatment. LIMITATIONS REASON FOR CAUTION: This study did not control for involuntary childlessness, non-ART fertility care (ovulation induction, IUI) and biological parenthood. Additionally, there are important predictors of divorce that were not considered. We were unable to adjust for religion, existence of previous marital relationships, income, employment, health status of parents and child(ren), and quality of relationship. WIDER IMPLICATION OF FINDINGS: The finding that going through ART does not increase the risk of break up per se is reassuring for couples who underwent ART and have children or are contemplating to start ART. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by FCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology), grant ref. SFRH/BPD/85789/2012. The authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Male psychological adaptation to unsuccessful medically assisted reproduction treatments: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Similarly to women, men suffer from engaging in fertility treatments, both physically and psychologically. Although there is a vast body of evidence on the emotional adjustment of women to infertility, there are no systematic reviews focusing on men's psychological adaptation to infertility and related treatments. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The main research questions addressed in this review were 'Does male psychological adaptation to unsuccessful medically assisted reproduction (MAR) treatment vary over time?' and 'Which psychosocial variables act as protective or risk factors for psychological maladaptation?' SEARCH METHODS: A literature search was conducted from inception to September 2015 on five databases using combinations of MeSH terms and keywords. Eligible studies had to present quantitative prospective designs and samples including men who did not achieve pregnancy or parenthood at follow-up. A narrative synthesis approach was used to conduct the review. OUTCOMES: Twelve studies from three continents were eligible from 2534 records identified in the search. The results revealed that psychological symptoms of maladjustment significantly increased in men 1 year after the first fertility evaluation. No significant differences were found two or more years after the initial consultation. Evidence was found for anxiety, depression, active-avoidance coping, catastrophizing, difficulties in partner communication and the use of avoidance or religious coping from the wife as risk factors for psychological maladjustment. Protective factors were related to the use of coping strategies that involve seeking information and attribution of a positive meaning to infertility, having the support of others and of one's spouse, and engaging in open communication about the infertility problem. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Our findings recommend an active involvement of men during the treatment process by health care professionals, and the inclusion of coping skills training and couple communication enhancement interventions in counselling. Further prospective large studies with high-quality design and power are warranted.