Current role of artificial intelligence in head and neck cancer surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Aim: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a new field of science in which computers will provide decisions-supporting tools to help doctors make difficult clinical choices. Recent AI applications in otolaryngology include head and neck oncology, rhinology, neurotology, and laryngology. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the potential uses of AI in head and neck oncology with a special focus on the surgical field. Methods: The authors performed a systematic review, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in the main medical databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, considering all original studies published until February 2023 about the role of AI in head and neck cancer surgery. The search strategy included a combination of the following terms: "artificial intelligence" or "machine learning" and "head and neck cancer". Results: Overall, 303 papers were identified and after duplicate removal (12 papers) and excluding papers not written in English (1 paper) and off-topic (4 papers), papers were assessed for eligibility; finally, only 12 papers were included. Three main fields of clinical interest were identified: the most widely investigated included the role of AI in surgical margins assessment (7 papers); the second most frequently evaluated topic was complications assessment (4 papers); finally, only one paper dealt with the indication of salvage laryngectomy after primary radiotherapy. Conclusions: The authors report the first systematic review in the literature concerning the role of AI in head and neck cancer surgery. An increasing influx of AI applications to clinical problems in otolaryngology is expected, so specialists should be increasingly prepared to manage the constant changes. It will always remain critical for clinicians to use their skills and knowledge to critically evaluate the additional information provided by AI and make the final decisions on each patient.

Treatment of primary epiglottis collapse in OSA in adults with glossoepiglottopexy: a 5-year experience.

Objective: To review our 5-year experience with a modified version of glossoepiglottopexy for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSA) in two hospitals. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out on a cohort of adult patients affected by OSA suffering from primary collapse of the epiglottis who underwent a modified glossoepiglottopexy. All patients underwent drug-induced sleep endoscopy, polysomnographic and swallowing evaluation, and assessment with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Results: Forty-nine patients were retrospectively evaluated. Both the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) (median AHIpost-AHIpre = -22.4 events/h; p < 0.001) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) showed a significant postoperative decrease (median ODIpost-ODIpre = -18 events/h; p < 0.001), as did hypoxaemia index (median T90% post-T90% pre = -5%; p < 0.001). The ESS questionnaire revealed a significant decrease in postoperative scores (median ESSpost-ESSpre =- 9; p < 0.001). None of the patients developed postoperative dysphagia. Conclusions: Our 5-year experience demonstrates that modified glossoepiglottopexy is a safe and reliable surgical technique for treatment of primary epiglottic collapse in OSA patients.

Awake Rhinology Surgery in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Europe.

BACKGROUND: European health-care systems are faced with a backlog of surgical procedures following the suspension of routine surgery during the COVID-19 crisis. Routine rhinology surgery under general anaesthetic (GA) is now faced with significant challenges which include limited theatre capacity, the negative ramifications of surgical prioritization, reduced patient throughput in secondary care, and additional personal protective equipment requirements. Delayed surgery in rhinology, particularly with regards to chronic rhinosinusitis, has previously been shown to have poorer surgical outcomes, a detrimental effect on quality of life and long-term negative health socio-economic effects. Awake rhinology surgery under local anaesthetic (LA) provides an ideal alternative to GA. It provides a means of operating on patients in a setting alternative to currently oversubscribed main theatres, by utilizing satellite facilities, while ensuring identical surgical outcomes for patients who may otherwise have been forced to wait a long time for their procedure. It also confers additional benefits in terms of shorter recovery time and hospital stay for patients. OBJECTIVES: We have developed a set of recommendations that are intended to help support clinicians and managers to better adopt LA rhinology protocols and minimize the risk to the patient and health-care professionals involved. METHODOLOGY: International roundtable forums were conducted and supplemented by individual interviews. The international board consisted of 12 rhinologists experienced in awake rhinology surgery. Feedback was analysed and shared to develop a consensus of best practice. RECOMMENDATIONS: Local and national guidelines need to be adhered to with specific focus on patient and clinician safety. When performing awake rhinology procedures in the COVID-19 recovery process, consider implementing specific safety measures and workflow practices to safeguard patients and staff and minimize the risk of infection. CONCLUSION: Awake surgery potentially provides quicker access to routine rhinology surgery in the post-COVID-19 recovery phase, ensuring patients are treated in a timely matter, thereby avoiding higher downstream costs, and improving outcomes.

Role of functional and anatomic study in sleep endoscopy for treatment of OSA.

Objective: To describe a clear and intuitive way to analyse the anatomical meaning of images observed in Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) to fully understand the obstructive dynamics and therefore opt for a tailor-made pharyngeal surgical technique. Methods: From January 2016 to December 2020, 298 patients who underwent DISE were selected according to inclusion criteria. Results: The case series consisted of 204 males and 94 females with a mean age of 56 years. Body mass index ranged from 19 kg/m2 to 34 kg/m2 with a median of 26.5 kg/m2. Median Apnoea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was 27 (range 5-62.3). The authors also observed four palate pharyngeal phenotypic patterns of collapse and clarify the morphology and role of the main muscles involved in upper airway collapse. Conclusions: DISE is fundamental to determine the collapse site in patients affected by obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. The velopharyngeal region is the most common site of obstruction and lateral pharyngeal wall collapse is the major determining factor. DISE can lead to a deeper understanding of the obstructive dynamic patterns and a more precise identification of the muscle bundles responsible for upper airway collapse.

The role of balloon sinuplasty in the treatment of sinus headache.

INTRODUCTION: Headache attributed to rhinosinusitis, commonly called sinus headache (SH), is probably one of the most prevalent secondary headaches. The purpose of our study was to examine further sinus headache comparing the effect of conventional functional endoscopic sinus surgery and the balloon sinuplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive patients were enrolled from 2009 to 2012, who were diagnosed sinus headache according the diagnostic criteria of AAO-HNS and of HIS. 40 patients were randomized to Conventional Endoscopy Sinus Surgery for frontal sinus (ESS Group), 35 to balloon sinuplasty of frontal sinus (BS Group). RESULTS: The mean operative time was 65 ± 15 min for ESS group patients and 32 ± 7 min for 23 patients (BS1 Group) and 55 ± 18 min for 12 treated with hybrid technique (BS2 Group). The preoperative mean of SNOT-22 scores improved from 28.6 ± 1.2 in ESS group and 27.3 ± 0.8 in BS group to a 1-month postoperative scores of 14.5 ± 0.6 in ESS group and 10.3 ± 0.5 in BS group and to a 6-month postoperative scores of 7.8 ± 0.6 and 5.3 ± 0.3, respectively (p<0.0001). The headache scores base on analog visual scale improved from a preoperative mean of 6.5 ± 0.3 in ESS group and 7.1 ± 0.4 in Bs group to a 1-month postoperative scores of 5.4 ± 0.4 in ESS group and 5.5 ± 0.4 in BS group and to a 6-month postoperative scores of 2.7 ± 0.5 and 1.2 ± 0.1, respectively, representing a statistically significant reduction in headache score in both group. CONCLUSION: Our data prove that improvement in headache can be expected in patients treated with balloon catheter.

Preliminary findings from our experience in anterior palatoplasty for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder affecting at least 2% to 4% of adult population characterized by the collapse of the pharyngeal airway. It is well established that retropalatal region is the most common site of obstruction. Consequently, many surgical techniques have been introduced. The purpose of this study is to present our preliminary results in the anterior palatoplasty (AP) compared with results of uvulopalatal flap (UPF). METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients with mild-moderate OSA were prospectively enrolled into a randomised surgical protocol. Surgical success was measured primarily by satisfactory reduction in snoring, as reported by snoring assessment questionnaire (SQ) of sleep partners. Secondary outcomes measures included improvement in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores, changes in the magnitude of pharyngeal collapse, and postoperative pain intensity. RESULTS: The ESS after AP improved from a preoperative value 8.5±3.7 to a postoperative mean of 4.9±3.2 (P<0.001) after UPF improved from a preoperative value of 8.1±3.5 to 5.2±3.2 postoperatively (P<0.001). The results of satisfactory reduction in the volume of snoring and response at polysomnographic data were also similar in both procedures. We reported a statistically significant difference of the collapse noted at Müller manoeuvre that improved from 2.7±1.0 on average, to 1.1±0.9 (P<0.001) after AP and with a lesser extent, (from 2.8±1.1 on average to 1.8±1.1; P<0.05), after UPF. The mean duration of pain was 10.8 days for UPF patients and 7.1 days for AP patients. The mean pain score in the first 3 days, was 6.8 in UPF patients and 5.1 in AP patients. CONCLUSION: The subjective and objective improvements evidenced may suggest how AP is far superior to other techniques aimed at creating a palatal fibrotic scar. In the light of these results we can suggest AP procedure as more practical and comfortable when compared to UPF.

Quality of life after conservative laryngeal surgery: a multidimensional method of evaluation.

Assessment of quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction with care are particularly important in the field of oncology. The definition of QoL and the requirements for its measurement are still a matter of debate, but it is generally accepted that QoL is a multidimensional concept involving three different domains: physical, psychological and social. The aim of this study was to test a simple, inexpensive, multidimensional method of QoL measurement, based both on patients' perception of clinical outcome and the quantitatively evaluated clinical outcome, equally weighted, in patients who underwent three different types of conservative laryngeal surgery: horizontal laryngectomy (HG), supraglottic laryngectomy (SL) and subtotal reconstructive laryngectomy (SRL). The following were carried out for each patient: subjective-objective evaluation of speech [computerized spectrographic analysis of fundamental frequency (FO), percentage of noise and intensity and logopedic evaluation of speech], evaluation of deglutition (videofluoroscopic parameters, and qualitative assessment) and evaluation of physical, social, emotional and functional well-being (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, FACT-G, and modified University of Washington Quality of life Scale, UWQoL). Each assessment was given a score rating from one to three points. The overall evaluation of the qualitative and quantitative score for each field and for each type of laryngeal surgery shows that SL results in the best post-operative QoL. Although HG is less damaging and involves swifter functional recovery times, its slightly lower score is due to the poorer quality of speech. The analysis of the results obtained confirm the need to set up an evaluation protocol combining both the subjective perceptions of the patient, as well as the more objective evaluation of the functions that are impaired following surgery. The protocol described above, although limited by the low number of cases, was easy to carry out, inexpensive and applicable in relation to the various types of surgery that may compromise phonation and deglutition.