RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes. This disease typically affects the elderly and presents with itch and localized or, most frequently, generalized bullous lesions. A subset of patients only develops excoriations, prurigo-like lesions, and eczematous and/or urticarial erythematous lesions. The disease, which is significantly associated with neurological disorders, has high morbidity and severely impacts the quality of life. OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY: The Autoimmune blistering diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology sought to update the guidelines for the management of BP based on new clinical information, and new evidence on diagnostic tools and interventions. The recommendations are either evidence-based or rely on expert opinion. The degree of consent among all task force members was included. RESULTS: Treatment depends on the severity of BP and patients' comorbidities. High-potency topical corticosteroids are recommended as the mainstay of treatment whenever possible. Oral prednisone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day is a recommended alternative. In case of contraindications or resistance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapies, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate acid, may be recommended. The use of doxycycline and dapsone is controversial. They may be recommended, in particular, in patients with contraindications to oral corticosteroids. B-cell-depleting therapy and intravenous immunoglobulins may be considered in treatment-resistant cases. Omalizumab and dupilumab have recently shown promising results. The final version of the guideline was consented to by several patient organizations. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines for the management of BP were updated. They summarize evidence- and expert-based recommendations useful in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Dermatología , Penfigoide Ampolloso , Venereología , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Vesícula/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Penfigoide Ampolloso/diagnóstico , Penfigoide Ampolloso/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Celulitis/diagnóstico , Celulitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Miositis/diagnóstico por imagen , Nalgas/patología , Celulitis/patología , Ceftriaxona/administración & dosificación , Clindamicina/administración & dosificación , Administración Intravenosa , Biopsia , Prednisona/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a real-life setting.Methods: All SLE patients treated with belimumab in the Department of Autoimmune Diseases of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona were retrospectively analysed. The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score, clinical SLEDAI-2K, levels of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody, complement components C3 and C4, and 50% haemolytic complement activity (CH50) were recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months. Adverse events were also collected.Results: Twenty-three patients (100% women) were enrolled in the study. The most frequent manifestations that led to belimumab use were arthritis (91%) and skin involvement (39%). Both SLEDAI-2K and clinical SLEDAI-2K improved over time at all time-points (p < 0.005). Complement levels increased and the values of anti-dsDNA antibody decreased during treatment. The mean dose of prednisone could be tapered at all time-points and achieved maximum and significant reduction at 24 months (10.4 ± 4.8 mg/day to 4.8 ± 2.1 mg/day; p < 0.0005). Belimumab was well tolerated and only six patients (26%) experienced adverse events, all of which were classified as infections (one urinary tract infection without bacterial detection in urine culture and five viral infections). No deaths, severe infusion reactions, or hypersensitivity reactions were noted.Conclusion: In our patients with SLE, belimumab decreased disease activity and allowed tapering of the daily glucocorticoid dose with a good safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Histiocitoma Fibroso Benigno/diagnóstico , Erupciones por Medicamentos , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Histiocitoma Fibroso Benigno/fisiopatología , Biopsia/métodosRESUMEN
Antecedentes y objetivo: Los ensayos pivotales de omalizumab en urticaria crónica espontánea (UCE) tienen un periodo de tratamiento de entre 12 y 24 semanas. Sin embargo, muchos pacientes en práctica clínica requieren periodos de tratamiento más prolongados. Por ello el objetivo es presentar un algoritmo de manejo del fármaco. Materiales y métodos: El documento de consenso que detallamos nace de la puesta en común, aceptación, revisión y confrontación de la literatura reciente del grupo de trabajo de UCE "Xarxa d'Urticària Catalana i Balear" (XUrCB). Resultados: Se inicia el tratamiento a dosis autorizada y se ajusta la dosis en intervalos trimestrales en función del Urticaria Activity Score de los últimos 7 días (UAS7) y/o el Urticarial Control Test (UCT). Conclusiones: El algoritmo propuesto pretende servir de guía respecto a cómo ajustar dosis, cómo y cuándo parar el fármaco y el modo de reintroducirlo en casos de recaída
Background and objective: Pivotal trials with omalizumab for treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are generally run over 12 to 24weeks. However, in clinical practice, many patients need longer treatment. In this article, we present an algorithm for treatment with omalizumab. Material and methods: The consensus document we present is the result of a series of meetings by the CSU working group of "Xarxa d'Urticària Catalana i Balear" (XUrCB) at which data from the recent literature were presented, discussed, compared, and agreed upon. Results: Treatment with omalizumab should be initiated at the authorized dose, and is adjusted at 3-monthly intervals according to the Urticaria Activity Score Over 7 days, the Urticaria Control Test, or both. Conclusions: The algorithm proposed is designed to provide guidance on how to adjust omalizumab doses, how and when to discontinue the drug, and how to reintroduce it in cases of relapse
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Omalizumab/administración & dosificación , Algoritmos , Consenso , Dosificación/métodos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a DrogaRESUMEN
ANTECEDENTES: Los problemas dermatológicos constituyen uno de los motivos de consulta más frecuentes en atención primaria. En los últimos años, como consecuencia de la adaptación al espacio europeo de educación superior, en muchos planes de estudios se ha reducido el tiempo destinado al aprendizaje de la dermatología. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Para consensuar los contenidos básicos del programa de dermatología en el pregrado, se remitió electrónicamente una encuesta a los 57 miembros de grupo de profesores de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología para establecer cuáles deberían ser los objetivos de aprendizaje de la asignatura en España. Se incluyeron 131 objetivos previamente seleccionados, buscándose un consenso mediante el método Delphi sobre los objetivos importantes o muy importantes (puntuación ≥ 4). RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron 19 respuestas (33%). Tras una segunda ronda de consenso 68 objetivos alcanzaron una puntuación≥4 de promedio en la escala de Likert. Destacan que los graduados conozcan la estructura y las funciones de la piel, las infecciones bacterianas, víricas, micóticas y de transmisión sexual frecuentes, las 4 principales dermatosis inflamatorias, algunos problemas comunes como el prurito y la alopecia en placas, el manejo de dermatosis urgentes, la púrpura y el eritema nudoso como signos de enfermedad interna y reconocer algunos tumores cutáneos benignos y el cáncer de piel, así como la prevención de las enfermedades de transmisión sexual y del cáncer cutáneo. Además, durante las prácticas clínicas, deberían adquirir las habilidades de comunicación necesarias para realizar una entrevista y redactar una historia clínica dermatológica y una hoja de derivación. Conclusiones; Se definen los contenidos considerados fundamentales para impartir en las facultades de medicina y recomendados por el grupo de profesores y docentes de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología
BACKGROUND: Skin problems are among the most frequent reasons for seeking medical attention in primary care. In recent years, as a result of the process of adapting medical curricula to the requirements of the European Higher Education Area, the amount of time students spend learning the concepts of dermatology has been reduced in many universities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In order to reach a consensus on core content for undergraduate education in dermatology, we sent a survey to the 57 members of the instructors' group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV), asking their opinions on what objectives should be set for a dermatology course in Spain. A total of 131 previously selected objectives were listed. We then applied the Delphi method to achieve consensus on which ones the respondents considered important or very important (score ≥ 4 on a Likert scale). RESULTS: Nineteen responses (33%) were received. On the second round of the Delphi process, 68 objectives achieved average scores of at least 4. The respondents emphasized that graduates should understand the structure and functions of the skin and know about bacterial, viral, and fungal skin infections, the most common sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and the 4 main inflammatory dermatoses. Students should also learn about common complaints, such as itching and bald patches; the management of dermatologic emergencies; purpura and erythema nodosum as signs of internal disease; and the prevention of STDs and skin cancer. During clinical clerkships students should acquire the communication skills they will need to interview patients, write up a patient's medical history, and refer the patient to a specialist. CONCLUSIONS: The AEDV's group of instructors have defined their recommendations on the core content that medical faculties should adopt for the undergraduate subject of dermatology in Spain
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Dermatología/educación , Dermatología/tendencias , Educación Médica/métodos , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Estudiantes de Medicina , Docentes Médicos , Recolección de Datos/instrumentación , Recolección de Datos/métodos , EspañaRESUMEN
No disponible
No disponible