Comparing fetal phantoms with surrogate organs in female phantoms during CT exposure of pregnant patients.

With the rising use of Computed Tomography (CT) in diagnostic radiology, there are concerns regarding radiation exposure to sensitive groups, including pregnant patients. Accurately determining the radiation dose to the fetus during CT scans is essential to balance diagnostic efficacy with patient safety. This study assessed the accuracy of using the female uterus as a surrogate for fetal radiation dose during CT imaging. The study used common CT protocols to encompass various scenarios, including primary beam, scatter, and partial exposure. The computational program NCICT was used to calculate radiation doses for an adult female and a fetus phantom. The study highlighted that using the uterus for dose estimation can result in consistent underestimations of the effective dose, particularly when the fetus lies within the primary radiation beam. These discrepancies may influence clinical decisions, affecting care strategies and perceptions of associated risks. In conclusion, while the female uterus can indicate fetal radiation dose if the fetus is outside the primary beam, it is unreliable when the fetus is within the primary beam. More reliable abdomen/pelvic organs were recommended.

Relative response of dosimeters to variations in scattered X-ray energy spectra encountered in interventional radiology.

PURPOSE: The new lower eye lens dose limit is of relevance in interventional radiology, where higher dose procedures result in increased scattered radiation to staff. The eye lens dose may be monitored using the directional dose equivalent at 3 mm depth, Hp(3), or through Hp(10) or Hp(0.07) measurements and using conversion factors. However, there are a considerable range of factors which contribute to measurement uncertainties, one of which is the incident photon energy. This study investigated the energy spectra of scattered radiation in interventional radiology, and the dosimetry accuracy of dosimeter types, evaluating their energy dependence. METHODS: Scatter X-ray energy spectra were recorded under varied conditions in a fluoroscopy imaging suite. Dosimetry accuracy of eye dosimeters, including TLDs (100 s, 100Hs), Landauer Hp(3), John Caunt ED3 and Electronic Personal dosimeters (EPDs) were compared to air kerma measurements across a range of tube voltages. RESULTS: The variation of energy spectra with changing phantom thickness, spectrometer angulation and filtration are presented. The 100 and 100H TLDs, and EPDs showed a consistent air kerma response (within 10%) with changes in energy. The real-time silicon diode detectors showed a variable over response of between 10 and 25% across the energies investigated while Landauers dedicated Hp(3) eye dosimeters showed considerable variation between dosimeters for similar conditions, a 17% variation at 50 kVp. CONCLUSION: The work aimed to validate the scattered energy spectra typically encountered in interventional radiology and to further determine the accuracy of eye dosimeters in relation to energy response variations.