Parent and practitioner perspectives on Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P): A qualitative study.

Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P) is an attachment-theory-informed program for parents of infants and young children. Designed for scalability, COS-P has been widely adopted internationally. Evidence for the program's effectiveness is limited, however, restricting capacity to make informed decisions about program allocation, and threatening ongoing program funding. To help address this evidence gap, this qualitative study explored the experiences and perceptions of 20 COS-P facilitators and 14 parent recipients in Australia, where COS-P uptake has been particularly widespread. Thematic analysis of combined interview and focus group data revealed a perception that COS-P primarily changes the lens through which parents view (a) their child, (b) themselves in the parenting role, and (c) the parent-child relationship, and that this was a pathway to increased empathy, compassion, and parenting confidence. Participants identified four components that underpinned program impact: key content, skills practice, group processes, and facilitator support. Although COS-P was considered suitable for broad application, limitations were noted. Findings can guide clinical application of COS-P and inform empirical research.

El Círculo de Seguridad - Crianza (COS-P) es un programa basado en la teoría de la afectividad para progenitores de infantes y niños pequeños. Diseñado con un enfoque de escala, COS-P ha sido ampliamente adoptado internacionalmente. La evidencia de su eficacia es limitada, sin embargo, lo cual restringe la capacidad de tomar decisiones fundamentadas acerca de la distribución de fondos y amenaza el continuo apoyo económico del programa. Este estudio cualitativo explora las experiencias y percepciones de 20 mediadores que facilitaban el programa COS-P y 14 progenitores que lo recibían en Australia, donde la aceptación de COS-P ha sido particularmente extensa. Los análisis temáticos de entrevistas combinadas y datos de grupos de enfoques revelaron una percepción de que COS-P cambia el lente a través del cual los progenitores ven (a) a su niño, (b) a sí mismos en el papel de crianza, y (c) la relación progenitor-niño, y que este era una trayectoria para incrementar la empatía, la compasión, así como la confianza en la crianza. Los participantes identificaron cuatro componentes que respaldan el impacto del programa: contenido clave, práctica de habilidades, procesos de grupo y apoyo del mediador. Aunque COS-P se consideró apropiado para una aplicación más amplia, se indicaron las limitaciones. Los resultados pueden guiar la aplicación clínica de COS-P y sustentar la investigación empírica.

Le Parentage Cercle de Sécurité (en anglais Circle of Security Parenting, soit COS-P) est un programme basé sur la théorie de l'attachement pour les parents de nourrissons et de jeunes enfants. Conçu pour son extensibilité le COS-P a été largement adopté au niveau international. Les preuves d'efficacité sont cependant limitées, ce qui restreint la capacité à prendre des décisions informées sur les allocations au programme et menaçant le financement continu du programme. Cette étude qualitative a exploré les expériences et les perceptions de 20 facilitateurs COS-P et 14 récipiendaires parents en Australie, ou l'adoption du COS-P est particulièrement répandue. Une analyse thématique consistant en une combinaison d'entretien et de données de groupes de discussion a révélé une perception que le COS-P change principalement le prisme au travers duquel les parents voient (a) leur enfant, (b) eux-mêmes dans le rôle de parentage, et (c) la relation parent-enfant, et que cela crée un chemin d'empathie, de compassion et de confiance de parentage accrue. Les participants ont identifié quatre composantes qui étaient l'impact du programme: un contenu clé, la pratique des compétences, les processus de groupe et le soutien au facilitateur. Bien que le COS-P soit considéré comme étant adapté à une application générale des limites ont été notées. Les résultats peuvent guider l'application clinique du COS-P et éclairer la recherche empirique.

Commentary on Guild et al. (2020): The Importance of Well-Designed Intervention Studies for Advancing Attachment Theory and its Clinical Applications.

Guild and colleagues (this issue) report results of a long-term follow up after a randomized trial of the effectiveness of an attachment-theory-informed psychotherapeutic intervention for mothers with depression and their toddlers. Their paper shows the intervention can increase the likelihood of secure attachment in children of depressed mothers and that secure attachment explains more optimal social-emotional functioning in middle childhood in the treated group. This commentary discusses the contribution of the paper by Guild and colleagues and their broader body of work to our evolving understanding of developmental processes underpinning social-emotional competence in children of depressed parents, and to several ongoing controversies in the field: 1) the relevance of attachment-theory-informed interventions in the context of maternal depression; 2) the evidence gap regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of attachment-theory-informed interventions, particularly with respect to sustained benefits; 3) cost-benefits of early interventions; and 4) the need for theory driven research that explains how and under what circumstances attachment is related to later child outcomes.

Addressing the Evidence Gap: Protocol for an Effectiveness Study of Circle of Security Parenting, an Attachment-Based Intervention.

Background: Parenting interventions informed by attachment theory are an increasingly popular choice for clinical services that work with parents of babies and young children. Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P) is one such intervention, which has had extraordinary uptake internationally. Evidence for COS-P is very limited, however; there are few published studies, most with very small samples, and findings are mixed. This paper describes a multi-site evaluation of COS-P, designed to help address this evidence gap. Methods/Design: This is a non-randomized controlled effectiveness study of COS-P in four community child and family health settings. Participants are caregivers of children aged 6 years and under, who present to study sites with parenting challenges in the early parenting period. Participants are recruited through these sites, and allocated to either treatment or waitlist control condition based on their capacity to attend the next available COS-P group. Outcomes (changes in caregiving attitudes and capacities linked to child social and emotional development, and caregiver depression symptoms) are assessed at baseline and post-treatment/waitlist using self-report questionnaires (all participants), and a narrative interview and 5-min parent-child interaction (a sub-sample of participants). Additionally, potential moderators of the intervention (demographic, symptom severity) will be tested. Discussion: This is one of the first controlled evaluations of COS-P, and the first in Australia where COS-P dissemination has been particularly widespread. Results from this study will provide valuable information about the effectiveness of COS-P for caregivers with early parenting challenges, and will increase understanding of what works for whom.