Occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Meat and Poultry Product Verification Testing Samples from U.S. Department of Agriculture-Regulated Producing Establishments, 2005 through 2017.

ABSTRACT: Ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry product samples collected between 2005 and 2017 from RTE-producing establishments for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) ALLRTE/RTEPROD_RAND (random) and RTE001/RTEPROD_RISK (risk-based) sampling projects were tested for Listeria monocytogenes (Lm). Data for 45,897 ALLRTE/RTEPROD_RAND samples collected from 3,607 distinct establishments and 112,347 RTE001/RTEPROD_RISK samples collected from 3,283 distinct establishments were analyzed for the presence of Lm. These data were also analyzed based upon the percentages of establishments with positive samples, annual production volume, sanitation control alternatives, geographic location, and season or month of sample collection. Results revealed low occurrence of Lm-positive samples from the random and risk-based sampling projects, with 152 (0.33%) positive samples for ALLRTE/RTEPROD_RAND and 403 (0.36%) positive samples for RTE001/RTEPROD_RISK. The percentage of positive samples significantly decreased over time, from about 0.7% in 2005 and 2006 to about 0.2% in 2017 (P < 0.05). From 2005 to 2017, 3.9% of establishments sampled under the ALLRTE/RTEPROD_RAND sampling project had at least one Lm-positive sample. Similarly, 10.0% of establishments sampled under the RTE001/RTEPROD_RISK sampling project had at least one positive sample. Samples positive for Lm were found in all geographic regions in all months. Thus, in 13 years of RTE product sampling in FSIS-regulated establishments (2005 through 2017), <0.4% of samples were positive for Lm in both risk-based and random sampling projects. The low prevalence of Lm in these products suggests that the combination of FSIS policies and industry practices may be effective for controlling Lm contamination. Information obtained from these sampling projects is relevant to the ongoing prevention of foodborne Lm illnesses from RTE meat and poultry products.

Salmonella and Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Products Sampled in the Food Safety and Inspection Service Raw Pork Baseline Study.

The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) conducts microbiological baseline studies to determine national prevalence of select foodborne pathogens in federally inspected meat and poultry products and to obtain data for risk assessments. The FSIS conducted a baseline study from 1 June 2017 through 31 May 2018 to characterize and determine the prevalence of Salmonella and assess the occurrence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in a variety of raw pork products. In total, 4,014 samples from slaughter and processing establishments were analyzed for Salmonella; a subset of these samples (1,395) from slaughter establishments were also analyzed for STEC. Analyses determined that the national prevalence of Salmonella in raw pork products was highest in comminuted products (28.9%), followed by intact cuts (5.3%) and nonintact cuts (3.9%). Less than 1% of samples analyzed were positive for the top seven STEC. Our findings indicate there is a need for additional pathogen reduction strategies for raw pork products.

Occurrence of Salmonella in Ready-to-Eat Meat and Poultry Product Samples from U.S. Department of Agriculture-Regulated Producing Establishments. I. Results from the ALLRTE and RTE001 Random and Risk-Based Sampling Projects, from 2005 to 2012.

Ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry product samples collected from RTE-producing establishments for the ALLRTE (random) and RTE001 (risk-based) sampling projects of the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) were tested for both Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes. The FSIS analyzed Salmonella results for RTE meat and poultry product samples collected for the two sampling projects from 2005 to 2012. Data for 24,385 ALLRTE samples collected from 3,023 establishments and 66,653 RTE001 samples collected from 2,784 establishments were evaluated for the percentages of Salmonella-positive samples, product types of positive samples, and Salmonella serotypes. There also were descriptive summaries with respect to establishment hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) size, production volumes, L. monocytogenes control alternatives, geographic location, and season or month of sample collection. Results showed low occurrences of Salmonella-positive samples from the ALLRTE and RTE001 sampling projects, with 14 positive samples (0.06%) for ALLRTE and 33 positive samples (0.05%) for RTE001. Percentages of establishments with at least one Salmonella-positive sample averaged 0.46% for ALLRTE and 1.11% for RTE001. Three product types-sausage products, pork barbecue, and head cheese-accounted for 62% of all positive samples. There were 27 distinct serotypes from 48 Salmonella isolates, with serotypes Infantis and Typhimurium being the most common (5 isolates each). All but one of the Salmonella-positive samples were obtained from establishments with HACCP sizes of small or very small. More than half of the positive samples were obtained from establishments using L. monocytogenes control alternative 3 (sanitation only, highest-risk category). Positive Salmonella samples were found in all geographic regions at all times of the year. Information obtained from these sampling projects is relevant to the prevention of foodborne Salmonella illnesses from RTE meat and poultry products.

Application of Bayesian techniques to model the burden of human salmonellosis attributable to U.S. food commodities at the point of processing: adaptation of a Danish model.

Mathematical models that estimate the proportion of foodborne illnesses attributable to food commodities at specific points in the food chain may be useful to risk managers and policy makers to formulate public health goals, prioritize interventions, and document the effectiveness of mitigations aimed at reducing illness. Using human surveillance data on laboratory-confirmed Salmonella infections from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Salmonella testing data from U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service's regulatory programs, we developed a point-of-processing foodborne illness attribution model by adapting the Hald Salmonella Bayesian source attribution model. Key model outputs include estimates of the relative proportions of domestically acquired sporadic human Salmonella infections resulting from contamination of raw meat, poultry, and egg products processed in the United States from 1998 through 2003. The current model estimates the relative contribution of chicken (48%), ground beef (28%), turkey (17%), egg products (6%), intact beef (1%), and pork (<1%) across 109 Salmonella serotypes found in food commodities at point of processing. While interpretation of the attribution estimates is constrained by data inputs, the adapted model shows promise and may serve as a basis for a common approach to attribution of human salmonellosis and food safety decision-making in more than one country.

Protein variations in Listeria monocytogenes exposed to sodium lactate, sodium diacetate, and their combination.

Most studies of the effect of adverse conditions on survival of Listeria monocytogenes have focused on stress caused by acid or sodium chloride. However, no information is available on resistance of this pathogen to stress caused by salts of organic acids. Sodium lactate and sodium diacetate are generally recognized as safe substances and are approved as ingredients for use in foods. We evaluated antilisterial properties of each of these salts and the enhanced inhibition effected by their combination in ready-to-eat meat products at pH 6.3. Changes in proteins found in this pathogen were studied in the presence of the salts in a chemically defined medium at the same pH using a proteomic approach. The total numbers of protein spots obtained from two-dimensional electrophoresis were 198, 150, and 131 for sodium diacetate, sodium lactate, and the control, respectively. Sodium diacetate treatment produced the highest number of unmatched proteins (124 versus 53 in lactate), the greatest increase in expression (20 versus 5 in lactate), and the highest number of novel proteins (90 versus 45 in lactate). The number of repressed proteins was highest in the combination treatment (41 versus -30 in the single salt treatment). Six proteins that increased or decreased by > or = 10-fold were further investigated; oxidoreductase and lipoprotein were upregulated, and DNA-binding protein, alpha amylase, and two SecA proteins were downregulated or completely suppressed by the salt treatment. Identification of all protein spots is essential for comparison with proteins induced or suppressed under other stress conditions.

Automated measurements of antilisterial activities of lactate and diacetate in ready-to-eat meat.

Standard procedures to enumerate Listeria organisms rely on plating food samples on selective agar media. The procedures are labor-intensive, and because of the limited sensitivity, pre-enrichment step is required for the detection of low numbers of the pathogen. In the present study, an automated rapid optic procedure and the standard procedure were used to determine the behavior of the pathogen in ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and to test the effect of antilisterial agents. Listeria monocytogenes strain Scott A or a six-strain mixture of Listeria was studied using lactate (2.5%), diacetate (0.2%) and their combination in beef bologna and in sterile beef emulsion. Samples stored for up to 60 days at 5 and 10 degrees C were tested at time intervals during storage. Using the plate count method, each of the salts caused a delay in growth of the pathogen, and the salt combination was most effective causing listeriostatic effects and decline in growth of the pathogen at 5 degrees C. High negative correlation (r), ranging from 0.92 to 0.99, was obtained between the detection time (DT) recorded by the optic procedure (BioSys instrument) and cell numbers determined by the plate count procedure. The rapid (< 24 h) optic procedure was reliable in assessing the efficacy of antimicrobials and in rapid detection of low levels of listeriae that are undetectable by direct plating procedure.