Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMJ Open ; 7(4): e014634, 2017 04 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420662

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Against a background of failure to prevent neonatal invasive early-onset group B Streptococcus infections (GBS) in our maternity unit using risk-based approach for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, we introduced an antenatal GBS carriage screening programme to identify additional women to target for prophylaxis. OBJECTIVES: To describe the implementation and outcome of an antepartum screening programme for prevention of invasive early-onset GBS infection in a UK maternity unit. DESIGN: Observational study of outcome of screening programme (intervention) with comparison to historical controls (preintervention). SETTING: Hospital and community-based maternity services provided by Northwick Park and Central Middlesex Hospitals in North West London. PARTICIPANTS: Women who gave birth between March 2014 and December 2015 at Northwick Park Hospital. METHODS: Women were screened for GBS at 35-37 weeks and carriers offered intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Screening programme was first introduced in hospital (March 2014) and then in community (August 2014). Compliance was audited by review of randomly selected case records. Invasive early-onset GBS infections were defined through GBS being cultured from neonatal blood, cerebrospinal fluid or sterile fluids within 0-6 days of birth. MAIN OUTCOME: Incidence of early-onset GBS infections. RESULTS: 6309 (69%) of the 9098 eligible women were tested. Screening rate improved progressively from 42% in 2014 to 75% in 2015. Audit showed that 98% of women accepted the offer of screening. Recto-vaginal GBS carriage rate was 29.4% (1822/6193). All strains were susceptible to penicillin but 11.3% (206/1822) were resistant to clindamycin. Early onset GBS rate fell from 0.99/1000 live births (25/25276) in the prescreening period to 0.33/1000 in the screening period (Rate Ratio=0.33; p=0.08). In the subset of mothers actually screened, the rate was 0.16/1000 live births (1/6309), (Rate Ratio=0.16; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that an antenatal screening programme for prevention of early-onset GBS infection can be implemented in a UK maternity setting and is associated with a fall in infection rates.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/prevención & control , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Adulto , Femenino , Estudio Históricamente Controlado , Unidades Hospitalarias , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Servicios de Salud Materna , Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/transmisión , Streptococcus agalactiae , Reino Unido , Adulto Joven
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 32(3): 247-51, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22369397

RESUMEN

This retrospective analysis evaluated the association between maternal body mass index (BMI) and the incidence of maternal and neonatal complications in those women delivering at a North West London hospital between January 2002 and December 2007. Of the women examined, obese mothers (BMI ≥ 30) were shown to be at significantly higher risk from multiple morbidities (p < 0.05), including gestational diabetes; antepartum haemorrhages; pre-term delivery before 37 and 33 weeks' gestation; induction of labour; analgesia use (beyond inhalational methods and local infiltration); caesarean sections; massive postpartum haemorrhages; higher birth weights; Apgar scores < 8 at 1 min and 5 min; cord base deficits less than-12 and a greater need for neonatal care (SCBU, HDU, NICU) compared with mothers with a BMI < 30. These findings add to the growing consensus that obesity increases the risks involved with pregnancy. While information is filtering through to the general public about the overall risks of obesity, more focused pre-pregnancy and inter-pregnancy counselling on the implications of a raised BMI specifically on pregnancy is required at both primary and secondary care sector levels.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Obesidad/complicaciones , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Adulto , Peso al Nacer , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Obesidad/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Delgadez/complicaciones , Delgadez/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA