Identifying the science and technology dimensions of emerging public policy issues through horizon scanning.

Public policy requires public support, which in turn implies a need to enable the public not just to understand policy but also to be engaged in its development. Where complex science and technology issues are involved in policy making, this takes time, so it is important to identify emerging issues of this type and prepare engagement plans. In our horizon scanning exercise, we used a modified Delphi technique. A wide group of people with interests in the science and policy interface (drawn from policy makers, policy adviser, practitioners, the private sector and academics) elicited a long list of emergent policy issues in which science and technology would feature strongly and which would also necessitate public engagement as policies are developed. This was then refined to a short list of top priorities for policy makers. Thirty issues were identified within broad areas of business and technology; energy and environment; government, politics and education; health, healthcare, population and aging; information, communication, infrastructure and transport; and public safety and national security.

Micro macro integration: reframing primary healthcare practice and community development in health

The idea of micro macro integration (MMI) provides a useful framework for thinking about primary healthcare (PHC) and community development in health (CD). PHC and CD are important strategies for addressing the structural determinants of health. They are each based on a powerful logic and have significant body of support. However, while exemplary, even inspiring, instances of practice are common, attempts to replicate models of good practice (or 'scale up') often flounder. As frameworks for analysing this paradox, both PHC and CD have limitations, partly because they are overburdened with different and conflicting meanings. This paper explores an alternative framework based on a common aspiration of both PHC and CD: to effect change at both the micro level (meeting the immediate health needs of individuals, families and communities) and also at the macro level (of political, economic and social structures). The MMI framework assumes that health issues can be analysed at different levels of scale and of term (from the micro to the macro); that objectives and strategies can be conceived at these different levels; and that a coherent programme of activities can be conceived and implemented which addresses both the immediate and local problems and the larger scale and longer term phenomena that reproduce those patterns of need. The idea of MMI is less ambitious than either PHC or CD but (partly because of this) has value as a framework for analysing barriers to good practice (AU)

Community consultation and engagement in health care reform.

In advocating for significant reform of the health care system, the Australian Health Care Reform Alliance (AHCRA) supports a process of citizen engagement that will allow the wider community to have a say in the future direction of their health care system. Models that have engaged community opinions have been successful overseas, and this article calls for similar processes in Australia.

Patient focus and the quality framework.

BACKGROUND: The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Quality Framework for Australian General Practice provides a mechanism for planning and assessing quality improvement initiatives in an Australian context that takes account of the perspective of patients in the health care system. OBJECTIVE: This article examines the patient focus domain of the quality framework. DISCUSSION: The quality framework is applied to the patient focus domain using examples such as the patient centred model of the consultation, consumer expectations of the general practice of the future, and health inequalities and the role of general practice.