Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
J Nurs Care Qual ; 38(1): 26-32, 2023.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35984709

BACKGROUND: Literature shows that interdisciplinary huddles help promote clear communication and proactive reporting of potential errors. LOCAL PROBLEM: High reliability organization (HRO) and just culture models were implemented, yet fragmented team communication about patient safety remained. Huddles were implemented to identify and address patient safety issues. METHODS: A pre/postintervention design was used. Near-miss and actual event safety metrics, patient satisfaction, and employee satisfaction/work group perceptions were measured at 3 time points over 1 year. INTERVENTIONS: Daily interdisciplinary huddles were implemented to improve communication, reduce errors, and improve patient and employee satisfaction. RESULTS: Near-miss reporting increased across time points. Patient satisfaction with how the staff worked together to provide care significantly increased over time. Employee satisfaction and perception of work group communication, collaboration, and psychological safety scores improved, however, were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Implementing huddles demonstrated improved outcomes in patient safety, patient satisfaction, and employee satisfaction/work group perceptions.


Communication , Patient Safety , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Patient Satisfaction , Patient Care Team
2.
Int J Artif Organs ; 43(2): 109-118, 2020 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31530254

In selected patients with left ventricular assist device-associated infection or malfunction, pump exchange may become necessary after conservative treatment options fail and heart transplantation is not readily available. We examined the survival and complication rate in patients (⩾19 years of age) who underwent HeartMate II to HeartMate II exchange at our institution from 1 January 2010 to 28 February 2018. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared for patients who underwent exchange for pump thrombosis (14 patients), breach of driveline integrity (5 patients), and device-associated infection (2 patients). There were no differences in 30-day mortality (p = 0.58), need for temporary renal replacement therapy (p = 0.58), right ventricular mechanical support (p = 0.11), and postoperative stroke (p = 0.80) among groups. Survival at 1 year was 90% ± 7% for the whole cohort and 85% ± 10% for those who underwent exchange for pump thrombosis. In patients exchanged for device thrombosis, freedom from re-thrombosis and survival free from pump re-thrombosis at 1 year were 49% ± 16% and 42% ± 15%, respectively. No association of demographic and clinical variables with the risk of recurrent pump thrombosis after the first exchange was identified. Survival after left ventricular assist device exchange compares well with published results after primary left ventricular assist device implantation. However, recurrence of thrombosis was common among patients who required a left ventricular assist device exchange due to pump thrombosis. In this sub-group, consideration should be given to alternative strategies to improve the outcomes.


Heart Failure , Heart-Assist Devices , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Thrombosis , Equipment Failure Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nebraska/epidemiology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Thrombosis/diagnosis , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Thrombosis/etiology
...