RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) plays a vital role in providing life support for patients with reversible cardiac or respiratory failure. Given the high rate of complications and difficulties associated with caring for ECMO patients, the goal of this study was to compare outcomes of orthopaedic surgery in polytrauma patients who received ECMO with similar patients who have not. This will help elucidate the timing and type of fixation that should be considered in patients on ECMO. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was collected from the electronic medical record of two level I trauma centers over an 8-year period (2015 to 2022) using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were matched with a similar counterpart not requiring ECMO based on sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, injury severity score, and fracture characteristics. Outcomes measured included length of stay, number of revisions, time to definitive fixation, infection, amputation, revision surgery to promote bone healing, implant failure, bleeding requiring return to the operating room, and mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients comprised our ECMO cohort with a patient-matched control group. The ECMO cohort had an increased length of stay (40 versus 17.5 days, P = 0.001), number of amputations (7 versus 0, P = 0.011), and mortality rate (19% versus 0%, P = 0.024). When comparing patients placed on ECMO before definitive fixation and after definitive fixation, the group placed on ECMO before definitive fixation had significantly longer time to definitive fixation than the group placed on ECMO after fixation (14 versus 2.0 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ECMO is a lifesaving measure for trauma patients with cardiopulmonary issues but can complicate fracture care. Although it is not associated with an increase in revision surgery rates, ECMO was associated with prolonged hospital stay and delays in definitive fracture surgery when initiated before definitive fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Incidental discovery of anomalous muscles and anatomical variants within the forearm and wrist through surgical exposure and advanced imaging techniques is relatively common. Case Report: The patient presented with pain and swelling in her hand that was refractory to rest and anti-inflammatory medications. Here, we describe the intraoperative discovery of an anatomical variant of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR), as well as an anomalous flexor carpi radialis brevis (FCRB) in a 58-year-old patient being treated for thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthritis. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of both anomalies within a single patient and the first use of the surgical technique, described here, in treating the patient's thumb CMCJ arthritis. This report reinforces the importance of meticulous dissection and identification of individual anatomy to optimize patient outcomes.