Despite initiatives to eliminate restraint from acute psychiatric care, there remain times when violent episodes threaten the safety of patients and/or staff. The restraint chair may be used in these moments and provide an alternative to four-point restraint. The purpose of this study was to examine the patient experience of the restraint chair. Patients who had an episode of restraint in the restraint chair during their hospital stay were interviewed about the experience. Participants described the experience as "unpleasant," with the majority preferring the restraint chair to other methods of restraint they had experienced. Participants indicated they could "understand" why the restraint had occurred and felt staff were "helpful" and "create safety." Finally, participants stated the hospital experience was "positive." Although the goal remains to eliminate restraint, psychiatric settings may want to consider the restraint chair as an alternative to four-point restraint for situations requiring mechanical restraint. Nurses' presence and communication with patients during the restraint process is important to the patient experience. More research is needed to verify these results.
Aggression , Restraint, Physical , Humans , Qualitative Research , Restraint, Physical/psychology , Patients , Patient Outcome Assessment
Restraint and seclusion continues to be a challenging topic in psychiatric nursing care. While there is a movement toward reduction and elimination of restraint, emergency situations still arise that require intervention for the safety of patients and staff. In addition to traditional methods of restraint (physical holds, four-point restraint, seclusion), the restraint chair has been introduced at some hospitals as an alternative to four-point restraint. The restraint chair allows the patient to be upright in a seated position during the restraint process. Little research on the restraint chair currently exists. The purpose of this study was to examine the nurses' experience with the restraint chair compared to four-point restraint. Results indicate nurses feel the restraint chair is easier to use, more humane, less traumatic, comforting, and enhances the therapeutic relationship compared to four-point restraint. Based on the reports of nurses in this study and prior quantitative work on the restraint chair (Castillo, Coyne, Chan, Hall, & Vilke, 2011; Visaggio et al., 2018), the restraint chair appears to be a safe and effective alternative to traditional four-point restraint. More research verifying these results at other hospitals in the United States and abroad is warranted.
Hospitals, Psychiatric , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Patient Safety , Psychiatric Nursing , Restraint, Physical/psychology , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/psychology , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires
