RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of pregnancies resulting in birth that were conceived with the use of clomiphene citrate (CC) and the frequency of multiple pregnancy. DESIGN: Whole-of-population cohort study, constructed through data linkage. Comprehensive Australian Government records of dispensed medications were linked to state Perinatal Registry records for all births of at least 20 weeks' gestation. SETTING: The state of South Australia. PATIENT(S): Women who maintained pregnancy for at least 20 weeks and gave birth between July 2003 and December 2015, a total of 150,713 women with 241,561 pregnancies. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy occurring in proximity to CC, defined as dispensing from 90 days before to the end of a conception window derived from newborn date of birth and gestational age. RESULT(S): Linkage to dispensed prescription records was achieved for 97.9% of women. Women who conceived with CC tended to be older and socioeconomically advantaged and more likely than other women to have a history of miscarriage. Ongoing pregnancies associated with CC comprised 1.6% of the total; 5.7% were multiple births (mostly twins, 94.6%) compared with 1.5% in the remainder (98.5% twins). CONCLUSION(S): In South Australia, 1.6% of pregnancies (1 in 60) of at least 20 weeks' gestation were conceived proximal to CC dispensing. Of these, 5.7% were multiple pregnancies. This takes the proportion of women who achieved an ongoing pregnancy with medical assistance from 4.4%, based on reports from assisted reproductive technology clinics, to 6% in total.
Asunto(s)
Clomifeno/uso terapéutico , Infertilidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo Múltiple/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Clomifeno/provisión & distribución , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Infertilidad/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Insomnia is a common disorder associated with a substantial burden of illness, particularly in older adults. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of lemborexant with specified other insomnia treatments through a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Medline and Embase were systematically searched from inception to February 2019 and updated with a targeted search of PubMed for pivotal trials in March 2021. Randomized controlled trials in adults with primary insomnia were included if they reported results following at least 1 week of treatment. Interventions of interest were specified as lemborexant, suvorexant, benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine receptor agonists (also called Z-drugs [zolpidem, eszopiclone, zaleplon, zopiclone]), trazodone, and ramelteon. Efficacy outcomes included wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency (SE), latency to persistent sleep (LPS)/sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Bayesian NMA were performed at predetermined time intervals approximating 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Safety outcomes included serious adverse events (SAEs), withdrawals due to adverse events (AEs), and specified AEs (dizziness, somnolence, and falls). Subgroup analysis was conducted in the older population. RESULTS: 45 studies were included in the NMA. At 4 weeks, lemborexant had the highest probability of being the best treatment for 3 of the 4 outcomes measured objectively by polysomnography-TST, LPS, and SE-and was ranked second to suvorexant on WASO. Eszopiclone was highly ranked for subjectively measured SOL and ISI at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Lemborexant was rated more highly than suvorexant in subjective measures of WASO, TST, and SOL at 4 weeks (the differences were not statistically significant). No statistically significant interactions between treatment effect and older subpopulations were found, indicating that the treatment effect was similar in older and adult populations. The safety profile of lemborexant was broadly similar to the other treatments for SAEs and withdrawals due to AEs. A limitation is the age of some of the included studies (3 were published in 1990 or earlier). A further limitation is the lack of stratification of recommended doses. If the doses used in the study publications do not reflect doses used in clinical practice, this could potentially bias the results. CONCLUSIONS: Lemborexant was ranked highest of the treatments studied on 3 out of the 4 objectively measured insomnia efficacy outcomes, with a safety profile broadly similar to other insomnia treatments. DISCLOSURES: This work was funded by Eisai Inc., which was involved with all stages of the study and analysis. McElroy, O'Leary, and Adena are consultants with Datalytics Pty Ltd., which was paid by Eisai Inc. for conducting the literature review and analysis. They were not financially compensated for collaborative efforts on publication-related activities. Campbell, Tahami Monfared, and Meier are employed by Eisai Inc. This study was presented as a poster at AMCP Nexus Virtual, October 20-23, 2020 and at the AGS Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting 2021, May 13-15, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de los Receptores de Orexina/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Study Objectives: This systematic literature review and meta-analysis explored the impact of lemborexant and other insomnia treatments on next-day driving performance. Methods: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase on May 16, 2019, supplemented by clinical trial registries. Randomized controlled trials in healthy volunteers or people with insomnia were included if they reported a standardized on-road driving test, were published in English and included ≥1 group receiving a recommended dose of flunitrazepam, estazolam, triazolam, temazepam, brotizolam, etizolam, alprazolam, lorazepam, zolpidem, eszopiclone, zaleplon, zopiclone, trazodone, ramelteon, lemborexant, or suvorexant. Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses used the difference between each active treatment and placebo in standard deviation of lateral position (ΔSDLP). ΔSDLP of +2.4 cm, established as equivalent to a blood alcohol concentration of 0.05%, was considered clinically significant. Results: Fourteen studies were included. Clinically significant differences in ΔSDLP were shown in healthy volunteers for zopiclone (10/10 studies) and ramelteon (1/1 study), and in people with insomnia for flunitrazepam (2/3 studies). Premature test termination was reported most frequently for zopiclone (5/10 studies) and was reported in two subjects for suvorexant (1/2 studies), one for flunitrazepam (1/3 studies), and one for placebo (1/12 studies). Lemborexant had no statistically or clinically significant ΔSDLP, and no premature driving test terminations. Conclusions: Zopiclone, flunitrazepam, and ramelteon were associated with impaired driving performance, similar to driving under the influence of alcohol. Premature test termination was reported most frequently for zopiclone, and also for suvorexant, flunitrazepam and placebo. Lemborexant had no statistically or clinically significant effect on driving performance.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the absence of clinical trials providing direct efficacy results, this study compares different methods of indirect treatment comparison (ITC), and their respective impacts on efficacy estimates for lenvatinib (LEN) plus everolimus (EVE) combination therapy compared to other second-line treatments for advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (a/mRCC). METHODS: Using EVE alone as the common comparator, the Bucher method for ITC compared LEN + EVE with cabozantinib (CAB), nivolumab (NIV), placebo (PBO) and axitinib (AXI). Hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) estimated the impact of applying three versions of the LEN+EVE trial data in separate ITCs. Last, to overcome exchangeability bias and potential violations to the proportional hazards assumption, a network meta-analysis using fractional polynomials was performed. RESULTS: Bucher ITCs demonstrated LEN + EVE superiority over EVE for PFS, indirect superiority to NIV, AXI, and PBO, and no difference to CAB. For OS, LEN + EVE was superior to EVE and indirectly superior to PBO, applying original HOPE 205 data. Using European Medicines Agency data, LEN + EVE was directly superior to EVE for OS. Fractional polynomial HRs for PFS and OS substantially overlapped with Bucher estimates, demonstrating LEN+EVE superiority over EVE, alone, NIV, and CAB. However, there were no statistically significant results as the credible intervals for HR crossed 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing three Bucher ITCs, LEN + EVE demonstrated superior PFS when indirectly compared to NIV, AXI, and PBO, and mixed results for OS. While fractional polynomial modelling for PFS and OS failed to find statistically significant differences in LEN + EVE efficacy, the overall HR trends were comparable.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Everolimus/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Treating infections of Gram-negative pathogens, in particular Pseudomonas aeruginosa, is a challenge for clinicians in the Asia-Pacific region owing to inherent and acquired antimicrobial resistance. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides updated information on risk factors for P. aeruginosa infection in Asia-Pacific as well as the consequences (e.g. mortality, costs) of initial inappropriate antimicrobial therapy (IIAT). METHODS: Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched for Asia-Pacific studies reporting the consequences of IIAT versus initial appropriate antimicrobial therapy (IAAT) in Gram-negative bacterial infections as well as risk factors for serious P. aeruginosa infection. A meta-analysis of unadjusted mortality was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies reporting mortality and 13 reporting risk factors were identified. The meta-analysis demonstrated that mortality was significantly lower in patients receiving IAAT versus IIAT, with a 67% reduction observed for 28- or 30-day all-cause mortality (odds ratio=0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.55; P<0.001). Risk factors for serious P. aeruginosa infection include previous exposure to antimicrobials, mechanical ventilation and previous hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: High rates of antimicrobial resistance in Asia-Pacific as well as the increased mortality associated with IIAT and the presence of risk factors for serious infection highlight the importance of access to newer and appropriate antimicrobials.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/mortalidad , Asia/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Missense variants represent a significant proportion of variants identified in clinical genetic testing. In the absence of strong clinical or functional evidence, the American College of Medical Genetics recommends that these findings be classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). VUSs may be reclassified to better inform patient care when new evidence is available. It is critical that the methods used for reclassification are robust in order to prevent inappropriate medical management strategies and unnecessary, life-altering surgeries. In an effort to provide evidence for classification, several in silico algorithms have been developed that attempt to predict the functional impact of missense variants through amino acid sequence conservation analysis. We report an analysis comparing internally derived, evidence-based classifications with the results obtained from six commonly used algorithms. We compiled a dataset of 1118 variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, and MSH2 previously classified by our laboratory's evidence-based variant classification program. We compared internally derived classifications with those obtained from the following in silico tools: Align-GVGD, CONDEL, Grantham Analysis, MAPP-MMR, PolyPhen-2, and SIFT. Despite being based on similar underlying principles, all algorithms displayed marked divergence in accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Overall, accuracy ranged from 58.7 to 90.8% while the Matthews Correlation Coefficient ranged from 0.26-0.65. CONDEL, a weighted average of multiple algorithms, did not perform significantly better than its individual components evaluated here. These results suggest that the in silico algorithms evaluated here do not provide reliable evidence regarding the clinical significance of missense variants in genes associated with hereditary cancer.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate medical resource utilization (MRU) and associated costs among Australian patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (GT1 CHC), including both untreated patients and those receiving treatment with first-generation protease inhibitor-based regimens (telaprevir, boceprevir with pegylated interferon and ribavirin). METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for a stratified random sample of GT1 CHC patients first attending two liver clinics between 2011-2013 (principal population; PP), supplemented by all GT1 CHC patients attending one transplant clinic in the same period (transplant population; TP). CHC-related MRU and associated costs are reported for the PP by treatment status (treated/not treated) stratified by baseline fibrosis grade; and for the TP for the pre-transplant, year of transplant and post-transplant periods. RESULTS: A total 1636 patients were screened and 590 patients (36.1%) were included. Comprehensive MRU data were collected for 276 PP patients (F0-1 n = 59, F2 n = 58, F3 n = 53, F4 n = 106; mean follow-up = 17.3 months). Thirty-eight (13.8%) were treatment-experienced prior to enrolment; 55 (19.9%) received triple therapy during the study. Data were collected for 112 TP patients (mean follow-up = 29.9 months), 33 (29.5%) received a transplant during the study, and 51 (45.5%) beforehand. The annual direct medical costs, excluding drug costs, were higher among treated PP vs untreated PP (AU$: $1,954 vs $1,202); and year of transplant TP vs pre-/post-transplant TP (AU$: pre-transplant $32,407, transplant $155,138, post-transplant $7,358). LIMITATIONS: To aid interpretation of results, note that only patients with GT1 CHC who are actively managed are included, and MRU data were collected specifically from liver outpatient clinics. That said, movement of patients between hospitals is rare, and any uncaptured MRU is expected to be minimal. CONCLUSIONS: CHC-related MRU increases substantially with disease severity. These real-world MRU data for GT1 CHC will be valuable in assessing the impact of new hepatitis C treatments.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Genotipo , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Australia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A previous fibromyalgia (FM) research reports that 20%-47% of diagnosed patients may not meet the study definition of FM 1-2 years after diagnosis. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the progression of FM in a geographically diverse cohort over a 2-year time period. METHODS: This cohort study followed 226 subjects recruited online to assess FM and chronic widespread pain (CWP) diagnosis stability over time. At enrollment (baseline), subjects provided informed consent, completed an online questionnaire consisting of the London Fibromyalgia Epidemiology Study Screening Questionnaire to screen for CWP (bilateral pain above/below waist lasting ≥1 week in the past 3 months), visited a site for physician evaluation for FM, and completed a questionnaire with validated patient-reported outcome instruments. Subjects were classified into mutually exclusive groups: FM+CWP+ (screened positive for CWP and received physician diagnosis of FM), FM-CWP+ (screened positive for CWP but did not receive physician diagnosis of FM), and FM-CWP- (screened negative for CWP). Approximately 2 years later (follow-up), subjects were reassessed at the same study site and completed a questionnaire with the same patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-six FM+CWP+ subjects completed assessments at both time points; 56 (73.7%) met the FM study definition at follow-up. Twenty subjects no longer met the FM study definition (eleven became FM-CWP- and nine became FM-CWP+). Ten subjects (two from FM-CWP- and eight from FM-CWP+) transitioned into the FM+CWP+ group at follow-up; they reported more tender points and pain interference with sleep and worse physical function at baseline compared with subjects who did not transition to FM+CWP+. Most (76.7%) of the subjects who transitioned into/out of FM+CWP+ experienced changes in CWP, number of positive tender points, or both. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that some FM+CWP+ patients experience fluctuation in symptoms over time, which may reflect the waxing and waning nature of FM and affect diagnosis and treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Longitudinal research on outcomes of patients with fibromyalgia is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess clinician and patient-reported outcomes over time among fibromyalgia patients. METHODS: At enrollment (Baseline) and follow-up (approximately 2 years later), consented patients were screened for chronic widespread pain (CWP), attended a physician site visit to determine fibromyalgia status, and completed an online questionnaire assessing pain, sleep, function, health status, productivity, medications, and healthcare resource use. RESULTS: Seventy-six fibromyalgia patients participated at both time points (at Baseline: 86.8% white, 89.5% female, mean age 50.9 years, and mean duration of fibromyalgia 4.1 years). Mean number of tender points at each physician visit was 14.1 and 13.5, respectively; 11 patients no longer screened positive for CWP at follow-up. A majority reported medication use for pain (59.2% at Baseline, 62.0% at Follow-up). The most common medication classes were opioids (32.4%), SSRIs (16.9%), and tramadol (14.1%) at Follow-up. Significant mean changes over time were observed for fibromyalgia symptoms (modified American College of Rheumatology 2010 criteria: 18.4 to 16.9; P=0.004), pain interference with function (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form: 5.9 to 5.3; P=0.013), and sleep (Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale: 58.3 to 52.7; P=0.004). Patients achieving ≥2 point improvement in pain (14.5%) experienced greater changes in pain interference with function (6.8 to 3.4; P=0.001) and sleep (62.4 to 51.0; P=0.061). CONCLUSION: Fibromyalgia patients reported high levels of burden at both time points, with few significant changes observed over time. Outcomes were variable among patients over time and were better among those with greater pain improvement.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Little information exists on the comparative patient and economic burden of chronic widespread pain (CWP) and fibromyalgia (FM) in the United States. METHODS: This multistage, observational study included an online screening survey of a large geographically diverse US sample to assess CWP status, a physician/site visit to determine FM diagnosis, and an online subject questionnaire to capture clinical characteristics, pain, health status, functioning, sleep, healthcare resource use (HRU), productivity, and costs. Based on the screener and physician evaluation, mutually exclusive groups of subjects without CWP (CWP-), with CWP but without FM (CWP+), and with confirmed FM were identified. RESULTS: Disease burden was examined in 472 subjects (125 CWP-, 176 CWP+, 171 FM). Age, race, and ethnicity were similar across groups. Mean body mass index and number of comorbidities increased from CWP- to CWP+ to FM (P = 0.0044, P < 0.0001, respectively). From CWP- to CWP+ to FM, there were reductions in health status (EQ-5D, SF-12) and sleep outcomes (MOS-SS, SSQ) (all P < 0.05). Pain severity, interference with function (BPI-SF), and overall work impairment (WPAI:SHP) increased from CWP- to CWP+ to FM (all P < 0.0001). Higher proportions of CWP+ (52.8%) and FM subjects (62.6%) were taking pain-related prescription medications relative to CWP- subjects (32.8%; P < 0.0001). Significant differences in total direct and indirect costs across the three groups (both P < 0.0001) were observed, with highest costs among FM subjects. CONCLUSION: Fibromyalgia subjects were characterized by the greatest disease burden with more comorbidities and pain-related medications, poorer health status, function, sleep, lower productivity, and higher costs.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Fibromialgia/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Costo de Enfermedad , Eficiencia , Femenino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sueño , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends in the incidence of adenocarcinoma (AC) of the oesophagus in New South Wales, factors associated with a diagnosis of AC, and factors associated with survival of patients with AC. DESIGN AND SETTING: We examined all cases of invasive oesophageal cancer recorded in the NSW Central Cancer Registry from 1972 to 2005. The Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia was used to assess geographical remoteness and the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage to assess socioeconomic status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of AC; factors associated with diagnosis of AC and survival of patients with AC. RESULTS: The overall incidence of oesophageal AC in NSW increased in both males and females (annual percentage change, 4.2% [95% CL, 2.7%, 5.8%] in males [1988-2005] and 4.3% [95% CL, 1.8%, 7.0%] in females [1983-2005]). A diagnosis of AC was significantly associated with being male (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.37 [95% CL, 3.84, 4.98]; P < 0.001); a younger age at diagnosis (P trend < 0.001); having distant rather than localised disease spread (AOR, 2.12 [95% CL, 1.82, 2.48]; P < 0.001); higher socioeconomic status (P trend < 0.001); and living in an inner regional area (AOR, 1.26 [95% CL, 1.11, 1.43]; P < 0.001) or outer regional area (AOR, 1.19 [95% CL, 1.00, 1.41]; P = 0.05) compared with a major city. Early diagnosis of AC was associated with substantial improvement in survival outcomes: patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis had a three times greater risk of dying than those with localised AC at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of AC is increasing in NSW. Possible contributing factors include increasing obesity, which is associated with increased incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Survival may be improved by diagnosis at an earlier stage and changes in modifiable risk factors (eg, smoking, diet, exercise).
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe a data artefact in degree-of-spread at first presentation in the New South Wales Central Cancer Registry (NSW CCR), the only Australian cancer registry that records degree-of-spread data for all solid tumours. METHOD: Trends in the proportions of cancer cases diagnosed annually over 1972-2004 by degree-of-spread categories of localised, regional, distant and unknown were calculated for each major cancer type. RESULTS: Excepting breast cancer and melanoma, the proportion of localised cancer cases reported from 1993-1998 was approximately 5% lower than expected, and was mirrored by an artefactual increase in unknown degree-of-spread cases. CONCLUSION: This artefact was caused by the introduction of the Electronic Notification System and cannot easily be remedied retrospectively. However, regional and distant categories of degree-of-spread in the NSW CCR data are reliably recorded for the 1972-2004 period. IMPLICATIONS: It is important that past and present cancer data users are notified and understand the quality issues with NSW CCR degree-of-spread data, and use it as recommended to avoid anomalous results or conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Invasividad Neoplásica/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros/normas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Sistemas de Información en Hospital/normas , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/patología , Nueva Gales del Sur , Informática en Salud Pública/normas , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled study conducted in China examined the efficacy and safety of olanzapine versus lithium in the treatment of patients with bipolar manic/mixed episodes. METHODS: Patients with bipolar manic or mixed episode (DSM-IV criteria) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score> or =20 at screening received olanzapine (5-20 mg/day, n=69) or lithium carbonate (600-1800 mg/day, n=71) for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was mean change from baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar Version Overall Severity of Illness (CGI-BP) score. Secondary efficacy measures included YMRS, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A significantly greater mean change was observed in olanzapine versus lithium patients in CGI-BP (Overall Severity) (P=0.009), YMRS (P=0.013), BPRS (P=0.032), and CGI-BP (Severity of Mania) (P=0.012) scores. More olanzapine than lithium patients experienced at least one adverse event possibly related to study drug (P=0.038). More olanzapine patients had a clinically significant weight increase (> or =7% of baseline weight) compared to lithium patients (P=0.009). More olanzapine patients completed the study than lithium patients, although this difference was not statistically significant (olz, 91.3%; lith, 78.9%; P=0.057). LIMITATIONS: No placebo arm was included; however both treatments have previously been reported to be more effective than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that olanzapine has superior efficacy to lithium in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar mania over a 4-week period. However, adverse events were experienced by a greater number of olanzapine patients than lithium patients.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Carbonato de Litio/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/epidemiología , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Trastorno Bipolar/complicaciones , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica Breve , Trastorno Depresivo/complicaciones , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Carbonato de Litio/efectos adversos , Masculino , Obesidad/inducido químicamente , Obesidad/epidemiología , Olanzapina , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Aumento de Peso/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate, in a clinical practice setting, the effectiveness of olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia among partially-responding, symptomatic Asian patients who switch from conventional antipsychotic treatment, (2) to assess the safety of olanzapine and (3) to assess the change in quality of life in Asian patients with schizophrenia who switch to olanzapine. METHODS: Effectiveness, safety and quality of life were assessed in outpatients with schizophrenia (n=1267) who lacked symptomatic control with conventional antipsychotics and were switched to olanzapine therapy. Data for this prospective, observational study were collected for 12 months from Asian patients in China, Hong Kong, the Philippines, South Korea and Taiwan. RESULTS: Significant clinical improvements (P<0.05) were observed following 12 months of olanzapine treatment and 87.3% of the subjects responded to treatment at endpoint (i.e. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Total score reduced by > or =30% relative to baseline; last observation carried forward). Abnormal involuntary movements (mean change in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale: -3.20, P<0.001) and quality of life were significantly improved in patients treated with olanzapine. However, some patients experienced significant weight gain (3.60+/-4.50 kg, P<0.001) with olanzapine treatment, relative to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that switching to olanzapine may be effective in improving symptoms, may be well-tolerated and may improve the quality of life in Asian patients who are only partially responsive to treatment with conventional antipsychotics. The pragmatic design and naturalistic setting of this large study make the findings relevant for treating patients from some Asian countries in routine clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Pueblo Asiatico , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Olanzapina , Estudios Prospectivos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Calidad de Vida , Tamaño de la Muestra , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Rural Australian Medical Undergraduate Scholarships (RAMUS) provide 10,000 dollars per annum to selected medical students with a rural background. Eligibility criteria include having lived in a rural community for five consecutive or eight cumulative years. We sought to validate the above-specified criterion using data from the Australian National Rural Background Study. DESIGN: National case control study stratified by jurisdiction. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand four hundred and fourteen Australian-trained rural and urban general practitioners (GPs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Whether the RAMUS rural background criterion was met or not. RESULTS: Doctors who met the RAMUS rural background criterion were more likely to be in rural practice (odds ratio = 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.97-3.18) than those who did not. This was true for all jurisdictions (except for the Northern Territory) and ranged from 1.95 for South Australia to 3.57 for Victoria. CONCLUSION: Rural GPs are more likely to fulfil the RAMUS rural background criterion, supporting the existence of the RAMUS scheme.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/economía , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Becas/estadística & datos numéricos , Becas/normas , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ubicación de la Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural , Distribución por SexoAsunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Australia , Episodio de Atención , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cintigrafía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dolor de Hombro/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of nurse-run asthma clinics based in general practice compared with usual medical care to produce at least a moderate improvement in the quality of life of adults with asthma. METHODOLOGY: A randomized controlled trial involving 80 asthma clinic and 90 usual medical care asthma participants, aged 18 years and older was conducted in 11 general practices in Adelaide. The main outcome measure was the St George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), from which quality-of-life scores were used to assess therapeutic benefit. Lung function measurements and health services utilization data were also collected. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-three participants (90%) were reviewed at follow up after 6-9 months. There was little difference between groups in baseline measures or for the 6-month follow-up outcomes, including the mean difference in total SGRQ scores (-0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.0, 2.9) and the mean difference in percentage predicted FEV(1) (2.3%, 95% CI -0.7, 5.3 pre-bronchodilator; 0.4%, 95% CI -5.1, 5.9 post-bronchodilator). Trends in health services utilization were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-run asthma clinics based in general practice and usual medical care were similar in their effects on quality of life and lung function in adults. These findings cannot be generalized to hospital outpatients and other clinics that manage more severe asthmatic patients.
Asunto(s)
Asma/enfermería , Asma/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Asma/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermeras Clínicas , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Australia del SurRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous studies do not provide a clear picture of the relationship between nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)) exposure and asthma. METHODS: Eighteen schools using unflued gas heating in winter were randomly allocated to either retain their heaters (10 control schools) or to have replacement flued gas or electric heaters installed at the beginning of winter (8 intervention schools). Fortnightly telephone interviews were used to record daily individual asthma symptoms that occurred over 12 weeks (including winter). Lung function and histamine challenge tests were performed at baseline and the end of the study. NO(2) was measured in each school classroom on 9 days and in each household on 3 days spread over the study period. RESULTS: From 199 primary school children that met the eligibility criteria, 45 intervention and 73 control children agreed to participate. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Difficulty breathing during the day (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.98) and night (RR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.69), chest tightness during the day (RR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.81), and daytime asthma attacks (RR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.93) were significantly reduced in the intervention group. Percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)), the concentration of histamine inducing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PD(20)), and the dose-response slope (DRS) were similar between groups at follow-up. Mean (standard deviation) NO(2) levels were 15.5 (6.6) parts per billion (ppb) and 47.0 (26.8) ppb in the intervention and control schools respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Asthma symptoms were reduced following a replacement intervention that removed high exposure to NO(2). Such replacement should be considered a public health priority for schools using unflued gas heating during winter.
Asunto(s)
Asma/fisiopatología , Calefacción/instrumentación , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/toxicidad , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Contaminación del Aire Interior , Asma/inducido químicamente , Pruebas de Provocación Bronquial/métodos , Niño , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Calefacción/efectos adversos , Histamina , Humanos , Exposición por Inhalación , Masculino , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/análisis , Respiración , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To quantify how frequently general practitioners in Australia prescribe antibiotics for acute bronchitis, which antibiotics are used, and whether there are subgroups of patients who might benefit from their use. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective descriptive study using 3 sets of data: Australian Sentinel Practice Research Network, the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) Program, and the General Practice Research Network (GPRN). RESULTS: Over 50% of all patients with 'acute bronchitis' had either chest or one or more systemic signs on physical examination. The rate of antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis was 79.6% of acute bronchitis visits using BEACH data 2001-2002 and varied from 68.6 (95% CI: 62.8-74.5%) in 2001 to 78.7 (95% CI: 72.2-85.2%) in 1999 using GPRN data. Penicillins, followed by macrolides, were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. DISCUSSION: Australian GPs frequently prescribe antibiotics for 'acute bronchitis' despite guidelines to the contrary. One reason may be that many patients present with chest or systemic signs.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bronquitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Aguda , Australia , Bronquitis/diagnóstico , Utilización de Medicamentos , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess if there are any differences in statin prescribing across Australia by socioeconomic status or sex and to relate prescribing rates to coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality rates. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using data on statin prescribing by age, sex and patient postcode for the period May to December 2002. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The Australian population, stratified by sex and quintile of Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-standardised rates of statin scripts per 1000 population per month for each sex and IRSD quintile. RESULTS: 9.1 million prescriptions for statins were supplied between May and December 2002, for a total cost of 570 million dollars. The age-standardised rates for statin prescribing in women varied from 56.9 (95% CI, 56.6-57.2) scripts per 1000 population per month in the most disadvantaged socioeconomic quintile through 53.4 (95% CI, 53.0-53.7), 50.3 (95% CI, 50.0-50.6), 48.4 (95% CI, 48.1-48.7) to 46.3 (95% CI, 46.0-46.6) in the least disadvantaged quintile. For men the figures were 52.6 (95% CI, 52.3-52.9), 50.9 (95% CI, 50.6-51.2), 48.8 (95% CI, 48.6-49.1), 47.7 (95% CI, 47.4-47.9), and 51.9 (95% CI, 51.6-52.2). There was a significant linear association between statin prescribing and CHD mortality by quintile of socioeconomic disadvantage in women (weighted least squares slope, 0.380; 95% CI, 0.366 to 0.395; P < 0.0001), but not in men (slope, -0.002; 95% CI, -0.010 to 0.006; P = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in men there is either overprescribing of statins in the highest socioeconomic quintile or underprescribing in the lowest. Furthermore, contrary to expectation, women - relative to men - are prescribed statins at higher rates at lower levels of risk (using CHD deaths as a proxy measure of risk).