Long-term outcomes to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab based on pathological response for patients with resectable stage III/IV cutaneous melanoma.

BACKGROUND: While neoadjuvant immunotherapy for melanoma has shown promising results, the data have been limited by a relatively short follow-up time, with most studies reporting 2-year outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine long-term outcomes for stage III/IV melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a follow-up study of a previously published phase Ib clinical trial of 30 patients with resectable stage III/IV cutaneous melanoma who received one dose of 200 mg IV neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 3 weeks before surgical resection, followed by 1 year of adjuvant pembrolizumab. The primary outcomes were 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), and recurrence patterns. RESULTS: We report updated results at 5 years of follow-up with a median follow-up of 61.9 months. No deaths occurred in patients with a major pathological response (MPR, <10% viable tumor) or complete pathological response (pCR, no viable tumor) (n = 8), compared to a 5-year OS of 72.8% for the remainder of the cohort (P = 0.12). Two of eight patients with a pCR or MPR had a recurrence. Of the patients with >10% viable tumor remaining, 8 of 22 patients (36%) had a recurrence. Additionally, the median time to recurrence was 3.9 years for patients with ≤10% viable tumor and 0.6 years for patients with >10% viable tumor (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year results from this trial represent the longest follow-up of a single-agent neoadjuvant PD-1 trial to date. Response to neoadjuvant therapy continues to be an important prognosticator with regard to OS and RFS. Additionally, recurrences in patients with pCR occur later and are salvageable, with a 5-year OS of 100%. These results demonstrate the long-term efficacy of single-agent neoadjuvant/adjuvant PD-1 blockade in patients with a pCR and the importance of long-term follow-up for these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02434354.

Establishing Benefit from Vitamin D Supplementation - Adherence to Defined Criteria and Targeting of High-Risk Groups Essential?

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D is the one of the most common nutritional deficiencies worldwide, and insufficiency or deficiency can be associated with musculoskeletal and non-skeletal conditions such as cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: Recent data suggests that Vitamin D is relatively safe and toxicity is rarer than previously indicated. However, international guidelines regarding dosage and target plasma levels are conflicting. Moreover multiple well-designed studies of healthy older adults, unselected in terms of Vitamin D status, have revealed largely negative results (with the possible exception of older patients in care homes/hospitals) in terms of improvement in musculoskeletal and non-skeletal conditions to date. CONCLUSION: On that basis, it is suggested that future trials regarding Vitamin D supplementation should be carried out in high-risk groups. The use of published criteria for evaluating the effect of nutrients and targeting of individuals with Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency for inclusion in such studies is also proposed. The identification of specific subgroups that will benefit from supplementation and replacement, and the establishment of a scientific basis for such therapy, should be possible with this approach.