Tumour necrosis factor superfamily members in ischaemic vascular diseases.

Current treatment of ischaemic vascular diseases such as coronary and peripheral artery disease includes angioplasty and bypass grafting, as well as lipid lowering therapies and control of other cardiovascular risk factors. Numerous members of the tumour necrosis factor superfamily (TNFSF) have recently shown emerging roles in both the protection and progression of such diseases. Understanding the role TNFSF members play in ischaemic vascular disease may provide insight into the development of novel therapeutics to prevent or treat diseases relating to atherosclerosis and ischaemia. This review summarizes the most recent findings relating to TNFSF members and the mechanisms that precede ischaemic vascular disease progression, particularly endothelial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and atherosclerotic plaque development. This review also explores recent translational research on the role of TNFSF therapies in cardiovascular disease.

The effect of concomitant glenohumeral joint capsule release during rotator cuff repair--a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: There is debate as to whether to operate or to defer surgery on patients with concomitant rotator cuff tear and shoulder stiffness. The purpose of this study was therefore to compare the outcomes in those patients who had both their rotator cuff tear and shoulder stiffness treated with the outcomes of patients who had a rotator cuff repair but no stiffness. METHODS: Twenty-five patients formed the stiffness group (receiving a concomitant rotator cuff repair and manipulation under anesthesia ± arthroscopic capsular release for preoperative ipsilateral stiffness), and a chronologically matched group of 170 rotator cuff repair-only patients formed the nonstiffness group. Patients ranked their pain and function scores preoperatively and at 1 week, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years postoperatively; examiners recorded range of motion, strength, and presence of impingement signs. Repair integrity was determined using ultrasound. RESULTS: Patients from both groups had significantly improved clinical outcomes at the 2-year follow-up compared with preoperative values. Range of motion was similar between groups at 2 years for forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation, whereas the nonstiffness group had a superior range of internal rotation (P = .014). Stiffness patients had 0 of 25 (0%) retears at 2 years compared with 34 of 170 (20%) in the nonstiffness group (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: The good outcomes of rotator cuff repair with glenohumeral capsular release disproved our hypothesis and suggest that there is no advantage in delaying repair of a rotator cuff tear to allow stiffness to resolve and that stiffness confers an advantage in terms of repair integrity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Retrospective Cohort Design; Treatment Study.