The Prevalence and Characteristics of Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse in Patients With Unexplained Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is associated with otherwise unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA). However, reports are hindered by the absence of a systematic ascertainment of alternative diagnoses. OBJECTIVES: This study reports the prevalence and characteristics of MVP in a large cohort of patients with UCA. METHODS: Patients were enrolled following an UCA, defined as cardiac arrest with no coronary artery disease, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, and no apparent explanation on electrocardiogram. A comprehensive evaluation was performed, and patients were diagnosed with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) if no cause was found. Echocardiography reports were reviewed for MVP. Patients with MVP were divided into 2 groups: those with IVF (AMVP) and those with an alternative diagnosis (nonarrhythmic MVP). Patient characteristics were then compared. The long-term outcomes of AMVP were reported. RESULTS: Among 571 with an initially UCA, 34 patients had MVP (6%). The prevalence of definite MVP was significantly higher in patients with IVF than those with an alternative diagnosis (24 of 366 [6.6%] vs 5 of 205 [2.4%]; P = 0.03). Bileaflet prolapse was significantly associated with AMVP (18 of 23 [78%] vs 1 of 8 [12.5%]; P = 0.001; OR: 25.2). The proportion of patients with AMVP who received appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies over a median follow-up of 42 months was 21.1% (4 of 19). CONCLUSIONS: MVP is associated with otherwise UCA (IVF), with a prevalence of 6.6%. Bileaflet prolapse appears to be a feature of AMVP, although future studies need to ascertain its independent association. A significant proportion of patients with AMVP received appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies during follow-up.

Short-coupled ventricular fibrillation represents a distinct phenotype among latent causes of unexplained cardiac arrest: a report from the CASPER registry.

AIMS: The term idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) describes survivors of unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA) without a specific diagnosis after clinical and genetic testing. Previous reports have described a subset of IVF individuals with ventricular arrhythmia initiated by short-coupled trigger premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) for which the term short-coupled ventricular fibrillation (SCVF) has been proposed. The aim of this article is to establish the phenotype and frequency of SCVF in a large cohort of UCA survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a multicentre study including consecutive UCA survivors from the CASPER registry. Short-coupled ventricular fibrillation was defined as otherwise unexplained ventricular fibrillation initiated by a trigger PVC with a coupling interval of <350 ms. Among 364 UCA survivors, 24/364 (6.6%) met diagnostic criteria for SCVF. The diagnosis of SCVF was obtained in 19/24 (79%) individuals by documented ventricular fibrillation during follow-up. Ventricular arrhythmia was initiated by a mean PVC coupling interval of 274 ± 32 ms. Electrical storm occurred in 21% of SCVF probands but not in any UCA proband (P < 0.001). The median time to recurrent ventricular arrhythmia in SCVF was 31 months. Recurrent ventricular fibrillation resulted in quinidine administration in 12/24 SCVF (50%) with excellent arrhythmia control. CONCLUSION: Short-coupled ventricular fibrillation is a distinct primary arrhythmia syndrome accounting for at least 6.6% of UCA. As documentation of ventricular fibrillation onset is necessary for the diagnosis, most cases are diagnosed at the time of recurrent arrhythmia, thus the true prevalence of SCVF remains still unknown. Quinidine is effective in SCVF and should be considered as first-line treatment for patients with recurrent episodes.

A virtual platform to deliver ambulatory care for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Background: There are little data on the use of virtual care for patients with arrhythmia. We evaluated a virtual clinic platform, in conjunction with specialist care, for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: This was a prospective, observational cohort study evaluating an online educational and treatment platform, with a randomized sub-study examining the use of an ambulatory single-lead electrocardiogram heart monitor (AHM). Follow-up was 6 months. The main outcome was patients' platform use; success was defined as 90% of patients using the platform at least once, and 75% using it at least twice. The primary outcome in the AHM sub-study was Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Severity (AFSS) score. Other outcomes included patient satisfaction questionnaires, quality of life, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for AF. Results: We enrolled 94 patients between July 2018 and May 2019; 83% of patients logged in at least once and 54.3% more than once. Patients who were older, were male, or had new-onset AF were more likely to log in to the platform. Satisfaction scores were high; 70%-94% of patients responded favorably. Quality-of-life scores improved at 3 and 6 months. In the AHM sub-study (n = 71), those who received an AHM had lower AFSS scores (least square mean difference -2.52, 95% CI -4.48 to -0.25, P = .03). There was no difference in emergency department visits or hospitalizations. Conclusion: The online platform did not reach our feasibility target but was well received. Allocation of an AHM was associated with improved quality of life. Virtual AF care shows promise and should be evaluated in further research.