Great Debate: Chemoradiation Should be Added to Chemotherapy as a Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategy for Resectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with resectable gastric cancer present with locally advanced disease and warrant neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on level 1 evidence. However, the incremental benefit of adding radiation to chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment strategy for these patients is less clear. METHODS: While awaiting the results of two ongoing randomized clinical trials attempting to specifically address this question (TOPGEAR and CRITICS-II), this article presents the debate between two gastric cancer surgery experts supporting each side of the argument on the use or omission of neoadjuvant radiation in this setting. RESULTS: On the one hand, neoadjuvant radiation may be better tolerated compared with modern triplet chemotherapy and may be associated with higher rates of major pathologic response. Additionally, there is evidence to suggest that radiation may offer a survival benefit when the tumor is located at the gastroesophageal junction or there is concern for a margin-positive resection. However, in the setting of adequate surgery, no survival benefit has been demonstrated by adding radiation to modern chemotherapy, likely reflecting the fact that death from gastric cancer is a result of distant recurrence, which is not addressed by local treatment such as radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: While awaiting the results of the TOPGEAR and CRITICS-II trials, this discussion of current evidence can facilitate the refinement of an optimal neoadjuvant therapy strategy in patients with resectable gastric cancer.

Successful virtual interviews for surgery residents.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic resulted in surgical residency and fellowship interviews shifting to a virtual, web-based format. Although virtual interviews have important benefits, this change also brought about new challenges for applicants, including a new interview etiquette and potential difficulty in evaluating and discriminating between programs. The aim of this article is to provide applicants with guidance for every step of their interview process so that they can confidently put forth their strongest performance. Preparing for effective virtual interviewing begins long before the interview day and involves critical self-reflection, practice with mock interviews, optimizing the interview environment, and conducting a technology trial run. During the interview day, standard interview advice for face-to-face interviews remains true for virtual interviews. However, there are a few additional considerations, including minimizing distractions, muting oneself in a group setting, and turning off the camera when stepping away from the screen. After the interview, there are several ways for applicants to elicit more information about the "fit" of different programs of interest. We recommend leveraging personal relationships to ask additional questions and consider visiting select programs in person, if possible. Although our recommendations are not exhaustive, we hope that by following these virtual interview best practices, applicants will be more prepared to present themselves strongly and successfully navigate the virtual interview process.

Do Resident Coaching Programs Benefit their Coaches? Impact of a Professional Development Coaching Program on The Coaches.

BACKGROUND: Coaching has been shown to decrease physician burnout; however, coachee outcomes have been the focus. We report the impact of coaching on women-identifying surgeons who participated as coaches in a 9-month virtual program. METHODS: A coaching program was implemented in the Association of Women Surgeons (AWS) to determine the effects of coaching on well-being and burnout from 2018 to 2020. AWS members volunteered and completed training in professional development coaching. Pre- and post-study measures were assessed, and bivariate analysis performed based on burnout and professional fulfillment score. RESULTS: Seventy-five coaches participated; 57 completed both pre- and post-study surveys. There were no significant changes in burnout or professional fulfillment including the Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationship, Meaning, and Accomplishment scale, hardiness, self-valuation, coping, gratitude, or intolerance of uncertainty scores from baseline to post-survey. On bivariate analysis, hardiness was associated with lower burnout throughout the duration of the program. Coaches with lower burnout at the end of the program met with their coachee more frequently than coaches with higher burnout [mean (SD) 3.95(2.16) versus 2.35(2.13) p = 0.0099]. DISCUSSION: Burnout and professional fulfillment demonstrated no change in women surgeons who participated as professional development coaches. Those with lower burnout and higher professional fulfillment at the end of the program were found to have higher hardiness, which may be worth future investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Acquisition of coaching skills did not directly improve well-being in faculty who participated in a resident coaching program. Future studies would benefit from control groups and exploration of qualitative benefits of coaching.

The Big Sibling program: Impact of a medical student-resident mentorship program during the surgery clerkship.

BACKGROUND: We created a Big Sibling mentorship program for medical students and studied the program effects. METHODS: Between July 2019 to December 2020, students completing their surgery clerkship were paired with a Big Sibling surgical research resident. Participation in and perceptions of the program were assessed by survey. RESULTS: 81 medical students and 25 residents participated with a 79% and 95% survey response rate, respectively. The most valuable topics discussed included ward skills, personal development and career advising. Students who interacted >2 times with their Big Sibling were more likely to perceive the operating room as a positive learning environment, view attendings as role models, and receive mentoring and feedback from residents and attendings (p = 0.03, 0.02, 0.01 respectively). 78% of residents thought the program was a positive experience and no residents found it burdensome. CONCLUSION: The Big Siblings program enhances the surgery clerkship learning environment. Students who engaged with their Big Sibling had a more positive view of the clerkship and the mentorship provided by residents and attendings.

Inpatient Satisfaction With Surgical Resident Care After Elective General and Oncologic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate inpatient satisfaction with surgical resident care. BACKGROUND: Surgical trainees are often the primary providers of care to surgical inpatients, yet patient satisfaction with surgical resident care is not well characterized or routinely assessed. METHODS: English-speaking, general surgery inpatients recovering from elective gastrointestinal and oncologic surgery were invited to complete a survey addressing their satisfaction with surgical resident care. Patients positively identified photos of surgical senior residents and interns before completing a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Surgical Care Survey (S-CAHPS). Adapted S-CAHPS items were scored using the "top-box" method. RESULTS: Ninety percent of recruited patients agreed to participate (324/359, mean age=62.2, 50.3% male). Patients were able to correctly identify their seniors and interns 85% and 83% of the time, respectively ( P =0.14). On a 10-point scale, seniors had a mean rating of 9.23±1.27 and interns had a mean rating of 9.01±1.49 ( P =0.14). Ninety-nine percent of patients agreed it was important to help in the education of future surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical inpatients were able to recognize their resident physicians with high frequency and rated resident care highly overall, suggesting that they may serve as a willing source of feedback regarding residents' development of core competencies such as interpersonal skills, communication, professionalism, and patient care. Future work should investigate how to best incorporate patient evaluation of surgical resident care routinely into trainee assessment to support resident development.

Impact of a Virtual Professional Development Coaching Program on the Professional Fulfillment and Well-Being of Women Surgery Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of a virtual coaching program offered to women surgery residents in a surgical society. BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled experiments evaluating the effect of coaching on trainee well-being and burnout is lacking. METHODS: Women surgery residents in the Association of Women Surgeons were recruited to participate in a randomized controlled trial of the effects of a virtual coaching program on trainee well-being. Attending surgeons served as coaches after completing in-person training. Residents (n=237) were randomized to intervention (three 1:1 coaching sessions over 9 mo) or control (e-mailed wellness resources). Participants were surveyed at baseline and postintervention using validated measures of well-being, burnout, and resilience. Changes in outcome measures between presurvey and postsurvey were compared between study arms. RESULTS: Survey response rates were 56.9% (n=66) in the control group and 69.4% (n=84) in the intervention group ( P =0.05). The intervention group showed significant improvement in professional fulfillment ( P =0.021), burnout (0.026), work exhaustion (0.017), self-valuation (0.003), and well-being ( P =0.002); whereas the control group showed significant improvement in self-valuation ( P =0.015) and significant decline in resilience ( P =0.025). The intervention group had a significant improvement in well-being ( P =0.015) and intolerance of uncertainty ( P =0.015) compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Women surgery residents who participated in a remote coaching program offered by a surgical society demonstrated improvement in aspects of well-being relative to peers who did not receive coaching. Therefore, remote coaching offered by a professional society may be a useful component of initiatives directed at trainee well-being.

Neurosurgeons' Perspectives on Vascular Entrustable Professional Activities.

This article discusses subspecialty Canadian neurosurgeons' perceptions of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) assessments and variabilities prior to the implementation of the Competence by Design (CBD) system in Canada. Vascular neurosurgeons were asked to reflect on how they would evaluate and give feedback to neurosurgery residents concerning the EPA "Performing surgery for patients with an intracranial aneurysm." Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a deductive approach. Themes were derived from these interviews and reflected on the subjectivity and biases present in the EPA assessment forms. Indeed, faculty may require more training in the transitioning to a CBD evaluation system.

Neoadjuvant therapy for melanoma: A critical appraisal.

The treatment of advanced melanoma has significantly changed since the development of targeted and immune therapy. To date, these agents have primarily been used in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. Given several theoretical advantages, there is increased interest in the use of these new therapeutics in the neoadjuvant setting. In this review, we detail the potential benefits and pitfalls of neoadjuvant therapy for melanoma, review the currently available data, and describe ongoing neoadjuvant trials.

Impact of Rater Training on Residents Technical Skill Assessments: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The ACS/APDS Resident Skills Curriculum's Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) consists of task-specific checklists and a global rating scale (GRS) completed by raters. Prior work demonstrated a need for rater training. This study evaluates the impact of a rater-training curriculum on scoring discrimination, consistency, and validity for handsewn bowel anastomosis (HBA) and vascular anastomosis (VA). DESIGN/ METHODS: A rater training video model was developed, which included a GRS orientation and anchoring performances representing the range of potential scores. Faculty raters were randomized to rater training or no rater training and were asked to score videos of resident HBA/VA. Consensus scores were assigned to each video using a modified Delphi process (Gold Score). Trained and untrained scores were analyzed for discrimination and score spread and compared to the Gold Score for relative agreement. RESULTS: Eight general and eight vascular surgery faculty were randomized to score 24 HBA/VA videos. Rater training increased rater discrimination and decreased rating scale shrinkage for both VA (mean trained score: 2.83, variance 1.88; mean untrained score: 3.1, variance 1.14, p = 0.007) and HBA (mean trained score: 3.52, variance 1.44; mean untrained score: 3.42, variance 0.96, p = 0.033). On validity analyses, a comparison between each rater group vs Gold Score revealed a moderate training impact for VA, trained κ=0.65 vs untrained κ=0.57 and no impact for HBA, R1 κ = 0.71 vs R2 κ = 0.73. CONCLUSION: A rater-training curriculum improved raters' ability to differentiate performance levels and use a wider range of the scoring scale. However, despite rater training, there was persistent disagreement between faculty GRS scores with no groups reaching the agreement threshold for formative assessment. If technical skill exams are incorporated into high stakes assessments, consensus ratings via a standard setting process are likely a more valid option than individual faculty ratings.

Transfer of virtual reality endoscopy training to live animal colonoscopy: a randomized control trial of proficiency vs. repetition-based training.

BACKGROUND: Low first-time pass rates of the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) exam stimulated development of virtual reality (VR) simulation curricula for test preparation. This study evaluates the transfer of VR endoscopy training to live porcine endoscopy performance and compares the relative effectiveness of a proficiency-based vs repetition-based VR training curriculum. METHODS: Novice endoscopists completed pretesting including the FES manual skills examination and Global Assessment of GI Endoscopic Skills (GAGES) assessment of porcine upper and lower endoscopy. Participants were randomly assigned one of two curricula: proficiency-based or repetition-based. Following curriculum completion, participants post-tested via repeat FES examination and GAGES porcine endoscopy assessments. The two cohorts pre-to-post-test differences were compared using ANCOVA. RESULTS: Twenty-two residents completed the curricula. There were no differences in demographics or clinical endoscopy experience between the groups. The repetition group spent significantly more time on the simulator (repetition: 242.2 min, SD 48.6) compared to the proficiency group (proficiency: 170.0 min, SD 66.3; p = 0.013). There was a significant improvement in porcine endoscopy (pre: 10.6, SD 2.8, post: 16.6, SD 3.4; p < 0.001) and colonoscopy (pre: 10.4, SD 2.7, post: 16.4, SD 4.2; p < 0.001) GAGES scores as well as FES manual skills performance (pre: 270.9, SD 105.5, post: 477.4, SD 68.9; p < 0.001) for the total cohort. There was no difference in post-test GAGES performance or FES manual skills exam performance between the two groups. Both the proficiency and repetition group had a 100% pass rate on the FES skills exam following VR curriculum completion. CONCLUSION: A VR endoscopy curriculum translates to improved performance in upper and lower endoscopy in a live animal model. VR curricula type did not affect FES manual skills examination or live colonoscopy outcomes; however, a proficiency curriculum is less time-consuming and can provide a structured approach to prepare for both the FES exam and clinical endoscopy.

A multisite study of medical student perspectives on the core surgical clerkship.

BACKGROUND: The surgical clerkship is the primary surgical learning experience for medical students. This study aims to understand student perspectives on the surgery clerkship both before and after the core surgical rotation. METHODS: Medical students at 4 academic hospitals completed pre and postclerkship surveys that included open-ended questions regarding (1) student learning goals and concerns and (2) how surgical clerkship learning could be enhanced. Thematic analysis was performed, and interrater reliability was calculated. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of students completed both a pre and postclerkship survey (n =162 of 179), generating 320 preclerkship and 270 postclerkship responses. Mean kappa coefficients were 0.83 and 0.82 for pre and postclerkship primary themes, respectively. Thematic analysis identified 5 broad themes: (1) core learning expectations, (2) understanding surgical careers, culture, and work, (3) inhabiting the role of a surgeon, (4) inclusion in the surgical team, and (5) the unique role of the medical student on clinical clerkships. Based on these themes, we propose a learner-centered model of a successful surgical clerkship that satisfies discrete student learning and goals and career objectives while ameliorating the challenges of high-stakes clinical surgical environments such as the operating room. CONCLUSION: Understanding student perspectives on the surgery clerkship, including preclerkship motivations and concerns and postclerkship reflections on surgical learning, revealed potential targets of intervention to improve the surgery clerkship. Future investigation may elucidate whether the proposed model of the elements of a successful surgery clerkship learning facilitates improvement of the surgical learning environment and enhanced surgical learning.

Designing the "match of the future": challenges and proposed solutions in the interview and match phase of the UME-GME transition.

This review focuses on the interview and match process with the purpose of broadly reviewing challenges in the current surgical residency selection process, detailing potential solutions, and identifying future avenues of investigation.

Becoming Artemis's Mother.

MINI-ABSTRACT: This perspective piece describes the author's evolving relationship to motherhood during surgical residency training, and how motherhood became a source of professional ambition despite persistent gender inequity that exists in academic surgery.

Eyes of the Beholders: First-year medical students' perceptions of surgeons and the field of surgery.

BACKGROUND: Medical students have negative perceptions of surgery prior to their clerkships. To explore possible explanations, we examined the association between these perceptions, individual identity and vulnerability to stereotype threat (ST). METHODS: All first-year medical students at a single school received an electronic survey which assessed identity groups, vulnerability to ST and perceptions of surgeons/surgery. Multi-method analyses examined these associations. RESULTS: Women held more negative than positive views about the field of surgery (p = 0.007) but not surgeons. Students vulnerable to ST had negative views about both surgeons (p < 0.0001) and surgery (p = 0.007). They were also less interested in pursuing a surgical career compared to non-vulnerable students (56% vs. 80% p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: For some students, negative views of surgeons and surgery appear to be associated with individual identity and ST. Future research should aim to confirm these findings and identify strategies to develop positive perceptions for these populations.

Challenges of virtual interviewing for surgical fellowships: a qualitative analysis of applicant experiences.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic forced surgical fellowship programs to transition from in-person to remote applicant interviews; the virtual interviewing format presented new and unique challenges. We sought to understand applicants' perceived challenges to virtual interviewing for a surgical fellowship program. METHOD: A grounded theory-based qualitative study was performed utilizing semi-structured interviews with fellowship applicants from the 2020 fellowship match. All Fellowship Council-registered applicants were eligible. We purposefully sampled participants to balance across gender, specialty-choice, and academic versus community-program affiliation. Interviews were inductively analyzed by two researchers for prominent themes. RESULTS: Fifteen interviews were conducted. Participants were 60% male (n = 9), with 33% (n = 5) from non-academic institutions. They applied for the following fellowships: Advanced Gastrointestinal/Minimal Invasive (55%), Bariatric (30%), Hepatopancreatobiliary (10%) and Surgical Oncology (5%). Four main themes emerged to describe virtual interview process challenges: (1) perceived data deficiency, (2) superficial personal connections, (3) magnification of non-professionalism, and (4) logistical frustrations. Applicants recommend program directors provide more information about the fellowship prior to interview day and offer informal independent interactions with current and previous fellows. CONCLUSIONS: According to fellowship applicants, virtual interviews resulted in a lack of information for rank-list decision making ultimately requiring them to rely on other information avenues to base their decisions. These applicants have offered advice to fellowship program directors and future applicants to better optimize this process.

Operating Room Staff Perceptions of Medical Students.

OBJECTIVE: While the operating room (OR) is a keystone experience, medical students often report negative experiences and intimidation in the OR. The purpose of this study is to describe the perceived role of medical students in the OR by registered nurses and certified surgical technologists to improve medical student education. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of select Massachusetts General Hospital perioperative staff in surgery was conducted through an anonymous survey in March 2021. Statistical analysis included inductive thematic analysis, descriptive statistics, and Mann-Whitney U tests, with a p-value of <0.05. The survey instrument characterized the perception of medical student preparedness for OR-related tasks and free-text responses on the role of medical students in the OR and opportunities for improvement. SETTING: The study was conducted at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included Massachusetts General Hospital perioperative staff in the Department of Surgery, with 262 registered nurses and 90 certified surgical technologists receiving the survey. RESULTS: There were 86 completed responses (24.4% response rate). A total of 71.23% of respondents believe medical students should be observational learners in the OR. Areas for improvement include OR etiquette (37.5%), awareness of the surgical field (26.79%), and scrubbing skills (26.79%). A total of 48.8% of staff agreed they enjoy working with medical students, followed by 20.9% who somewhat agree. A total of 27.91% of respondents somewhat agreed that medical students were knowledgeable about OR sterility and scrubbing procedures, followed by 25.58% who somewhat disagreed. CONCLUSIONS: Operating room staff enjoy working with medical students. The majority of staff believe medical students' role in the OR is that of observational learning. Areas of improvement for medical students include OR etiquette, awareness of the surgical field, scrubbing and gowning skills, and assisting staff whenever needed. Possible solutions include incorporating nursing staff as surgery clerkship stakeholders to optimize medical student experiences in the OR.

Evaluating and Comparing Emotional Intelligence and Improvement Mindset of Plastic Surgery Residents.

BACKGROUND: Emotional Intelligence (EI) has been linked to burnout, job satisfaction, and work performance among resident physicians. Individuals with a growth mindset believe intelligence and ability are traits that can be increased or improved upon through learning. EI and mindset have yet to be studied among plastic surgeons in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was distributed to plastic surgery residents and general surgery residents at a single institution containing a validated EI survey tool (TEIQue-SF). Second, a survey was sent to all plastic surgery residents in the United States containing the TEIQue-SF and a validated survey tool to assess mindset (ITIS). RESULTS: The response rate for the local study was 82% (plastic surgery) and 75% (general surgery). Only 7.8% of plastic surgery residents had any prior formal EI training or education. Mean global EI scores of local plastic surgery residents were higher than the normative population sample (P <0.0001). Plastic surgery and general surgery residents had similar EI scores. Integrated residents and junior plastic surgery residents had higher Well-Being scores compared to independent (P = 0.04) and senior residents (P = 0.04). Sixty-four plastic surgery residents completed the national survey. No correlation was found between EI and ITIS scores among the national plastic surgery resident cohort. CONCLUSION: Despite different work profiles, general surgery and plastic surgery residents may have similar EI profiles. Mindset does not appear to correlate to EI domains. Future studies will focus on how EI and mindset may develop over the course of residency training and their relationship to overall resident wellness.

SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD).

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is an extremely common condition with several medical and surgical treatment options. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions regarding the treatment of GERD with an emphasis on evaluating different surgical techniques. METHODS: Literature reviews were conducted for 4 key questions regarding the surgical treatment of GERD in both adults and children: surgical vs. medical treatment, robotic vs. laparoscopic fundoplication, partial vs. complete fundoplication, and division vs. preservation of short gastric vessels in adults or maximal versus minimal dissection in pediatric patients. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS: The panel provided seven recommendations for adults and children with GERD. All recommendations were conditional due to very low, low, or moderate certainty of evidence. The panel conditionally recommended surgical treatment over medical management for adults with chronic or chronic refractory GERD. There was insufficient evidence for the panel to make a recommendation regarding surgical versus medical treatment in children. The panel suggested that once the decision to pursue surgical therapy is made, adults and children with GERD may be treated with either a robotic or a laparoscopic approach, and either partial or complete fundoplication based on surgeon-patient shared decision-making and patient values. In adults, the panel suggested either division or non-division of the short gastric vessels is appropriate, and that children should undergo minimal dissection during fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations should provide guidance with regard to surgical decision-making in the treatment of GERD and highlight the importance of shared decision-making and patient values to optimize patient outcomes. Pursuing the identified research needs may improve future versions of guidelines for the treatment of GERD.

The Resident-Run Minor Surgery Clinic: A Four-Year Analysis of Patient Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Resident Education.

OBJECTIVE: A resident-run minor surgery clinic was developed to increase resident procedural autonomy. We evaluated whether 1) there was a significant difference between complications and patient satisfaction when procedures were independently performed by surgical residents vs. a surgical attending and 2) if participation was associated with an increase in resident procedural confidence. DESIGN: Third year general surgery residents participated in a weekly procedure clinic from 2014-2018. Post-procedure complications and patient satisfaction were compared between patients operated on by residents vs. the staff surgeon. Residents were surveyed regarding their confidence in independently performing a variety of clinic-based patient care tasks. SETTING: Massachusetts General Hospital General in Boston, MA; an academic tertiary care general surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS: Post-graduate year three general surgery residents that ran the clinic as part of a general surgery rotation. RESULTS: 1230 patients underwent 1592 procedures (612 in resident clinic, 980 in attending clinic). There was no significant difference in the 30-day complication rate between patients operated on by the resident vs. attending (2.5% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.49). 459 patient satisfaction surveys were administered with a 79.1% response rate. There was no significant difference in the overall quality of care rating between residents and the attending surgeon (87.5% top-box rating vs. 93.1%, p = 0.15). Twenty-one residents completed both a pre- and post-rotation survey (77.8% response rate). The proportion of residents indicating that they could independently perform a variety of patient care tasks significantly increased across the rotation (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mid-level general surgery residents can independently perform office-based procedures without detriment to safety or patient satisfaction. The resident-run procedure clinic serves as an environment for residents to grow in confidence in both technical and non-technical skills. Given the high rate at which patients provide resident feedback, future work may investigate how to best incorporate patient derived evaluations into resident assessment.