Association and correlation of patient symptom perception and asthma control - a rapid literature review.

BACKGROUND: Several studies suggest that patients often under-estimate their asthma symptoms and over-estimate their level of asthma control, potentially putting them at risk of undertreatment with inhaled corticosteroids. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association and correlation between patient symptom perception and asthma control. METHODS: A rapid literature review comprising searches in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library identified English language articles published between 2011-2021 that included a statistical measure of the association or correlation between perceptions of symptoms and asthma control in patients with asthma (adults and/or children). [PROSPERO CRD42021230152]. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) instrument was used for study quality appraisal. RESULTS: Of 22 identified studies, nine presented association data and 13 reported correlation analyses. Eight of nine association studies showed a discordance between patients perceived symptoms and level of asthma control or lung function; among these, patients more frequently overestimated their asthma control than they underestimated their asthma control. Of 10 studies reporting correlation coefficients, all reported a statistically significant correlation between increased symptoms and worse asthma control; however, the strength of the correlation was shown to be only weak or moderate in most studies (coefficients numerically ranged from 0.12 to 0.74). CONCLUSION: Many patients with asthma tend to overestimate their level of asthma control. Although more frequent or worse symptoms were shown to be statistically significantly correlated with worsening asthma control, there was wide variation in correlation strengths, most showing weak or moderate correlations. Research to further understand the reasons for patient symptom misperceptions are warranted.

How Diverse Is Medicinal Chemistry? Insights into Race, Ethnicity, Origin, Gender, and Geography.

A bibliometric study of authors across medicinal chemistry journals over 20 years reveals important trends. Most United States (US) based authors are assigned as racially/ethnically Asian or White; few are Black or Hispanic. More US coauthors have the same race/ethnicity as the corresponding author than expected. The percentage of female authors increased globally, but only slowly. Since 2010, the number of female and male authors declined by 9% and 30%, respectively. Geographically, most authors are male except in Italy where there is gender balance. Gender homophily is observed globally. Geographically, the discipline is now more widely practiced. Article output doubled from 2000 to 2010 with a large increase in articles from China. China excepted, output has since declined. The average number of authors per article rose by a third since 2000. The value of high diversity groups in education, research, and industry cannot be overstated. We recommend diversity is addressed by every medicinal chemist.