Cord blood troponin I levels: biomarker evidence of fetal cardiac injury in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy has been linked to sudden stillbirth. The suddenness of the stillbirths in these cases have led clinicians to suspect that the pathogenesis of stillbirth in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is not related to asphyxia but rather to an undefined etiology. One leading hypothesis relates certain bile acid metabolites to myocardial injury. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether cord blood troponin I levels are increased in fetuses born to mothers with a diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, case-control study was performed at a single institution between 2017 to 2019 in which 87 pregnant patients with a diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (total bile acids ≥10 µmol/L) were enrolled as cases and 122 randomly selected pregnant patients (asymptomatic with intrapartum total bile acids <10 µmol/L) were enrolled as controls. Cord blood troponin I levels were measured at delivery in both groups using a commercially available chemiluminescent immunoassay. Values ≤0.04 ng/mL were considered negative. Values >0.04 ng/mL were considered positive. The primary outcome was the presence of elevated troponin levels in both cases and controls as a surrogate marker for cardiac status. Our secondary outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit stay, low Apgar scores, neonatal acidosis, and hypoxia indicated by cord blood pH and base excess levels at the time of birth. Chi square and t tests were performed to compare social and obstetrical variables. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. A stratification by total bile acids range of <40 µmol/L, 40 to 100 µmol/L, and >100 µmol/L was performed to assess the relationship between the different severities of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (by risk of fetal demise with those with total bile acids of >100 µmol/L considered at greatest risk) and the likelihood of a positive troponin I result. Finally, a logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if levels of ≥10 µmol/L were associated with elevated troponin levels. RESULTS: The mean gestational age at delivery was 38.96±1.47 and 37.71±1.59 weeks of gestation in the controls and cases respectively (P<.001). The mean total bile acids values were 5.2±1.28 ng/mL and 43.2±40.62 ng/mL in the controls and cases respectively (P<.001). Cord blood troponin I was positive in 15 of 122 (12.30%) controls and in 20 of 87 (22.99%) cases. (P<.001). When further stratified by total bile acids levels of <40, 40 to 100, and >100 µmol/L, we found a positive correlation between higher total bile acids levels and a positive troponin I test (P=.002). When controlling for gestational age at delivery, maternal age, and body mass index, higher total bile acids levels were associated with a positive troponin I level (adjusted odds ratio, 1.015; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-1.026). CONCLUSION: Elevated troponin I was more likely to be found in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy than in those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. When stratified by total bile acids levels, a positive troponin I level was more likely to be found with higher levels of total bile acids. In addition, as total bile acids levels increased, they were more likely to be associated with a positive troponin I level. Although there were no stillbirths in our cohort, our findings suggest a potential relationship between cardiac injury and high levels of total bile acids demonstrated by the presence of elevated troponin I levels in cord blood at the time of birth.

Trends in Preeclampsia Risk Factors in the US From 2010 to 2021.

This population-based retrospective study uses data from the National Vital Statistics System to evaluate trends in risk factors for preeclampsia in the US between 2010 and 2021.

One-step vs 2-step gestational diabetes mellitus screening and pregnancy outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes of patients screened with the 1-step or 2-step screening method for gestational diabetes mellitus. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and LILACS were searched from inception up to September 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only randomized controlled trials were included. Studies that had overlapping populations were excluded (International Prospective Register of Systematic Review registration number: CRD42022358903). METHODS: Risk ratios were computed with 95% confidence intervals by 2 authors. Unpublished data were requested. Large for gestational age was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The search yielded 394 citations. Moreover, 7 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. A total of 54,650 participants were screened for gestational diabetes mellitus by either the 1-step screening method (n=27,163) or the 2-step screening method (n=27,487). For large for gestational age, there was no significant difference found between the groups (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.05; I2=0%). Newborns of patients who underwent 1-step screening had higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia (risk ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.34; I2=0%) and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (risk ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.21; I2=0%) than newborns of patients who underwent 2-step screening. Patients in the 1-step screening method group were more likely to be diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (risk ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-2.09; I2=80%) than patients in the 2-step screening method group. In addition, among trials that tested all patients before randomization and excluded patients with pregestational diabetes mellitus, newborns were more likely to have macrosomia (risk ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.34; I2=0%). Overall risk of bias assessment was of low concern. CONCLUSION: Large for gestational age did not differ between patients screened using the 1-step screening method and those screened using the 2-step screening method. However, patients randomized to the 1-step screening method had higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia and neonatal intensive care unit admission and maternal gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis than the patients randomized to the 2-step screening method.

Antenatal steroids and neonatal outcomes in late preterm births with pregestational diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if antenatal steroid use was associated with a lower rate of respiratory complications in neonates born late preterm to patients with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of live, singleton, non-anomalous, late preterm births complicated by PGDM using data from the Centers for Disease Control and National Vital Statistics System from 2017 to 2021. The primary (assisted ventilation use >6 h) and secondary neonatal outcomes (immediate assisted ventilation, Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] admission, and surfactant use) were compared between births that received steroids and those that did not. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: There were 24 323 late preterm births with PGDM, of which 4613 received antenatal steroids and 19 710 did not receive steroids. After adjusting for the differences among the two groups, the need for assisted neonatal ventilation for more than 6 h (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-1.86), immediate assisted neonatal ventilation (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.55-1.80), NICU admission (aOR 1.95, 95% CI 1.81-2.10), and surfactant use (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.40-2.02) were higher in the births that received steroids compared with those that did not. These findings did not differ when examining outcomes at each gestational week of delivery between 34 weeks 0 days and 36 weeks 6 days. CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal steroid use in late preterm births complicated with PGDM was associated with worse immediate respiratory neonatal outcomes. Our findings support current recommendations against the use of steroids in the late preterm period in pregnancies with PGDM.

Maternal outcomes of a cohort of pregnancies affected by non-immune hydrops fetalis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the maternal outcomes of a prospective cohort of non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) pregnancies with negative standard-of-care evaluations. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of NIHF pregnancies with negative work-ups (infection, alloimmune anemia, fetomaternal hemorrhage, and chromosomal disorders). Outcomes were obstetric complications, including pre-eclampsia, mirror syndrome, preterm birth, polyhydramnios, postpartum hemorrhage, and maternal mental health. RESULTS: Forty pregnancies were included. Four patients developed pre-eclampsia (4/40, 10.0%); three occurred postpartum. None was diagnosed with mirror syndrome. Of the 31 continued pregnancies, 16 (51.6%) resulted in early fetal death or stillbirth and 15 (48.4%) resulted in live births. Of the 15 live births, 8 (53.3%) were delivered by primary cesarean delivery; 5 (62.5%) were for hydrops fetalis. Eleven live births (73.3%) were delivered preterm; 9 (81.8%) were indicated, most commonly for fetal indications (7/9, 77.8%). Polyhydramnios occurred in 14/40 (35.0%) cases. Where EBL was recorded (n=37), there were 5 (13.5%) cases of postpartum hemorrhage and an additional 3 (8.1%) had uterine atony without hemorrhage. Eighteen patients (18/40, 45.0%) had new-onset or exacerbated depression or anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our study identified several important adverse outcomes of pregnancies complicated by NIHF with negative standard-of-care evaluations, including a high rate of postpartum pre-eclampsia and worsened mental health. We identified a higher rate of cesarean delivery and preterm birth, both primarily for fetal indications. We also observed the known relationship between polyhydramnios, hemorrhage, and atony, but noted that this risk included pregnancies concluding in dilation and evacuation. Counseling after a diagnosis of NIHF should include these adverse outcomes.

Are women residents of surgical specialties at a higher risk of developing imposter syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Imposter syndrome is a chronic feeling of doubt leading to a sense of incompetence, which is common among trainees. However, little is known about the effect of gender on imposter syndrome among surgical trainees. METHODS: An online national survey was distributed to the surgical subspecialty residents between March and September 2022, including demographics, validated Clance Imposter Scale and a short questionnaire evaluating depression and anxiety. RESULTS: Of the participants self identified as women (264, 69.1%) and men (118, 30.9%) (response rate 36.4%), the prevalence of imposterism was higher among women trainees (97% vs. 86%; p â€‹< â€‹0.0001). Risk factors were being a gynecologist (156, 59%, p â€‹< â€‹0.0001), single (157, 59.7% p â€‹= â€‹0.007), having no dependents (233, 88.3% p â€‹= â€‹0.001), being a foreign graduate (24, 9.1%, p â€‹= â€‹0.024) and having feelings of anxiety (82, 31.1% p â€‹= â€‹0.012). When using multivariate logistic regression to adjust for these factors, the prevalence of imposter syndrome remained significantly higher among women. CONCLUSION: Women trainees belonging to various surgical fields are affected by Imposter syndrome. Residency programs should develop wellness programs and provide mentorship to address this condition.

PIEZO1 is the most common monogenic etiology of non-immune hydrops fetalis detected by prenatal exome sequencing.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the relevance of PIEZO1 variants detected by prenatal exome in the context of non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF). METHODS: A systematic review of prenatal exome studies from 1/1/2000-8/1/2022 was performed. Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. PIEZO1 variants were categorized by disease mode (dominant (AD) versus recessive (AR)) and classified by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. RESULTS: Twenty-two pregnancies with 35 distinct PIEZO1 variants were included. We deemed PIEZO1 variants to be "likely diagnostic" in 12/22 pregnancies, "possibly diagnostic" in 7/22, and "unlikely diagnostic" in 3/22. In total, 19 of 191 NIHF cases diagnosed by prenatal exome were attributed to PIEZO1. Among likely diagnosed cases, the disease mode was AR in eight and AD in four. PIEZO1 variants causing AR NIHF were characterized by loss of function and isolated NIHF phenotype. PIEZO1 variants causing AD NIHF were characterized by gain of function in red blood cells, scarcity in databases, and sporadic inheritance. Missense variants associated with NIHF were clustered in three domains: transmembrane helical unit 4 (THU4), THU5, and the Cap. CONCLUSION: PIEZO1 variants were reported in 10% of NIHF cases diagnosed by prenatal exome, making PIEZO1 the most common single gene reported in NIHF.

Differences in Exposure to Minimally Invasive Surgery in a Sample of United States Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.

OBJECTIVE:  The objective of this study was to assess the exposure to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) techniques among senior (third and fourth year) Obstetrics and Gynecology residents in the United States. METHODS:  We conducted an online cross-sectional survey among senior residents who completed a 19-item questionnaire regarding their exposure to laparoscopic and robotic cases and techniques and their access to their simulation. We performed a comparison among these residents, grouped based on the four geographical regions of the United States. RESULTS:  Senior residents, on average, performed 4.0 MIGS cases (standard deviation (SD) ±2.5), 1.0 two-handed laparoscopy (SD ±1.0), and 1.5 robotic cases (SD ±1.5) per week. The exposure to challenging skills such as extracorporeal and intracorporeal suturing and laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery per week was minimal and did not vary across the nation (p=0.99, p=0.06, p=0.52, respectively). Access to dual consoles increased the number of robotic cases performed per week (p=0.01). While residents of all regions had equal access to laparoscopic box trainers (p=0.81) and laparoscopic simulators (p=0.22), residents of the southern region had less access to robotic simulators (p=0.04). CONCLUSION:  The number of MIGS cases performed by residents did not differ nationwide. However, exposure to advanced aspects of endoscopy training was minimal. The presence of a fellowship or type of teaching environment did not alter the number of cases performed by residents. Residents performed a greater number of robotic cases with the presence of dual consoles.

Imaging and outcomes of fetal adrenal hemorrhage: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe prenatal and postnatal imaging findings of fetal adrenal hemorrhage (FAH) and its associated perinatal outcomes, including frequency of postnatal surgical intervention. METHOD: A systematic literature review of seven electronic databases was conducted from inception until January 2022, with 2008 articles identified reporting prenatally identified fetal adrenal masses. Studies with confirmed FAH diagnosis were included. Quality and risk assessment were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies, including 102 FAH cases, were analyzed. FAH was commonly described as cystic (28/90, 31%), anechoic (25/90, 28%), or mixed echogenic (14/90, 16%) on ultrasound. Outcome data were available for 65 cases (64%) of FAH: 9% (6/65) resolved prenatally, 35% (23/65) resolved postnatally, 34% (22/65) regressed in size after birth, and 22% (14/65) persisted postnatally. Overall, 25% (16/65) of cases underwent postnatal surgical intervention. Neuroblastoma was suspected in all 16 surgical cases. Only one case (1/16, 6%) confirmed a cystic hematoma with microscopic islets of neuroblastoma in situ on pathology. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis of FAH is challenging due to the significant heterogeneity of ultrasound findings. Final pathology did not support the need for surgical intervention. Persistent postnatal FAH warrants shared decision making for further management based on the clinical presentation.

Incarcerated gravid uterus - A systematic review.

Incarcerated gravid uterus (IGU) is a serious complication of pregnancy that leads to adverse obstetric outcomes. The aim of this review was to describe this entity in detail. We also aimed to understand if pregnancies with predisposing risk factors that increase the risk of developing IGU had a difference in their clinical manifestations, treatment, and obstetric outcomes. The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception to July 2023. Case reports and series that provided all the details of the pregnancy and IGU outcome were included. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using a tool that is an adaptation from criteria listed by Pierson, Bradford Hills and Newcastle Ottawa scale modification. Patients with the condition of interest included in this review were grouped into those with documented, identified risk factors and no risk factors. The two groups were compared to understand the difference in obstetric outcome and presentation of IGU. Data were analyzed and summarized descriptively, categorical variables were assessed by chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables by the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney test. Of 236 articles found, 62 articles with 80 cases were included in the final analysis. The median age was 32 [27-35] years. The median gestational age of diagnosis was 17 [14-26] weeks. The most common risk factor was fibroids (N = 22, 27.5 %). Most common presentation was urinary complaints and lower abdomen pain (N = 47, 58.6 %). Twenty-seven patients (33.6 %) needed more than one visit for the diagnosis to be made. Conservative management was the first step to treat IGU in most patients. Most common complication was fetal malpresentation (N = 13, 40.6 %). Patients with or without risk factors developing IGU had no statistical difference in- parity, median gestational age of diagnosis, delay in diagnosis, increased chance of misdiagnosis, management of IGU or in obstetric outcome (all p > 0.05). It is important to recognize this entity early to prevent obstetric complications especially when patients report urinary retention and abdomen pain. The presence of risk factors does not change the management course or obstetric outcome in patients with IGU. Hence it is reasonable to start with conservative management of IGU regardless of presence of risk factors or the gestational age of diagnosis, in clinical practice.

Changes in Rates of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Among Nulliparous Patients After the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) Trial.

The ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) trial demonstrated lower rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) among low-risk nulliparous patients undergoing labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation. We conducted a population-based cohort study in which we evaluated the association between the routinization of 39-week induction and the rate of HDP by comparing rates before and after the ARRIVE trial publication, using the National Vital Statistics System. Logistic regression models were used to project what the HDP rate would have been based on trends seen pre-ARRIVE. Despite an overall increase in the rate of HDP from pre-ARRIVE to post-ARRIVE (4.9% pre vs 6.3% post, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26, 95% CI 1.24-1.27), the HDP rate was significantly lower in the post-ARRIVE group among patients undergoing induction at 39 weeks of gestation (14.7% pre vs 14.1% post, aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.90-0.93), decreasing by 12.0% per year (P<.001). The rate of HDP among all other delivering patients was higher in the post-ARRIVE group (4.1% pre vs 5.5% post, aOR1.32, 95% CI 1.30-1.34). Our findings may suggest that, as the overall HDP rate rises, the relative advantage of 39-week induction will rise similarly.

Connecting the dots: Carrier screening and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To highlight the possibility of genetic discrimination in the United States with respect to carrier screening under limitations of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and to encourage providers to educate patients about this possibility during pretest counseling. METHODS: Review of current professional guidelines and practice resources regarding the necessary components of pretest counseling for carrier screening in the context of GINA's limitations and the potential impact of carrier screening results on life, long-term care and disability insurance. RESULTS: Current practice resources advise that patients in the United States should be informed that their employer or health insurance company generally cannot use their genetic information during the underwriting process. However, these resources do not elaborate on GINA's limitations or explain why there may be adverse consequences to patients regarding these limitations. Studies have demonstrated significant gaps in provider knowledge of GINA, especially for those without formal genetic training. CONCLUSION: Enhanced education and provision of GINA educational resources for providers and patients will help ensure that patients have the opportunity to prioritize their insurance needs prior to undergoing carrier screening.

HELLP syndrome at <23 weeks' gestation: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review to evaluate the clinical presentation and maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with early-onset HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were queried from inception through January 1, 2023 with the following terms: "HELLP syndrome," "HELLP," "hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets," "hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets syndrome," "pre-viable," "peri-viable," "previable," "periviable," "first trimester," "second trimester," "before 23 weeks," "<23 weeks," "<23 week gestation," and "before 23 weeks gestation." We also included an additional case from our institution. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Abstracts, unpublished studies, and review articles were excluded, yielding 46 studies that met our inclusion criteria. METHODS: Two reviewers (N.S.I. and M.H.M.) performed the study selection and subsequent data extraction independently, after which the results were reviewed together. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and our study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021292692). RESULTS: A total of 55 patients had 58 pregnancies complicated by early-onset HELLP syndrome, including 3 with recurrent HELLP. The most common presenting signs/symptoms were abdominal pain (35/45; 78%), hypertension (32/49; 65%), nausea/vomiting (16/45; 36%), headache (13/45; 29%), and edema (8/45; 18%). Lactate dehydrogenase ≥600 IU/L was observed in 21 of 31 (68%) cases, whereas liver enzyme abnormalities and thrombocytopenia were reported in 48 of 51 (94%) and 50 of 54 (93%) cases, respectively. Maternal complications were encountered in 25 of 56 (45%) cases. The most common complications were hepatic (13/56; 23%), central nervous system-related (11/56; 20%), and respiratory (11/56; 20%). In 36 of 57 (63%) cases, pregnancy was terminated. Of the 21 continued pregnancies, early fetal death (at <20 weeks' gestation) was reported in 10 (48%), stillbirth in 6 (28%), and neonatal demise in 2 (10%). Living neonates were reported in 3 of 21 (14%) cases, all delivered at 23 weeks. The perinatal mortality rate was 73% (8/11). One case (2%) reported maternal death. Antiphospholipid syndrome was diagnosed in 14 of 29 (48%) cases. CONCLUSION: Early-onset HELLP syndrome presents with symptoms similar to those observed in later gestation. Maternal complications are life-threatening, with the most common complications being hepatic, central nervous system-related, and respiratory. Fetal outcomes are poor.

Rates of Influenza and Tdap Vaccination in Teaching and Private Obstetrical Practices, and the Influence of Vaccine Hesitancy.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated differences in vaccination rates of patients of teaching and private practices, and explored the rate of vaccine hesitancy in pregnant women. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of recently delivered women. Women completed a survey, which included a question about whether they received the influenza and/or Tdap vaccine, and a vaccine hesitancy scale for both influenza and Tdap vaccines. We also reviewed prenatal records to confirm vaccine administration and collected demographic data. Patients who received care on the teaching service (care by residents supervised by faculty) were compared with those who received care from 26 private practitioners in nine groups. The primary outcome was rate of vaccination. Fisher's exact test was performed to compare groups. RESULTS: Of the 231 women approached, 208 (90.0%) agreed to participate. Of the 208 participants, 70 (33.7%) had prenatal care with a teaching practice, and 138 (66.3%) with a private practice. Patients of teaching practices had a higher influenza and Tdap vaccination rate compared with patients of private practices (Influenza: 70% versus 54.3%, p = 0.036; Tdap: 77.1% versus 58.4%, p = 0.009). Among the entire cohort, 55.3% had some degree of vaccine hesitancy. This did not differ between teaching and private practices (54.3% versus 55.8%, p = 0.883). CONCLUSIONS: In spite of similar prevalence of vaccine hesitancy, pregnant women cared for in teaching practices had higher vaccination rates than those cared for in private practices.

Implications for Prenatal Genetic Testing in the United States After the Reversal of Roe v Wade.

Prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic testing should be offered to every pregnant individual, with methods varying based on gestational age. Since Roe v Wade was overturned in June 2022, many states have implemented gestational age-based abortion restrictions. It is critical that reproductive health care professionals be aware of the interaction between the timing of genetic screening and diagnostic testing and the availability of legal abortion services in their state. We examined individual state abortion restrictions per publicly available data from The New York Times and the Guttmacher Institute and reviewed which genetic screening and diagnostic tests could be performed to provide results in time for individuals to decide whether to terminate their pregnancies legally in each state. As of December 11, 2022, 14 states have restrictions in which no diagnostic testing could be completed before gestational age-based cutoffs. Gestational age-based abortion restrictions may also influence a patient to favor chorionic villous sampling (CVS) over amniocentesis. There are two states, Florida and Arizona, where CVS would be feasible before the state's gestational age limit on abortion but amniocentesis would not. Both CVS and amniocentesis are feasible in 35 states, with legal challenges pending in 8 of the 35. Seven states specifically prohibit abortion for fetuses with genetic abnormalities. Clinicians may be placed in the suboptimal position of counseling patients with screening results alone before the gestational age-based ban in their state. There are several potential downstream consequences of gestational age-based termination restrictions for current genetic screening and testing paradigms, from adjustments to counseling options to potentially higher CVS procedure rates. Clinicians should be prepared for practice patterns to change to best serve patients in this evolving legal context.

Cesarean Birth Morbidity among Women with SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare maternal outcomes of women with and without severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections who underwent cesarean births. STUDY DESIGN: This was a matched cohort study of pregnant women who had a cesarean birth between March 15, 2020, and May 20, 2020. Cases included women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. For every case, two patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 were matched by maternal age, gestational age, body mass index, primary or repeat cesarean birth, and whether the procedure was scheduled or unscheduled. We compared rates of adverse postcesarean complications (intraoperative bladder or bowel injury, estimated blood loss more than or equal to 1,000 mL, hemoglobin drop more than 3 g/dL, hematocrit drop more than 10%, need for blood transfusion, need for hysterectomy, maternal intensive care unit admission, postoperative fever, and development of surgical site infection), with the primary outcome being a composite of those outcomes. We also assessed duration of postoperative stay. Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare the primary outcome between both groups. RESULTS: Between March and May 2020, 202 women who subsequently underwent cesarean birth were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of those 202, 43 (21.3%) patients were positive. They were matched to 86 patients who tested negative. There was no significant difference in the rate of composite adverse surgical outcomes between the groups (SARS-CoV-2 infected 27.9%, SARS-CoV-2 uninfected 25.6%; p = 0.833). There was a higher rate of postoperative fevers (20.9 vs. 5.8%; p = 0.015), but that did not result in a longer length of stay (p = 0.302). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 who underwent a cesarean birth did not have an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes, other than fever, compared with pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2. KEY POINTS: · Women with SARS-CoV-2 had more postoperative fevers.. · Length of stay did not differ based on SARS-CoV-2 status.. · Composite postoperative outcome did not differ based on SARS-CoV-2 status..

Use of Machine Learning to Identify Clinical Variables in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women with SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to identify the important clinical variables found in both pregnant and non-pregnant women who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, using an artificial intelligence (AI) platform. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all women between the ages of 18 to 45, who were admitted to Maimonides Medical Center between March 10, 2020 and December 20, 2021. Patients were included if they had nasopharyngeal PCR swab positive for SARS-CoV-2. Safe People Artificial Intelligence (SPAI) platform, developed by Gynisus, Inc., was used to identify key clinical variables predicting a positive test in pregnant and non-pregnant women. A list of mathematically important clinical variables was generated for both non-pregnant and pregnant women. RESULTS: Positive results were obtained in 1,935 non-pregnant women and 1,909 non-pregnant women tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among pregnant women, 280 tested positive, and 1,000 tested negative. The most important clinical variable to predict a positive swab result in non-pregnant women was age, while elevated D-dimer levels and presence of an abnormal fetal heart rate pattern were the most important clinical variable in pregnant women to predict a positive test. CONCLUSION: In an attempt to better understand the natural history of the SARS-CoV-2 infection we present a side-by-side analysis of clinical variables found in pregnant and non-pregnant women who tested positive for COVID-19. These clinical variables can help stratify and highlight those at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and shed light on the individual patient risk for testing positive.