Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular/complicaciones , Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Hipotricosis/complicaciones , Hipotricosis/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Anciano , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs) have been increasingly used to enable delivery of intravenous chemotherapy. We aimed to compare the safety and cost of two commonly used CVCs, peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICCs) and ports, in the delivery of chemotherapy in patients with non-haematological malignancies. METHODS: Seventy patients were randomly assigned to receive either a PICC or a port. The primary endpoint was occurrence of major complications, which required removal of the CVC and secondary endpoints included occurrence of any complications. RESULTS: Port devices were associated with fewer complications compared with PICC lines (hazard ratio of 0.25, CI, 0.09-0.86, P = 0.038). Major complication rate was lower in the port arm compared to the PICC arm (0.047 versus 0.193 major complications/100 catheter days, P = 0.034) with 6 versus 20 % of patients experiencing major complications, respectively. Thrombosis, the most common complication, was significantly higher in the PICC arm compared to the port arm (25 versus 0 %, P = 0.013). Quality of life and cost estimates did not differ significantly between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: Port devices are associated with a lower risk of complications, with no difference in cost, compared to PICC lines in patients with non-haematological malignancies receiving intravenous chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economía , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/economía , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Australia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/economía , Calidad de Vida , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trombosis/economía , Trombosis/etiología , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/economíaRESUMEN
Bearing in mind the continuing controversy over the prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-r) expression, we investigated its clinical significance prospectively in 345 primary breast cancer patients. The prognostic significance of EGF-r expression, as measured by a radioligand binding assay, was determined by Cox's multivariate analysis using EGF-r concentration as a continuous or dichotomous variable. Increased EGF-r expression was detected in 20-32% of tumours, depending on the cut-off in concentration used. EGF-r expression, irrespective of the cut-off, was not associated with tumour size or grade or the number of axillary nodes involved. There was, however, a strong inverse association between EGF-r expression and the absence of hormone receptors. After a median follow-up period of 57 months, multivariate analysis suggested that EGF-r expression was associated with increases in risk for both relapse and death from breast cancer, even after adjusting for oestrogen receptor (ER) concentration, tumour size and the number of axillary nodes involved. Patients with ER-positive tumours, which also expressed EGF-r, had increases in risk for both relapse and death from breast cancer compared with tumours without EGF-r. Expression of EGF-r was not a predictor of poor prognosis in either node-negative or ER-negative subgroups of patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Receptores ErbB/análisis , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
This study investigates the effect of freezing and storage of tissue and subcellular fractions on the measurement of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGF-r); compares competition binding and single saturating dose assays (SSD) for quantitating EGF-r levels; investigates several tissues as potential quality control; and examines the relationship between EGF-r and hormone receptor expression in human breast cancers. Mouse and calf uterine cell membranes were preferred sources of quality control tissue with similar levels of high affinity EGF-r to human breast cancer tissue (less than 150-200 fmol/mg membrane protein). Studies using pooled mouse uterine tissues indicated a loss of 40% in EGF-r activity following a single-20 degrees C freeze/thaw cycle, while a breast cancer tissue showed a 75% loss, independent of storage temperature (liquid nitrogen, -70 degrees C, -20 degrees C). A single freeze/thaw cycle of mouse uterine broken cell pellets (nuclei plus membrane fraction) again indicated a loss of EGF-r irrespective of storage temperature (43% loss at -70 degrees C, 52% loss at -20 degrees C). In most cases irrespective of the tissue type or tissue fraction being stored, the length of storage had little impact on the extent of the loss in activity. A second freeze/thaw cycle of intact tissue, or freezing of broken cell pellets from a previously-frozen tissue, led to a further major or total loss of the remaining EGF-r. Overall these results are commensurate with the published effects of freezing and storage on estrogen receptor measurement. In addition, our studies suggest that the most suitable procedure for assaying frozen breast cancer specimens for EGF-r levels in conjunction with steroid receptor quantitation is to prepare and assay both cytosol and membrane fractions for their respective receptor content without further storage. A concordance of 86% was found in 44 breast cancers assayed for EGF-4 by saturation analysis and SSD. Statistically significant inverse relationships were found between EGF-r and estrogen and progesterone receptor levels in the study of approximately 350 breast cancer patients. No association was found with tumor stage or diameter, axillary node involvement, or patient age.