Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 2024 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985318

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The goal of surgical management in pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) is gross total resection (GTR), as it is considered curative with favorable long-term outcomes. Achieving GTR can be challenging in the setting of eloquent-region gliomas, in which resection may increase risk of neurological deficits. Awake craniotomy (AC) with intraoperative neurofunctional mapping (IONM) offers a promising approach to achieve maximal resection while preserving neurological function. However, its adoption in pediatric cases has been hindered, and barriers to its adoption have not previously been elucidated. FINDINGS: This review includes two complementary investigations. First, a survey study was conducted querying pediatric neurosurgeons on their perceived barriers to the procedure in children with pLGG. Next, these critical barriers were analyzed in the context of existing literature. These barriers included the lack of standardized IONM techniques for children, inadequate surgical and anesthesia experience, concerns regarding increased complication risks, doubts about children's ability to tolerate the procedure, and perceived non-indications due to alternative monitoring tools. CONCLUSION: Efforts to overcome these barriers include standardizing IONM protocols, refining anesthesia management, enhancing patient preparation strategies, and challenging entrenched beliefs about pediatric AC. Collaborative interdisciplinary efforts and further studies are needed to establish safety guidelines and broaden the application of AC, ultimately improving outcomes for children with pLGG.

2.
Laryngoscope ; 134(2): 600-606, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37551878

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine factors that female resident physicians find most influential when choosing an otolaryngology residency program. METHODS: A three-part survey was sent to current female otolaryngology residents via email evaluating the importance of 19 characteristics impacting program choice. The 19 factors were scored from 1 (least important) to 5 (most important). The participants also ranked their personal top five most influential factors. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty of 339 contacted residents participated. Most were aged 30-39 (63%), white (70%), and married (43%). Eighty-five percent had no children, and 52% did not plan to have children during residency. The highest scoring factors derived from Likert scale ratings included resident camaraderie (4.5 ± 0.8), resident happiness (4.4 ± 0.8), and case variety/number (4.4 ± 0.8). The lowest scoring factors were number of fellows (2.9 ± 1.1), attitudes toward maternity leave (2.7 ± 1.3), and maternity leave policies (2.4 ± 1.2). The top five most influential factors and the percentage selecting this were resident camaraderie (57%), resident happiness (57%), academic reputation (51%), case variety/number (47%), and early surgical/clinical experience (44%). Gender-specific factors were infrequently selected. However, 51 (34%) ranked at least one gender-specific factor within their top five list. CONCLUSION: Non-gender-related factors, like resident camaraderie and surgical experiences, were most valued by women. Conversely, gender-specific factors were less critical and infrequently ranked. Ninety-nine residents (64%) rated exclusively gender-neutral characteristics in their top five list of most influential factors. Our data offer insight into program characteristics most important to female otolaryngology residents, which may assist residency programs hoping to match female applicants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 134:600-606, 2024.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Otolaringología , Médicos Mujeres , Embarazo , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Actitud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Otolaringología/educación
3.
Urology ; 183: 288-300, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37926380

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors that women urology resident physicians rate as most influential when selecting residency programs. METHODS: Surveys were emailed to female urology residents during the 2021-2022 academic year. Residents scored 19 factors influencing residency program choice from 1 "least" to 5 "most" important and ranked their top 5 most influential factors. Data were analyzed via descriptive statistics and quantile regression. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six (37%) of 367 female urology residents who received the survey participated. Eighty-two percent had no children and 57% did not plan to have children during residency. The three highest scoring factors derived from Likert scale ratings were resident camaraderie (4.6 ±â€¯0.5 [mean ±â€¯SD]), resident happiness (4.6 ±â€¯0.6), and case variety/number (4.4 ±â€¯0.8). As a whole, the lowest scoring characteristics were attitudes toward maternity leave (2.6 ±â€¯1.2) and maternity leave policies (2.5 ±â€¯1.2). Married residents were more likely than those who were single and engaged/in a committed relationship to rank attitudes and policies toward maternity leave as more important (3 vs 2 vs 2, P <.0001). Residents with children were more likely than those without children to rank maternity leave policies as more important (3 vs 2, P <.0001). CONCLUSION: As a whole, women urology residents prioritized non-gender-related factors. However, gender-specific factors were rated highly by married residents and those with children or planning to have children. Urology training programs may use these results to highlight desirable characteristics to aid recruitment of female residents.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Médicos Mujeres , Urología , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Urología/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Global Spine J ; 13(3): 683-688, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33853404

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate factors associated with increased risk of prolonged post-operative opioid pain medication usage following spine surgery, as well as identify the risk of various post-operative complications that may be associated with pre-operative opioid usage. METHODS: The MarketScan commercial claims and encounters database includes approximately 39 million patients per year. Patients undergoing cervical and lumbar spine surgery between the years 2005-2014 were identified using CPT codes. Pre-operative comorbidities including DSM-V mental health disorders, chronic pain, chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), obesity, tobacco use, medications, and diabetes were queried and documented. Patients who utilized opioids from 1-3 months prior to surgery were identified. This timeframe was chosen to exclude patients who had been prescribed pre- and post-operative narcotic medications up to 1 month prior to surgery. We utilized odds ratios (OR), 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), and regression analysis to determine factors that are associated with prolonged post-operative opioid use at 3 time intervals. RESULTS: 553,509 patients who underwent spine surgery during the 10-year period were identified. 34.9% of patients utilized opioids 1-3 months pre-operatively. 25% patients were still utilizing opioids at 6 weeks, 17.3% at 3 months, 12.7% at 6 months, and 9.0% at 1 year after surgery. Pre-operative opioid exposure was associated with increased likelihood of post-operative use at 6-12 weeks (OR 5.45, 95% CI 5.37-5.53), 3-6 months (OR 6.48, 95% CI 6.37-6.59), 6-12 months (OR 6.97, 95% CI 6.84-7.11), and >12 months (OR 7.12, 95% CI 6.96-7.29). Mental health diagnosis, tobacco usage, diagnosis of chronic pain or CRPS, and non-narcotic neuromodulatory medications yielded increased likelihood of prolonged post-op opioid usage. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative narcotic use and several patient comorbidities diagnoses are associated with prolonged post-operative opioid usage following spine surgery. Chronic opioid use, diagnosis of chronic pain, or use of non-narcotic neuromodulatory medications have the highest risk of prolonged post-operative opioid consumption. Patients using opiates pre-operatively did have an increased 30 and 90-day readmission risk, in addition to a number of serious post-operative complications. This data provides spine surgeons a number of variables to consider when determining post-operative analgesia strategies, and provides health systems, providers, and payers with information on complications associated with pre-operative opioid utilization.

5.
J Neurosurg ; 136(6): 1773-1780, 2022 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34715672

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Abstracts act as short, efficient sources of new information. This intentional brevity potentially diminishes scientific reliability of described findings. The authors' objective was to 1) determine the proportion of abstracts submitted to the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) annual meeting that subsequently are published in peer-reviewed journals, 2) assess AANS abstract publications for publication bias, and 3) assess AANS abstract publications for differing results. METHODS: The authors screened all abstracts from the annual 2012 AANS meeting and identified their corresponding full-text publication, if applicable, by searching PubMed/MEDLINE. The abstract and subsequent publication were analyzed for result type (positive or negative) and differences in results. RESULTS: Overall, 49.3% of abstracts were published as papers. Many (18.1%) of these published papers differed in message from their original abstract. Publication bias exists, with positive abstracts being 40% more likely to be published than negative abstracts. The top journals in which the full-text articles were published were Journal of Neurosurgery (13.1%), Neurosurgery (7.3%), and World Neurosurgery (5.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Here, the authors demonstrate that alone, abstracts are not reliable sources of information. Many abstracts ultimately remain unpublished; therefore, they do not attain a level of scientific scrutiny that merits alteration of clinical care. Furthermore, many that are published have differing results or conclusions. In addition, positive publication bias exists, as positive abstracts are more likely to be published than negative abstracts.

6.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol ; 34(4): 392-400, 2022 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34001816

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas impose substantial morbidity and mortality due to rapid cancer progression and recurrence. Factors such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy remain the cornerstones for treatment of brain cancer and brain cancer research. The role of anesthetics on glioma progression is largely unknown. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent high-grade glioma resection with minimal sedation (awake craniotomy) and those who underwent craniotomy with general anesthesia (GA). Various perioperative factors, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and adjuvant treatment regimens were recorded. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), postoperative pain score, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 891 patients were included; 79% received GA, and 21% underwent awake craniotomy. There was no difference in median PFS between awake craniotomy (0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.65 y) and GA (0.53, 95% CI: 0.48-0.60 y) groups (hazard ratio 1.05; P <0.553). Median OS was significantly longer in the awake craniotomy (1.70, 95% CI: 1.30-2.32 y) compared with that in the GA (1.25, 95% CI: 1.15-1.37 y) group (hazard ratio 0.76; P <0.009) but this effect did not persist after controlling for other variables of interest. Median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the awake craniotomy group (2 [range: 0 to 76], interquartile range 3 d vs. 5 [0 to 98], interquartile range 5 for awake craniotomy and GA groups, respectively; P <0.001). Pain scores were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in PFS and OS between patients who underwent surgical resection of high-grade glioma with minimal sedation (awake craniotomy) or GA. Further large prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to explore the role of anesthetics on glioma progression and patient survival.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Anestesia General , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Craneotomía , Glioma/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vigilia
7.
Pituitary ; 25(1): 85-91, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34269977

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas account for 15-30% of pituitary tumors. Studies exploring the role of an intracranial tumor diagnosis, specifically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, on mental health disorders (MHDs) in patients have been limited. We characterize the incidence and factors affecting the development of MHDs in untreated pituitary adenomas. METHODS: Utilizing a large-scale private payor database, MarketScan, we performed a retrospective study of patients with an untreated pituitary adenomas and corresponding MHD. RESULTS: We found that in patients diagnosed with an untreated pituitary adenomas, approximately 15% were newly diagnosed with a MHD within 1 year of the pituitary adenoma diagnosis. Independent risk factors included female gender and substance abuse. Headaches, visual symptoms, and higher Charlson Co-morbidity indexes were also independently associated with a subsequent diagnosis of MHD. On multivariable analysis, patients in the pituitary tumor cohort were more likely to be diagnosed with a MHD than those in the matched cohort (aOR: 1.31, CI: 1.19-1.44). CONCLUSION: By identifying risk factors, advanced screening can focus on non-operative pituitary adenoma patients at high-risk for the development of MHD.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Salud Mental , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 208: 106897, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34455403

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating condition with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation (AVM) rupture are two common etiologies leading to ICH. Here we provide an update on ICH during pregnancy with a focus on those caused by aneurysm or AVM rupture. METHODS: Here we systematically review 25 studies reported in the literature to provide an update on ICH during pregnancy focusing on aneurysm or AVM rupture. We also reviewed the prognosis of ICH during puerperium. RESULTS: Discrepancies exist between studies supporting or refuting the hypothesis of a higher rate of ICH during pregnancy, obscuring the overall rate of aneurysm and AVM rupture in pregnant ICH patients. However, risk factors such as maternal age and hypertension have shown to increase the frequency of ICH in pregnant patients. We also show increased morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from preeclampsia/eclampsia. DISCUSSION: ICH is rare, but the various studies demonstrating its increased frequency, morbidity, and mortality during pregnancy should raise our awareness of this condition. The management and treatment decisions for a pregnant ICH patient should follow the same principles as nonpregnant patients, but with the knowledge that not all medications are appropriate for use in the pregnant patient. Although there seems to be a higher frequency of AVM rupture, further research must be conducted in order to fully determine the effects of pregnancy on aneurysm and AVM ruptures.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Roto/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico/epidemiología , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/epidemiología , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Embarazo , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo
9.
J Neurosurg Pediatr ; 28(5): 609-619, 2021 08 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416730

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System (2016) classifies nonmeningothelial malignant spindle cell tumors involving the extraaxial tissues of the posterior fossa as melanocytic tumors and malignant mesenchymal tumors (sarcomas). The objective of this study was to conduct a review of the literature pertaining to the management strategies of posterior fossa malignant spindle cell tumors in the pediatric population. METHODS: The authors performed an institutional search of their pathology database for patients younger than 18 years of age who presented with posterior fossa malignant spindle cell tumors. A literature review was also performed using the PubMed database, with "posterior fossa" or "spindle cell tumors" or "Ewing sarcoma" or "high-grade" or "spindle cell sarcoma" or "leptomeningeal melanocytoma" as keywords. The database search was restricted to pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years). Parameters reported from the literature review included patient age, tumor location, presenting symptoms, treatment modalities (resection, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy), leptomeningeal spread at or after the time of treatment, and follow-up length and resulting outcome. RESULTS: The authors report 3 rare cases of posterior fossa malignant spindle cell tumors, including Ewing sarcoma in a 13-year-old male; high-grade spindle cell sarcoma, not otherwise specified in a 10-year-old male; and primary leptomeningeal melanocytoma in a 16-year-old female. All 3 patients underwent resection and radiotherapy and either chemotherapy or targeted immunotherapy. At the last follow-up, all patients were alive with either resolution or stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: A review of these 3 cases and the existing literature support managing patients with intracranial malignant spindle cell tumors with multimodal therapy that can include a combination of resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy or immunotherapy to prolong progression-free and overall survival.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Infratentoriales/cirugía , Sarcoma/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Infratentoriales/complicaciones , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Sarcoma/complicaciones , Sarcoma de Ewing/complicaciones , Sarcoma de Ewing/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/complicaciones , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Cureus ; 13(5): e15273, 2021 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34194877

RESUMEN

Background The number of publications is widely used as a measure of academic productivity in the field of orthopaedics. How "productive" a physician is has a great influence on consideration for employment, compensation, and promotions. Predictors of potential high-output researchers would be of value to the orthopaedic department and university leadership for new faculty evaluation. Methods The study population included orthopaedic faculty from the top 10 orthopaedic institutions in the United States. Their names and the number of publications at each point in their training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) and early career (first five and 10 years following fellowship) along with a total number of publications to date were collected by using PubMed. Results Strong correlations were seen between publications during total training and publications output in the first five years following fellowship (rs =0.717, P<0.0001). However, no significant correlations were found comparing publications during each stage of training and the first 10 years following fellowship. A moderate positive correlation was found when comparing publications during medical school and residency output (rs =0.401, P<0.0001). Conclusions The data presented here may be utilized by department chairs during the evaluation of faculty and candidates to not interpret the number of publications during training and early career as a gauge of research interest and potential for future publications. Program directors may also use the only moderate correlation between publications in medical school and residency when evaluating applications as support of a more holistic review of applicants to determine research interest.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA