Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Res ; 264: 321-326, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848830

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The optimal laparoscopic appendectomy approach is not clear, comparing single site laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) to conventional 3-port appendectomy (CLA). We investigated outcomes in pediatric patients comparing SILA to CLA: length of operation, length of stay, time to resumption of regular diet, follow up, rehospitalization, and cost. METHODS: Data was collected from children 1 to 18 years with appendectomy at Loma Linda University from 2018 to 2020, operated by two surgeons. Analysis utilized two-sample T, chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Of 173 patients, 77 underwent SILA and 96 had CLA. There was no gender, age, or race difference between groups. Mean WBC was 17.5 × 103/mL in SILA group, compared to 15.3 × 103/mL in CLA group (P = 0.004). Operative time was 47.0 SILA compared to 49.5 minutes CLA (P = 0.269). Of SILA cases, 55.8% were simple appendicitis, while 53.3% of the CLA cases were simple (P = 0.857). Regular diet was resumed after 1.7 days in the SILA group, 1.1 days in CLA (P = 0.018). Length of stay was 2.9 days for SILA, 2.4 days for CLA (P = 0.144). Seven children required hospital readmission, 5 SILA and 2 CLA (P = 0.244). Five of the children who returned had intra-abdominal abscesses, of whom 4 had SILA. There was no difference in cost. CONCLUSIONS: The operative techniques had similar outcomes and operative times. There was a trend toward more intra-abdominal abscesses in the SILA group. Further study and longer follow up is needed to determine if there is an advantage to one laparoscopic approach over another.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal/epidemiología , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Absceso Abdominal/economía , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Adolescente , Apendicectomía/economía , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/economía , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/economía , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Int Med Res ; 49(3): 300060520981362, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33730887

RESUMEN

Lipoblastomas and liposarcomas are rare causes of soft tissue masses in paediatric patients. In this retrospective clinical case series we identified 11 patients from our paediatric database (10 with a lipoblastoma and one with a liposarcoma) who had attended our hospital between 1998 and 2019. The median age of patients with lipoblastoma was 29 months. All lipoblastoma cases were managed with surgical excision and histological examination. The 18-year old patient with liposarcoma presented with a metastatic and unresectable tumour that was unresponsive to chemotherapy and radiation. Our experience demonstrates the importance of differentiating the type of soft tissue mass in children.


Asunto(s)
Lipoblastoma , Liposarcoma , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lipoblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Lipoblastoma/cirugía , Liposarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Liposarcoma/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA