[Interferon-ß1b in multiple sclerosis therapy: more than 20 years clinical experience]. / Interferon-ß1b in der Multiple-Sklerose-Therapie : Mehr als 20 Jahre klinische Erfahrung.

The introduction of interferon-ß1b in 1993 in the USA and 2 years later in Europe made it possible for the first time to alter the course of the disease in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Subsequently, interferon-ß1b was approved for the treatment of patients with active secondary progressive MS (1999) and early relapsing-remitting MS following a first demyelinating event (clinically isolated syndrome, CIS) (2006). Here we provide an overview of the clinical experience gathered during more than 20 years of interferon-ß use focusing on long-term efficacy and safety and the impact of early initiation of treatment. Furthermore, the following aspects will be discussed: putative mechanisms of action of interferon-ß, indications for a disease-modifying therapy, clinical relevance of neutralizing antibodies, importance of adherence in MS therapy, high versus low frequency therapy, combination therapies with interferon-ß and safety of interferon-ß in children and adolescents with MS and during pregnancy.

Randomised multicentre trial on safety and efficacy of rivastigmine in cognitively impaired multiple sclerosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive decline has been recognised as a frequent symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS). Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are employed for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, but there is some evidence that ChEIs might also be effective in MS patients with cognitive deficits, particularly deficits of memory function. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy on memory function and safety of the ChEI rivastigmine in MS patients with cognitive deficits as measured by the change from baseline of the total recall score of the selective reminding test (SRT) after 16 weeks of treatment. METHODS: Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine were analysed in a 16-week, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study, followed by an optional one-year open-label treatment phase. Effects of rivastigmine and placebo were compared by an analysis of covariance. RESULTS: In total, 86 patients were enrolled. Patients who received rivastigmine (n = 43) showed a non-significant increase in total recall score (sum of all words immediately recalled over all six trials) over placebo (n = 38) after 16 weeks of treatment (p = 0.2576). Other outcome measures provided no evidence supporting benefits of rivastigmine. Treatment with rivastigmine was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: With the results of this study, the need for an effective therapy in cognitively impaired MS patients is still required. Thus, intensive and continued clinical research is required to explore therapeutic options for cognitive deficits in MS patients.

[Fingolimod compassionate use program: case study on the concept of a therapy option for multiple sclerosis prior to marketing approval]. / Fingolimod-Compassionate-use-Programm : Fallstudie zum Konzept einer Therapieoption bei Multipler Sklerose vor Zulassung und Markteinführung.

BACKGROUND: In order to meet the needs of therapy of multiple sclerosis (MS) new immune therapies with a user-friendly application and better effectiveness together with good tolerability are necessary. COMPASSIONATE USE: With respect to its potential to improve MS therapy, patients with a high medical need were given access to Fingolimod even before marketing approval. Therefore, a compassionate use program unique in the field of MS was initiated. In total 137 centers participated (75 % outpatient neurologists and 25 % hospitals). Within 19 weeks 135 patients were enrolled to receive Fingolimod. The patients in the compassionate use program can be representatively described as showing hardly controllable disease activity and progression with currently available, often poorly tolerated therapy. The compassionate use program for these patients offered better control of the disease with Fingolimod. The adverse events were as expected. CONCLUSIONS: The Fingolimod compassionate use program demonstrated the need for this new therapeutic option. Patients who were not yet sufficiently treated were provided with an effective therapy with a good safety profile and a user-friendly administration form.

Downregulation of beta-adrenergic receptors by low density lipoproteins and its prevention by beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists.

OBJECTIVE: Vasodilation by beta-adrenergic receptors of smooth muscle cells appears to be impaired early after the onset of hypercholesteremia. The aim of this study was to analyze the modulation of beta-adrenergic receptor density and adenylyl cyclase activity in the presence of moderately elevated concentrations of LDL. The effects of beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptor antagonists on LDL-induced receptor changes were studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Media explants of porcine coronary arteries were incubated with moderately elevated LDL concentrations (0.7-3.9 mmol/l). The density of beta-adrenergic receptors was determined in plasma membranes using the radioligand [125I]iodocyanopinodolol. LDL (3.9 mmol/l) resulted in a decrease of beta-adrenergic receptor density (control 137 +/- 5 vs. 89 +/- 7 fmol/mg protein, P < 0.01). After removal of LDL and cultivation for an additional 3 days beta-adrenergic receptors increased to 129 +/- 5 fmol/mg. In the presence of the beta 1- or beta 2-adrenergic receptor antagonists the LDL-mediated decrease was inhibited. Addition of metoprolol after 3 days of LDL incubation caused a restoration of receptor density. The basal, isoproterenol- and forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activities were increased after LDL incubation by 180, 110 or 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Moderately elevated LDL levels decreased beta-adrenergic receptor density while adenylyl cyclase activity was simultaneously increased. beta 1- or beta 2-adrenergic receptor antagonists prevented this receptor decrease and might preserve the beta-adrenergic receptor density in the presence of moderately elevated LDL levels.