The Goutallier Classification System: How Does Paravertebral Adipose Degeneration Change in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the Goutallier classification system (GS) and anthropometric, clinical, and radiologic features in 168 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). BACKGROUND: There is no agreement on a classification system that is both reliable and easy to use for describing the severity of fatty degeneration in the paravertebral muscles of the lower back in patients with symptomatic LSS. This study aimed to determine the statistical relationship between the GS and anthropometric, clinical, and radiologic factors in 168 patients with LSS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 168 patients with LSS scheduled for elective decompressive surgery. A control group of 110 healthy individuals was enrolled. The study assessed paralumbar musculature fatty infiltration using GS on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. The authors evaluated the statistical association between patient age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire, and cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the dural sac and lumbar paraspinal muscles. Multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: This study enrolled 168 patients with symptomatic LSS (95 men, 73 women); mean±SD age: 67.81±9.38 (range: 32.78-92.34) years; BMI: 28.29±3.36 (19.95-38.10) kg/m 2 . The control group was comprised of 110 healthy patients (61 men and 49 women). Age, sex, BMI, and erector spinae (ES)-CSA were not significantly different between the two groups. The authors found a direct relationship between GS grade and age and an inverse relationship between GS grade and dural sac-, multifidus lumbaris (LM)-, ES-, and psoas muscle (PM)-CSAs. Univariate analyses showed the variables statistically related to a higher GS grade included patient age ( P <0.001), ODI ( P =0.136), dural sac-CSA ( P =0.011), LM-CSA ( P < 0.001), ES-CSA ( P <0.001), and PM-CSA ( P <0.001). Multivariate least squares analysis showed the GS grade to be influenced by patient age ( P =0.01), LM-CSA ( P =0.002), ES-CSA ( P =0.002), and PM-CSA ( P =0.003). CONCLUSIONS: GS shows great potential as a tool for evaluating fat infiltration in the paralumbar muscles. This measure does not correlate with the ODI and BMI but is related to all radiologic parameters and patient age. Further prospective studies are required to establish a link between preoperative and postoperative outcomes in the setting of paraspinal fat infiltration.

Multiple univariate analysis of radiologic and clinical features on 168 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: what is the role of the erector spinae in the development of a patient's disability?

BACKGROUND: The weakening of paraspinal muscles in the paravertebral area may play a role in developing central lumbar spinal stenosis, resulting in lower back discomfort. OBJECTIVE: The study thoroughly examined the correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index, Dural Sac cross-sectional area, Schizas grading Scale, Body Mass Index, and the cross-sectional areas of Erector Spinae, Multifidus, and Psoas muscles. The findings were also compared between patients with central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and healthy individuals. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective monocentric observational study. METHODS: The study recruited 168 consecutive patients aged 60 or older diagnosed with central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis between January 2020 and July 2022. The patients' condition was evaluated by administering a preoperative Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire, measuring their Body Mass Index, and performing preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The analyzed parameters were the cross-sectional area of paraspinal muscles at the L4-L5 level, dural sac cross-sectional area, and Schizas grading Scale at the most stenotic level, using multiple linear univariate analyses. Two groups of healthy individuals were recruited: Group A (under 60 years old) and Group B (over 60 years old). The same data extrapolated from these groups were compared with those of patients with central lumbar stenosis using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: As the Erector Spinae degenerates, the Oswestry Disability Index tends to increase. Similarly, an increase in Body Mass Index is often accompanied by a decrease in the cross-sectional area of the Erector Spinae. Low dural sac cross-sectional area is statistically linked to a reduced Multifidus cross-sectional area. Interestingly, the Schizas grading scale does not appear to correlate with changes in the cross-sectional area of the paraspinal muscles. Additionally, there is no significant difference in the cross-sectional area of the Psoas muscle between individuals with central lumbar spinal stenosis and healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that degeneration of the Erector Spinae plays a crucial role in the progression of perceived disability in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Prospective studies should investigate the long-term evolution of paraspinal muscles in decompressed patients.

Psychiatric Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease Patients before and One Year after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy: Role of Lead Positioning and Not of Total Electrical Energy Delivered.

Parkinson's disease (PD) patients may experience neuropsychiatric symptoms, including depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, psychosis, as well as behavioral and cognitive symptoms during all the different stages of the illness. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) therapy has proven to be successful in controlling the motor symptoms of PD and its possible correlation with the occurrence or worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms has been reported. We aimed to assess the neuropsychiatric symptoms of 14 PD patients before and after one year of Subthalamic Nucleus (STN)-DBS and to correlate the possible changes to the lead placement and to the total electrical energy delivered. We assessed PD motor symptoms, depression, anxiety, apathy, impulsivity, and suicidality using clinician- and/or self-administered rating scales and correlated the results to the lead position using the Medtronic SuretuneTM software and to the total electrical energy delivered (TEED). At the 12-month follow-up, the patients showed a significant improvement in PD symptoms on the UPDRS (Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale) (−38.5%; p < 0.001) and in anxiety on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) (−29%; p = 0.041), with the most significant reduction in the physiological anxiety subscore (−36.26%; p < 0.001). A mild worsening of impulsivity was detected on the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) (+9%; p = 0.048), with the greatest increase in the attentional impulsiveness subscore (+13.60%; p = 0.050). No statistically significant differences were found for the other scales. No correlation was found between TEED and scales' scores, while the positioning of the stimulating electrodes in the different portions of the STN was shown to considerably influence the outcome, with more anterior and/or medial lead position negatively influencing psychiatric symptoms.

Multidisciplinary management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Vertebral fractures represent the most frequent complication associated with osteoporosis. Patients harboring a vertebral fracture complain physical impairment including low back pain and spine balance alteration, i.e., kyphosis, leading to subsequent systemic complication, with an increase in morbidity and mortality risk. Different strategies are available in the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: medical therapy acts as a prevention strategy while surgical vertebral augmentation procedures, when correctly indicated, aim to reduce pain and to restore the physiological vertebral height. Considering the growing prevalence and incidence of this condition and its socio-economic burden, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures are of utmost importance. Our aim is to review the current strategies for the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures providing an integrated multidisciplinary endocrinological, radiological and neurosurgical point of view.