RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined disparities in dementia care that affect the U.S. Hispanic/Latino population, including clinician bias, lack of cultural responsiveness, and less access to health care. However, there is limited research that specifically investigates the impact of language barriers to health disparities in dementia diagnosis. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 12,080 English- or Spanish- speaking patients who received an initial diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia between July 2017 and June 2019 were identified in the Yale New Haven Health (YNHH) electronic medical record. To evaluate the timeliness of diagnosis, an initial diagnosis of MCI was classified as "timely", while an initial diagnosis of dementia was considered "delayed." Comprehensiveness of diagnosis was assessed by measuring the presence of laboratory studies, neuroimaging, specialist evaluation, and advanced diagnostics six months before or after diagnosis. Binomial logistic regressions were calculated with and without adjustment for age, legal sex, ethnicity, neighborhood disadvantage, and medical comorbidities. RESULTS: Spanish speakers were less likely to receive a timely diagnosis when compared with English speakers both before (unadjusted OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53-0.80, p <0.0001) and after adjusting for covariates (adjusted OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75, p = 0.0001). Diagnostic services were provided equally between groups, except for referrals to geriatrics, which were more frequent among Spanish-speaking patients. A subgroup analysis revealed that Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latino patients were less likely to receive a timely diagnosis compared to English-speaking Hispanic/Latino patients (adjusted OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.73, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Non-English language preference is likely to be a contributing factor to timely diagnosis of cognitive impairment. In this study, Spanish language preference rather than Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was a significant predictor of a less timely diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Policy changes are needed to reduce barriers in cognitive disorders care for Spanish-speaking patients.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunción Cognitiva/etnología , Barreras de Comunicación , Estudios Transversales , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Lenguaje , Estudios Retrospectivos , Connecticut/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate domestic violence (DV)-related ocular injuries among adult emergency department (ED) patients in the US. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients with a diagnosis of DV and diagnosis of ocular injury in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) from 2008-2017. We identified patient- and hospital-level variables associated with DV-related ocular injuries. We calculated annual incidence rates using US Census data. Adjusting for inflation using the Consumer Price Index, we calculated mean and total charges. RESULTS: From 2008-2017, there were 26,215 ED visits for ocular injuries related to DV with an average incidence of 1.09 per 100,000 adult population (female patients, 84.5%; mean age [SE], 34.3 [0.2]). DV-related ocular injuries were most prevalent among patients in the lowest income quartile (39.1%) and on Medicaid (37.4%). Most ED visits presented to metropolitan teaching (55.4%), non-trauma (46.7%), and south regional (30.5%) hospitals. The most common ocular injury was contusion of eye/adnexa (61.1%). The hospital admission rate was 5.2% with a mean hospital stay of 2.9 [0.2]. The inflation-adjusted mean cost for medical services was $38,540 [2,310.8] per encounter with an average increase of $2,116 per encounter, annually. The likelihood of hospital admission increased for patients aged ≥60 years old, on Medicare, and with open globes or facial/orbital fractures (all p < .05). CONCLUSION: Contusion of the eye/adnexa was the most common ocular injury among patients with DV-related ED visits. To better facilitate referrals to social services, ophthalmologists should utilize DV screenings, especially towards women and patients of less privileged socioeconomic status.
Asunto(s)
Contusiones , Violencia Doméstica , Lesiones Oculares , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medicare , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
Purpose: Acute primary angle closure (APAC) is an ophthalmologic emergency. Nationwide data on the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of APAC are lacking despite the associated visual morbidity. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). The NEDS was queried by ICD-9/10 code for cases of APAC presenting to the United States emergency departments over a ten-year period from 2008 to 2017. All identified cases were included to produce nationally representative estimates. Linear regression and seasonality tests were used to identify trends. Reported outcomes include the incidence, demographics, seasonality, and economic impact of APAC regionally and nationwide. Results: A total of 23,203 APAC-related ED visits were identified. The mean (SD) and median ages were 58.8 (16.2) and 60 years, respectively. Females (59.4%, p < 0.01), those in the lowest income quartile (6983, 30.1%, p < 0.01), and those in the seventh decade of life (5599, 24.1%) presented more frequently with APAC. The incidence of ED presentations within each age group rose with age and increased significantly over the study period (p < 0.01). The Northeast region had the highest average incidence (0.93 per 100,000 population). Significant seasonal variation was seen regionally and nationally (p < 0.01), with the highest average incidence in December and lowest in April. Median inflation adjusted charge per ED visit was $2496.10, and the total inflation adjusted charges equaled $101.5 million. Conclusion: The incidence of APAC-related ED visits continues to rise in the United States. High-risk groups include women, individuals of low socioeconomic status, and those between ages 50 and 70. Significant seasonal and regional trends were observed in ED presentations of APAC.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted cholecystectomies are often criticized as expensive with uncertain benefit to patients. Characterization of robotic surgery benefits, as well as specific factors that drive cost, has the potential to shape the current debate. METHODS: The surgical cost and outcomes among patients who underwent robotic (n = 283) or non-robotic (n = 1438) laparoscopic cholecystectomies between 2012 and 2018 at a single academic institution were examined retrospectively. All cholecystectomies were primary surgical procedures with no secondary procedures. We also examined the subset of robotic (n = 277) and non-robotic (n = 1108) outpatient procedures. RESULTS: Robotic cholecystectomies were associated with higher median total cost compared to conventional procedures, largely attributable to variable costs and surgical costs. Patients who underwent conventional cholecystectomy had longer mean lengths of stays (1.7 versus 1.1 days) compared to robotic procedures-with over 10 times as many requiring hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: At present, robotic cholecystectomies have a little value to patients and institutions outside of surgical training. Prior to narrowing the analysis to outpatient cases, difference in total cost between procedures was less pronounced due to more frequent inpatient management following conventional procedures. Future optimization of robotic consumables and free market competition among system manufacturers may increase financial feasibility by decreasing variable costs associated with robotic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Colecistectomía/métodos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Maxillofacial trauma is treated by two medical specialties, plastic surgery (PRS) and otolaryngology (ENT). Differences in training exposure and practice patterns exist between specialties, but their respective outcomes have never been compared. METHODS: Mandible fracture data were reviewed from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2005 to 2016. Demographics variables, repair types, and adverse outcomes were compared between PRS and ENT. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2016, one thousand two hundred eighty-two cases were identified with 756 cases managed by ENT and 526 cases managed by PRS. Mean patient age was 34.6 years for both specialties (Pâ=â0.95). Patient demographics between both cohorts were not statistically different except for higher rates of hypertension among ENT patients (10.2% for ENT versus 6.7% for PRS, Pâ=â0.027) and higher rates of smoking history among PRS patients (46.8% versus 52.3%, Pâ=â0.055). Mean operative time (131.3 versus 124.0âmin, Pâ=â0.090) had a trend toward being longer for ENT and mean length of stay (1.3 versus 2.0, Pâ=â0.002) was significantly longer for PRS. Despite a greater proportion of high ASA class patients in the ENT group (Pâ=â0.012) and patients with dirty/infected wounds in the PRS group (Pâ=â0.013), there were no significant differences in 30-day readmission rates, 30-day reoperation rates, or wound infection rates. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in 30-day readmission rates, reoperation rates, or wound infection rates for mandible fracture management exist between specialties. Despite differences in training between PRS and ENT, both specialties have comparable perioperative outcomes for mandible fracture management.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Mandibulares , Cirugía Plástica , Adulto , Humanos , Mandíbula , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: BREAST-Q is a validated measure of patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast surgery. Limited evidence exists with regard to the influence of preoperative overall health status on BREAST-Q outcomes. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification is representative of preoperative overall health and its impact on patient-reported outcomes can be assessed. METHODS: Patients who received breast reconstruction at Yale New Haven Hospital between 2013 and 2018 and completed the BREAST-Q were enrolled in the study. Associations between BREAST-Q scores within modules and between modules and ASA were analyzed. Pearson's correlation and Spearman's Rho were used to characterize correlations between patient factors and BREAST-Q scores. Significantly correlated factors were entered into a general linear model (GLM) to control for confounding variables and isolate the effect of ASA on BREAST-Q scores. RESULTS: A total of 1136 patients underwent breast reconstruction of whom 489 patients completed the BREAST-Q. Increasing ASA indicative of worsening overall health was associated with a decreased BREAST-Q score for all modules except Physical Well-being of the Abdomen (p<0.01 to pâ¯=â¯0.029). In a GLM controlling for relevant covariates, ASA remained a significant contributor for all modules except Physical Well-being of the Chest (p<0.01 to pâ¯=â¯0.021). BREAST-Q scores decreased by approximately twice as much from ASA 1 to 2 compared to ASA 2 to 3. CONCLUSION: ASA classification is an independent predictor of BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction. Communicating the potential impact of overall health may help reduce the discrepancy in postoperative satisfaction across ASA classifications.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estado de Salud , Mamoplastia , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mamoplastia/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Psychiatric well-being impacts on general satisfaction and quality of life. This study explored how the presence of psychiatric diagnoses affects patient-reported outcomes in breast reconstruction and on selection of reconstructive modality. Patients who received breast reconstruction at a tertiary hospital between 2013 and 2018 and completed the BREAST-Q survey were included. BREAST-Q module scores were compared between patients who had a psychiatric diagnosis at presentation and the remaining cohort using t tests. General linear models (GLMs) were used to control for confounding factors. A chi-squared test was used to assess the effect on reconstructive modality, and binary logistic regression was used to control for confounding factors. Of the 471 patients included, 93 (19.7%) had at least one psychiatric diagnosis. Cohorts did not differ significantly by age, BMI, race, ASA classification, or insurance status. Patients with a psychiatric diagnosis experienced a decrease in BREAST-Q scores for the Psychosocial Wellbeing (B = 9.16, P = .001) and Sexual Wellbeing (B = 9.29, P = .025) modules. On binary logistic regression, patients with a psychiatric diagnosis were less likely to receive autologous reconstruction compared with implant reconstruction (OR = 0.489, P = .010). The presence of psychiatric diagnoses is an independent predictor of decreased BREAST-Q. Furthermore, there is a significant disparity in modality of reconstruction given to patients with psychiatric diagnoses. Further study is needed to evaluate interventions to improve satisfaction among at-risk populations and evaluate the reason for low autologous reconstruction in this population.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Trastornos Mentales , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Research experience is believed to be an important component of the neurosurgery residency application process. One measure of research productivity is publication volume. The preresidency publication volume of U.S. neurosurgery interns and any potential association between applicant publication volume and the match results of top-ranked residency programs have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we sought to characterize the preresidency publication volume of U.S. neurosurgery residents in the 2018-2019 intern class using the Scopus database. METHODS: For each intern, we recorded the total number of publications, total number of first or last author publications, total number of neuroscience-related publications, mean number of citations per publication, and mean impact factor of the journal per publication. Preresidency publication volumes of interns at the top-25 programs (based on a composite ranking score according to 4 different ranking metrics) were compared with those at all other programs. RESULTS: We found that 82% of neurosurgery interns included in the analysis (190 interns from 95 programs) had at least 1 publication. The average number of publications per intern among all programs was 6 ± 0.63 (mean ± standard error of the mean). We also found that interns at top-25 neurosurgery residency programs tended to have a higher number of publications (8.3 ± 1.2 vs. 4.8 ± 0.7, P = 0.0137), number of neuroscience-related publications (6.8 ± 1.1 vs. 4.1 ± 0.7, P = 0.0419), and mean number of citations per publication (9.8 ± 1.7 vs. 5.7 ± 0.8, P = 0.0267) compared with interns at all other programs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a general estimate of the preresidency publication volume of U.S. neurosurgery interns and suggest a potential association between publication volume and matching in the top-25 neurosurgery residency programs.
Asunto(s)
Eficiencia , Internado y Residencia , Neurocirugia/educación , Publicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To explain the effects of the osmolyte proline on the protein-protein interactions (PPI), viscosity and stability of highly concentrated antibody solutions in contrast to other neutral osmolytes. METHODS: The viscosity of ~225 mg/mL mAb solutions was measured with proline, glycine and trehalose as a function of pH and co-solute concentration up to 1.3 M. The stability was assessed via turbidity as well as size exclusion chromatography after 4 weeks storage at 40°C. The PPI strength was assessed qualitatively via the high concentration diffusion rate by dynamic light scattering. RESULTS: Increasing proline significantly reduced the mAb viscosity and increased the colloidal stability at pH 6, but not at pH 5 further from the mAb pI. In contrast, glycine and trehalose did not improve the viscosity nor stability. The normalized diffusion coefficient at high concentration, which is inversely proportional to the attractive PPI strength, increased with proline concentration but decreased with increasing glycine. CONCLUSIONS: Proline demonstrated greater efficacy for improving mAb viscosity and stability in contrast to glycine and trehalose due to its amphipathic structure and partial charge on the pyrrolidine side chain. These properties likely allow proline to screen the attractive electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions that promote self-association and high viscosities. Binary proline-histidine formulations also demonstrated greater viscosity reduction effects than histidine alone at the same total co-solute concentration, while maintaining a lower total solution osmolarity.