Is G. cambogia a promising treatment? Effects on cultured nasal epithelial cells.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of applying Garcinia cambogia to cultured human nasal epithelial cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cell culture was set up consisting of human primary nasal epithelial cells harvested during septorhinoplasty from volunteers. The cells came from individuals with no history of rhinosinusitis. One assay for assessing cytotoxicity in cell culture utilizes MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide). This method allows visualization of fragmented DNA, condensation of nuclei and changes to the external cellular membrane or cytoskeleton. Our study employed this method. Nasal epithelial cells at 37°C were exposed in culture to G. cambogia for a period of 24 hours. Afterwards an MTT assay was used in conjunction with confocal microscopy to assess evidence of toxicity. The proliferative capability of the nasal epithelial cells was also evaluated by inducing a scratch injury to cultured cells followed by light microscopic examination. RESULTS: Testing for cytotoxicity in this manner indicates that G. cambogia does not appear harmful to cultured nasal epithelial cells when applied directly. The cells exposed to this plant extract were still fully viable 24 hours afterwards. There was no increase in viability at the level of statistical significance. It was noted, however, that proliferation did increase slightly within the exposure period. The MTT assay and confocal microscopy confirm these findings. Under confocal microscopic examination, a compact morphology with unaltered nuclear and cytoskeletal appearances was observed. Thus, there is no evidence suggesting viability is impaired or that cytotoxicity occurs. Ordinary light microscopic examination showed the area denuded of cells had become re-covered completely within 24 hours in the cultures where G. cambogia had been applied. The result suggests that exposure to G. cambogia has no significant effect in terms of stimulating or inhibiting cellular proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: G. cambogia may offer clinical benefit as a supplementary topical treatment for inflammation of the nose and sinuses, as seen in chronic and acute rhinosinusitis, or nasal polyps. The plant appears to increase nasal epitheliocytic proliferation slightly, as revealed by the MTT assay. There were no indications of a cytotoxic effect on epithelial cells of the nose.

The superiority of Dexpanthenol or Vaseline as excipient in nasal formulations.

OBJECTIVE: Dexpanthenol is an ingredient in multiple topical pharmaceutical preparations thanks to its high penetration and localized concentration. It is included in many ointments or lotions for dermatological use, assisting in healing and reducing pruritus. Vaseline is a synthetic product obtained by distilling crude oil. It is commercially available in several grades. The study presented here examined how topically applied agents (dexpanthenol or vaseline) affect nasal epithelial cells in culture. In particular, the study aimed to identify any alterations to epithelial cells which might indicate toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nasal epithelial cells used were sourced from mucosal tissue fragments left over the following septorhinoplasty on five patients not suffering from rhinosinusitis. The first step was to dissect the mucosal fragments into smaller pieces on a sterilized Petri dish. These fragments were then placed into the DMEM-F12 cell culture medium, which had been freshly prepared. The dexpanthenol and vaseline were diluted in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) to a concentration of 5 mg/mL. The cells in the wells were exposed to varying concentrations of dexpanthenol or vaseline. The actual concentration of the test reagent to which the epithelial cells were exposed ranged from 0.15 mg/mL to 5 mg/mL. The exposure period was 24 hours. The cells were finally examined using a Leica SP5II confocal microscope. The features sought were DNA fragmentation, condensation of the nuclei, changes in the outer membrane, or cytoskeletal abnormality. These features, if present, indicate cytotoxicity. RESULTS: The viability of the cultured nasal epithelial cells was unaltered by a 24-hour exposure to dexpanthenol, nor was the cellular proliferation rate affected at the level of statistical significance. There was evidence of a cytotoxic effect from exposing nasal epithelial cells to vaseline in liquid form for 24 hours. There was a reduction in cellular viability in the plates where the highest dose of vaseline (5 mg/mL) was used. Cellular viability was not affected significantly at any of the doses below 5 mg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of cytotoxic effects from the application of dexpanthenol to the nasal mucosa indicates that this agent may be safely used within the nose. The cytotoxic effects of liquid vaseline observed in this trial (condensed nuclear chromatin, loss of cellular volume) indicate that this agent may be harmful when used intranasally. For patients who require nasal packing due to nose bleeds or following endoscopic sinus surgical procedures, dexpanthenol should be preferred to vaseline from the point of view of maximizing healing of a nasal injury.

Protective effects of ellagic acid in D-galactosamine-induced kidney damage in rats.

D-Galactosamine (D-GalN), which is an established experimental toxin, primarily causes liver injury by the generation of free radicals and depletion of UTP nucleotides. D-GalN intoxication also induces renal dysfunction thus, renal failure is often associated with the end-stage of the liver damage. We have investigated both preventive and curative effects of ellagic acid (EA) in this study. EA treatment at a gavage dose of 20 mg/kg body weight was administered before and after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of D-GalN at a dose of 750 mg/kg. Tissue and blood samples of animals were collected for morphological and biochemical evaluations. Our study results suggest that EA treatment both prior to and after the toxin administration successfully altered the toxic effects on the rats. Moreover, pre-treatment of EA was more protective than post-treatment indicated by histopathological and biochemical values. In conclusion, EA treatment both before and after D-GalN intoxication could protect kidney tissues against D-GalN induced oxidative stress.