Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Energy Devices in Bench Surgery for Pancreas Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Bench surgery for the preparation of deceased donor pancreatic grafts is labor-intensive and time-consuming. We hypothesized that energy devices could be used during bench surgery to decrease the bench surgery time. However, because bench surgery has two unique characteristics, wet conditions and no blood flow in the vessels, it is necessary to verify the safety and efficacy under such conditions. METHODS: In an animal tissue model, we validated both ultrasonic and bipolar energy devices: Harmonic Shears and the LigaSure (LS) vessel-sealing device by evaluating heat spread and pressure resistance under bench surgery conditions. In a clinical evaluation of the LS, we compared the outcomes of 22 patients in two different bench surgery groups: with and without the use of the LS. RESULTS: Clinically, the bench surgery time was significantly shorter in the LS group than that in the conventional group (P < 0.001). In the animal tissue experiments, the highest temperature in bench surgery conditions was 60.4°C after 1 s at a 5-mm distance in the LS group. Pressure resistance of ≥ 750 mmHg was achieved in almost all trials in both veins and arteries, with no difference between Harmonic Shears and LS. There was more surgical smoke visually in bench conditions versus in dry conditions and under half bite versus full bite conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The encouraging results of our exploratory clinical and animal studies of the energy devices suggest that they may be useful in the setting of bench surgery.

Size-mismatched transplantation from large donors to small recipients is associated with pancreas graft thrombosis: A retrospective national observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Donor-recipient (D/R) size mismatch has been evaluated for a number of organs but not for pancreas transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 438 patients who had undergone pancreas transplantation. The D/R body surface area (BSA) ratio was calculated, and the relationship between the ratio and graft prognosis was evaluated. We divided the patients into two groups and evaluated graft survival. The incidence of pancreas graft thrombosis resulting in graft failure within 14 days and 1-year graft survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the prognostic factors associated with graft thrombosis were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The mean/median donor and recipient BSAs were 1.63 m2 /1.65 m2 , and 1.57 m2 /1.55 m2 , respectively; the mean and median D/R BSAs were both 1.05. The receiver operating characteristic curve cutoff for the D/R BSA ratio was 1.09, and significant differences were identified between patients with ratios of ≥1.09 (high group) versus <1.09 (low group). The incidence of graft thrombosis resulting in pancreas graft failure within 14 days was significantly higher in the high group than in the low group (p < .01). One-year overall and death-censored pancreas graft survival were significantly higher in the low group than in the high group (p < .01). Multivariate analysis identified recipient height, donor BSA, and donor hemoglobin A1c as significant independent factors for graft thrombosis. Cubic spline curve analysis indicated an increased risk of graft thrombosis with increasing D/R BSA ratio. CONCLUSION: D/R size mismatch is associated with graft thrombosis after pancreas transplantation.

Utilization of the Pancreas From Donors With an Extremely High Pancreas Donor Risk Index: Report of the National Registry of Pancreas Transplantation.

Pancreas transplants from expanded criteria donors are performed widely in Japan because there is a shortage of brain-dead donors. However, the effectiveness of this strategy is unknown. We retrospectively studied 371 pancreas transplants to evaluate the possibility of pancreas transplantation from expanded criteria donors by the Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI). Patients were divided into five groups according to quintiles of PDRI values (Q1-Q5). The 1-year pancreas graft survival rates were 94.5% for Q1, 91.9% for Q2, 90.5% for Q3, 89.3% for Q4, and 79.6% for Q5, and were significantly lower with a lower PDRI (p = 0.04). A multivariate analysis showed that the PDRI, donor hemoglobin A1c values, and pancreas transplantation alone significantly predicted 1-year pancreas graft survival (all p < 0.05). Spline curve analysis showed that the PDRI was incrementally associated with an increased risk of 1-year graft failure. In the group with a PDRI ≥ 2.87, 8/56 patients had graft failures within 1 month, and all were due to graft thrombosis. The PDRI is a prognostic factor related to the 1-year graft survival rate. However, pancreas transplantation from high-PDRI donors shows acceptable results and could be an alternative when the donor pool is insufficient.

Effects of periodontal pathogen-induced intestinal dysbiosis on transplant immunity in an allogenic skin graft model.

Periodontal disease can induce dysbiosis, a compositional and functional alteration in the microbiota. Dysbiosis induced by periodontal disease is known to cause systemic inflammation and may affect transplant immunity. Here, we examined the effects of periodontal disease-related intestinal dysbiosis on transplant immunity using a mouse model of allogenic skin graft in which the mice were orally administered the periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg). For 6 weeks, the Pg group orally received Pg while the control group orally received phosphate-buffered saline solution. After that, both groups received allogenic skin grafts. 16 s rRNA analysis of feces revealed that oral administration of Pg significantly increased three short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) producing genera. SCFA (acetate and propionate) levels were significantly higher in the Pg group (p = 0.040 and p = 0.005). The ratio of regulatory T cells, which are positively correlated with SCFAs, to total CD4+ T cells in the peripheral blood and spleen was significantly greater (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) in the Pg group by flowcytometry. Finally, oral administration of Pg significantly prolonged skin graft survival (p < 0.001) and reduced pathological inflammation in transplanted skin grafts. In conclusion, periodontal pathogen-induced intestinal dysbiosis may affect transplant immunity through increased levels of SCFAs and regulatory T cells. (198 words).

Efficacy of Linear Stapler With Polyglycolic Acid Felt for Preventing Graft Duodenal Perforation After Pancreas Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Graft duodenal perforation is a serious complication in pancreas transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether using a reinforced linear stapler during bench surgery in pancreas transplant affects the risk of graft duodenal perforation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent pancreas transplant at our institution from 2011 to 2020. A reinforced stapler with polyglycolic acid felt was used to dissect the graft duodenum during bench surgery in 16 of the 47 patients (reinforced group). A conventional linear stapler was used in the remaining 31 patients (conventional group). Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative parameters were compared between the reinforced group and the conventional group. RESULTS: Graft duodenal perforation occurred in 6 patients (19.4%) in the conventional group and in none of the patients in the reinforced group. Logistic regression analysis revealed no significant associations between donor- orrecipient-related factors and graft duodenal perforation. Among operative factors, use of a reinforced stapler was the only factor significantly associated with the risk of graft duodenal perforation (odds ratio = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a reinforced stapler during dissection of the duodenum in bench surgery for pancreas transplant was associated with a lower risk of graft duodenal perforation than use of a conventional stapler.

Outcomes of Everolimus Plus Standard-Dose Tacrolimus Immunosuppression in De Novo Kidney Transplant: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study of 225 Transplants.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, our aim was to compare the outcomes of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose tacrolimus immunosuppression in patients who received de novo kidney transplant at our center in Fukuoka, Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, observational, single-center, inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis study, 225 recipients who underwent kidney transplant at our center between January 2013 and December 2018 were included. The variables considered were recipient age/sex, duration of dialysis, cytomegalovirus mismatch (seronegative recipient and seropositive donor), cause of end-stage renal disease, donor age/sex, and number of HLA mismatches. RESULTS: Our analyses included 85 transplant recipients in the everolimus group and 141 transplant recipients in the mycophenolate mofetil group (n = 226 overall). There were no significant differences between the groups at 1 year for incidence of patient death and allograft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection, BK virus-associated nephropathy, surgical complications, delayed graft function, and posttransplant diabetes mellitus. Incidence of cytomegalovirus infection and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significantly lower in the everolimus group than in the mycophenolate mofetil group. Posttransplant triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein were higher in the everolimus group than in the mycophenolate mofetil group. Multivariate ordered logistic analysis showed that older donor age and an acute rejection episode, but not induction with everolimus or mean tacrolimus trough concentration throughoutthe firstpostoperative year,were significant risk factors for severity of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy at the 1-year protocol biopsy (P = .004 and P < .001,respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term outcomes with everolimus plus standard-dose tacrolimus in recipients of de novo kidney transplant were comparable to those with mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose tacrolimus.

Effective Technique for Pancreas Transplantation by Iliac Vascular Transposition, Without Heparin-Based Anticoagulation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate patients undergoing a new procedure, iliac vascular transposition, in pancreas transplantation regarding the risk of thrombosis and graft survival without heparin-based anticoagulation therapy. METHODS: Iliac vascular transposition (IVT) involves changing the positions of the external iliac artery and vein relative to each other. In this study, this technique was evaluated in patients undergoing the procedure compared with patients not undergoing the procedure (iliac vascular parallel (IVP) group). RESULTS: No patients received prophylactic heparin therapy. Two patients in the IVP group (n = 26) developed complete thrombosis and six developed partial thrombosis, compared with no patients with complete thrombosis and one with partial thrombosis in the IVT group (n = 29). The cumulative incidence of thrombosis was significantly higher in the IVP group (p < 0.01). Cox regression revealed that not receiving iliac vascular transposition was the only significant risk factor for thrombosis (odds ratio: 10.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-81.2; p = 0.03). One-year graft survival was significantly better in the IVT group vs IVP group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: IVT in pancreas transplantation is a simple technique that results in a lower thrombosis risk and better graft survival rates without heparin-based anticoagulation therapy.

Safety and Efficacy of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Pretransplant Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective, Single-center, Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis of 85 Transplant Patients.

Whether sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors can be used effectively and safely in kidney transplant (KT) recipients with pretransplant type 2 diabetes as the primary cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains unclear. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors compared with other oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) in KT recipients with pretransplant type 2 diabetes as the primary cause of ESRD. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational, single-center, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis study, we compared the outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2 group) and other OHAs (control group) following KT. A total of 85 recipients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy as the major cause of ESRD before KT who were treated at our institute between October 2003 and October 2019 were screened and included. The variables considered for IPTW were recipient age, sex, body mass index, history of cardiovascular disease, ABO incompatibility, insulin therapy, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at the initiation of additional OHAs. Primary endpoints were changes in HbA1c, body weight, and eGFR 1 y after the initiation of additional OHAs. RESULTS: After IPTW analysis, there were 26 patients in the SGLT2 group and 59 patients in the control group (n = 85 overall). The body weights were significantly reduced in the SGLT2 group. There was no statistical difference in changes in HbA1c and eGFR. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the incidence of urinary infection, acute rejection, or other side effects between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the body weight of KT recipients and were used safely without increasing side effects.

Impact of the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score on Donor and Recipient Outcomes After Living-donor Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective, Single-center Study of 782 Transplants.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to assess the impact of the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score on donor and recipient outcomes after living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 782 transplants involving LDKT between February 2008 and October 2019 to assess the correlation between the MAP score and outcome after LDKT. We divided the transplants into 2 groups according to the donor MAP score: 0 (MAP0) and 1-5 (MAP1-5). RESULTS: Compared with the MAP0 group, donors in the MAP1-5 group were significantly older, had higher body mass index, and were more likely to be men. The prevalences of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes were also higher among donors in the MAP1-5 group than among donors in the MAP0 group. Operative time, estimated blood loss during donor nephrectomy, and percentage of glomerular sclerosis were significantly greater in the MAP1-5 group than in the MAP0 group. Donor and recipient perioperative complications were comparable between the 2 groups; death-censored graft survival rates also did not significantly differ between groups. Although the recipient mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from postoperative d 1 to 7 was significantly higher in the MAP0 group than in the MAP1-5 group (P = 0.007), eGFR reductions within 5 y after transplantation were similar between groups. There were no significant differences between groups in recipient mortality and biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes within 1 y after transplantation. Additionally, multivariate analysis showed that the only factors affecting recipient eGFR at postoperative d 7 were donor age, recipient age, and female sex (P < 0.001, <0.001, and =0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The MAP score did not influence surgical complications or graft survival; therefore, it should not affect donor selection.

Impact of Recipient Age on Outcomes After Pancreas Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Few reports have provided the ages of pancreas transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to determine whether recipient age affects survival of pancreatic grafts after transplantation. METHODS: We analyzed 73 patients who had undergone pancreas transplantation at our institution from August 2001 to March 2020 and assessed the effects of recipient age on pancreas graft survival within 5 years after pancreas transplantation. RESULTS: The cutoff value for recipient age established by receiver operating characteristic curve was 35 years. The pancreas graft survival rate of recipients aged 35 years or younger (1, 3, and 5 years: 72.9%, 41.7%, and 41.7%, respectively) was significantly lower than that of recipients aged over 35 years (1, 3, and 5 years: 93.2%, 88.4%, and 88.4%, respectively). Multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis showed that recipient age 35 years or younger (hazard ratio = 3.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-12.50; P = .044) and solitary pancreas transplantation (hazard ratio = 10.72; 95% confidence interval, 2.72-42.28; P < .001) were significant risk factors for pancreas graft loss within 5 years. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that younger recipient age is a risk factor for pancreas graft loss after transplantation.

Predicting Operation Time and Creating a Difficulty Scoring System in Donor Nephrectomy.

Background: To determine predictive formulas for operation time and surgical difficulty in laparoscopic living-donor kidney transplantation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for 222 living donors aged >20 years and recorded factors affecting operation time from patients' CT images and medical records. We used the factors significantly affecting operation time to create a formula to predict operation time and designed a model to predict surgical difficulty based on the standardized partial regression coefficient, ß. We also analyzed the relationship between surgical difficulty (high vs low) and operation time. Results: This study involved 111 pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomies (PRDN) and 111 hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies (HALDN). Patients' mean age was 55.7 years, and 59.5% were women; 5.0% underwent right nephrectomy, and 77.0% vs 23.0% had single- vs multiple renal arteries. The average estimated kidney graft weight was 160.0 g, and actual average graft weight was 155.3 g. The following factors were significantly correlated with operation time in the regression analysis: number of renal arteries, Mayo adhesive probability score, estimated kidney graft weight, right nephrectomy, and operation type (PRDN). These five factors were used to create the operation time prediction equation and difficulty scoring system. The multiple r2 value was 0.40 for the operation time prediction equation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the difficulty scoring system revealed the following: sensitivity: 78.0%, specificity: 64.9%, and c-statistic: 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 0.83). Conclusions: The equation to predict operation time and the surgical difficulty prediction model created in this study are easy to calculate and are accurate. Both may help in selecting an appropriately skilled surgeon and in improving safety in living-donor kidney transplantation.

Risk Factors and Optimal Methods for Incisional Hernias After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience From Asia.

BACKGROUND: For kidney transplant patients, incisional hernia (IH) is a major complication resulting from prolonged pretransplant dialysis, immunosuppressive drugs, and the high prevalence of diabetes. However, there have been relatively few studies of IH after kidney transplantation (KT) in Japan and in the greater Asian population. Additionally, operative methods for IH repair have not been established. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 465 consecutive patients who underwent KT at our hospital from April 2013 to March 2019. Patients who underwent incisional hernia repair were included in this study, and the follow-up time was extended to September 2020. We defined severe IH as an IH requiring surgical repair. We examine the risk factors for severe IH among KT patients and also discuss the operative methods of IH repair. RESULTS: During the study period, 7 patients developed severe IH after KT. The cumulative occurrence rate for severe IH was 1.1% 1 year postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that age at KT and dialysis duration (hazard ratio = 1.112, P = .016; hazard ratio = 1.106, respectively; P = .038) were independent risk factors for severe IH. We used polypropylene mesh for IH repair in all cases, with onlay repair performed in 5 of 7 cases. There was no recurrence or infection after mesh repair during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, age at KT and dialysis duration were independent risk factors for severe IH in the Japanese population. Onlay repair with a polypropylene mesh appeared to be a safe and acceptable operation for IH repair after KT.

Impact of the introduction of pure retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy on perioperative donor outcomes: A propensity score matching comparison with hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: We previously reported that the outcomes of pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy are superior to those of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy. Consequently, we introduced pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy in our hospital. Here, we compared perioperative outcomes between hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 315 living-donor kidney transplantation procedures performed between October 2015 and December 2020 (213 involving hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, October 2015 to June 2019; 102 involving pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy, May 2019 to December 2020). After propensity score matching, 90 transplantations were included in each group (n = 180 overall). RESULTS: Donors in the pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy group had longer warm ischemia times (P < .001), lower serum C-reactive protein concentrations and white blood cell counts on postoperative day 1 (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively), and shorter postoperative stays (P < .001) than donors in the hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group. Five (5.6%) modified Clavien-classifiable complications occurred in the hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group; no complications occurred in the pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy group (P = 0.008). One recipient in the hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group had donor-related delayed graft function. There were no significant differences between groups in recipient estimated glomerular filtration on postoperative day 7. CONCLUSION: The introduction of pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy was safe and effective. Moreover, it was less invasive and less harmful for donors, compared with hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; recipient outcomes were equivalent.

Effects of Concomitant Administration of Vonoprazan Fumarate on the Tacrolimus Blood Concentration in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Vonoprazan fumarate (vonoprazan) is a new kind of acid suppressant with potent acid inhibitory effects. Therefore, it has been administered to kidney transplant recipients for treatment or prophylaxis of steroid ulcers, refractory peptic ulcers, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Because tacrolimus, which is a well-established immunosuppressant for kidney transplantation, and vonoprazan share the CYP3A4 system for metabolism, drug interactions are anticipated upon simultaneous administration. We retrospectively analyzed 52 kidney transplant recipients who were converted from rabeprazole, which has a small effect on the tacrolimus trough blood concentration (C0), to vonoprazan between August 2016 and July 2019. We compared the tacrolimus C0/tacrolimus dose (C0/D) before and after conversion and serum liver enzymes, serum total bilirubin, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). As a result, mean tacrolimus C0/D before and after conversion was 1.98 ± 1.02 and 2.19 ± 1.15 (ng/mL)/(mg/d), respectively, (p < 0.001). Additionally, mean aspartate transaminase (AST) before and after conversion was 18.6 ± 4.2 and 19.6 ± 5.2 IU/L, respectively, (p = 0.037). Mean alanine transaminase (ALT) before and after conversion was 15.8 ± 5.5 and 17.6 ± 7.1 IU/L, respectively, (p = 0.007). Mean eGFR before and after conversion was 50.6 ± 14.4 and 51.4 ± 14.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively (p = 0.021). Mean AST, ALT, and eGFR were slightly but significantly elevated within normal ranges after conversion. In conclusion, our study suggests that the mean tacrolimus C0/D was elevated significantly by converting from rabeprazole to vonoprazan, but it had little clinical significance. Vonoprazan can be administered safely to kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus.

Association of Pretransplant BK Polyomavirus Antibody Status with BK Polyomavirus Infection After Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Pilot Study of 47 Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Prevention and early detection of BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is important for long-term kidney graft survival; hence, pretransplant screening methods are essential to identify recipients at high risk for BKV infection. This study investigated the association of pretransplant donor and recipient BKV antibody status with the occurrence of post-transplant BKV infection. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 47 adult living donor kidney transplant pairs from December 2014 to January 2016. Recipient and donor pretransplant BKV antibody titer was measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. Donor and recipient median HI titer of 1:20 was used as a cutoff to define seropositivity. Recipients were divided into 2 groups (BKV antibody donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) and non-D+/R-). Urinary cytology was used to screen for BKV infection. Plasma polymerase chain reaction testing for BKV DNA was used when decoy cells in urine were persistently detected. RESULTS: Nine (19.2%) of 47 patients belonged to the D+/R- group. Decoy cells were observed in 32 recipients (68.1%) during follow-up. BK viremia occurred in 3 (6.4%) cases. The maximum decoy cell count was significantly higher in the D+/R- group than in the non-D+/R- group (P = .0002). Decoy-cell-free survival was significantly shorter in the D+/R- group (P = .0220). Multivariate analysis identified only BKV antibody serostatus as an independent risk factor for decoy cell appearance (P = .0491). CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant donor and recipient BKV antibody status was associated with higher maximum decoy cell count and shorter decoy-cell-free survival after kidney transplantation.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in kidney transplant patients with resolved hepatitis B virus infection: Risk factors and the safety and efficacy of preemptive therapy.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is associated with complications and adverse outcomes in patients with clinically resolved HBV infection who are seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag), and seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBc Ab) and/or hepatitis B surface antibody (HBs Ab) before kidney transplantation (KT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients with resolved HBV infection who were HBV-DNA negative. HBV-DNA after KT was evaluated, and the occurrence of HBV reactivation and outcomes were monitored. We defined HBV reactivation as seropositivity for HBV-DNA at or above the minimal detection level of 1.0 log IU/mL and treated preemptively (using entecavir) when the HBV-DNA level was at or above 1.3 log IU/mL, in accordance with the Japanese Guidelines for HBV treatment. RESULTS: Among the 52 patients, the mean age was 57.2 ± 10.8 years. The median HBc Ab titer was 12.8 (interquartile range, 4.6-42.6) cutoff index, and five (9.6%) cases of HBV reactivation occurred. No patients developed graft loss and died due to HBV reactivation. Statistical analysis showed that age and HBc Ab titer were significant risk factors for HBV reactivation (P = .037 and P = .042, respectively). No significant differences were found between graft survival and the presence or absence of HBV reactivation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that HBc Ab titer and age could be significant risk factors for HBV reactivation. Resolution of HBV infection did not appear to be associated with patient or graft survival, regardless of whether HBV reactivation occurred, when following our preemptive strategy.