Simultaneous Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Isolated Septal Myocardial Infarction in a Young Patient.

We report the case of a young patient with a simultaneous isolated septal myocardial infarction (MI) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim was to describe a rare clinical entity and to explain why these two pathologies were present at the same time in a young patient. A review of literature was performed. An interventional cardiologist, an interventional radiologist and a lung specialist were consulted. The diagnostic workup revealed only heterozygous Factor Leiden V mutation. This presentation was probably fortuitous, but worth reporting in our opinion. LEARNING POINTS: To our knowledge, the simultaneous presentation of an isolated septal MI and PE in a young patient has never been reported.Isolated septal MI should be considered in the presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) at sub-occlusion of a large septal branch. The final diagnosis can optimally be confirmed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).An increasing number of asymptomatic PE are being detected due to advances in computed tomography (CT) scanning. This is important because, if left untreated, incidental PE may be associated with higher recurrence rate and mortality.

Elective ostial left main stenting: a tailored approach.

Elective left main (LM) stenting is increasingly performed as a valuable alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting. Nevertheless, clinical data are limited to registries, and randomized trials have not been published. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been recognized as an accurate tool for assessing optimal stent deployment. We hereby report the usefulness of IVUS in defining the interventional strategy in four consecutive patients presenting with severe, symptomatic ostial LM disease, and this in the era of drug-eluting stents. The first two patients were treated by a short drug-eluting stent for a critical LM stenosis as IVUS demonstrated a reference diameter < 3.7 mm. The third patient had a larger reference diameter and was treated with conventional stenting with optimization of the result by IVUS. IVUS was particularly helpful in all patients to confirm accurate stent placement in relation to the LM ostium and bifurcation. In another patient, based on IVUS findings, surgery was preferred. This patient with diabetes as a risk factor presented with comparable angiographic features. IVUS, however, showed diffuse disease without any healthy reference segment in the LM. All stented patients are asymptomatic at 15 +/- 7 months follow-up with negative stress testing. The present observation indicates that IVUS is an essential tool for strategic selection and to optimize percutaneous coronary intervention for LM disease.

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: head-to-head comparison of two different devices.

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been proposed as the treatment of choice for young high-risk patients who suffered cryptogenic stroke and/or peripheral paradoxical embolism. We sought to compare prospectively two different devices used for percutaneous PFO closure.Prospective data were collected on 40 high risk patients (females: 38%, mean age : 44 +/- 11 years, interatrial septal aneurysm >10 mm: 68%) who underwent percutaneous PFO closure after cryptogenic stroke (n = 38) or peripheral paradoxical embolism (n = 2). Chronologically, 20 patients were first treated by a PFO-Star (Cardia, Burnsville, MI) device. Then, 20 other patients received a Starflex occluder (NMT, Boston, MA). The primary endpoint was complete PFO closure at 6 months as assessed by transthoracic contrast echocardiography. Secondary endpoints were major peri- or post procedural complications and clinical recurrence at 1 year follow-up.Baseline clinical and anatomical characteristics were comparable for both groups. Complete PFO closure was observed in 50% (PFO-Star) and 90% (Starflex) of patients (p=0.001) respectively. Major peri-procedural complications occurred in the PFO-star group only: right-sided device thrombus (1 patient) and aorto-right atrial fistula (1 patient). At 1 year follow-up, no clinical recurrence occurred.In conclusion, despite the absence of clinical recurrence in this high-risk population with presumed paradoxical embolism, complete PFO closure at 6 months follow-up was significantly related to the type of closure device used.

ECG interpretation during the acute phase of coronary syndromes: in need of improvement?

QUESTION UNDER STUDY: Emergency room (ER) interpretation of the ECG is critical to assessment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Our aim was to assess its reliability in our institution, a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: Over a 6-month period all consecutive patients admitted for ACS were included in the study. ECG interpretation by emergency physicians (EPs) was recorded on a preformatted sheet and compared with the interpretation of two specialist physicians (SPs). Discrepancies between the 2 specialists were resolved by an ECG specialist. RESULTS: Over the 6-month period, 692 consecutive patients were admitted with suspected ACS. ECG interpretation was available in 641 cases (93%). Concordance between SPs was 87%. Interpretation of normality or abnormality of the ECG was concordant between EPs and SPs in 475 cases (74%, kappa = 0.51). Interpretation of ischaemic modifications was concordant in 69% of cases, and as many ST segment elevations were unrecognised as overdiagnosed (5% each). The same findings occurred for ST segment depressions and negative T waves (12% each). CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of the ECG recorded during ACS by 2 SPs was discrepant in 13% of cases. Similarly, EP interpretation was discrepant from SP interpretation in 25% of cases, equally distributed between over- and underdiagnosing of ischaemic changes. The clinical implications and impact of medical education on ECG interpretation require further study.