Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 23
1.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 31(6): 857-868, 2019 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30560737

OBJECTIVES: Various art programs are available for people with dementia. These have been shown to contribute to the patient's quality of life. But are all types of art suitable for this purpose and for the target group? This study investigated whether responsiveness during museum programs depends on the type of art work shown and/or characteristics of the person with dementia, such as severity of dementia or specific cognitive impairments. METHOD: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in which the responsiveness of people with dementia to different types of art was investigated as part of a study into the implementation of the Unforgettable program, an interactive guided museum tour program in Dutch museums for people with dementia. RESULTS: The appreciative and active responsiveness and interaction with others during the program appeared related to the severity of dementia, to specific cognitive impairments, and to type of artworks. People with more severe dementia responded less to art than people with mild dementia. Artworks with more natural elements revealed less interaction with others. Artifacts (i.e., objects not originally meant as artworks) evoked more reactions than artworks. CONCLUSION: The study results are important to take into account when designing and offering art programs for people with dementia. Knowing which type of art works appeals most to (subgroups of) people with dementia will contribute to the optimization of art programs for this target group and to their active participation in such programs.

2.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 30(4): 527-537, 2018 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29145912

ABSTRACTBackground:In the MEETINGDEM project, the Meeting Centers Support Program (MCSP) was adaptively implemented and evaluated in three European countries: Italy, Poland, and the United Kingdom. The aim of this study was to investigate overall and country-specific facilitators and barriers to the implementation of MCSP in these European countries. METHODS: A qualitative multiple case study design was used. Based on the theoretical model of adaptive implementation, a checklist was composed of potential facilitators and barriers to the implementation of MCSP. This checklist was administered among stakeholders involved in the implementation of MCSP to trace the experienced facilitators and barriers. Twenty-eight checklists were completed. RESULTS: Main similarities between countries were related to the presence of suitable staff, management, and a project manager, and the fact that the MCSP is attuned to needs and wishes of people with dementia and informal caregivers. Main differences between countries were related to: communication with potential referrers, setting up an inter-organizational collaboration network, receiving support of national organizations, having clear discharge criteria for the MCSP and continuous PR in the region. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide insight into generic and country specific factors that can influence the implementation of MCSP in different European countries. This study informs further implementation and dissemination of MCSP in Europe and may also serve as an example for the dissemination and implementation of other effective psychosocial support interventions for people with dementia and their informal caregivers across and beyond Europe.


Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Program Evaluation/methods , Social Support , Caregivers/psychology , Dementia/psychology , Dementia/therapy , Humans , Italy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Poland , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life , United Kingdom
3.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 161: D1878, 2017.
Article Nl | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28936937

- In this article, we describe the current state of affairs with respect to informal care for people with dementia. We focus on the impact of informal care on the caregiver, caregiving strategies and effective ways to support informal caregivers, including e-health and technological support.- Informal care for people with dementia is intense and has consequences, both positive and negative: 78% of informal caregivers has good feelings about the care they give, but 15% feels heavily burdened.- A stimulating and supportive approach creates a positive and safe environment. Person-centred interventions providing several types of support are most effective for people with dementia and their informal caregivers.- E-health and technological interventions have favourable effects on trust, concern and depressive symptoms of informal caregivers.- New interventions should focus more on social health: interactions between people with dementia and their informal caregivers and encouragement of both to use their abilities.


Caregivers , Dementia/therapy , Patient Care/methods , Humans
4.
BMC Geriatr ; 17(1): 79, 2017 04 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28376895

BACKGROUND: The MEETINGDEM study aims to implement and evaluate an innovative, inclusive, approach to supporting community dwelling people with mild to moderate dementia and their family carers, called the Meeting Centers Support Program (MCSP), in three countries in the European Union (EU): Italy, Poland and United Kingdom. Demonstrated benefits of this person-centered approach, developed in The Netherlands, include high user satisfaction, reduced behavioral and mood problems, delayed admission to residential care, lower levels of caregiving-related stress, higher carer competence, and improved collaboration between care and welfare organizations. METHODS: The project will be carried out over a 36 month period. Project partners in the three countries will utilize, and adapt, strategies and tools developed in the Netherlands. In Phase One (month 1-18) activities will focus on establishing an initiative group of relevant organizations and user representatives in each country, exploring pathways to care and potential facilitators and barriers to implementing the program, and developing country specific implementation plans and materials. In Phase Two (month 19­36) training will be provided to organizations and staff, after which the meeting centers will be established and evaluated for impact on behavior, mood and quality of life of people with dementia and carers, cost-effectiveness, changes in service use, user satisfaction and implementation process. DISCUSSION: An overall evaluation will draw together findings from the three countries to develop recommendations for successful implementation of MCSP across the EU. If the Meeting Centers approach can be widely implemented, this could lead to major improvements in dementia care across Europe and beyond. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered in May 2016: trial number: NTR5936 .


Caregivers/psychology , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Dementia/psychology , Social Support , Dementia/therapy , Europe , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Program Evaluation , Quality of Life
5.
Aging Ment Health ; 21(1): 40-48, 2017 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27982713

OBJECTIVES: The implementation of new health services is a complex process. This study investigated the first phase of the adaptive implementation of the Dutch Meeting Centres Support Programme (MCSP) for people with dementia and their carers in three European countries (Italy, Poland, the UK) within the JPND-MEETINGDEM project. Anticipated and experienced factors influencing the implementation, and the efficacy of the implementation process, were investigated. Findings were compared with previous research in the Netherlands. METHOD: A qualitative multiple case study design was applied. Checklist on anticipated facilitators and barriers to the implementation and semi-structured interview were completed by stakeholders, respectively at the end and at the beginning of the preparation phase. RESULTS: Overall, few differences between countries were founded. Facilitators for all countries were: added value of MCSP matching needs of the target group, evidence of effectiveness of MCSP, enthusiasm of stakeholders. General barriers were: competition with existing care and welfare organizations and scarce funding. Some countries experienced improved collaborations, others had difficulties finding a socially integrated location for MCSP. The step-by-step implementation method proved efficacious. CONCLUSION: These insights into factors influencing the implementation of MCSP in three European countries and the efficacy of the step-by-step preparation may aid further implementation of MCSP in Europe.


Caregivers/psychology , Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Dementia/therapy , Social Support , Aged , Dementia/psychology , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Poland , Program Development , Qualitative Research , United Kingdom
6.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 28(5): 801-13, 2016 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26632631

BACKGROUND: The aim was to develop an evidence-based model that focuses specifically on factors that enable the provision of personalized care to facilitate and promote the implementation of community-based personalized dementia care interventions. The model is based on our previous research and additional literature. METHODS: The theoretical model of adaptive implementation was used as a framework to structure our model. Facilitators and barriers considered relevant for personalized care were extracted from our studies and additional literature, and were synthesized into the new evidence-based implementation model and checklist for personalized dementia care in the community. RESULTS: Extraction of data led to a composition of an evidence-based model for the implementation of personalized psychosocial care interventions that incorporates core components of personalized care. The model addresses several issues, e.g. how personalized care interventions should be offered and to whom; whether these are able to adapt to personal characteristics and needs of clients and informal caregivers; and whether both organizational management and staff that provide the intervention support personalized care and are able to focus on providing individualized care. CONCLUSIONS: Our model provides a checklist for researchers, professional caregivers, and policy-makers who wish to develop, evaluate, or implement personalized care interventions.


Checklist/standards , Dementia/therapy , Evidence-Based Practice/methods , Models, Theoretical , Humans , Netherlands , Review Literature as Topic
7.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol ; 11(1): 61-71, 2016.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24989993

PURPOSE: This research aimed to integrate three previously developed assistive technology (AT) systems into one modular, multifunctional system, which can support people with dementia and carers throughout the course of dementia. . In an explorative evaluation study, the integrated system, called Rosetta, was tested on usefulness, user-friendliness and impact, in people with dementia, their informal carers and professional carers involved. The Rosetta system was installed in participants' homes in three countries: The Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. METHODS: Controlled trial with pre- and post-test measures across three countries (randomized controlled trial in Germany; matched groups in the Netherlands and Belgium). Participants completed questionnaires for impact measurement and participated in semi-structured interviews regarding usefulness and user-friendliness of Rosetta. RESULTS: All participants agreed that Rosetta is a very useful development. They did not rate the user-friendliness of the system highly. No significant effects were found on impact measurements. CONCLUSION: All participants found Rosetta a very useful development for future care, and would consider using it. Since Rosetta was still in development during evaluation, a discrepancy between expectations and actual functioning of Rosetta existed, which may explain the lack of findings on the impact of the system and the low appreciation of user-friendliness. Implications for Rehabilitation People with dementia and carers find assistive technology (AT) a useful future development and they are willing to use it in the future. People with dementia and carers have little privacy issues with AT. If they have concerns, they are willing to accept the trade-off of reduced privacy in exchange for the ability to live in their own homes for longer. Given that a system works flawlessly, informal carers indicate that integrated AT can reduce their burden and stress. This can in turn help informal carers to provide better care for a longer period of time.


Attitude to Computers , Caregivers/psychology , Dementia/psychology , Dementia/rehabilitation , Self-Help Devices/psychology , Accidental Falls , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Belgium , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Surveys and Questionnaires , User-Computer Interface
8.
Int J Nurs Stud ; 52(8): 1310-22, 2015 Aug.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25952337

BACKGROUND: The community-based Meeting Centres Support Programme for people with dementia and their carers has been proven more effective in influencing behaviour and mood problems of people with dementia and improving sense of competence of carers compared to nursing home-based day care centres for people with dementia. Six Dutch nursing home-based day care centres were transformed into Community-based day care centres with carer support, according to this Meeting Centres model. OBJECTIVES: To determine which factors facilitate or impede the transition to Community-based day care. DESIGN: A process evaluation was conducted with a qualitative study design. SETTINGS: Six nursing home-based day care centres transformed into Community-based day care centres for people with dementia and their carers. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Stakeholders (n=40) that were involved during the transition. METHODS: Factors that facilitated or impeded the transition were traced by means of (audiotaped and transcribed) interviews with stakeholders and document analysis. All data were coded by two independent researchers and analyzed using thematic analysis based on the Theoretical framework of adaptive implementation. RESULTS: Six nursing home-based day care centres successfully made the transition to Community-based day care with carer support. Success factors for the start of the project were: the innovation being in line with the current trend towards more outpatient care and having motivated pioneers responsible for the execution of the transition. Barriers were difficulties reaching/recruiting the target group (people with dementia and carers), inflexible staff and little or no experience with collaboration with community-based care and welfare organizations. Facilitating factors during the implementation phase were: finding a suitable location in the community, positive changes in staff attitude and adoption of the new vision, and good cooperation with care and welfare organizations. Barriers were insufficient involvement of, and support from the managers of the responsible organizations, and communication problems with referrers of other organizations, including the GPs and case managers. CONCLUSIONS: The transition from nursing home-based psychogeriatric day care support to a community-based combined support programme for people with dementia and their informal carer is shown to be feasible. Successful implementation of this community-based combined support programme requires - besides motivated pioneers, a change in staff attitude and working style, a suitable pleasant location and collaboration with other care and welfare organizations - special attention for effective communication with the target user group and the referrers, and also how the management of the pioneer organizations can facilitate the staff during the transition process.


Continuity of Patient Care , Dementia/nursing , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Aged , Humans , Netherlands
9.
Aging Ment Health ; 19(10): 902-11, 2015.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25564968

OBJECTIVES: In the Netherlands, many community-dwelling people with dementia and behavioral disturbances and their family caregivers receive mental health care from a community psychiatric nurse (CPN). To promote continuity of care for these persons after moving to a nursing home, a transfer intervention was developed. The aim of this explorative study was to evaluate this intervention and its implementation. METHOD: A qualitative explorative study design was used. CPNs visited professional nursing home carers, people with dementia and family caregivers six weeks after moving, advised on how to manage behavioral problems of their former clients and provided support to family caregivers. Twenty-two interviews were conducted with participants exposed to the intervention (5 CPNs, 5 family and 12 nursing home carers) and with 11 stakeholders (i.e., nursing home and mental health care managers, professional caregivers) to identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation. Data were collected in 2012 and 2013. RESULTS: The follow-up visit at six weeks met the need for background information of new admitted patients and helped family caregivers close off the period prior to the move. It did not meet the original purpose of providing nursing home staff with advice about problem behaviors on time: six weeks after the move was experienced as too late. CONCLUSION: The transfer intervention increased the awareness of nursing home staff about personal and behavioral characteristics of residents with dementia and supported caregivers in coping with the new situation. The timing of the intervention could be improved by scheduling it immediately after the move.


Caregivers/psychology , Continuity of Patient Care , Dementia/nursing , Nursing Homes , Nursing Staff/psychology , Patient Transfer/organization & administration , Problem Behavior , Aged , Dementia/psychology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Netherlands , Qualitative Research
10.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr ; 46(1): 1-11, 2015 Feb.
Article Nl | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25112667

BACKGROUND: In this study, the transition of a nursing home based psychogeriatric day care centre to an easy-access community day care centre plus caregiver support (DC-plus CS) is followed closely. The transition was based on the proven effective Meeting Centres Support Program. METHOD: By means of qualitative analysis of documents and interviews with key persons (n=11) we investigate facilitating and impeding factors for making this transition. Besides, we evaluate the satisfaction of participants and informal caregivers that used the new support program longer than 6 months. RESULTS: Several characteristics of the innovation (DC-plus CS) help to establish cooperation with other care and welfare services in the region, such as: the easy-access location, the social integration in the community, and the focus on combined support for people with dementia and their informal carers. The good cooperation and the suitable location in the community facilitate the implementation. At first, the presence of other community care-centres for people with dementia and their informal carers in the neighbourhood impedes the recruitment of new participants for the DC-plus CS. In general, the satisfaction of participants and informal carers about the support program is high. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The transition is made successfully and this study gives other psychogeriatric day care centres in the nursing home insight in how to make a similar transition to DC-plus CS.


Caregivers/psychology , Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Day Care, Medical/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Process Assessment, Health Care , Adaptation, Psychological , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Dementia/psychology , Dementia/therapy , Female , Geriatric Psychiatry , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Male , Needs Assessment , Netherlands , Pilot Projects , Social Environment , Social Support
11.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr ; 45(2): 105-16, 2014 Apr.
Article Nl | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24691857

BACKGROUND: Dementia care in The Netherlands is shifting from fragmented, ad hoc care to more coordinated and personalized care. Case management contributes to this shift. The linkage model and a combination of intensive case management and joint agency care models were selected based on their emerging prominence in The Netherlands. It is unclear if these different forms of case management are more effective than usual care in improving or preserving the functioning and well-being at the patient and caregiver level and at the societal cost. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to describe the design of a study comparing these two case management care models against usual care. Clinical and cost outcomes are investigated while care processes and the facilitators and barriers for implementation of these models are considered. DESIGN: Mixed methods include a prospective, observational, controlled, cohort study among persons with dementia and their primary informal caregiver in regions of The Netherlands with and without case management including a qualitative process evaluation. Community-dwelling individuals with a dementia diagnosis with an informal caregiver are included. The primary outcome measure is the Neuropsychiatric Inventory for the people with dementia and the General Health Questionnaire for their caregivers. Costs are measured from a societal perspective. Semi-structured interviews with stakeholders based on the theoretical model of adaptive implementation are planned. RESULTS: 521 pairs of persons with dementia and their primary informal caregiver were included and are followed over two years. In the linked model substantially more impeding factors for implementation were identified compared with the model. DISCUSSION: This article describes the design of an evaluation study of two case management models along with clinical and economic data from persons with dementia and caregivers. The impeding and facilitating factors differed substantially between the two models. Further results on cost-effectiveness are expected by the beginning of 2015. This is a Dutch adaptation of MacNeil Vroomen et al., Comparing Dutch case management care models for people with dementia and their caregivers: The design of the COMPAS study.


Case Management/organization & administration , Dementia/nursing , Research Design , Aged , Caregivers , Case Management/economics , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Theoretical , Netherlands , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 26(5): 769-79, 2014 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24507571

BACKGROUND: In the European Rosetta project three separate, previously developed, ICT systems were improved and integrated to create one modular system that helps community-dwelling people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia in different stages of the disease. The system aims to support them in daily functioning, monitor (deviations from) patterns in daily behaviour and to automatically detect emergency situations. The study aimed to inventory the end users' needs and wishes regarding the development and design of the new integrated Rosetta system, and to describe the to be developed Rosetta system. METHODS: Qualitative user-participatory design with in total 50 persons: 14 people with dementia, 13 informal carers, 6 professional carers, 9 dementia experts, 7 care partners within the project, and 1 volunteer. In the Netherlands user focus group sessions were performed and in Germany individual interviews. Dementia experts were consulted by means of a questionnaire, an expert meeting session, and interviews. RESULTS: Persons with dementia and informal carers appreciated the following functionalities most: help in cases of emergencies, navigation support and the calendar function. Dementia experts rated various behaviours relevant to monitor in order to detect timely changes in functioning, e.g. eating, drinking, going to the toilet, taking medicine adequately, performance of activities and sleep patterns. No ethical issues regarding the use of sensors and cameras were mentioned. CONCLUSION: The user participatory design resulted in valuable input from persons with dementia, informal carers and professional carers/dementia experts, based on which a first prototype Rosetta system was built.


Activities of Daily Living , Caregivers , Cognition Disorders , Mental Competency , Patient Participation , Aged , Cognition Disorders/physiopathology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation , Consumer Behavior , Female , Germany , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Independent Living/psychology , Male , Medical Informatics/methods , Medical Informatics/organization & administration , Netherlands , Patient Participation/methods , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Program Evaluation , Qualitative Research , Severity of Illness Index , Social Support
13.
Ageing Res Rev ; 9(2): 163-83, 2010 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19781667

Many psychosocial intervention studies report effects in subgroups of people with dementia. Insight into the characteristics of these subgroups is important for care practice. This study reviews personal characteristics of people with dementia (living in the community or in an institution) that are related to positive outcomes of psychosocial interventions. Electronic databases and key articles were searched for effect studies published between January 1990 and February 2008. Outcome measures were clustered into categories such as cognitive functioning, behavioural functioning and mental health. Seventy-one studies showed positive outcomes on psychosocial interventions, such as decreased depression and less behavioural problems, related to personal characteristics of people with dementia, such as gender, type or severity of dementia, presence of behavioural or mental health problems, and living situation. For people with dementia living in the community positive effects were most frequently found in the persons with mild to severe dementia not otherwise specified and with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease. For people with dementia living in an institution positive effects were found most frequently in the subgroups moderate to severe dementia, severe to very severe dementia and in the subgroup with behavioural problems. This study provides a unique overview of characteristics that are related to effective intervention outcomes. It also suggests that more research will lead to a better understanding of which care and welfare interventions are effective for specific subgroups of people with dementia.


Dementia/psychology , Dementia/therapy , Psychotherapy/methods , Psychotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Social Support , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Cognition Disorders/therapy , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Psychotherapy/trends , Social Behavior Disorders/etiology , Social Behavior Disorders/psychology , Social Behavior Disorders/therapy , Treatment Outcome
14.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 137: 210-24, 2008.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18560083

Community dwelling people with dementia and their informal carers experience a lot of problems. In the course of the disease process people with dementia become more dependent on others and professional help is often necessary. Many informal carers and people with dementia experience unmet needs with regard to information on the disease and on the available care and welfare offer, therefore they tend not to utilize the broad spectrum of available care and welfare services. This can have very negative consequences like unsafe situations, social isolation of the person with dementia and overburden of informal carers with consequent increased risk of illness for them. The development of a DEMentia specific Digital Interactive Social Chart (DEM-DISC) may counteract these problems. DEM-DISC is a demand oriented website for people with dementia and their carers, which is easy, accessible and provides users with customized information on healthcare and welfare services. DEM-DISC is developed according to the human centered design principles, this means that people with dementia, informal carers and healthcare professionals were involved throughout the development process. This paper describes the development of DEM-DISC from four perspectives, a domain specific content perspective, an ICT perspective, a user perspective and an organizational perspective. The aims and most important results from each perspective will be discussed. It is concluded that the human centered design was a valuable method for the development of the DEM-DISC.


Caregivers , Community Networks/organization & administration , Community Participation , Dementia/therapy , Needs Assessment , Consumer Health Information/organization & administration , Humans , Internet , Netherlands , Pilot Projects , Program Development , Social Work/organization & administration
15.
Ageing Res Rev ; 6(3): 223-46, 2007 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17869590

Some of the needs that people with dementia and their informal carers currently perceive as insufficiently met by regular care and support services might be alleviated, or even be met, using modern Information and Communication Technology (ICT). The study described in this paper was designed to provide an insight into the state of the art in ICT solutions that could contribute to meet the most frequently mentioned unmet needs by people with dementia and their informal carers. These needs can be summarized as (1) the need for general and personalized information; (2) the need for support with regard to symptoms of dementia; (3) the need for social contact and company; and (4) the need for health monitoring and perceived safety. Databases that were searched include: PubMed, Cinahl, Psychinfo, Google (Scholar), INSPEC and IEEE. In total 22 websites and 46 publications were included that satisfied the following criteria: the article reports on people with dementia and/or their informal carers and discusses an ICT-device that has been tested within the target group and has proven to be helpful. Within the first need area 18 relevant websites and three studies were included; within the second need area 4 websites and 20 publications were included. Within the third and fourth need area 11 and 12 publications were included respectively. Most articles reported on uncontrolled studies. It is concluded that the informational websites offer helpful information for carers but seem less attuned to the person with dementia and do not offer personalized information. ICT solutions aimed at compensating for disabilities, such as memory problems and daily activities demonstrate that people with mild to moderate dementia are capable of handling simple electronic equipment and can benefit from it in terms of more confidence and enhanced positive effect. Instrumental ICT-support for coping with behavioral and psychological changes in dementia is relatively disregarded as yet, while support for social contact can be effectively realized through, for example, simplified (mobile) phones or videophones or (entertainment) robots. GPS technology and monitoring systems are proven to result in enhanced feelings of safety and less fear and anxiety. Though these results are promising, more controlled studies in which the developed ICT solutions are tested in real life situations are needed before implementing them in the care for people with dementia. It is recommended that future studies also focus on the integration of the current techniques and solutions.


Computer Systems/trends , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Dementia/nursing , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Internet/trends , Respite Care/trends , Aged , Caregivers/psychology , Computer Systems/standards , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Dementia/psychology , Dementia/rehabilitation , Educational Technology/standards , Educational Technology/trends , Health Services Needs and Demand/standards , Humans , Internet/standards , Monitoring, Physiologic/standards , Monitoring, Physiologic/trends , Respite Care/standards , Self-Help Devices/standards , Self-Help Devices/trends
16.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 127: 166-77, 2007.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17901610

Dementia is a progressive, chronic disease affecting 5% of all persons above 65 and over 40% of people over 90. The aim of the COGKNOW project is to achieve a breakthrough with research that addresses the needs of those with dementia, particularly those with mild dementia living in the community. This entails cognitive reinforcement in four main areas: helping people to remember, helping to maintain social contact, helping with performing daily life and recreational activities and finally enhance feelings of safety. Based on a sound foundation of needs reported in dementia literature, workshops and individual interviews have been carried out with dementia sufferers and their carers in three European countries. A ranked analysis of information from workshops and interviews, and the state of the art of successful ICT solutions will be the basis for formulating the functionalities of the technical solution and for the development of a cognitive prosthetic device with associated services for people with mild dementia. The research and evaluation will be conducted from human factors, technology, and business perspectives in three phases of one year each. In this paper we discuss the design of the COGKNOW project, the first results of the user needs inquiry workshops and the ICT solutions the COGKNOW project will focus on in the first year.


Computer Communication Networks/organization & administration , Dementia , Reminder Systems , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Education , Europe , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Reminder Systems/instrumentation
17.
Aging Ment Health ; 10(2): 112-24, 2006 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16517486

Because of the complex nature of the problems that carers of persons with dementia encounter, several comprehensive support programs for carers were developed in the past decade. One such program is the Meeting Centres Support Program (MCSP) that integrates different types of support for persons with dementia and their carers, which have proved to be effective in practice and/or research. Within the framework of a study into the national implementation of the MCSP, it was investigated whether the positive effects found in carers that participated in the first Amsterdam Meeting Centres, were also achieved in other regions of The Netherlands. A pre-test-post-test control group design with matched groups was applied. In total, 94 carers in the MCSP in eight meeting centres and 34 carers of dementia patients who frequented regular psychogeriatric day care (PDC) in three nursing homes were included in the study. During the study period 23 carers of the MCSP group and 21 carers of the PDC group dropped out. At baseline and after seven months indicators of burden (psychological and psychosomatic symptoms, feelings of burden and time between start of support and institutionalization of the persons with dementia) were measured, as well as potential determinants of burden (sense of competence, coping strategies, experienced support, loneliness and the emotional impact of behaviour problems). Though on a group level no effect was found, either in psychological and psychosomatic symptoms or in the determinants of burden, a subgroup of carers who felt lonely (n=22) at baseline benefited significantly more from the MCSP than from PDC in terms of psychological and psychosomatic symptoms. A majority of MCSP carers (82.1%) experienced less burden and more professional support. After seven months significantly fewer persons with dementia in the MCSP (4%) were institutionalized as compared to the patients in PDC (29%). Patients in the MCSP participated for a longer period of time before institutionalization. Although the effect on sense of competence of carers that was found in the Amsterdam study was not found in this multi-centre study, the effect on burden and delayed institutionalization of the person with dementia were confirmed. The integrated MCSP also proved more effective than PDC in decreasing psychological and psychosomatic symptoms in lonely carers. Further dissemination of the MCSP is therefore recommended.


Caregivers , Dementia , Self-Help Groups , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 114: 210-20, 2005.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15923777

We-centric services may play an important role in the field of care and support for elderly persons with dementia and their carers. They may solve problems, such as fragmentation of care, gaps in the continuum of care and welfare services, and inefficient and uncustomized service delivery to patients and carers. In the FRUX Health Care pilot opportunities for we-centric, context-sensitive service bundles in the field of dementia care will be explored. The service on which we focus in this paper is a dynamic interactive social chart for dementia care (DEM-DISC). The feasibility of DEM-DISC will be investigated from a domain specific content perspective (needs, offerings, information and advice), an ICT perspective (ontology and application), a user perspective (persons with dementia, their carers and professionals/organizations), and an organisational perspective (necessary collaboration, governance and control, business modelling). A first demonstrator (validator) of the DEM-DISC will be designed, built and evaluated. Future possibilities to connect DEM-DISC to actual service delivery will be explored. In this paper we discuss the most important research questions from the different perspectives and the methods used to answer them.


Caregivers , Dementia , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Social Welfare
19.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr ; 36(2): 68-79, 2005 Apr.
Article Nl | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23203462

Background: A previous study in Amsterdam showed that combined family support in the Meeting Centres Support Programme, in which persons with dementia patients and their carers are both supported by one professional staff, is more effective in influencing behaviour problems and mood of dementia patients living in the community than non-integrated support, such as day care only. A multi-centre implementation study tests if similar effects are achieved in other regions of The Netherlands.Methods: A pretest-posttest control group design was applied. 112 dementia patients who visited psychogeriatric day care in eight community centres across the country and in three nursing homes, and their carers participated in the study. The patients in the experimental group (n=89) received support from the Meeting Centres Support Programme together with their carers, while the control group (n=23) received day care only. Behaviour problems (aggressive behaviour, inactivity, non-social behaviour) and mood (dissatisfaction, depressive behaviour) were assessed using standardized observation scales. Quality of life was assessed by interviewing the patients.Results: After 7 months the Meeting Centres Support Programme, compared to regular day care, showed a moderately positive effect on the degree of total behaviour problems (effect size=0.52), especially on inactivity (effect size=0.37) and non-social behaviour (effect size=0.60), a large effect on depressive behaviour (effect size=0.92) and a moderate effect on self-esteem (effect size=0.43).Conclusions: The Meeting Centres Support Programme proves to be more effective than regular day care in influencing behaviour problems, especially inactivity and non-social behaviour, and depressed mood. Participation in the programme also seems to have a positive effect on self-esteem, an important aspect of quality of life. These findings surpass the results of the Amsterdam study and confirm the surplus value of the Meeting Centres Support Programme as compared to regular day care for people with mild to severe dementia.

20.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl ; (9): 127-47, 2004.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15207407

In this study we investigated whether a support program based on the model of the Amsterdam meeting centers for people with dementia and their carers, is in line with the needs and possibilities in other areas in the Netherlands, or if variations in the program are indicated. This study is part of a larger study into the nationwide implementation of meeting centers in the Netherlands. The data gathered on the basis of questionnaires shows that, although the support offer is almost identical on the interregional level, there are differences in terms of initiator(s), type of location, frequency of discussion groups and monthly meeting for all participants, background of staff members, number of volunteers and structural funding. The people with dementia who use the meeting centers in the various regions do not differ significantly on sex, age, civil status, severity of dementia and physical invalidity. The family carers also exhibit more similarities than differences on the interregional level. In every region the majority of carers are female, married or cohabiting, and a minority are gainfully employed.They generally share a household with the person with dementia, or they live in the same municipality. In nearly all centers the majority of carers exhibit psychological and/or psychosomatic symptoms. In most regions participants make use of all elements of the support program (social club, discussion groups, informative meetings, consultation hour). The study shows that the support program based on the Amsterdam model meets general needs of people with dementia and their carers and is therefore generally applicable, but adaptive implementation is desirable.


Caregivers , Day Care, Medical , Dementia/rehabilitation , Family Relations , Group Processes , Social Support , Aged , Dementia/classification , Dementia/diagnosis , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Patient Care Team , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
...