Impact of Long-Term Evoked Compound Action Potential Controlled Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sleep Quality in Patients With Chronic Pain: An EVOKE Randomized Controlled Trial Study Subanalysis.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is considered an effective interventional nonpharmacologic treatment option for several chronic pain conditions. Here we present the effects of the novel evoked compound action potential (ECAP) controlled closed-loop (ECAP-CL) SCS system on long-term sleep quality outcomes from the EVOKE study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EVOKE study is a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted at 13 sites in the United States (N = 134 patients). The clinical trial utilized SCS to manage chronic pain and compared novel ECAP-CL technology to open-loop SCS. Additionally, sleep quality data was collected using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline and all study visits. RESULTS: The mean PSQI global score for ECAP-CL patients at baseline was 14.0 (n = 62; ± 0.5, SD 3.8), indicating poor sleep quality. Clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions (p < 0.001) in the global PSQI scores were noted at 12 months (n = 55; 5.7 ± 0.6, SD 4.2). A total of 76.4% of ECAP-CL patients met or exceeded Minimal Clinically Important Difference from baseline in PSQI at 12 months. Additionally, 30.9% of ECAP-CL patients achieved "good sleep quality" scores (PSQI ≤ 5), and 29.1% achieved sleep quality remission. "Normative" sleep scores were observed in 29.6% of ECAP-CL patients at 12 months, and these scores were better than the US general population. Additionally, ECAP-CL patients achieved statistically significant changes from baseline (p < 0.01) across all seven subcomponent scores of PSQI at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: ECAP-CL SCS elicits consistent neural activation of the target leading to less variability in long-term therapy delivery. In the EVOKE study, this resulted in ECAP-CL patients demonstrating clinically superior and sustained pain relief. Results from this study provide new evidence of long-term improvement in sleep quality and quantity in patients with chronic pain resulting from the use of this novel ECAP-CL SCS technology. CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT02924129.

Degeneration of retinal ganglion cells in diabetic dogs and mice: relationship to glycemic control and retinal capillary degeneration.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate (i) the effect of diabetes on retinal ganglion cell death in diabetic dogs and mice, (ii) the effect of prolonged glycemic control on diabetes-induced death of retinal ganglion cells, (iii) whether retinal ganglion cell death in diabetes is associated with degeneration of retinal capillaries, and (iv) the effect of diet on diabetes-induced degeneration of retinal ganglion cells in mice. METHODS: Diabetes was induced in dogs using streptozotocin, and levels of glycemic control (good, moderate, and poor) were maintained for 5 years. Diabetes was studied in two mouse models (diabetes induced in C57Bl/6J mice using streptozotocin and spontaneously diabetic Ins2Akita mice). Retinal ganglion cell death was investigated by counting the number of axons from the ganglion cells in the optic nerve and with terminal transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling and annexin V staining in mice. RESULTS: As reported previously, the development and severity of vascular lesions of diabetic retinopathy in diabetic dogs were strongly associated with glycemic control. Loss of retinal ganglion cells was extensive in dogs kept in poor glycemic control, and was essentially prevented in diabetic dogs kept in good glycemic control for the 5 years of study. In contrast, "moderate" glycemic control (intermediate between poor and good glycemic control) caused a significant increase in vascular pathology, but did not cause loss of retinal axons in the optic nerve. Using this validated optic nerve axon counting method, the two mouse models of diabetic retinopathy were studied to assess ganglion cell death. Despite 10 months of diabetes (a duration that has been shown to cause retinal capillary degeneration in both models), neither mouse model showed loss of optic nerve axons (thus suggesting no loss of retinal ganglion cells). Likewise, other parameters of cell death (terminal transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling and annexin V labeling) did not suggest ganglion cell death in diabetic C57Bl/6J mice, and ganglion cell death was not increased by a different commercial diet. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal ganglion cell death in diabetic dogs is significantly inhibited by good or even moderate glycemic control. The finding that diabetic dogs in moderate glycemic control had appreciable vascular disease without apparent retinal ganglion cell degeneration does not support the postulate that neural degeneration causes the vascular pathology. Studies of diabetic mice in our colony again fail to find evidence of ganglion cell death due to prolonged diabetes in this species.