Baseline and 1-year follow-up differences between hip-fracture patients admitted from nursing homes and the community. A cohort study on 509 consecutive patients (FONDA Cohort) / Diferencias iniciales y a 1 año de seguimiento entre los pacientes con fractura de cadera de residencia de ancianos y de comunidad. Estudio de una cohorte de 509 pacientes (Cohorte FONDA)

Objective: To determine the clinical and functional differences at hospital admission and at 1 year after a hip fracture (HF) in nursing homes (NH) and community-dwelling (CD) patients. Methods: All patients with HF admitted to the orthogeriatric unit at a university hospital between January 2013 and February 2014 were prospectively included. Clinical and functional variables, and mortality were recorded during the hospital admission. The patients were contacted by telephone at 1 year to determine their vital condition and functional status. Results: A total of 509 patients were included, 116 (22.8%) of whom came from NH. Compared with the CD patients, the NH patients had higher surgical risk (ASA ≥3: 83.6% vs. 66.4%, P<.001), poorer theoretical vital prognosis (Nottingham Profile ≥5: 98.3% vs. 56.6%, P<.001), higher rate of previous functional status (median Barthel index: 55 [IQR, 36-80] vs. 90 [IQR, 75-100], P<.001), poorer mental status (Pfeiffer's SPMSQ>2: 74.1% vs. 40.2%, P<.001), and a higher rate of sarcopenia (24.3% vs. 15.2%, P<.05). There were no differences in in-hospital or at 1-year mortality. At 1 year, NH patients recovered their previous walking capacity at a lower rate (38.5% vs. 56.2%, P<.001). Conclusions: Among the patients with HF treated in an orthogeriatric unit, NH patients had higher, surgical risk, functional and mental impairment, and a higher rate of sarcopenia than CD patients. At 1 year of follow-up, NH patients did not have higher mortality, but they recovered their previous capacity for walking less frequently

Objetivo: Determinar las diferencias clínicas y funcionales, basales y al año de la fractura, en los pacientes hospitalizados por fractura de cadera (FC) que provienen de residencia de ancianos (RA) y de la comunidad. Métodos: Se incluyeron de forma prospectiva todos los pacientes ingresados con el diagnóstico de FC en la unidad de ortogeriatría de un hospital universitario entre enero de 2013 y febrero de 2014. Se recogieron variables clínicas, funcionales, cognitivas y la evolución durante la hospitalización. Se contactó telefónicamente al año para conocer su estado vital y funcional. Resultados: Se incluyeron 509 pacientes, de los que 116 (22,8%) provenían de RA. Comparados con las personas que provenían de comunidad, éstos tenían un mayor riesgo quirúrgico (ASA≥3: 83,6% vs. 66,4%, p<0,001), peor pronóstico vital teórico (Perfil de Nottingham≥5: 98,3% vs. 56,6%, p<0,001), peor estado funcional basal (Índice Barthel medio: 55 [RIC, 36-80] vs. 90 [RIC, 75-100], p<0,001), peor estado mental (Test de Pfeiffer>2: 74,1% vs. 40,2%, p<0,001) y tasas más altas de sarcopenia (24,3% vs. 15,2%, p<0,05). No hubo diferencias en la mortalidad durante la hospitalización ni al año. Al año los pacientes de RA recuperaron su capacidad de ambulación previa con menos frecuencia (38,5% vs. 56,2%, p<0,001). Conclusiones: Los pacientes ingresados por FC provenientes de RA presentan mayor riesgo quirúrgico, mayor deterioro funcional y mental y mayor tasa de sarcopenia que los pacientes de la comunidad. No presentan mayor mortalidad durante el ingreso ni al año de la FC, pero recuperan su capacidad de deambulación previa con menos frecuencia

Baseline and 1-year follow-up differences between hip-fracture patients admitted from nursing homes and the community. A cohort study on 509 consecutive patients (FONDA Cohort).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and functional differences at hospital admission and at 1 year after a hip fracture (HF) in nursing homes (NH) and community-dwelling (CD) patients. METHODS: All patients with HF admitted to the orthogeriatric unit at a university hospital between January 2013 and February 2014 were prospectively included. Clinical and functional variables, and mortality were recorded during the hospital admission. The patients were contacted by telephone at 1 year to determine their vital condition and functional status. RESULTS: A total of 509 patients were included, 116 (22.8%) of whom came from NH. Compared with the CD patients, the NH patients had higher surgical risk (ASA ≥3: 83.6% vs. 66.4%, P<.001), poorer theoretical vital prognosis (Nottingham Profile ≥5: 98.3% vs. 56.6%, P<.001), higher rate of previous functional status (median Barthel index: 55 [IQR, 36-80] vs. 90 [IQR, 75-100], P<.001), poorer mental status (Pfeiffer's SPMSQ>2: 74.1% vs. 40.2%, P<.001), and a higher rate of sarcopenia (24.3% vs. 15.2%, P<.05). There were no differences in in-hospital or at 1-year mortality. At 1 year, NH patients recovered their previous walking capacity at a lower rate (38.5% vs. 56.2%, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients with HF treated in an orthogeriatric unit, NH patients had higher, surgical risk, functional and mental impairment, and a higher rate of sarcopenia than CD patients. At 1 year of follow-up, NH patients did not have higher mortality, but they recovered their previous capacity for walking less frequently.

Prevalence of malnutrition in a cohort of 509 patients with acute hip fracture: the importance of a comprehensive assessment.

Backgrounds/objectives:Malnutrition is very common in acute hip fracture (HF) patients. Studies differ widely in their findings, with reported prevalences between 31 and 88% mainly because of small sample sizes and the use of different criteria. The aim of this study was to learn the prevalence of malnutrition in a large cohort of HF patients in an comprehensive way that includes the frequency of protein-energy malnutrition, vitamin D deficiency and sarcopenia. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A 1-year consecutive sample of patients admitted with fragility HF in a 1300-bed public University Hospital, who were assessed within the first 72 h of admission. Clinical, functional, cognitive and laboratory variables were included. Energy malnutrition (body mass index (BMI) <22 kg/m2), protein malnutrition (serum total protein <6.5 g/dl or albumin <3.5 g/dl), vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-OH-vitamin D <30 ng/dl) and sarcopenia (low muscle mass plus low grip strength) were considered. RESULTS: Five hundred nine HF patients were included. The mean age was 85.6±6.9 years and 79.2% were women. Ninety-nine (20.1%) patients had a BMI <22 kg/m2. Four hundred nine patients (81.2%) had protein malnutrition. Eighty-seven (17.1%) patients had both energy and protein malnutrition. Serum vitamin D was <30 ng/ml in 466 (93%) patients. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 17.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Protein malnutrition and vitamin D deficiency are the rule in acute HF patients. Energy malnutrition and sarcopenia are also common. A nutritional assessment in these patients should include these aspects together.

Utilidad de la estación unipodal en la valoración del riesgo de caídas / Utility of one-leg balance in evaluation of the risk of falls

Objetivo: comparar los resultados obtenidos en la estación unipodal con el análisis del equilibrio estático mediante posturografía. Métodos: 59 sujetos mayores de 64 años. Se evaluó la estación unipodal y el Modified Clinical Test for the Sensory Interaction on Balance mediante el posturógrafo Balance Master (Neurocom®). Grupo A: sujetos que no realizaron la estación unipodal, y grupo B: los que sí pudieron realizarla. Resultados: grupo A: 37,2% (22). Grupo B: 62,6% (37). Sobre una superficie dura y con los ojos abiertos, el centro de gravedad del grupo A se desplazó 0,4 grados/s (0,28-0,6) y el del grupo B 0,2 grados/s (0,1-0,3) (p = 0,01). Sobre una superficie firme y con los ojos cerrados, el centro de gravedad del grupo A se desplazó 0,5 grados/s (0,3-0,8) y el del grupo B 0,3 grados/s (0,1-0,4) (p = 0,002). Sobre una superficie almohadillada y con los ojos abiertos, el centro de gravedad del grupo A se desplazó 1,1 grados/s (0,90-1,60) y el del grupo B 0,9 grados/s (0,73-1,3) (p = 0,045). Sobre una superficie almohadillada y con los ojos cerrados, el centro de gravedad del grupo A se desplazó 6 grados/ s (4-6) y el del grupo B 2,3 grados/s (1,63-3,08) (p < 0,001). Conclusiones: los sujetos de edad avanzada capaces de mantener la estación unipodal durante al menos 5 s muestran un menor desplazamiento de su centro de gravedad que los que no lo consiguen. Los resultados se mantienen cuando se suprimen las aferencias visual y propioceptiva (AU)

Aims: to compare posturographic test with One-Leg Balance test in the elderly. Methods: we studied 59 healthy men and women living in the community who were at least 65 years of age. All of them were evaluated with One–Leg Balance (defined as the ability to stand on one leg unsupported for 5 seconds) and Modifies Clinical Test for the Sensory Interaction on Balance by the Balance Master (Neurocom®). We distributed the patients in two groups. Group A included those who couldn’t perform one-leg balance and group B those who could perform it. Results: 62.6% of subjects could perform one-leg balance and 37.2% could not perform it. On a firm surface with opened eyes, the A group made a variation of 0.4 deg/s (0.28-0.6) in the gravity center position and the B group 0,2 deg/s (0.1-0.3) (p = 0.010). On a firm surface with closed eyes, the A group made a variation of 0.5 deg/s (0.3-0.8) and the B group 0.3 deg/s (0.1- 0.4) (p = 0.002). On a foam surface with open eyes, the A group made a variation of their gravity center position of 1.10 deg/s (0.90-1.60) and the B group 0.9 deg/s (0.73-1.30) (p = 0.045). On a foam surface with closed eyes the A group made a variation of their gravity center position of 6 deg/s (4-6) and the B group 2.3 deg/s (1.63-3.08) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: elderly patients who can perform one-leg balance, make less variations of their gravity centre. The results are the same when visual and propioceptive afferences are suppressed (AU)