Understanding the Importance of Blood-Brain Barrier Alterations in Brain Arteriovenous Malformations and Implications for Treatment: A Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-MRI-Based Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The major clinical implication of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) is spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. There is a growing body of experimental evidence proving that inflammation and blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction are involved in both the clinical course of the disease and the risk of bleeding. However, how bAVM treatment affects perilesional BBB disturbances is yet unclear. METHODS: We assessed the permeability changes of the BBB using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in a series of bAVMs (n = 35), before and at a mean of 5 (±2) days after treatment. A set of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) (n = 16) was used as a control group for the assessment of the surgical-related collateral changes. The extended Tofts pharmacokinetic model was used to extract permeability (Ktrans) values in the lesional, perilesional, and normal brain tissues. RESULTS: In patients with bAVM, the permeability of BBB was higher in the perilesional of bAVM tissue compared with the rest of the brain parenchyma (mean Ktrans 0.145 ± 0.104 vs 0.084 ± 0.035, P = .004). Meanwhile, no significant changes were seen in the perilesional brain of CCM cases (mean Ktrans 0.055 ± 0.056 vs 0.061 ± 0.026, P = .96). A significant decrease in BBB permeability was evident in the perilesional area of bAVM after surgical resection (mean Ktrans 0.145 ± 0.104 vs 0.096 ± 0.059, P = .037). This benefit in BBB permeability reduction after surgery seemed to surpass the relative increase in permeability inherent to the surgical manipulation. CONCLUSION: In contrast to CCMs, BBB permeability in patients with bAVM is increased in the perilesional parenchyma, as assessed using DCE-MRI. However, bAVM surgical resection seems to reduce BBB permeability in the perilesional tissue. No evidence of the so-called breakthrough phenomenon was detected in our series. DCE-MRI could become a valuable tool to follow the longitudinal course of BBB damage throughout the natural history and clinical course of bAVMs.

Intraoperative ultrasound and magnetic resonance comparative analysis in brain tumor surgery: a valuable tool to flatten ultrasound's learning curve.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is a profitable tool for neurosurgical procedures' assistance, especially in neuro-oncology. It is a rapid, ergonomic and reproducible technique. However, its known handicap is a steep learning curve for neurosurgeons. Here, we describe an interesting postoperative analysis that provides extra feedback after surgery, accelerating the learning process. METHOD: We conducted a descriptive retrospective unicenter study including patients operated from intra-axial brain tumors using neuronavigation (Curve, Brainlab) and IOUS (BK-5000, BK medical) guidance. All patients had preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) prior to tumor resection. During surgery, 3D neuronavigated IOUS studies (n3DUS) were obtained through craniotomy N13C5 transducer's integration to the neuronavigation system. At least two n3DUS studies were obtained: prior to tumor resection and at the resection conclusion. A postoperative MRI was performed within 48 h. MRI and n3DUS studies were posteriorly fused and analyzed with Elements (Brainlab) planning software, permitting two comparative analyses: preoperative MRI compared to pre-resection n3DUS and postoperative MRI to post-resection n3DUS. Cases with incomplete MRI or n3DUS studies were withdrawn from the study. RESULTS: From April 2022 to March 2024, 73 patients were operated assisted by IOUS. From them, 39 were included in the study. Analyses comparing preoperative MRI and pre-resection n3DUS showed great concordance of tumor volume (p < 0,001) between both modalities. Analysis comparing postoperative MRI and post-resection n3DUS also showed good concordance in residual tumor volume (RTV) in cases where gross total resection (GTR) was not achieved (p < 0,001). In two cases, RTV detected on MRI that was not detected intra-operatively with IOUS could be reviewed in detail to recheck its appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative comparative analyses between IOUS and MRI is a valuable tool for novel ultrasound users, as it enhances the amount of feedback provided by cases and could accelerate the learning process, flattening this technique's learning curve.

Funnel Shaped Anterior Communicating Artery Fenestration Mistaken for an Aneurysm: A Cautionary Tale.

This report portrays a case of a funnel shaped anterior communicating artery (ACoA) fenestration which was mistaken as a small A1 aneurysm in a subarachnoid hemorrhage case. Although tridimensional rotational digital subtraction angiography improves aneurysm diagnosis specially at the ACoA complex, current spatial resolution might leave behind a considerable percentage of ACoA fenestrations. This may lead to diagnostic errors and unnecessary treatments risking iatrogenic complications. Luckily for our patient, a concomitant aneurysm warranted clipping and subsequent surgical exploration of the ACoA complex revealed the pitfall, thus preventing further action. Interestingly, another group of authors who reported similar misdiagnosis with ACoA aneurysms were able to prevent a third error, thanks to the experience acquired with 2 prior cases. Therefore, this clinical image aims to raise wider awareness of the need for very cautious consideration of imaging depicting small and/or atypical aneurysms in the ACoA complex.