RESUMEN
In this study, we compared the tumor-targeting properties, therapeutic efficacy, and tolerability of the humanized anti-CAIX antibody (hG250) labeled with either the α-emitter actinium-225 (225Ac) or the ß--emitter lutetium-177 (177Lu) in mice. BALB/c nude mice were grafted with human renal cell carcinoma SK-RC-52 cells and intravenously injected with 30 µg [225Ac] Ac-DOTA-hG250 (225Ac-hG250) or 30 µg [177Lu] Lu-DOTA-hG250 (177Lu-hG250), followed by ex vivo biodistribution studies. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in mice receiving 5, 15, and 25 kBq of 225Ac-hG250; 13 MBq of 177Lu-hG250; or no treatment. Tolerability was evaluated in non-tumor-bearing animals. High tumor uptake of both radioimmunoconjugates was observed and increased up to day 7 (212.8 ± 50.2 %IA/g vs. 101.0 ± 18.4 %IA/g for 225Ac-hG250 and 177Lu-hG250, respectively). Survival was significantly prolonged in mice treated with 15 kBq 225Ac-hG250, 25 kBq 225Ac-hG250, and 13 MBq 177Lu-hG250 compared to untreated control (p < 0.05). Non-tumor-bearing mice that received single-dose treatment with 15 or 25 kBq 225Ac-hG250 showed weight loss at the end of the experiment (day 126), and immunohistochemical analysis suggested radiation-induced nephrotoxicity. These results demonstrate the therapeutic potential of CAIX-targeted α-therapy in renal cell carcinoma. Future studies are required to find an optimal balance between therapeutic efficacy and toxicity.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: In this phase I study, we evaluated the safety, biodistribution and dosimetry of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-girentuximab (89Zr-girentuximab) PET/CT imaging in patients with suspicion of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS: Ten eligible patients received an intravenous administration of 37 MBq (± 10%) of 89Zr-girentuximab at mass doses of 5 mg or 10 mg. Safety was evaluated according to the NCI CTCAE (version 4.03). Biodistribution and normal organ dosimetry was performed based on PET/CT images acquired at 0.5, 4, 24, 72 and 168 h post-administration. Additionally, tumour dosimetry was performed in patients with confirmed ccRCC and visible tumour uptake on PET/CT imaging. RESULTS: 89Zr-girentuximab was administered in ten patients as per protocol. No treatment-related adverse events ≥ grade 3 were reported. 89Zr-girentuximab imaging allowed successful differentiation between ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions in all patients, as confirmed with histological data. Dosimetry analysis using OLINDA/EXM 2.1 showed that the organs receiving the highest doses (mean ± SD) were the liver (1.86 ± 0.40 mGy/MBq), the kidneys (1.50 ± 0.22 mGy/MBq) and the heart wall (1.45 ± 0.19 mGy/MBq), with a mean whole body effective dose of 0.57 ± 0.08 mSv/MBq. Tumour dosimetry was performed in the 6 patients with histologically confirmed ccRCC resulting in a median tumour-absorbed dose of 4.03 mGy/MBq (range 1.90-11.6 mGy/MBq). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that 89Zr-girentuximab is safe and well tolerated for the administered activities and mass doses and allows quantitative assessment of 89Zr-girentuximab PET/CT imaging in patients with suspicion of ccRCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03556046-14th of June, 2018.
