Relapsing polychondritis: clinical updates and new differential diagnoses.

Relapsing polychondritis is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by recurrent inflammation of cartilaginous structures, mainly of the ears, nose and respiratory tract, with a broad spectrum of accompanying systemic features. Despite its rarity, prompt recognition and accurate diagnosis of relapsing polychondritis is crucial for appropriate management and optimal outcomes. Our understanding of relapsing polychondritis has changed markedly in the past couple of years with the identification of three distinct patient clusters that have different clinical manifestations and prognostic outcomes. With the progress of pangenomic sequencing and the discovery of new somatic and monogenic autoinflammatory diseases, new differential diagnoses have emerged, notably the vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome, autoinflammatory diseases and immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events. In this Review, we present a detailed update of the newly identified clusters and highlight red flags that should raise suspicion of these alternative diagnoses. The identification of these different clusters and mimickers has a direct impact on the management, follow-up and prognosis of patients with relapsing polychondritis and autoinflammatory syndromes.

Type 1 interferons: A target for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs).

The improved understanding of the molecular basis of innate immunity have led to the identification of type I interferons (IFNs), particularly IFN-α, as central mediators in the pathogenesis of several Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, inflammatory myositis and Sjögren's syndrome. Here, we review the main data regarding the opportunity to target type I IFNs for the treatment of IMIDs. Type I IFNs and their downstream pathways can be targeted pharmacologically in several manners. One approach is to use monoclonal antibodies against IFNs or the IFN-receptors (IFNARs, such as with anifrolumab). The downstream signaling pathways of type I IFNs also contain several targets of interest in IMIDs, such as JAK1 and Tyk2. Of these, anifrolumab is licensed and JAK1/Tyk2 inhibitors are in phase III trials in SLE. Targeting IFN-Is for the treatment of SLE is already a reality and in the near future may prove useful in other IMIDs. IFN assays will find a role in routine clinical practice for the care of IMIDs as further validation work is completed and a greater range of targeted therapies becomes available.

Assessment and personalised advice for fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus using an innovative digital tool: the Lupus Expert system for the Assessment of Fatigue (LEAF) study.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is reported as the most prevalent symptom by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Fatigue management is complex due to its multifactorial nature. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of an innovative digital tool to manage fatigue in SLE, in a completely automated manner. METHODS: The «Lupus Expert System for Assessment of Fatigue¼ (LEAF) is free digital tool which measures the intensity and characteristics of fatigue and assesses disease activity, pain, insomnia, anxiety, depression, stress, fibromyalgia and physical activity using validated patient-reported instruments. Then, LEAF automatically provides personalised feedback and recommendations to cope with fatigue. RESULTS: Between May and November 2022, 1250 participants with SLE were included (95.2% women, median age 43yo (IQR: 34-51)). Significant fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue <34) was reported by 78.9% of patients. In univariate analysis, SLE participants with fatigue were more likely to be women (p=0.01), perceived their disease as more active (p<0.0001), had higher levels of pain (p<0.0001), anxiety (p<0.0001), depression (p<0.0001), insomnia (p<0.0001), stress (p<0.0001) and were more likely to screen for fibromyalgia (p<0.0001), compared with patients without significant fatigue. In multivariable analysis, parameters independently associated with fatigue were insomnia (p=0.0003), pain (p=0.002), fibromyalgia (p=0.008), self-reported active SLE (p=0.02) and stress (p=0.045). 93.2% of the participants found LEAF helpful and 92.3% would recommend it to another patient with SLE. CONCLUSION: Fatigue is commonly severe in SLE, and associated with insomnia, pain, fibromyalgia and active disease according to patients' perspective. Our study shows the usefulness of an automated digital tool to manage fatigue in SLE.

New and future therapies: Changes in the therapeutic armamentarium for SLE.

Following better understanding of molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), pharmaceutical companies have been investigating new targeted drugs for SLE. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an updated view of the most promising targeted therapies currently in clinical development or recently approved for SLE treatment as well as of the most promising potential future therapeutic strategies in SLE. In the past several years, two new drugs have been developed for lupus treatment along with an extended indication for belimumab. Anifrolumab, the anti-interferon medication, to treat non-renal lupus; voclosporin, a calcineurin inhibitor, for the treatment of lupus nephritis; and belimumab for lupus nephritis. More than 90 investigational drugs are currently in clinical development for SLE treatment, with various targets including inflammatory cytokines and their receptors, intracellular signaling, B cells or plasma cells, co-stimulation molecules, complement fractions, T cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells as well as various other immunological targets of interest. Researchers are also actively engaged in the development of new therapeutic strategies, including the use of monoclonal antibodies in combination with bispecific monoclonal antibodies, nanobodies and nanoparticles, therapeutic vaccines, utilizing siRNA interference techniques, autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and Chimeric Antigens Receptor (CAR)-T cells. The therapeutic management and prognosis of SLE have profoundly evolved with changes in the therapeutic armamentarium. With the broad pipeline of targeted treatments in clinical development and new treatment strategies in the future, current challenges are transitioning from the availability of new drugs to the selection of the most appropriate strategy at the patient level.

Rheumatoid vasculitis in 2023: Changes and challenges since the biologics era.

BACKGROUND: Significant changes in the epidemiology and natural history of rheumatoid vasculitis (RV) have occurred with the introduction of biological therapies such as TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and rituximab. PURPOSE: This scoping review aims to address the key current challenges and propose updated criteria for RV. This will aid future descriptive observational studies and prospective therapeutic trials. METHODOLOGY: The MEDLINE database was searched for eligible articles from inception through December 2022. Articles were selected based on language and publication date after 1998, corresponding to the approval of the first TNFi in rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: Sixty articles were included in the review. The mean incidence of RV has decreased since the approval of biologic therapies in RA, from 9.1 (95% CI: 6.8-12.0) per million between 1988 and 2000 to 3.9 (95% CI: 2.3-6.2) between 2001 and 2010, probably due to significant improvement in RA severity and a decrease in smoking habits. Factors associated with an increased risk of RV include smoking at RA diagnosis, longer disease duration, severe RA, immunopositivity, and male gender (regardless of age). Homozygosity for the HLA-DRB104 shared epitope is linked to RV, while the presence of HLA-C3 is a significant predictor of vasculitis in patients without HLA-DRB104. Cutaneous (65-88%), neurologic (35-63%), and cardiac (33%) manifestations are common in RV, often associated with constitutional symptoms (70%). Histologic findings range from small vessel vasculitis to medium-sized necrotizing arteritis, but definite evidence of vasculitis is not required in the 1984 Scott and Bacon diagnostic criteria. Existing data on RV treatment are retrospective, and no formal published guidelines are currently available. CONCLUSION: The understanding of RV pathogenesis has improved since its initial diagnostic criteria, with a wider range of clinical manifestations identified. However, a validated and updated criteria that incorporates these advances is currently lacking, impeding the development of descriptive observational studies and prospective therapeutic trials. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

[Restatement. Relapsing polychondritis]. / Polychondrite chronique atrophianteMise au point. Polychondrite chronique atrophiante.

RELAPSING POLYCHONDRITIS. Relapsing polychondritis (RP) is a systemic disease which diagnosis relies on the existence of typical chondritis present at the beginning of the disease only in 1/3 of cases. Three phenotypes of RP have been described, each one characterized by specific manifestations and the need of a specific therapeutic management and follow-up. Screening for tracheo-bronchial manifestations must be systematic if RP is suspected, as it is responsible for most of the morbi-mortality of the disease. Screening for the presence of UBA1 mutations for VEXAS syndrome (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) is key in male patients over 50 years-old presenting with macrocytic anemia, especially also in case of dermatologic or pulmonary manifestations or thrombo-embolic complications. Initial screening allow to rule-out the main differential diagnosis (ANCA-associates vasculitis) and to look for associated auto-immune or inflammatory diseases which are present in 30% of cases. Therapeutic management of RP is yet to be codified and depends on the severity of the disease.

POLYCHONDRITE CHRONIQUE ATROPHIANTE. La polychondrite chronique atrophiante (PCA) est une maladie systémique évoluant par poussées imprévisibles, dont le diagnostic est essentiellement clinique et repose sur l'existence de chondrites caractéristiques qui ne sont présentes au début de la maladie que dans un tiers des cas. Trois principaux phénotypes de PCA sont décrits, imposant une prise en charge thérapeutique spécifique face à des pronostics différents. Il convient de rechercher de façon systématique l'atteinte trachéobronchique, responsable d'une grande partie de la morbi-mortalité de la maladie. Il en est de même pour le syndrome VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) mais uniquement chez tout patient masculin de plus de 50 ans avec une anémie macrocytaire, d'autant plus s'il existe une atteinte dermatologique, parenchymateuse pulmonaire ou des complications thromboemboliques. Le bilan initial permet d'éliminer les principaux diagnostics différentiels (notamment les vascularites à anticorps anticytoplasme des polynucléaires neutrophiles [ANCA]) et de rechercher une maladie associée (auto-immune ou inflammatoire) dans 30 % des cas. La prise en charge thérapeutique de la PCA reste encore mal codifiée et dépend de sa gravité.

Refining Incidence and Characteristics of Inflammatory Myopathies: A Quadruple-Source Capture-Recapture Survey Using the 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory myopathies (IM), characterized by muscle inflammation and weakness, are rare systemic diseases. Our previous study estimated an IM incidence rate of 7.98 cases per million people per year (95% confidence interval 7.38-8.66) and highlighted important variations that were likely because of methodologic issues rather than true epidemiologic differences. In this study, we aimed to refine the incidence of IM, using the 2017 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for IM and a quadruple-source capture-recapture method during a 6-year period in Alsace, France, a region with a population of 2 million having benefits of good access to health care and accredited IM referral centers. METHODS: Clinical data of potential IM patients were obtained from 4 sources (general practitioners and community specialists, public and private hospital records, public and private laboratories, and archives from the pathology department). Patients residing in Alsace and who fulfilled the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for IM between January 1, 2006, and January 1, 2013, were included. We corrected potentially incomplete ascertainment of cases with capture-recapture analyses. We studied both spatial and temporal distributions of incidence of IM. We also assessed systemic manifestations of the disease. RESULTS: Our review of 1,742 potential cases identified 106 patients with IM. No spatial or temporal heterogeneity was observed. Use of log-linear models showed an estimated 14.9 additional missed cases. Thus, the incidence rate of IM was 8.22 new cases per million inhabitants per year (95% confidence interval 6.76-9.69). Extramuscular manifestations other than dermatomyositis rash were frequently recorded. CONCLUSION: The stringent methodology used in our study provides an accurate estimation of the incidence of IM. This study also demonstrates, in a population-based cohort, the systemic nature of IM.

Novel therapeutic strategies for autoimmune and inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Drugs of unknown mechanisms of action are no longer being developed because we have largely capitalized on our improved understanding of the immunopathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) to develop therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and targeted treatments. These therapies have profoundly revolutionized the care of IMIDs. However, because of the heterogeneity of IMIDs and the redundancy of the targeted molecular pathways, some patients with IMIDs might not respond to a specific targeted drug or their disease might relapse secondarily. Therefore, there is much at stake in the development of new therapeutic strategies, which include combinations of mAbs or bispecific mAbs (BsMAbs), nanobodies and nanoparticles (NPs), therapeutic vaccines, small interfering RNA (siRNA) interference, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT), or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. With the broad pipeline of targeted treatments in clinical development, the therapeutic paradigm is rapidly evolving from whether new drugs will be available to the complex selection of the most adequate targeted treatment (or treatment combination) at the patient level. This paradigm change highlights the need to better characterize the heterogeneous immunological spectrum of these diseases. Only then will these novel therapeutic strategies be able to fully demonstrate their potential to treat IMIDs.

New biologics and targeted therapies in systemic lupus: From new molecular targets to new indications. A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Despite available therapies, persistently active and corticosteroid-dependent Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) represent a significant therapeutic challenge. The purpose of this systematic review was to provide an updated view of targeted therapies currently in clinical development in SLE, with a special focus on the most promising ones. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of targeted therapies in clinical development in SLE in clinicaltrials.gov (search date: 28th of August 2022). Targeted therapies (defined as drugs specifically designed to block certain molecules, receptors, or pathways involved in the development of SLE) were extracted. For each investigational drug, we considered only the study at the most advanced stage of clinical development. RESULTS: The systematic review yielded a total of 92 targeted therapies (58 biological DMARDs [bDMARDs] and 34 targeted synthetic [ts]DMARDs) assessed in a total of 203 clinical trials. The candidate drugs reached phase I (n=20), Ia/IIb (n=6), phase II (n=51), phase II/III (n=1), phase III (n=13) and phase IV (n=1). These trials were reported as recruiting (n=31), active but not recruiting (n=8), not yet recruiting (n=4), enrolling by invitation (n=2), completed (n=31), prematurely terminated (n=12) and withdrawn in 1 (status unknown in 3). The main investigational drugs for SLE target inflammatory cytokines, chemokines or their receptors (n=19), intracellular signaling pathways (n=18), B cells (n=14) or plasma cells (n=7),T/B cells co-stimulation molecules (n=10), complement molecules (n=5),T lymphocytes (n=2), plasmacytoid dendritic cells (n=2), as well as various other immune targets (n=15). CONCLUSION: The pipeline of investigational drugs in SLE is highly diversified and will hopefully enable more optimal Treat-To-Target with the goal of disease modification. Companion biomarkers will be needed to better characterized SLE heterogeneity and optimize treatment selection at the individual-patient level.

Fatigue is independently associated with disease activity assessed using the Physician Global Assessment but not the SLEDAI in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse whether reported fatigue, one of the most challenging manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), may bias the assessment of disease activity in SLE according to the Physician Global Assessment (PGA). METHODS: Patients from the Lupus BioBank of the upper Rhein database, a cross-sectional multicentre collection of detailed clinical and biological data from patients with SLE, were included. Patients had to fulfil the 1997 American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE and the PGA (0-3 scale) at the time of inclusion had to be available. Fatigue was assessed according to the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions. Univariate and multivariate regression models were built to determine which variables were associated with the PGA. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients (89% female; median age: 42 years, IQR: 34-52) were included. The median Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score was 4 (IQR: 2-6). Of these 350 patients, 257 (73%) reported significant fatigue. The PGA (p=0.004) but not the SELENA-SLEDAI (p=0.43) was significantly associated with fatigue. Both fatigue and SELENA-SLEDAI were independently associated with the PGA in two different multivariate models. CONCLUSION: Fatigue is independently associated with disease activity assessed using the PGA but not the SLEDAI. These findings highlight the fact that the PGA should capture only objectively active disease manifestations in order to improve its reliability.

Fatigue in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Update on Its Impact, Determinants and Therapeutic Management.

Fatigue is a complex and multifactorial phenomenon which is often neglected by clinicians. The aim of this review was to analyze the impact, determinants and management of fatigue in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Fatigue is one of the most prevalent symptoms in SLE, reported by 67% to 90% of patients. It is also described as the most bothersome symptom, considering that it may impair key aspects of health-related quality of life, while also leading to employment disability. It is a multifactorial phenomenon involving psychological factors, pain, lifestyle factors such as reduced physical activity, whereas the contribution of disease activity remains controversial. The management of fatigue in patients with SLE should rely upon a person-centered approach, with targeted interventions. Some pharmacological treatments used to control disease activity have demonstrated beneficial effects upon fatigue and non-pharmacological therapies such as psychological interventions, pain reduction and lifestyle changes, and each of these should be incorporated into fatigue management in SLE.

Patterns of fatigue and association with disease activity and clinical manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of fatigue is high in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In this study, we used latent class analysis to reveal patterns of fatigue, anxiety, depression and organ involvement in a large international cohort of SLE patients. METHODS: We used the Lupus BioBank of the upper Rhein to analyse patterns of fatigue using latent class analysis (LCA). After determining the optimal number of latent classes, patients were assigned according to model generated probabilities, and characteristics of classes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 502 patients were included. Significant fatigue, anxiety and depression were reported by 341 (67.9%), 159 (31.7%) and 52 (10.4%) patients, respectively. LCA revealed a first cluster (67.5% of patients) with low disease activity [median (25th-75th percentile interquartile range) Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI: 2 (0-4)], significant fatigue (55.5%, P < 0.0001), low anxiety (11.8%, P < 0.0001) and depression (0.9%, P < 0.0001). Cluster 2 (25.3%) also comprised patients with low disease activity [SELENA-SLEDAI: 2 (0-6)], but those patients had a very high prevalence of fatigue (100%, P < 0.0001), anxiety (89%, P < 0.0001) and depression (38.6%, P < 0.0001). Cluster 3 (7.2%) comprised patients with high disease activity [SELENA-SLEDAI: 12 (8-17), P < 0.0001] and high fatigue (72.2%, P < 0.0001) with low levels of anxiety (16.7%, P < 0.0001) and no depression (0%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: LCA revealed three patterns of fatigue with important practical implications. Based on these, it is crucial to distinguish patients with active disease (in whom remission will be achieved) from those with no or mild activity but high levels of fatigue, depression and anxiety, for whom psychological counselling should be prioritized.

Towards a practical management of fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Significant fatigue is reported by two-thirds of patients with SLE and severe fatigue by one-third. The assessment and treatment of fatigue remains a major challenge in SLE, especially in patients with no disease activity. Here, we suggest a practical algorithm for the management of fatigue in SLE. First, common but non-SLE-related causes of fatigue should be ruled out based on medical history, clinical and laboratory examinations. Then, presence of SLE-related disease activity or organ damage should be assessed. In patients with active disease, remission is the most appropriate therapeutic target while symptomatic support is needed in case of damage. Both anxiety and depression are major independent predictors of fatigue in SLE and require dedicated assessment and care with psychological counselling and pharmacological intervention if needed. This practical algorithm will help in improving the management of one the most common and complex patient complaints in SLE.