A proof of principle investigation of a novel enzyme formulation on dental calculus deposition: a 4-week randomized human clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The dissolution of dental calculus, safely and at home, is among the more challenging issues facing the over-the-counter healthcare industry. Pontis Biologics, Inc. has developed novel model of calculus development and structure and has formulated a dentifrice (Tartarase™) using digestive enzymes as active ingredients that is shown to dissolve dental calculus in this Proof of Principle clinical trial. METHODS: This investigation was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel enzyme formulation to remove existing calculus deposits in 4 weeks, measured using the Volpe-Manhold Index (V-MI) on lingual surfaces of 6 lower anterior teeth. The test formulation was compared to Crest Cavity Protection, as a control dentifrice. A total of 40 randomized test subjects began the study with 20 assigned to the control dentifrice and 20 assigned to the Tartarase groups (ten each, one brushing with Tartarase twice daily and one brushed with Tartarase and wore a dental tray filled with Tartarase for 30 min then brushed again with Tartarase, once daily). RESULTS: The Crest group experienced a 12% increase in calculus, in contrast to the results of both Tartarase groups that experienced a 40% reduction in calculus in 4 weeks of unsupervised at home use of the Tartarase toothpaste formulation. CONCLUSIONS: This proof of principle study demonstrates that a dentifrice, formulated along the lines of the Tartarase material, is capable of combating calculus accumulation using the same oral hygiene habits that are common worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered retrospectively at clinicaltrials.gov and has the Unique Identification Number: NCT06139835, 14/11/2023.

Quantitative analysis of the effects of brushing, flossing, and mouthrinsing on supragingival and subgingival plaque microbiota: 12-week clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Translational microbiome research using next-generation DNA sequencing is challenging due to the semi-qualitative nature of relative abundance data. A novel method for quantitative analysis was applied in this 12-week clinical trial to understand the mechanical vs. chemotherapeutic actions of brushing, flossing, and mouthrinsing against the supragingival dental plaque microbiome. Enumeration of viable bacteria using vPCR was also applied on supragingival plaque for validation and on subgingival plaque to evaluate interventional effects below the gingival margin. METHODS: Subjects with gingivitis were enrolled in a single center, examiner-blind, virtually supervised, parallel group controlled clinical trial. Subjects with gingivitis were randomized into brushing only (B); brushing and flossing (BF); brushing and rinsing with Listerine® Cool Mint® Antiseptic (BA); brushing and rinsing with Listerine® Cool Mint® Zero (BZ); or brushing, flossing, and rinsing with Listerine® Cool Mint® Zero (BFZ). All subjects brushed twice daily for 1 min with a sodium monofluorophosphate toothpaste and a soft-bristled toothbrush. Subjects who flossed used unflavored waxed dental floss once daily. Subjects assigned to mouthrinses rinsed twice daily. Plaque specimens were collected at the baseline visit and after 4 and 12 weeks of intervention. Bacterial cell number quantification was achieved by adding reference amounts of DNA controls to plaque samples prior to DNA extraction, followed by shallow shotgun metagenome sequencing. RESULTS: 286 subjects completed the trial. The metagenomic data for supragingival plaque showed significant reductions in Shannon-Weaver diversity, species richness, and total and categorical bacterial abundances (commensal, gingivitis, and malodor) after 4 and 12 weeks for the BA, BZ, and BFZ groups compared to the B group, while no significant differences were observed between the B and BF groups. Supragingival plaque vPCR further validated these results, and subgingival plaque vPCR demonstrated significant efficacy for the BFZ intervention only. CONCLUSIONS: This publication reports on a successful application of a quantitative method of microbiome analysis in a clinical trial demonstrating the sustained and superior efficacy of essential oil mouthrinses at controlling dental plaque compared to mechanical methods. The quantitative microbiological data in this trial also reinforce the safety and mechanism of action of EO mouthrinses against plaque microbial ecology and highlights the importance of elevating EO mouthrinsing as an integral part of an oral hygiene regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 31/10/2022. The registration number is NCT05600231.

Quantitative analysis of the effects of essential oil mouthrinses on clinical plaque microbiome: a parallel-group, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The rich diversity of microorganisms in the oral cavity plays an important role in the maintenance of oral health and development of detrimental oral health conditions. Beyond commonly used qualitative microbiome metrics, such as relative proportions or diversity, both the species-level identification and quantification of bacteria are key to understanding clinical disease associations. This study reports the first-time application of an absolute quantitative microbiome analysis using spiked DNA standards and shotgun metagenome sequencing to assess the efficacy and safety of product intervention on dental plaque microbiome. METHODS: In this parallel-group, randomized clinical trial, essential oil mouthrinses, including LISTERINE® Cool Mint Antiseptic (LCM), an alcohol-containing prototype mouthrinse (ACPM), and an alcohol-free prototype mouthrinse (AFPM), were compared against a hydroalcohol control rinse on clinical parameters and the oral microbiome of subjects with moderate gingivitis. To enable a sensitive and clinically meaningful measure of bacterial abundances, species were categorized according to their associations with oral conditions based on published literature and quantified using known amounts of spiked DNA standards. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that both LCM and ACPM shifted the dysbiotic microbiome composition of subjects with gingivitis to a healthier state after 4 weeks of twice-daily use, resembling the composition of subjects with clinically healthy oral conditions recruited for observational reference comparison at baseline. The essential oil-containing mouthrinses evaluated in this study showed statistically significant reductions in clinical gingivitis and plaque measurements when compared to the hydroalcohol control rinse after 6 weeks of use. CONCLUSIONS: By establishing a novel quantitative method for microbiome analysis, this study sheds light on the mechanisms of LCM mouthrinse efficacy on oral microbial ecology, demonstrating that repeated usage non-selectively resets a gingivitis-like oral microbiome toward that of a healthy oral cavity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 10/06/2021. The registration number is NCT04921371.

Clinical Assessment of Plaque Removal Using a Novel Dentifrice Containing Cellulose Microfibrils.

Dentifrice performance in the removal of dental plaque is influenced by the interactions of dentifrice components with tooth surfaces. This randomized controlled clinical study assessed the effectiveness and safety of a novel fluoride dentifrice formulation that included a micro-fibrillated cellulose network with entangled microcrystalline cellulose and silica particles (ProtegeraTM), and compared this to a positive control fluoride dentifrice (Crest Cavity Protection™). Whole mouth dental plaque levels in 82 healthy adults were measured after the first supervised use, and following a week of twice daily use at home. Overall, the test dentifrice was at least three times and up to four times more effective in whole-mouth plaque reductions, with a 38.6% reduction on first use, a 30.9% reduction at day 7, and a 41.6% reduction from day 1 to day 7, compared to reductions of 12.0%, 9.6% and 11.6%, respectively for the positive control, and up to seven times more effective in lingual plaque reductions, than the reference dentifrice (p < 0.001), with a 27.7% reduction on first use, a 22.3% reduction at day 7, and a 31.0% reduction from day 1 to day 7, compared to reductions of 4.4%, 2.2%, and 4.5%, respectively, for the positive control. No safety issues arose from the use of the test dentifrice. These results indicate that including micro-fibrillated cellulose enhances plaque removal effectiveness, without causing adverse changes to oral soft tissues.

Clinical Efficacy of the Oral Health System by Fresh Health Inc. in Adults on Gingivitis and Plaque in a 3-Arm, 30-Day Study as Compared to String Floss and Manual Brushing.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Oral Health System by Fresh Health Inc., used in conjunction with manual toothbrushing (Fresh + MTB) as compared to string floss and manual toothbrushing (floss + MTB) and manual toothbrushing (MTB) alone, as measured by clinical signs of gingivitis, plaque reduction, pocket depth, and bleeding. METHODS: One hundred ninety-two (192) generally healthy adults exhibiting signs of gingivitis completed this 30-day randomized, controlled, examiner-blinded, three-group parallel study design. All subjects were assigned a manual toothbrush and fluoride dentifrice, instructed to brush twice daily according to their normal habits, and provided with written and verbal instructions for all assigned products. Subjects in the control group used only the manual toothbrush and dentifrice. Subjects assigned to the string floss + MTB group were instructed to also floss once daily. Subjects assigned to the Fresh + MTB group were provided a Fresh Health Inc. custom-fit oral irrigator and instructed to use the device once daily with water for approximately 7 seconds in addition to toothbrushing. Gingivitis was assessed using the modified gingival index (MGI), bleeding on marginal probing was assessed via the gingival bleeding index (GBI), and plaque was measured using the Rustogi modified navy plaque index (RMNPI) at day 1, day 15, and day 30. Periodontal probing depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were measured at day 1 and day 30. Oral soft- and hard-tissue assessments were performed at all examination visits. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in age or sex between groups, and no significant difference in baseline MGI, GBI, RMNPI, BOP, and PPD values across groups. The Fresh + MTB group demonstrated statistically significantly better performance than the floss + MTB group and MTB group across all clinical indices at both 15 days and 30 days. At 30 days, the Fresh + MTB group showed a 40.9% improvement in whole-mouth MGI, which was significantly greater than the MTB and floss + MTB groups.

Safety and efficacy of a novel toothbrush utilizing RF energy for the reduction of plaque, calculus and gingivitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ToothWave radiofrequency (RF) toothbrush in the reduction of plaque, calculus and gingival inflammation, as compared to a standard powered toothbrush accepted by the American Dental Association (ADA). METHODS: This was a single-blind, double arm, prospective study. Subjects were randomized to one of two treatment groups, receiving either the RF powered toothbrush or a control powered toothbrush, and performing twice daily brushing for a test period of 6 weeks. Plaque (RMNPI), calculus (V-MI), gingival inflammation (MGI) and bleeding (GBI) were assessed at baseline, after 4 and 6 weeks. Comparisons were completed both within and between each treatment group. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann Whitney non-parametric model. RESULTS: 85 subjects completed the study and had fully evaluable data. No significant differences between the groups were found in the baseline scores (P≥ 0.165). Following 6 weeks, the RF test group demonstrated statistically significant reductions in plaque, gingivitis and calculus compared to the control powered toothbrush (P≤ 0.001). Both toothbrushes were well-tolerated and no device-related adverse events were reported. The RF-utilizing powered toothbrush produced statistically significant reductions in dental plaque, calculus deposition, gingival inflammation and gingival bleeding as compared to a control powered toothbrush. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The RF powered toothbrush used twice daily resulted in an overall improvement in oral health.

A randomized clinical study to evaluate the effect of denture adhesive application technique on food particle accumulation under dentures.

Food ingress under dentures is a common problem that may be reduced by denture adhesive use. The objective of this study was to explore the effect of the mode of application of a denture adhesive on reducing accumulation of food particles under dentures. This was a single-centre, controlled, single-blind, randomized, three-treatment, three-period, crossover study in participants with complete, removable well-fitting, well-made upper/lower dentures. Treatments were: 1) experimental denture adhesive application (test adhesive) applied with a precision applicator as continuous strips; 2) marketed denture adhesive (positive control) applied using a flat ribbon nozzle as dabs; 3) no adhesive. Food-occlusion testing was performed by assessing peanut particle migration under dentures with denture retention/stability evaluated using the Kapur Index (Olshan modification). Differences were assessed using an ANOVA model. Adhesive oozing and perceptions of the adhesives were assessed by questionnaire. All 83 randomized participants completed the study. There were no significant differences between positive control or test adhesives versus no adhesive, or between test adhesive and positive control, for mass of peanut particles recovered from dentures. Both adhesives had significantly higher retention and stability scores compared with no adhesive (all P < .01). Participants reported significantly higher scores for denture comfort, confidence, satisfaction and movement with both adhesives versus no adhesive (all P < .01). No differences in adhesive ooze were reported between adhesives. No adverse events were reported. In conclusion, there was no difference in performance, as measured by peanut particle mass recovered from upper/lower dentures, for the test adhesive, positive control and no adhesive.

Stain control with two experimental dentin hypersensitivity toothpastes containing spherical silica: a randomised, early-phase development study.

AIMS: To determine in human participants whether toothpastes containing small quantities of a novel spherical silica, added to provide enhanced cleaning properties, could achieve similar or greater extrinsic dental stain removal compared to toothpastes containing standard dental abrasive silica concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-three adults with extrinsic dental stain were randomised to one of four parallel groups for 8 weeks' twice-daily brushing with an experimental toothpaste containing either 0.5% or 1% spherical silica (with relative dentin abrasivity [RDA] of ~38 and ~58, respectively), or marketed toothpastes containing either 6% (RDA ~ 36) or 16% (RDA ~ 166) standard abrasive silica. The objective was to evaluate the ranking order in extrinsic dental stain removal at Week 8, as measured by MacPherson modification of Lobene stain index Area × Intensity. RESULTS: Small treatment differences were observed between toothpaste formulations. The ranking order in extrinsic dental stain removal was: experimental 1% spherical silica toothpaste >16% standard abrasive silica toothpaste >6% standard abrasive silica toothpaste >experimental 0.5% spherical silica toothpaste. Toothpastes were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This early-phase development study suggests that toothpaste formulations with low concentrations of a novel spherical silica abrasive with high-cleaning capability are generally well tolerated and appropriate for further development.

The Effects of Use of a Powered and a Manual Home Oral Hygiene Regimen on Plaque and Gum Health in an Orthodontic Population.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of two home use oral hygiene regimens on plaque, gingivitis, and gingival bleeding on subjects undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel, single-center clinical trial. Eligible study subjects fit the following profile: age 12-65 years; nonsmoker; plaque score of = 2.0 per Bonded Bracket Index (BBI) on dentition with fixed orthodontic hardware; minimum of 10 orthodontic brackets in each arch or on all teeth from first molar to first molar; presenting with mild to moderate gingivitis, defined as a score of = 1 on at least 20 sites per Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI). Subjects with advanced periodontal disease or gingival recession were not eligible. Eligible subjects were randomized to one of two home use oral hygiene regimens: manual toothbrush plus string floss (used with a threading device) for interdental cleaning (MTF regimen); or Philips Sonicare EasyClean power toothbrush with InterCare brush head and AirFloss Pro powered device, used with BreathRx mouthrinse for interdental cleaning (Sonicare Orthodontic Regimen or SOR). All subjects brushed twice daily with standard fluoridated dentifrice and performed interdental cleaning once daily. Efficacy and safety examinations were performed at Baseline and following three and six weeks of home use of the study products, and included assessments of BBI, GBI, Modified Gingival Index (MGI), and Modified Plaque Index (MPI). RESULTS: Of 228 enrolled subjects, 223 were included in the primary analysis. For the primary endpoint, reduction in BBI score following three weeks of product use, the overall least squares (LS) mean (95% CI) reduction was 0.89 (0.84, 0.95) for SOR and 0.06 (0.01, 0.12) for MTF. Expressed as percent reduction (95% CI) from Baseline, this was 33.1% (31.1%, 35.2%) for SOR and 2.01% (-0.06%, 4.07%) for MTF. The differences between regimens were statistically significant, p < 0.0001. Statistically significant differences between regimens were observed in BBI following six weeks of product use, and also for all other efficacy variables (GBI, MGI, MPI) at Week 3 and Week 6. CONCLUSIONS: The powered oral hygiene regimen was significantly more effective than a manual regimen in reducing plaque on bracketed and non-bracketed teeth, and in reducing gingival bleeding and gingival inflammation in orthodontic subjects following three weeks of use and persisting following six weeks of use. All products were safe on oral tissues and fixed orthodontic appliances.

A Comparison of the Effect of Two Power Toothbrushes on the Reduction of Gingival Inflammation and Supragingival Plaque.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of the Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart and Oral-B Genius 8000 powered toothbrushes on gingivitis, gingival bleeding, and supragingival plaque reduction following 42 days of home use. METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel, examiner-blinded, prospective clinical trial with two treatment groups. Eligible participants were generally healthy volunteers who were manual toothbrush users, non-flossers, 18-65 years of age. The subject panel included non-smokers with = 50 sites of gingival bleeding according to the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), and a supragingival plaque score of = 1.8 per Modified Plaque Index (MPI) at 3-6 hours following last tooth brushing encounter. Eligible subjects were randomized to use either a Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart with Premium Plaque Control brush head (DCS) or an Oral-B Genius 8000 with FlossAction brush head (OBG) for home use. Each toothbrush was used twice daily for two minutes. All subjects used a standardized fluoride-containing dentifrice. All other oral hygiene measures were prohibited. Subjects returned at Day 14 for an interim compliance and safety assessment, and at Day 42 for the final safety and efficacy assessments. RESULTS: Of 222 enrolled and eligible subjects, 219 completed (112 in the SDC group, 107 in the OBG group) the study. The least squares (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) estimates for gingivitis reduction and percent reduction per Modified Gingival Index (MGI) following 42 days of product home use were 1.38 (1.30, 1.46) and 51.32% (48.45%, 54.19%) for DCS, and 0.53 (0.45, 0.61) and 20.07% (17.14%, 23.00%) for OBG. The differences, expressed as either reduction or percent reduction, were statistically significant between the two groups, p < 0.001. Statistically significant differences were also observed between products at Day 42 for the gingival bleeding and supragingival plaque reduction endpoints, p < 0.001. There were two reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart powered toothbrush reduced gingival inflammation, gingival bleeding, and supragingival plaque significantly more than the Oral-B Genius 8000 powered toothbrush following a 42-day home-use period. Both products were safe for use.

A Randomized Parallel Study to Compare the Effects of Powered and Manual Tooth Brushing on Gingival Health and Plaque.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of powered and manual tooth brushing on plaque and gingivitis following two and six weeks of home use. METHODS: This was a randomized, three-arm, parallel-design clinical trial. Eligible participants were manual toothbrush users who were generally healthy non-smokers, aged 18-65 years, with a plaque score of = 1.8 per Lobene and Soparkar Modified Plaque Index (MPI), and mild to moderate gingivitis, defined as a Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) = 1 on at least 20 sites. Subjects with advanced periodontal disease, excessive gingival recession, and heavy deposits of calculus or rampant decay were excluded. Enrolled participants were randomly dispensed one of three devices: a powered toothbrush (Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart with Premium Gum Care brush head) used in either Gum Heath mode (DC-GH) or Clean mode (DC-C), or an ADA reference manual toothbrush (MTB). Efficacy and safety variables were assessed at Baseline, and at two and six weeks following twice-daily product home use. RESULTS: For the primary endpoint, reduction in gingivitis per Modified Gingival Index (MGI) at Week 2, 188 subjects completed and were included in the analysis. Expressed as percent reduction from Baseline, the adjusted mean reduction and Standard Error (SE) estimates were 60.31% (1.95%) for DC-GH, 53.08% (1.95%) for DC-C, and 16.59% (1.96%) for MTB. The difference between each power toothbrush group and the manual toothbrush was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences were also observed between DC-GH, DC-C, and manual tooth brushing for MGI at Week 6, as well as for MPI and GBI at Weeks 2 and 6. CONCLUSIONS: The powered toothbrush, used in either Gum Health or Clean mode, was statistically significantly superior to a manual tooth brush in reducing gingival inflammation, gingival bleeding, and plaque following two and six weeks of home use.

A Comparison of the Effects of a Powered and Manual Toothbrush on Gingivitis and Plaque: A Randomized Parallel Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of a powered and a manual toothbrush on gingivitis and plaque following two and four weeks of home use. METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel-design, single-blind clinical trial. Eligible participants were generally healthy non-smoking manual toothbrush users aged 18-65 years, with a plaque score of = 1.8 per Lobene and Soparkar Modified Plaque Index (MPI) following a 3-6 hour plaque accumulation period, and mild to moderate gingivitis defined as a Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) = 1 on at least 20 sites. Subjects with advanced periodontal disease, xerostomia, excessive gingival recession, uncontrolled diabetes, and heavy deposits of calculus or rampant decay were excluded. Enrolled participants were randomly dispensed either a Philips Sonicare powered toothbrush used with the InterCare brush head (PTB) or an American Dental Association (ADA) reference manual toothbrush (MTB). Efficacy and safety variables were assessed at Baseline, and at two and four weeks following twice-daily product home use. The primary endpoint of the study was reduction of gingivitis per the Modified Gingival Index (MGI) after four weeks of home use. RESULTS: All 148 randomized subjects (74 per group) completed the study. A statistically significant difference in MGI reduction was observed between the two study groups (p < 0.001). The least square (LS) mean and standard error reduction from Baseline was 0.72 (0.04) for the PTB group compared to 0.09 (0.04) for the MTB group. Expressed as percent reduction from Baseline, the LS mean values were 35.77% (2.19%) and 4.22% (2.19%) for PTB and MTB, respectively. Statistically significant differences were also observed for MGI reduction at Week 2, as well as for MPI and GBI reduction at Weeks 2 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: The powered toothbrush was statistically significantly superior to a manual toothbrush in reducing gingival inflammation, gingival bleeding, and plaque following two and four weeks of home use.

Efficacy of a 3% potassium nitrate mouthrinse for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity: An 8-week randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Mouthrinses containing potassium salts have been shown to be effective for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) when used adjunctively to toothbrushing with a nonsensitivity toothpaste. METHODS: The authors conducted a randomized, 8-week, single-center, examiner-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial with 191 participants with DH. Participants were randomized to twice-daily use of either 3% potassium nitrate (KNO3) mouthrinse plus fluoride toothpaste or the same fluoride toothpaste alone. The primary outcome was change from baseline in response to an evaporative (air) stimulus at 8 weeks, measured using the Schiff sensitivity scale. Secondary outcomes were response to an evaporative (air) stimulus with the Schiff sensitivity scale (4 weeks) and a visual rating scale (4 and 8 weeks) and response to a tactile stimulus (4 and 8 weeks). RESULTS: Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in evaporative (air) sensitivity from baseline after 4 and 8 weeks (P < .0001). At weeks 4 and 8, the authors observed significant improvements from baseline in tactile sensitivity only in the KNO3 mouthrinse group (P < .0001). Between-treatment comparisons for all sensitivity measures at both time points showed statistically significantly greater DH reductions in the KNO3 mouthrinse group compared with the toothpaste-alone group (P = .0004 for the visual rating scale at week 4; P < .0001 for all other measures and time points). Treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily use of a 3% KNO3 mouthrinse, adjunctive to toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste, provided significant improvements in DH compared with fluoride toothpaste alone. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Addition of 3% KNO3 mouthrinse to a typical oral hygiene regimen of toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste provides an alternative strategy for the management of DH. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02226562.

A method development randomised clinical study investigating efficacy of an experimental oral rinse in providing long-term relief from dentinal hypersensitivity.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare clinical efficacy of a 1.5% dipotassium oxalate monohydrate (KOX)-containing oral rinse ('Test') for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) against Negative Control and Placebo oral rinses, adjunctive to twice-daily brushing with a standard fluoride dentifrice, after 8 weeks. METHODS: This was a randomised, examiner blind, parallel-group, method development study in participants with DH, assessed at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks by response to an evaporative (air) stimulus (evaluated by Schiff sensitivity score and a 10-point visual rating scale [VRS]) and a tactile stimulus (Yeaple probe). To boost compliance, study features included recruiting only regular oral rinse users, use of an oral rinse during acclimatisation, weekly supervised rinsing and twice-daily text reminders. RESULTS: After 8 weeks, adjusted mean change from baseline in Schiff sensitivity score was significantly lower in the Test rinse group (n=43) versus the Negative Control group (n=23) (difference: -1.22; 95% CI -1.657, -0.782); tactile threshold score was significantly higher in the Test rinse group compared to the Negative Control rinse (difference: 37.46g; 95% CI: 22.916, 51.995). Similar significant differences in Schiff/tactile scores were also demonstrated after 4 weeks use, after 4 and 8 weeks use as assessed by VRS and as compared to the Placebo rinse (n=23) in all instances. Study products were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The Test rinse showed statistically significant improvements in DH compared to the Negative Control and Placebo rinses after 8 weeks twice daily use. Compliance with the rinsing regimen and study visits was excellent. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Additional compliance features incorporated into this dentinal hypersensitivity study - recruitment of regular oral rinse users only, acclimatisation rinse, weekly supervised rinsing at the study site, twice-daily text reminders - appear to have been of benefit to the overall study design as compliance was high, and primary and secondary objectives were met.

Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Oral and Dermal Tolerability of an Experimental Denture Wipe.

PURPOSE: To evaluate oral and dermal tolerance following use and user acceptability of an experimental denture-cleansing wipe. An exploratory objective was to develop a method to assess denture wipe effectiveness in removing debris from denture surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, examiner-blind study in participants with ≥1 full/partial denture. Participants were randomized to clean their dentures with the denture wipe (n = 76) or water (n = 76) up to 4 times per day for 14 days. Tolerability was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), oral soft tissue examination, and lead hand dermatological assessment. Acceptability was assessed by questionnaire. The feasibility of a methodology to assess the efficacy of the wipe at removing food particles was also evaluated through determination of the mass of chewed peanut particles that the wipe removed after a single use (n = 31). RESULTS: The proportion of participants experiencing oral TEAEs by day 14 was 0.039% with the denture wipe (lip injury [n = 1], mouth injury [n = 2]) and 0.013% with the water rinse (coated tongue [n = 1]). There were no dermal TEAEs and no TEAE-related study withdrawals. Skin irritation scores with the denture wipe remained unchanged from baseline. Comparing before vs. after cleaning with the denture wipe, a higher proportion of participants rated their dentures as feeling extremely/very fresh (28.9% pre-/85.5% post-cleaning), feeling extremely/very clean (34.2%/86.8%) and looking extremely/very clean (43.5%/85.5%). More denture-wipe group participants than water-rinse group participants were extremely/very satisfied with the amount of debris removed from their dentures (88.1% vs 72.4%). The methodology used to assess the weight of peanut particles captured from the wipes/dentures appeared to be a feasible investigation technique. CONCLUSIONS: The denture wipe was generally well-tolerated and had good user acceptability. The methodology for assessing the mass of peanut particles removed by denture wipes was successful.

Subgingival uptake and retention of stannous fluoride from dentifrice: Gingival crevicular fluid concentrations in sulci post-brushing.

PURPOSE: To examine the delivery of stannous fluoride to subgingival sulci following toothpaste use in a clinical population. METHODS: This was a controlled, single-site study. 23 subjects with at least 20 dental pockets, 2-4 mm with bleeding, who had not used a stannous fluoride dentifrice in the last 3 months were enrolled. After a 2-week washout period, 20 subjects returned for a baseline visit. They were instructed to refrain from brushing the night before the baseline visit. GCF samples were taken from up to 10 sites identified as sampling sites. Subjects were then given a 0.454% stannous fluoride dentifrice and soft manual toothbrush and asked to brush for 1 minute. 30 minutes after brushing, GCF was re-sampled. Subjects continued using the stannous fluoride dentifrice and soft manual toothbrush at home, twice daily for 2 weeks, in place of their usual hygiene products. At Days 1 and 14, subjects returned to the site, and 12 hours post-brushing GCF samples were taken. The samples were analyzed by ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to determine the difference between post-baseline visits and baseline. Statistical tests were 2-sided using a 5% significance level. RESULTS: 20 subjects completed the trial. Significant levels of tin, a marker for stannous fluoride, were detected 30 minutes after brushing at sampling sites of 2-4 mm. The median tin level in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was 24.59 ng/µl, which was highly significant versus baseline (P< 0.0001). Tin levels sampled in GCF 12 hours after brushing on Days 1 and 14 were highly significant versus Baseline (P< 0.0001), showing an increasing trend with continued use. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Stannous fluoride was found to penetrate sampling sites from 2-4 mm and was retained for 12 hours. Subgingival uptake and retention of stannous fluoride following toothbrushing may play a role in detoxification effects on microbial biofilms and may contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of stannous fluoride dentifrices in promoting gingival health.

A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of sodium bicarbonate dentifrices in a single brushing clinical model.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate plaque removal efficacy of dentifrices containing sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) compared with a non-NaHCO3 dentifrice after a single-timed brushing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomised, controlled, examiner-blinded, four-period, crossover study in 56 adults with a mean whole-mouth plaque index of ≥2.00 (six site modification of Turesky modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index [TPI]). Subjects brushed once for one timed minute with a 67% NaHCO3 dentifrice with herbs; a 67% NaHCO3 dentifrice without herbs; a 62% NaHCO3 dentifrice with herbs; or a non-NaHCO3 dentifrice without herbs. All contained 923 p.p.m. fluoride as sodium fluoride. Pre- and post-brushing plaque assessments were performed. RESULTS: Mean TPI score decreased from pre- to post-brushing with all treatments. There were statistically significantly greater reductions in plaque for NaHCO3 dentifrices compared to non-NaHCO3 (p < 0.0001 for all) with no significant differences between NaHCO3-containing dentifrices. A post hoc analysis of plaque removal from different oral areas showed statistically significant differences in favour of the NaHCO3 dentifrices over the non-NaHCO3 dentifrice for almost all surfaces. No adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Plaque removal was significantly greater with NaHCO3-containing dentifrices compared with a non-NaHCO3 dentifrice after a single, timed brushing. There was no effect of herbal tinctures. This study was registered at ClincalTrials.org: NCT03285984.

Six-Month Evaluation of a Sodium Bicarbonate-Containing Toothpaste for Reduction of Established Gingivitis: A Randomized USA-Based Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Short-term use of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3)-containing toothpaste reduces plaque and improves clinical measures of gingivitis. To examine this over a longer period, we compared efficacy and tolerability of twice-daily brushing for 24 weeks with 67% or 0% NaHCO3-containing toothpastes in USA-based participants with moderate gingivitis (Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02207400). METHODS: This was a six-month, randomized, examiner-blind, parallel-group, clinical trial. Investigators randomized adults with blood in expectorate after brushing and ≥ 20 gingival bleeding sites to 67% NaHCO3 (n = 123; n = 107 completed study) or 0% NaHCO3 (n = 123; n = 109 completed study) toothpastes. Primary efficacy variables included between-treatment differences in number of bleeding sites and Modified Gingival Index (MGI) score at 24 weeks. Secondary efficacy variables included Bleeding Index and Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (overall and interproximal sites) at six, 12, and 24 weeks. A subset of 50 participants underwent sampling to assess plaque microbiology over the course of treatment. RESULTS: Compared with the 0% NaHCO3 toothpaste, the 67% NaHCO3 toothpaste produced statistically significant improvements at Week 24 in number of bleeding sites (46.7% difference) and MGI (33.9% difference), and for all other endpoints (all p < 0.0001). There was no significant between-treatment difference in the proportion of participants harboring opportunistic pathogens. Products were generally well tolerated, with two and five treatment-related adverse events reported in the 67% and 0% NaHCO3 toothpaste groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Gingival bleeding, gingivitis, and plaque indices were significantly improved at six, 12, and 24 weeks with twice-daily brushing with 67% NaHCO3-containing toothpaste in participants with moderate gingivitis.

An exploratory study to investigate stain build-up with long term use of a stannous fluoride dentifrice.

PURPOSE: To monitor extrinsic stain formation over 24 weeks with twice-daily use of an anhydrous 0.454% SnF2 dentifrice containing 5% sodium tripolyphosphate (STP) ('Test'), compared to a standard fluoride dentifrice (0.76% fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate [SMFP\) ('Comparator') following a professional prophylaxis. METHODS: Primary efficacy variables were between-treatment differences in extrinsic dental stain of anterior teeth after 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks' use using mean area and intensity scores of the MacPherson modification of the Lobene stain index (MLSI), and to monitor oral tolerability. RESULTS: Overall, 214 subjects were randomized to treatment. The Test dentifrice group demonstrated statistically significantly less stain compared with the Comparator at each timepoint for all outcome variables (MLSI - Area × Intensity, Area only, and Intensity only) with the exception of MLSI (Area × Intensity) at Week 12. Products were generally well tolerated with 26 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) reported (10 with Test, 16 with Comparator). Five subjects withdrew from the 24-week study due to TRAEs, three in the Test group, two in the Comparator group. Statistically significantly less anterior tooth staining was observed with up to 24 weeks twice-daily brushing with a 0.454% SnF2/5% STP anhydrous dentifrice compared to a marketed fluoride dentifrice with 0.76% SMFP. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Long term use of a SnF2/STP dentifrice demonstrated minimal stain build-up after 24 weeks, twice-daily use; products were generally well-tolerated.

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation.

OBJECTIVES: Phytate is an organic, cyclic polyphosphate analogous to linear condensed polyphosphates used as stain removal agents. This study investigated stain removal efficacy of an experimental sodium phytate-containing dentifrice compared to a reference dentifrice. METHODS: An experimental, moderate abrasivity (relative dentine abrasivity [RDA] âˆ¼130) antisensitivity fluoride dentifrice containing sodium phytate (0.85% w/w as the hexasodium salt) (n = 111) was compared to a reference, marketed, low-abrasivity (RDA âˆ¼ 43), anti-sensitivity fluoride dentifrice (n = 113), both containing 1150 ppm fluoride as sodium fluoride. Primary efficacy variables were between-treatment differences in extrinsic dental stain of anterior teeth after 6 and 12 weeks' twice-daily use, using Lobene stain index (MacPherson modification, MLSI) mean area (A) and intensity (I) scores. Comparisons included whole-tooth and hard-to-reach areas (gingival, interproximal, body of lingual). RESULTS: At both 6- and 12-week timepoints, MLSI (A × I) scores for total area and hard-to-reach areas for the experimental dentifrice were statistically significantly lower than baseline (P < .0001 for all). This was demonstrated for the reference dentifrice at 6 weeks only, for total, interproximal (P < .0001 for both), and body of lingual (P = .0395) scores. Compared with the reference, the experimental dentifrice had statistically significantly lower MLSI scores at both 6 and 12 weeks for all outcome variables including both total MLSI (A × I) and hard-to reach areas (P < .0001 in all cases). Products were generally well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between treatments were considered clinically differentiable. Sodium phytate may therefore be a suitable additive ingredient to improve tooth stain control performance within an otherwise conventional dentifrice formulation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Following 6 and 12 weeks brushing, clinically differentiable differences were shown in stain index scores with an experimental dentifrice containing sodium phytate compared to a reference dentifrice without sodium phytate. Sodium phytate may therefore be a suitable additive ingredient to improve tooth stain control performance within an otherwise conventional dentifrice formulation.