Monoclonal antibodies against GFRα3 are efficacious against evoked hyperalgesic and allodynic responses in mouse join pain models but, one of these, REGN5069, was not effective against pain in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with osteoarthritis pain.

The artemin-GFRα3 signaling pathway has been implicated in various painful conditions including migraine, cold allodynia, hyperalgesia, inflammatory bone pain, and mouse knees contain GFRα3-immunoreactive nerve endings. We developed high affinity mouse (REGN1967) and human (REGN5069) GFRα3-blocking monoclonal antibodies and, following in vivo evaluations in mouse models of chronic joint pain (osteoarthritic-like and inflammatory), conducted a first-in-human phase 1 pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety trial of REGN5069 (NCT03645746) in healthy volunteers, and a phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled efficacy and safety trial of REGN5069 (NCT03956550) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain. In three commonly used mouse models of chronic joint pain (destabilization of the medial meniscus, intra-articular monoiodoacetate, or Complete Freund's Adjuvant), REGN1967 and REGN5069 attenuated evoked behaviors including tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia without discernably impacting joint pathology or inflammation, prompting us to further evaluate REGN5069 in humans. In the phase 1 study in healthy subjects, the safety profiles of single doses of REGN5069 up to 3000 mg (intravenous) or 600 mg (subcutaneous) were comparable to placebo; PK were consistent with a monoclonal antibody exhibiting target-mediated disposition. In the phase 2 study in patients with OA knee pain, two doses of REGN5069 (100 mg or 1000 mg intravenous every 4 weeks) for 8 weeks failed to achieve the 12-week primary and secondary efficacy endpoints relative to placebo. In addition to possible differences in GFRα3 biology between mice and humans, we highlight here differences in experimental parameters that could have contributed to a different profile of efficacy in mouse models versus human OA pain. Additional research is required to more fully evaluate any potential role of GFRα3 in human pain.

Casirivimab and Imdevimab for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The open-label RECOVERY study reported improved survival in hospitalized, SARS-CoV-2 seronegative patients treated with casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS + IMD). METHODS: In this phase 1/2/3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted prior to widespread circulation of Delta and Omicron, hospitalized COVID-19 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to 2.4 g or 8.0 g CAS + IMD or placebo, and characterized at baseline for viral load and SARS-CoV-2 serostatus. RESULTS: In total, 1336 patients on low-flow or no supplemental (low-flow/no) oxygen were treated. The primary endpoint was met in seronegative patients, the least-squares mean difference (CAS + IMD versus placebo) for time-weighted average change from baseline in viral load through day 7 was -0.28 log10 copies/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], -.51 to -.05; P = .0172). The primary clinical analysis of death or mechanical ventilation from day 6 to 29 in patients with high viral load had a strong positive trend but did not reach significance. CAS + IMD numerically reduced all-cause mortality in seronegative patients through day 29 (relative risk reduction, 55.6%; 95% CI, 24.2%-74.0%). No safety concerns were noted. CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized COVID-19 patients on low-flow/no oxygen, CAS + IMD reduced viral load and likely improves clinical outcomes in the overall population, with the benefit driven by seronegative patients, and no harm observed in seropositive patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04426695.

Lay Summary . Monoclonal antibody therapies that block the virus that causes COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) can prevent patients from being hospitalized. We hypothesized that these antibodies may also benefit patients who are already hospitalized with COVID-19. Therefore, we performed a study to determine if the monoclonal antibody combination of casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS + IMD) can decrease the amount of virus in the nose of hospitalized patients and prevent the disease from becoming more severe. The study, conducted from June 2020 to April 2021, found that CAS + IMD treatment reduced the amount of virus in these patients, and may reduce their chance of dying or needing a ventilator (a machine that helps patients breathe). Patients were examined in 2 groups: those whose immune systems, at the start of the study, had not produced their own antibodies to fight SARS-CoV-2 (seronegative patients); or those that had already produced their own antibodies (seropositive patients) at the start of the study. Seronegative patients benefited the most from CAS + IMD. No safety concerns related to CAS + IMD were observed. These results demonstrate that monoclonal antibody therapy can help hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and may decrease their chances of needing assistance to breathe or dying.

Sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, does not affect the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol or norethindrone in healthy female subjects.

Sitagliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitor used for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-period, crossover study evaluated the effect of sitagliptin on the pharmacokinetics of 17 α-ethinyl estradiol (EE(2)) and norethindrone (NET) in healthy female subjects who were receiving oral contraceptives for >3 months prior to enrollment. A total of 18 subjects with normal menstrual cycles received the oral contraceptive pill ORTHO-NOVUM(®) 7/7/7 on days 1 to 28 for 2 successive cycles, and on days 1 to 21 were randomly assigned to receive sitagliptin 200 mg/day (2 × 100 mg tablets) or placebo using a computer-generated allocation schedule. Blood samples for determination of plasma EE(2) and NET concentrations were collected predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose on day 20 or 21 of each treatment period. The GMRs (90% confidence interval [CI]) for the AUC(0-24 hr) of EE(2) and NET were 0.99 (0.93, 1.06) and 1.03 (0.97, 1.09), respectively, and for C(max) were 0.97 (0.86, 1.10) and 0.98 (0.89, 1.07), respectively. The coadministration of sitagliptin 200 mg/day with an oral contraceptive for 21 days did not lead to clinically meaningful alterations in the pharmacokinetics of EE(2) and NET.

Bioequivalence of sitagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination tablets and concomitant administration of sitagliptin and metformin in healthy adult subjects: a randomized, open-label, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with an oral antihyperglycaemic agent administered as monotherapy is often unsuccessful at achieving or maintaining glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The combined use of sitagliptin and metformin is an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus, consistent with the complementary mechanisms of action by which these two agents improve glucose control. OBJECTIVES: To establish bioequivalence between sitagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets (Janumet®) and co-administration of corresponding doses of sitagliptin and metformin as individual tablets. METHODS: This was an randomized, open-label, two-part, two-period crossover study, which included a total of 48 healthy subjects, 24 subjects per part (parts I and II). Within each part, subjects were assigned to receive treatments in random order; treatment periods were separated by a washout interval of at least 7 days. Eligible study participants included healthy, non-smoking (within previous 6 months), male and female subjects aged between 18 and 45 years with a body mass index ≤32 kg/m². Part I consisted of treatments A (co-administration of sitagliptin 50 mg and metformin 500 mg) and B (sitagliptin/metformin 50 mg/500 mg FDC tablet); part II consisted of treatments C (co-administration of sitagliptin 50 mg and metformin 1000 mg) and D (sitagliptin 50 mg/metformin 1000 mg FDC tablet). Blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 72 hours post-dose in each treatment period for determination of plasma sitagliptin and metformin concentrations and calculation of the respective pharmacokinetic parameters. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for both sitagliptin and metformin were designated as the primary and secondary study endpoints, respectively, and analysed using an ANOVA model after logarithmic transformation of the data. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs; FDC tablet/co-administration) of the AUC(∞) and C(max) for both sitagliptin and metformin fell within pre-specified bounds of (0.80, 1.25). RESULTS: The GMRs (90% CI) for the AUC(∞) of sitagliptin 50 mg and metformin 500 mg were 0.98 (0.96, 1.00) and 1.0 (0.95, 1.04), respectively, and for C(max) of sitagliptin and metformin were 1.00 (0.94, 1.06) and 1.00 (0.94, 1.06), respectively. The GMRs (90% CI) for the AUC(∞) of sitagliptin 50 mg and metformin 1000 mg (part II) were 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) and 1.00 (0.94, 1.07), respectively, and for the C(max) of sitagliptin and metformin were 0.94 (0.88, 1.01) and 1.01 (0.93, 1.10), respectively. In both part I and part II, the 90% CIs of the GMRs of the AUC(∞) and C(max) for both sitagliptin and metformin all fell within the pre-specified bioequivalence bounds of (0.80, 1.25). Administration of single doses of sitagliptin/metformin 50 mg/500 mg (part I) and 50 mg/1000 mg FDC tablets (part II) and co-administration of corresponding doses of sitagliptin and metformin as individual tablets were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The sitagliptin/metformin 50 mg/500 mg and 50 mg/1000 mg FDC tablets are bioequivalent to co-administration of corresponding doses of sitagliptin and metformin as individual tablets and support bioequivalence to the sitagliptin/metformin 50 mg/850 mg tablet strength. These results indicate that the safety and efficacy profile of co-administration of sitagliptin and metformin can be extended to the sitagliptin/metformin FDC tablets.

Examination of the effect of increasing doses of etoricoxib on oral methotrexate pharmacokinetics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The authors designed 2 randomized controlled studies to examine the effects of etoricoxib 60 to 120 mg daily on methotrexate pharmacokinetics in 50 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients on stable doses of methotrexate (7.5-20 mg). Patients received oral methotrexate at baseline and on days 7 and 14. In study 1, patients received etoricoxib 60 mg (days 1-7) and then 120 mg (days 8-14); in study 2, patients received etoricoxib 90 mg (days 1-7) and then 120 mg (days 8-14). For study 1, the AUC(0-infinity) geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval [CI]) for day 7 versus baseline was 1.01 (0.91, 1.12) for etoricoxib 60 mg; the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) GMR (90% CI) for day 14 was 1.28 (1.15, 1.42) for etoricoxib 120 mg. For study 2, the AUC(0-infinity) GMR (90% CI) for day 7 versus baseline was 1.07 (1.01, 1.13) for etoricoxib 90 mg; the AUC(0-infinity) GMR (90% CI) for day 14 was 1.05 (0.99, 1.11) for etoricoxib 120 mg. In summary, etoricoxib 60 and 90 mg had no effect on methotrexate plasma concentrations. Although no effect on methotrexate pharmacokinetics was observed with etoricoxib 120 mg in study 2, GMR AUC(0-infinity) fell outside the prespecified bounds in study 1. Standard monitoring of methotrexate-related toxicity should be continued when etoricoxib and methotrexate are administered concurrently, especially with doses >90 mg etoricoxib.

A thorough QTc study to assess the effect of sitagliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor, on ventricular repolarization in healthy subjects.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-period crossover study was performed with a single oral dose of sitagliptin (100 mg, 800 mg), moxifloxacin (400 mg), and placebo in order to provide a rigorous assessment of the effect of sitagliptin on ventricular repolarization based on the ICH E14 guidance. The clinical dose of sitagliptin 100 mg was not associated with an increase in QTc interval, corrected using the Fridericia correction (QTcf), at any time point. The supratherapeutic 800-mg dose of sitagliptin was generally well tolerated and was associated with minimal, clinically insignificant prolongation of the QTcf interval at concentrations approximately 11-fold higher than maximal concentrations following the 100-mg clinical dose. The PK/QTc model demonstrated a shallow relationship between the plasma concentration of sitagliptin and the placebo-subtracted QTcf change from baseline, with a 0.59-millisecond increase in QTc for every 1000-nM increment in sitagliptin plasma concentration. The sensitivity of the assay to detect modest increases in QTc interval was established with the active control moxifloxacin. In conclusion, at clinically relevant concentrations, sitagliptin is not associated with clinically meaningful QTcf prolongation.

Minimal pharmacokinetic interaction between the human immunodeficiency virus nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor etravirine and the integrase inhibitor raltegravir in healthy subjects.

Etravirine, a next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and raltegravir, an integrase strand transfer inhibitor, have separately demonstrated potent activity in treatment-experienced, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. An open-label, sequential, three-period study with healthy, HIV-seronegative subjects was conducted to assess the two-way interaction between etravirine and raltegravir for potential coadministration to HIV-infected patients. In period 1, 19 subjects were administered 400 mg raltegravir every 12 h (q12 h) for 4 days, followed by a 4-day washout; in period 2, subjects were administered 200 mg etravirine q12 h for 8 days; and in period 3, subjects were coadministered 400 mg raltegravir and 200 mg etravirine q12 h for 4 days. There was no washout between periods 2 and 3. Doses were administered with a moderate-fat meal. Etravirine had only modest effects on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir, while raltegravir had no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of etravirine. For raltegravir coadministered with etravirine relative to raltegravir alone, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) were 0.90 and 0.68 to 1.18, respectively, for the area under the concentration curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), 0.89 and 0.68 to 1.15, respectively, for the maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), and 0.66 and 0.34 to 1.26, respectively, for the trough drug concentration (C(12)); the GMR (90% CI) for etravirine coadministered with raltegravir relative to etravirine alone was 1.10 (1.03, 1.16) for AUC(0-12), 1.04 (0.97, 1.12) for C(max), and 1.17 (1.10, 1.26) for C(12). All drug-related adverse clinical experiences were mild and generally transient in nature. No grade 3 or 4 adverse experiences or discontinuations due to adverse experiences occurred. Coadministration of etravirine and raltegravir was generally well tolerated; the data suggest that no dose adjustment for either drug is necessary.

Comparative inhibitory activity of etoricoxib, celecoxib, and diclofenac on COX-2 versus COX-1 in healthy subjects.

We determined cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibition in healthy middle-aged subjects (41-65 years) randomly assigned to four 7-day treatment sequences of etoricoxib 90 mg every day, celecoxib 200 mg twice a day, diclofenac 75 mg twice a day, or placebo in a double-blind, randomized, 4-period crossover study. Maximum inhibition of thromboxane B(2) (cyclo-oxygenase-1 activity) in clotting whole blood on day 7 (0-24 hours postdose) was the primary endpoint. Inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced prostaglandin E(2) in whole blood (cyclo-oxygenase-2 activity) was assessed on day 7 (0-24 hours postdose) as a secondary endpoint. Diclofenac had significantly greater maximum inhibition of thromboxane B(2) versus each comparator (P < .001); placebo 2.4% (95% confidence interval: -8.7% to 12.3%), diclofenac 92.2% (91.4% to 92.9%), etoricoxib 15.5% (6.6% to 23.5%), and celecoxib 20.2% (11.5% to 28.1%). Prostaglandin E(2) synthesis was inhibited with a rank order of potency of diclofenac > etoricoxib > celecoxib. In summary, at doses commonly used in rheumatoid arthritis, diclofenac significantly inhibits both cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2, whereas etoricoxib and celecoxib significantly inhibit cyclo-oxygenase-2 and do not substantially inhibit cyclo-oxygenase-1.

Effects of etoricoxib and comparator nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on urinary sodium excretion, blood pressure, and other renal function indicators in elderly subjects consuming a controlled sodium diet.

This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study assessed renal function during dosing with etoricoxib 90 mg daily, celecoxib 200 mg twice daily, and naproxen 500 mg twice daily. Male and female subjects 60 to 81 years old (n = 85), in sodium balance on a controlled, normal sodium diet, were treated for 15 days. There were no clinically meaningful between-treatment differences in urinary sodium excretion, creatinine clearance, body weight, or serum electrolytes during the 2 weeks of treatment. Etoricoxib and celecoxib had no effect on the urinary thromboxane metabolite, 11-dehydrothromboxane B(2), while significantly decreasing the urinary prostacyclin metabolite, 2,3-dinor-6-keto PGF(1alpha). Decreases were greater for both metabolites following naproxen. Ambulatory systolic blood pressures were significantly higher than placebo for all treatments, with moderately greater increases for etoricoxib relative to other active treatments on day 14. Ambulatory diastolic blood pressures were significantly higher than placebo for etoricoxib and naproxen but not for celecoxib.

A dual PPAR alpha/gamma agonist increases adiponectin and improves plasma lipid profiles in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: The objective of these studies was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MK-0767, a prototypical dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha/gamma agonist, following administration of single and multiple oral doses in healthy male subjects. METHODS: The first study was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, alternating two-panel, rising dose protocol in which single doses of 1-80 mg of MK-0767 were administered. The second study was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, staggered incremental dose, parallel-group protocol in which multiple doses of 0.3-25 mg of MK-0767 were administered once daily for 14 days. In both studies at each dose level, six subjects received MK-0767 and two subjects received placebo. RESULTS: Plasma area under the concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration increased with single and multiple doses of MK-0767 over the dose ranges studied. The apparent terminal half-life of MK-0767 averaged approximately 36 hours following single and multiple doses. Steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved following approximately 8 days of multiple doses. Compared with placebo, MK-0767 produced dose-dependent reductions in triglycerides (-26 +/- 8% [p = 0.002] and -33 +/- 13% [p = 0.008]) and free fatty acids (-50 +/- 11% [p < 0.001] and -67 +/- 23% [p = 0.008]) following single and multiple doses, respectively. Significant (p < or = 0.050) dose-dependent alterations in adiponectin (332 +/- 36%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-29 +/- 5%), total cholesterol (-19 +/- 3%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-28 +/- 4%), and fasting plasma glucose (-6 +/- 2%; only in the 25 mg group) were observed after multiple doses. CONCLUSIONS: The observed effects of MK-0767 on adiponectin, free fatty acids and lipids, even after single doses, demonstrate that this prototypical dual PPAR alpha/gamma agonist has clinically meaningful activity in vivo.

The effects of modifying in vivo cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) activity on etoricoxib pharmacokinetics and of etoricoxib administration on CYP3A activity.

To investigate the influence of modifying in vivo cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) activity on the pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, and of etoricoxib administration on CYP3A activity, a 3-part, randomized, crossover study was conducted in 3 panels of healthy volunteers. In part I, 8 subjects were administered a single dose of 60 mg etoricoxib alone and following daily doses of 400 mg ketoconazole, a known strong inhibitor of CYP3A. In part II, 8 different subjects were administered a single dose of 60 mg etoricoxib alone and following daily doses of 600 mg rifampin, a known strong inducer of CYP3A. In parts I and II, plasma samples were collected following each etoricoxib dose and analyzed for etoricoxib. In part III, 8 different subjects were administered 120 mg etoricoxib or placebo once daily for 11 days, and the erythromycin breath test was administered on day 11 of each period. Coadministration of etoricoxib with daily doses of ketoconazole resulted in an average 43% increase in etoricoxib AUC; based on previous studies, this increase would not be expected to have any clinically meaningful effect. In contrast, coadministration of etoricoxib with daily doses of rifampin had a potentially clinically important effect on etoricoxib pharmacokinetics (average 65% decrease in etoricoxib AUC). Etoricoxib had no effect on hepatic CYP3A activity, as assessed by the erythromycin breath test.