Decline of case reports in pathology and their renewal in the digital age: an analysis of publication trends over four decades.

AIMS: We investigated the trend in case reports (CRs) publication in a sample of pathology journals. Furthermore, we proposed an alternative publishing route through new digital communication platforms, represented by the 'social media case report'. METHODS: 28 pathology journals were selected from SCImago database and searched in PubMed to identify the number of published CRs. Four reference decades (1981-2020) were selected. The 5-year impact factor (IF) was retrieved from the Academic Accelerator database. RESULTS: CRs increased during the first three decades (6752, 8698 and 11148, respectively; mean values: 355, 27.3%; 334, 26.4%; 398, 28.8%) as the number of CR-publishing journals (19, 26 and 28, respectively). In the last decade, CRs significantly decreased (9341; mean 334, 23.6%) without variation in the number of CR-publishing journals (28). Half of the journals reduced CRs (from -1.1% to -37.9%; mean decreasing percentage -14.7%), especially if active since the first decade (11/14, 79%); the other half increased CRs (from +0.5% to +34.2%; mean increasing percentage +11.8%), with 8/14 (57%) starting publishing in the first decade. The 5-year IF ranged from 0.504 to 5.722. Most of the journals with IF ≥2 (10/14, 71%) reduced the CRs number, while 71% of journals with IF <2 increased CRs publication (especially journals with IF <1, +15.1%). CONCLUSIONS: CRs publication decreased during the last decade, especially for journals which are older or have higher IF. Social media CRs may represent a valid alternative and by using standardised templates to enter all relevant data may be organised in digital databases and/or transformed in traditional CRs.

The "Make Surgical Pathology Easy" project: learning Pathology through tailored digital infographics - the case for renovation of an old teaching method.

The term 'infographics' is a blend of the two words "information" and "graphics". Infographics can be described as 'information visualizations', conceived as visual translation of data including text, numbers, graphs, charts, drawings and so on. Visual representations are a fundamental part of scientific communication. They match the need to organize different pieces of information in a coherent and synthetic structure and constitute one of the most effective methods scientists rely on to divulge their findings. In particular, infographics provide an overview of key points regarding specific topics in a form that promotes quick learning and knowledge retention. They can be presented in printed or digital formats, being the latter particularly suitable for a global-scale diffusion via social media or websites.In recent years, many pathologists have started developing digital infographics as a strategy for providing free educational contents on Facebook, Twitter or websites. In the present review, we focus on the value of digital infographics to summarize various aspects of Surgical and General Pathology. They shed light on diagnostic criteria, differentials and predictive/prognostic markers for many diseases, being a useful learning tool both for residents and practicing pathologists. In this paper, the model of infographics ideation, processing and sharing to an online audience is described and the impact of infographics on knowledge processes in Pathology is investigated.

Mixed Invasive Apocrine Papillary/Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast: Another Brick in the Triple-Negative Wall.

Pure invasive papillary carcinoma (IPC) is a rare subtype of breast carcinoma with good prognosis compared with classical invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) of no special type. The majority of IPC are estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) positive and HER2 negative (luminal A-like). We report the case of a 72-year-old women who was referred to the Senology Clinic for a routine workup following surgery for an intraductal papilloma. The core needle biopsy (CNB) showed a lesion mainly composed of irregular papillae and micropapillae with apocrine epithelial cells of low-to-intermediate nuclear grade, without a myoepithelial cell layer within the papillae and at the periphery, as demonstrated with multiple immunostains. The diagnosis of apocrine papillary lesion of uncertain malignant potential was made. The subsequent lumpectomy showed an IBC with the same cyto-architectural features as the CNB. In addition, lymphovascular invasion and papillary/micropapillary apocrine in situ lesion were noted. Notably, the tumor was ER/PR and HER2 negative and strongly positive for androgen receptor. A final diagnosis of mixed apocrine papillary/micropapillary carcinoma with triple-negative status was made. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an IBC with these features. Breast pathologists should be aware of this entity when dealing with CNB samples characterized by a complex papillary lesion with apocrine atypia that lacks a myoepithelial cell layer on multiple immunostains. These lesions should be classified at least as of uncertain malignant potential based on the cyto-architectural features prompting a surgery for removal.