Impact of an Intervention to Promote the Vaccination of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a dysregulated immune system, being at high risk of opportunistic infections. Low vaccination rates hinder the prevention of such diseases. Therefore, we implemented an intervention to increase vaccination rates, and we aimed to evaluate the effect. We determined the change in professionals and the change in the vaccination rates after the intervention. A quasi-experimental study was carried out using data from 31 December 2016 to 31 December 2021. First, healthcare professionals specializing in IBD agreed on a vaccination protocol; then, this protocol was passed on to the professionals involved in vaccination. We evaluated the perception of knowledge, capacity, and intention to vaccinate patients with IBD among the professionals before and after the intervention with a survey. We also described the effectiveness of the intervention for already diagnosed patients and compared the vaccination rates between patients diagnosed prior to the intervention and newly diagnosed patients. The intervention resulted in an improved perception of knowledge, capacity, and intention to vaccinate patients with IBD among the professionals (p < 0.05). Moreover, during the post-intervention period, in the 315 patients, the vaccination rate increased for all immune-preventable diseases (p < 0.05). The professionals positively valued the intervention, and compliance with the recommended vaccination protocol in patients with IBD improved significantly.

Compliance with the guidelines on recommended immunization schedule in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: implications on public health policies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a higher risk of developing opportunistic infections due to either the disease itself or to treatment with immunosuppressants. This risk can be reduced through vaccination. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of compliance with the guidelines on recommended immunization schedule in patients with IBD in the health district of Lleida, Spain. METHODS: Descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective study of data at December 31, 2016. The reference population was formed by adults with a clinical diagnosis of IBD. The dependent variable was "compliance with the guidelines on recommended immunization schedule". Variables were sex, age, residence, diagnosis, vaccination against measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, tetanus-diphtheria, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus C, hepatitis B, and hepatitis A. Data were obtained from electronic medical records. For the data analysis, mean (standard deviation), prevalence with 95% confidence intervals, χ2 test and Mann-Whitney test were used. RESULTS: Compliance did not exceed 65% for any of vaccines analysed in the 1722 studied patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Significant differences across age groups were found in compliance for measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, tetanus, diphtheria and influenza in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and for meningococcus C and hepatitis A exclusively in ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance in patients with IBD is low. Thus, prevention of immunopreventable diseases or their complications is not maximized in this kind of patients. Greater awareness of how vaccines can reduce the risk of vaccine-preventable infections is needed among both patients and healthcare professionals.

Vaccines for the prevention of infections in adults: an opinion paper on the situation in Spain / Vacunas para la prevención de infecciones en adultos: artículo de opinión sobre la situación en España

The childhood immunization schedule is well known and generally well implemented in developed countries. For various reasons, the same is not true of vaccines aimed at preventing infections in adults, in which vaccination coverage is incomplete and generally very deficient. In order to assess the situation of adult vaccination in Spain, the Fundación de Ciencias de la Salud has brought together a series of experts in different fields, including doctors, nurses, representatives of patient associations, health managers and economists, health authorities and journalists to deal with this issue. The format was that of a round table in which a series of questions previously formulated by the coordinators were to be answered and debated. The document presented is not an exhaustive review of the topic, nor is it intended to make recommendations, but only to give a multidisciplinary opinion on topics that could be particularly debatable or controversial. The paper reviews the main vaccine-preventable adult diseases, their clinical and economic impact, the possibilities of reducing them with vaccination programmes and the difficulties in carrying them out. The role of nursing, pharmacy services, patient associations and the health administration itself in changing the current situation was discussed. Prospects for new vaccines were discussed and we speculated on the future in this field. Finally, particularly relevant ethical aspects in decision-making regarding vaccination were discussed, which must be faced by both individuals and states. We have tried to summarize, at the end of the presentation of each question, the environment of opinion that was agreed with all the members of the table

El calendario de vacunación infantil es bien conocido y generalmente bien implementado en los países desarrollados. Por varias razones, no ocurre lo mismo en el caso de las vacunas destinadas a prevenir las infecciones en adultos, en los que la cobertura vacunal es incompleta y generalmente muy deficiente. Con el fin de evaluar la situación de la vacunación de adultos en España, la Fundación de Ciencias de la Salud ha reunido a una serie de expertos en diferentes campos, incluyendo médicos, enfermeras, representantes de asociaciones de pacientes, gestores sanitarios, economistas, autoridades sanitarias y periodistas para discutir este asunto. El formato fue el de una mesa redonda en la que una serie de preguntas, formuladas previamente por los coordinadores, debían ser contestadas y debatidas. El documento presentado no es una revisión exhaustiva del tema, ni tiene por objeto hacer recomendaciones, simplemente pretende dar una opinión multidisciplinar sobre aspectos que pueden ser debatibles o controvertidos. El documento revisa las principales enfermedades de los adultos que pueden prevenirse con vacunas, su impacto clínico y económico, las posibilidades de reducirlos con los programas de vacunación y las dificultades para llevarlos a cabo. Se discutió el papel de la enfermería, la farmacia, los servicios de salud, las asociaciones de pacientes y la propia administración sanitaria para cambiar la situación actual. Se evaluaron las perspectivas para nuevas vacunas y se especuló sobre el futuro en este campo. Por último, se discutieron los aspectos éticos especialmente relevantes en la toma de decisiones con respecto a la vacunación, que deben ser afrontados tanto por los individuos como por los estados. Hemos intentado resumir, al final de la presentación de cada pregunta, la opinión que representaba el consenso de todos los miembros de la mesa